Skip to main content

Ineffizienz und Unhandhabbarkeit

oder es geht nicht immer kostengünstig

  • Chapter
Algorithmik
  • 2105 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Kapitel 7

  1. M. R. Garey und D. S. Johnson, Computers and Intractability: A Guide to NP-Complete-ness, W. H. Freeman & Co., 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. D. Davis, R. Sigal und E. J. Weyuker, Computability, Complexity, and Languages: Fundamentals of Theoretical Computer Science, 2. Auflage, Academic Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. E. Hopcroft, R. Motwani und J. D. Ullman, Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages and Computation, 2. Auflage, Addison-Wesley, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Horowitz, S. Sahni und S. Rajasekaran, Computer Algorithms, Computer Science Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. V. Krishnamurthy, Introductory Theory of Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. R. Lewis und C. H. Papadimitriou, Elements of the Theory of Computation, 2. Auflage, Prentice-Hall, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Machtey und P. Young, An Introduction to the General Theory of Algorithms, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. Mehlhorn, Data Structures and Algorithms 2: Graph Algorithms and NP-Completeness, Springer-Verlag, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. H. Papadimitriou und K. Steiglitz, Combinatorial Optimization: Algorithms and Complexity, Prentice-Hall, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. H. Papadimitriou, Computational Complexity, Addison-Wesley, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. R. Lewis und C. H. Papadimitriou, „The Efficiency of Algorithms,“ Scientific American 238:1 (1978), S. 96–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. L. J. Stockmeyer und A. K. Chandra, „Intrinsically Difficult Problems,“ Scientific American 240:5 (1979), S. 140–59.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. O. Rabin, „Complexity of Computations,“ Comm. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 20 (1977), S. 625–33.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. S. A. Cook, „An Overview of Computational Complexity,“ Comm. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 26 (1983), S. 401–8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. M. Karp, „Combinatorics, Complexity, and Randomness,“ Comm. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 29 (1986), S. 98–109.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. D. S. Johnson, „A Catalog of Complexity Classes,“ in Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science Vol. A, J. van Leeuwen, Hrsg., Elsevier und MIT Press, 1990, S. 67–161.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. O. Rabin, „Degree of Difficulty of Computing a Function and a Partial Ordering of Recursive Sets,“ Technical Report No. 2, Hebrew University, Branch of Applied Logic, Jerusalem, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Cobham, „The Intrinsic Computational Difficulty of Functions,“ Proc. 1964 Int. Congress for Logic, Methodology, and Phil. of Sci., Y. Bar-Hillel, Hrsg., North Holland, S. 24–30,1965.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Edmonds, „Paths, Trees, and Flowers,“ Canad. J. Math. 17 (1965), S. 449–67.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. J. Hartmanis und R. E. Stearns, „On the Computational Complexity of Algorithms,“ Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 117 (1965), S. 285–306.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Blum, „A Machine Independent Theory of the Complexity of Recursive Functions,“ J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 14 (1967), S. 322–36.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. S. A. Cook, „The Complexity of Theorem Proving Procedures,“ Proc. 3rd ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing, ACM Press, S. 151–8, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  23. L. A. Levin, „Universal Search Problems,“ Problemy Peredaci Informacii 9 (1973), S. 115–16 (russisch). Englische Übersetzung Problems of Information Transmission 9 (1973), S. 265–6.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. R. M. Karp, „Reducibility Among Combinatorial Problems,“ in Complexity of Computer Computations, R. E. Miller und J. W. Thatcher, Hrsg., Plenum Press, S. 85–104, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  25. C. H. Papadimitriou, „The Euclidean Traveling Salesman Problem is NP-Complete,“ Theor. Comput. Sci. 4 (1977), S. 237–44.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. S. Even, A. Itai und A. Shamir, „On the Complexity of Timetable and Multicommodity Flow Problems,“ SIAM J. Comput. 5 (1976), S. 691–703.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. W. S. Baring-Gould und C. Baring-Gould, Annotated Mother Goose, Clarkson N. Potter, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  28. V. R. Pratt, „Every Prime has a Succint Certificate,“ SIAM J. Comput. 4 (1975), S. 214–20.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. M. Agrawal, N. Kayal und N. Saxena, „PRIMES is in P,“ Preprint, August 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  30. M. Agrawal, N. Kayal und N. Saxena, „PRIMES is in P,“ Annals of Mathematics, 160 (2004), S. 781–93.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. V. V. Vazirani, Approximation Algorithms, Springer-Verlag, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  32. G. Ausiello, P. Crescenzi, G. Gambosi, V. Kann, A. Marchetti-Spaccamela und M. Protasi, Complexity and Approximation: Combinatorial Optimization Problems and Their Approximability Properties, Springer-Verlag, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Approximation Algorithms for NP-Hard Problems, D. S. Hochbaum, Hrsg., Brooks Cole, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  34. R. M. Karp, „The Probabilistic Analysis of Partitioning Algorithms for the Traveling-Salesman Problem in the Plane,“ Math. Oper. Res. 2 (1977), S. 209–24.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. The Traveling Salesman Problem: A Guided Tour of Combinatorial Optimization, E. L. Lawler et al., Hrsg., John Wiley & Sons, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  36. U. Feige, S. Goldwasser, L. Lovász, S. Safra und M. Szegedy, „Approximating Clique is Almost NP-Complete,“ J. Assoc. Comput. Mach., 43 (1996), S. 268–92.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. S. Arora und S. Safra, „Probabilistic Checking of Proofs: A New Characterization of NP,“. Assoc. Comput. Mach., 45 (1998), S. 70–122.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. S. Arora, C. Lund, R. Motwani, M. Sudan und M. Szegedy, „Proof Verification and Intractability of Approximation Problems,“ J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 45 (1998), S. 501–55.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. M. R. Garey und D. S. Johnson, „The Complexity of Near-Optimal Graph Coloring,“. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 23 (1976), S. 43–9.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. A. R. Meyer und L. J. Stockmeyer, „The Equivalence Problem for Regular Expressions with Squaring Requires Exponential Time,“ Proc. 13th Ann. Symp. on Switching and Automata Theory, IEEE Press, S. 125–9,1972.

    Google Scholar 

  41. A. S. Fraenkel und D. Lichtenstein, „Computing a Perfect Strategy for n×n Chess Requires Time Exponential in nJ. Combinatorial Theory, Reihe A31 (1981), S. 199–214.

    Google Scholar 

  42. J. M. Robson, „N by N Checkers is Exptime Complete,“ SIAM J. Comput. 13 (1984), S. 252–67.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. L. J. Stockmeyer und A. K. Chandra, „Provably Difficult Combinatorial Games,“ SIAM J. Comput. 8 (1979), S. 151–74.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. M. J. Fischer und R. E. Ladner, „Propositional Dynamic Logic of Regular Programs,“. Comput. Syst. Sci. 18 (1979), S. 194–211.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  45. M. J. Fischer und M. O. Rabin, „Super-Exponential Complexity of Presburger Arithmetic,“ in Complexity of Computation, R. M. Karp, Hrsg., Amer. Math. Soc, Providence, RI, S. 27–1, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  46. A. R. Meyer, „Weak Monadic Second Order Theory of Successor is not Elementary Recursive,“ in Logic Colloquium, R. Parikh, Hrsg., Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 453, Springer-Verlag, S. 132–54. 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  47. J. Ferrante und C. W. Rackoff, The Computational Complexity of Logical Theories, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 718, Springer-Verlag, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  48. G. B. Dantzig, Linear Programming and Extensions, Princeton University Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  49. L. G. Khachiyan, „A Polynomial Algorithm in Linear Programming,“ Doklady Akademiia Nauk SSSR 244 (1979), S. 1093–6 (russisch). Englische Übersetzung in Soviet Mathematics Doklad 20 (1979), S. 191–4.

    Google Scholar 

  50. N. Karmarkar, „A New Polynomial-Time Algorithm for Linear Programming,“ Combinatorial 4 (1984), S. 373–95.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2006). Ineffizienz und Unhandhabbarkeit. In: Algorithmik. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-37437-X_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics