Abstract
The negative perception of the Balkans came with the first Western travellers and their writings about the region.1 Their views were reified by the Balkan wars, which occurred as the practice of journalism was developing in the early twentieth century. This made the information from the region more accessible to the West, therefore contributing to the perception of the Balkans as primitive and violent. The eruption of the First World War further entrenched this image. During the communist era, the region remained mostly closed to the Western world, with some of the first images from the Balkans being those of the execution of Romania’s ruling couple during the fall of communism. This, together with the violent dissolution of Yugoslavia, and the development of 24hour satellite broadcasting, enabled most of the world to watch live broadcasts from the war in the region. The images of violence coming from the Balkans advanced misperceptions of this part of Europe. As a result, the Balkans were assigned an inferior position within the European continent, and this view of the region was transferred to international intervention in the 1990s. Liberal peacebuilding, devised by Western interveners who were guided by the orientalist discourse, was applied in the intervention. This left almost no room for the inclusion of local history, culture and identity. However, things started to change with the legitimacy crisis of the liberal peacebuilding project and the growing assertiveness of local actors.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Rebecca West, Black Lamb and Grey Falcon: A Journey through Yugoslavia (New York: Penguin, 1982 [1942]).
See Robert D. Kaplan, Balkan Ghosts (New York: St Martin’s Press, 1993), xxiii.
Maria Todorova, Imagining the Balkans (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 167.
See also John R. Lampe, ‘Introduction’, in Ideologies and National Identities, eds John R. Lampe and Mark Mazower (Budapest and New York: Central European University Press, 2004), 1.
Cathie Carmichael, Ethnic Cleansing in the Balkans: Nationalism and the Destruction of Tradition (London and New York: Routledge, 2003), 109.
Alex N. Grigor’ev and Adrian Severin, ‘Debalkanizing the Balkans: A Strategy for a Sustainable Peace in Kosovo’, International Politics and Society 1 (2007): 129.
See also Tom Gallagher, Outcast Europe: The Balkans, 1789–1989 (New York, London: Routledge, 2001), viii, x.
Warren Zimmermann, Origins of a Catastrophe (New York: Times Books, 1996), 209.
Roger Mac Ginty and Oliver P. Richmond, ‘The Local Turn in Peace Building: A Critical Agenda for Peace’, Third World Quarterly 34, no. 5 (2013): 769.
See Homi Bhabha, ‘Of Mimicry and Man: The Ambivalence of Colonial Discourse’, Discipleship 28 (1984): 125–133;
Gayatri C. Spivak, ‘Can the Subaltern speak?’, in Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, eds C. Nelson and L. Grossberg (London: Macmillan, 1998), 24–28.
Jason Miklian, Kristoffer Liden and Ashild Kolas, ‘The Perils of Going Local: Liberal Peace-Building Agendas in Nepal’, Conflict Security and Development 11, no. 3 (2011): 285–308.
Timothy Donais, ‘Empowerment or Imposition? Dilemmas of Local Ownership in Post-Conflict Peacebuilding Processes’, Peace & Change 34, no. 1 (2009): 7.
Oliver P. Richmond, A Post-Liberal Peace (London: Routledge, 2011), 70.
Jenny H. Peterson, ‘A Conceptual Unpacking of Hybridity: Accounting for Notions of Power, Politics and Progress in Analyses of Aid-Driven Interfaces’, Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 7, no. 2 (2012): 14.
Oliver P. Richmond and Audra Mitchell, ‘Introduction’, in Hybrid Forms of Peace. From Everyday Agency to Post-Liberalism, eds Oliver P. Richmond and Audra Mitchell (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), 11.
Beatrice Pouligny, ‘Civil Society and Post-Conflict Peacebuilding: Ambiguities of International Programmes Aimed at Building “New” Societies’, Security Dialogue 36, no. 4 (2005): 503.
Volker Boege, M. Anne Brown, Kevin P. Clements and Anna Nolan, ‘States Emerging from Hybrid Political Orders — Pacific Experiences’, The Australian Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies Occasional Papers Series, Number 11, September 2008, 36.
Pnina Werbner, ‘The Limits of Cultural Hybridity: On Ritual Monsters, Poetic License and Contested Post-Colonial Purifications’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 7, no. 1 (2001): 149, quoted in Peterson, ‘A Conceptual Unpacking of Hybridity’, 19.
Nora Fisher Onar and Othon Anastasakis, ‘Sustaining Engagement? On Symmetries and Asymmetries in Greek-Turkish Relations’, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 13, no. 3 (2013): 401–406; see also Stephen Kinzer, ‘Earthquakes Help Warm Greek–Turkish Relations’, The New York Times, 13 September 1999, http://www.nytimes.com/1999/09/13/world/earthquakes-help-warm-greek-turkish-relations.html, accessed 20 December 2014. The two countries are also in dispute over the Aegean Sea.
Elizabeth Pond, Endgame in the Balkans (Washington: The Brookings Institution, 2006);
Andrew Rossos, Macedonia and the Macedonians (Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 2008). For alternative views on the dispute,
see Aristotle Tziampiris, ‘Greece and the Macedonian Question: An Assessment of Recent Claims and Criticisms’, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 11, no. 1 (2011): 69–83.
See Iskra Baeva and Evgenia Kalinova, ‘Bulgarian Turks during the Transition Period’, in Bulgaria and Europe, ed. Stefanos Katsikas (London: Anthem Press, 2010).
See Claude Karnoouh, ‘Multiculturalism and Ethnic Relations in Transylvania’, in Romania since 1989, ed. Henry F. Carey (Lanham: Lexington Books, 2004).
Gjergj Erebara, ‘Albania’s Nationalist Show: All Bark and No Bite’, Balkan Insight, 25 March 2015, http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/blog/albania-s-nationalist-show-all-bark-and-no-bite, accessed 29 March 2015. See also Robert C. Austin, ‘Greater Albania: The Albanian State and the Question of Kosovo’, in Ideologies and National Identities, eds John R. Lampe and Mark Mazower (Budapest and New York: Central European University Press, 2004).
Paul Stubbs, ‘Nationalisms, Globalization and Civil Society in Croatia and Slovenia’, Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change 19 (1996): 5.
Ana Devic, ‘Anti-War Initiatives and the Un-Making of Civic Identities in the Former Yugoslav Republics’, Journal of Historical Sociology 10, no. 2 (1997): 127–156.
Orli Fridman, ‘“It Was Like Fighting a War with Our Own People”: Anti-War Activism in Serbia during the 1990s’, Nationalities Papers 39, no. 4 (2011): 510.
See Ioannis Armakolas, ‘The “Paradox” of Tuzla City: Explaining Non-Nationalist Local Politics during the Bosnian War’, Europe-Asia Studies 63, no. 2 (2011): 229–261.
Stefanie Kappler, Local Agency and Peacebuilding — EU and International Engagement in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Cyprus and South Africa (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).
Daria Sito-Sucic, ‘Bosnian Activists Erect “Guerrilla Memorials” to War Crime Victims’, 26 October 2013, http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/10/26/us-bosnia-memorials-idUSBRE99P02U20131026, accessed 21 February 2015.
Judy Batt, ed., ‘The Western Balkans: Moving on’, Chaillot Paper No. 70, Institute for Security Studies, Paris, October 2003, http://www.iss-eu.org/chaillot, accessed 17 December 2014; International Commission on the Balkans, ‘The Balkans in Europe’s Future’, 2005.
Tom Gallagher, The Balkans in the New Millennium (London and New York: Routledge, 2005), 190.
Guilame Durand and Antonio Missiroli, ‘Absorption Capacity: Old Wine in New Bottles’, European Policy Centre, Policy brief, September 2006.
Anthony Czuczka and Brian Parkin, ‘Merkel Bids to Stall Putin Influence at EU’s Balkan Edge’, Bloomberg, 21 November 2014, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014–11–20/merkel-bids-to-stall-putin-influence-at-eu-s-balkan-edge, accessed 10 January 2015.
Zoran Ilievski and Dane Taleski, ‘Was the EU’s Role in Conflict Management in Macedonia a Success?’ Ethnopolitics 8, nos. 3–4 (2009): 364.
Andrew Rettman, ‘Slovenia Puts 172EUR Price Tag on Croatia’s EU Entry’, EU Observer, 21 September 2012, https://euobserver.com/enlargement/117629, accessed 15 December 2014.
Cosmina Tanasoiu, ‘Europeanization Post-Accession: Rule Adoption and National Political Elites in Romania and Bulgaria’, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 12, no. 1 (2012): 174.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Jasmin Ramović
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ramović, J. (2016). Peace in the Balkans: (En)countering the European Other. In: Richmond, O.P., Pogodda, S., Ramović, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Disciplinary and Regional Approaches to Peace. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-40761-0_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-40761-0_33
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-40760-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40761-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)