Volume 11, Issue 4 e1553
Advanced Review

From isolated structures to continuous networks: A categorization of cytoskeleton-based motile engineered biological microstructures

Rachel Andorfer

Rachel Andorfer

Department of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina

Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Joshua D. Alper

Corresponding Author

Joshua D. Alper

Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina

Department of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina

Eukaryotic Pathogen Innovations Center, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina

Correspondence

Joshua D. Alper, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 February 2019
Citations: 6

Funding information National Institute of General Medical Sciences, Grant/Award Number: P20GM109094; Clemson University

Abstract

As technology at the small scale is advancing, motile engineered microstructures are becoming useful in drug delivery, biomedicine, and lab-on-a-chip devices. However, traditional engineering methods and materials can be inefficient or functionally inadequate for small-scale applications. Increasingly, researchers are turning to the biology of the cytoskeleton, including microtubules, actin filaments, kinesins, dyneins, myosins, and associated proteins, for both inspiration and solutions. They are engineering structures with components that range from being entirely biological to being entirely synthetic mimics of biology and on scales that range from isotropic continuous networks to single isolated structures. Motile biological microstructures trace their origins from the development of assays used to study the cytoskeleton to the array of structures currently available today. We define 12 types of motile biological microstructures, based on four categories: entirely biological, modular, hybrid, and synthetic, and three scales: networks, clusters, and isolated structures. We highlight some key examples, the unique functionalities, and the potential applications of each microstructure type, and we summarize the quantitative models that enable engineering them. By categorizing the diversity of motile biological microstructures in this way, we aim to establish a framework to classify these structures, define the gaps in current research, and spur ideas to fill those gaps.

This article is categorized under:

  • Nanotechnology Approaches to Biology > Nanoscale Systems in Biology
  • Nanotechnology Approaches to Biology > Cells at the Nanoscale
  • Biology-Inspired Nanomaterials > Protein and Virus-Based Structures
  • Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Emerging Technologies

Graphical Abstract

Cytoskeleton-based motile engineered biological microstructures range from isolated structures to continuous networks and from entirely biological to fully synthetic biomimetics. They interface with biological systems at the cellular scale in biomedical applications.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest for this article.