Abstract
The existence and activity of Political Opposition is indispensable in democratic systems of government. This chapter argues that the vital democratic functions of opposition (informing the voters and providing an alternative) are confined to the electoral arena. In the parliamentary arena, however, the distinction between government and opposition is blurred when opposition parties support the government, when governing parties oppose the government, when opposition parties provide structural support to a minority government, and when the government anticipates an opposition majority in another institution of government. As long as this blurring of opposition in the parliamentary arena goes unnoticed by the voters, opposition parties may still fulfill their democratic duties in the electoral arena, albeit in a hypocritical way. However, in recent years, government and opposition are growing so indistinct in the parliamentary arena that increasingly voters may find that they are no longer offered a meaningful choice within the system.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andeweg, R. B. (2000). Consociational democracy. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 509–536.
Andeweg, R. B., De Winter, L., & Müller, W. C. (2008). Parliamentary opposition in post-consociational democracies: Austria, Belgium and the Netherlands. Journal of Legislative Studies, 14(1), 77–112.
Andeweg, R.B. & Nijzink, L. (1995). Beyond the two-body image: Relations between ministers and MPs. In H. Döring (Ed.), Parliaments and majority rule in Western Europe (pp. 152–178). Frankfurt: Campus/New York: St Martin’s Press.
Blondel, J. (1997). Political opposition in the contemporary world. Government and Opposition, 32(4), 462–486.
Bale, T., & Bergman, T. (2006). Captives no longer, but servants still? Contract parliamentarism and the new minority governance in Sweden and New Zealand. Government and Opposition, 41(3), 422–449.
Brack, N., & Weinblum, S. (2011). Political opposition: Towards a renewed research agenda. Interdisciplinary Political Studies, 1(1), 69–79.
Carroll, R., & Cox, G. W. (2012). Shadowing ministers: monitoring partners in coalition governments. Comparative Political Studies, 45(2), 220–236.
Church, C. H., & Vatter, A. (2009). Opposition in consensual Switzerland: A short but significant experiment. Government and Opposition, 44(4), 412–437.
Dahl, R. A. (Ed.) (1966a). Political oppositions in western democracies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dahl, R.A. (1966b). Preface. In R.A. Dahl (Ed.), Political oppositions in western democracies (pp. xiii–xxi). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dahl, R. A. (1966c). Patterns of opposition. In R. A. Dahl (Ed.), Political oppositions in western democracies (pp. 332–347). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Deschouwer, K. (2009). Coalition formation and congruence in a multi-layered setting: Belgium 1995–2008. Regional and Federal Studies, 19(1), 13–35.
Elgie, R. (2001). What is divided government? In R. Elgie (Ed.), Divided government in comparative perspective (pp. 1–20). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Engelmann, F. C. (1966). Austria: The pooling of opposition. In R. A. Dahl (Ed.), Political oppositions in western democracies (pp. 260–283). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Friedrich, C. J. (1966). Federalism and opposition. Government and Opposition, 1(3), 286–296.
Giuliani, M. (2008). Patterns of consensual law-making in the Italian Parliament. South European Society and Politics, 13(1), 61–85.
Helms, L. (2004). Five ways of institutionalizing political opposition. Government and Opposition, 39(1), 45–50.
Helms, L. (Ed.) (2008a). Parliamentary opposition in old and new democracies. Special Issue of the Journal of Legislative Issues, 14(1), 1–2.
Helms, L. (2008b). Studying parliamentary opposition in old and new democracies: Issues and perspectives. Journal of Legislative Studies, 14(1), 6–19.
Herman, V., & Pope, J. (1973). Minority governments in western democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 3(2), 191–212.
Holzhacker, R. (2002). National parliamentary scrutiny over EU issues: Comparing the goals and methods of governing and opposition parties. European Union Politics, 3(4), 459–479.
Katz, R. S., & Mair, P. (1995). Changing models of party organization and party democracy: The emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics, 1(1), 5–28.
Kerr, H. H. (1978). The structure of opposition in the Swiss Parliament. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 3(1), 51–62.
Kirchheimer, O. (1957). The waning of opposition in parliamentary regimes. Social Research, 24(2), 129–156.
King, A. (1976). Modes of executive-legislative relations: Great Britain, France and West Germany. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 1(1), 11–36.
Kolinsky, E. (Ed.) (1987). Opposition in Western Europe. London: Croom Helm.
Laver, M., & Shepsle, K. A. (1991). Divided government: America is not exceptional. Governance, 4(3), 250–269.
Lijphart, A. (1968). Typologies of democratic systems. Comparative Political Studies, 1(1), 3–44.
Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in plural societies: A comparative explanation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Mair, P. (1995). Political parties, popular legitimacy and public privilege. West European Politics, 18(3), 40–57.
Manow, P., & Burkhart, S. (2007). Legislative self-restraint under divided government in Germany; 1976–2002. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 32(2), 167–191.
Mayhew, D. R. (1991). Divided we govern: Party control, lawmaking, and investigations 1946–1990. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Mujica, A., & Sanchez-Cuenca, I. (2006). Consensus and parliamentary opposition: The case of Spain. Government and Opposition, 41(1), 86–108.
Müller, W. C. (1993). Executive-legislative relations in Austria: 1945–1992. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 18(4), 467–494.
Müller, W. C. (2011). Successful failure: Ill-conceived pre-commitments and welcome bargaining failure paving the way to minority government in Austria. In R. B. Andeweg, L. De Winter, & P. Dumont (Eds.), Puzzles of government formation: Coalition theory and deviant cases (pp. 88–111). London: Routledge.
Narud, H. M., & Valen, H. (2008). Coalition membership and electoral performance. In K. Strøm, W. C. Müller, & T. Bergman (Eds.), Cabinets and coalition bargaining: The democratic life cycle in Western Europe (pp. 369–402). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Norton, P. (2008). Making sense of opposition. Journal of Legislative Studies, 14(1), 236–250.
Oberreuter, H. (Ed.) (1975). Parlamentarische Opposition: ein internationaler Vergleich. Hamburg: Hoffman and Campe.
Russell, G. W. E. (1912). One look back. London: Nelson.
Schumpeter, J. (1950). Capitalism, socialism and democracy (3rd ed.). New York: Harper.
Steinack, K. (2011). Two patterns of opposition: Party group interaction in the Bavarian State Parliament. Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(1), 1–26.
Strøm, K. (1990). Minority government and majority rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strøm, K., & Müller, W. C. (1999). Political parties and hard choices. In W. C. Müller & K. Strøm (Eds.), Policy, office, or votes: How political parties in Western Europe make hard decisions (pp. 1–35). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sturm, R. (2001). Divided government in Germany: The case of the Bundesrat. In R. Elgie (Ed.), Divided government in comparative perspective (pp. 167–181). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swenden, W. (2002). Asymmetric federalism and coalition making in Belgium. Publius, 32(3), 67–88.
Thies, M. (2001). Keeping tabs on partners; the logic of delegation in coalition governments. American Journal of Political Science, 45(3), 580–598.
van Mechelen, D., & Rose, R. (1986). Patterns of parliamentary legislation. Aldershot: Gower.
Visscher, G. (1994). Parlementaire Invloed op Wetgeving. The Hague: SDU.
von Beyme, K. (1987). Parliamentary oppositions in Europe. In E. Kolinsky (Ed.), Opposition in Western Europe (pp. 31–51). London: Croom Helm.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Andeweg, R.B. (2013). Parties in Parliament: The Blurring of Opposition. In: Müller, W., Narud, H. (eds) Party Governance and Party Democracy. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6588-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6588-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6587-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6588-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)