Abstract
This chapter questions whether the objective circumstances of justice, and in particular the assumption of mutual advantage, apply to climate action. The first part of the chapter explains why two asymmetries, of benefits and costs, further exacerbated by intergenerational conflicts, both past and future oriented, make climate change an intricate multiplayer prisoner’s dilemma. The second part of the chapter analyses whether and how the two asymmetries can be scaled down, based on a series of empirical arguments: global vulnerability to local economic setbacks, financial risks and security threats (benefit asymmetry), co-benefits of the energy transition immediately collectable, especially in developed and some emerging countries (cost asymmetry), moral, axiological and economic benefits of intergenerational sustainability (intergenerational conflicts). The conclusion is that the circumstances of justice, that make climate cooperation both possible and necessary, obtain, in spite of the two global asymmetries and of intergenerational conflicts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Alcaraz, O., Buenestado, P., Escribano, B., et al. (2018). Distributing the global carbon budget with climate justice criteria. Climatic Change, 149, 131–145.
Andina, T. (2022). A philosophy for future generations. The structure and dynamics of Transgenerationality. Bloomsbury Academic.
Baatz, C. (2013). Responsibility for the past? Some thoughts on compensating those vulnerable to climate change in developing countries. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 16(1), 94–110.
Barry, B. (1989). Theories of justice. A treatise on social justice, Vol. I. Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
Bergant, K., Mano, R. C., & Shibata, I (2022). From polluting to green jobs: A seamless transition in the U.S.?. IMF, WP/22/129. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2022/07/01/From-Polluting-to-Green-Jobs-A-Seamless-Transition-in-the-U-S-520244
Binmore, K. (2015). Why all the fuss? The many aspects of the Prisoner’s dilemma. In M. Peterson (Ed.), The Prisoner’s dilemma (pp. 16–43). Cambridge University Press.
Brandstedt, E. (2015). The circumstances of intergenerational justice. Moral Philosophy and Politics, 2(1), 33–55.
Brenton, P., & Chemutai, V. (2021). The trade and climate change Nexus: The urgency and opportunities for developing countries. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/36294/9781464817700.pdf
Brookings Institution. (2019). The climate crisis, migration, and refugees. https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-climate-crisis-migration-and-refugees/
Buchanan, A. (2000). Rawls’s law of peoples: Rules for a vanished Westphalian world. Ethics, 110(4), 697–721.
Burke, M., Davis, W. M., & Diffenbaugh, N. S. (2018). Large potential reduction in economic damages under UN mitigation targets. Nature, 557, 549–553.
Bush, M. (2017). Climate change adaptation in Small Island developing states. Wiley.
Caney, S. (2006). Environmental degradation, reparations, and the moral significance of history. Journal of Social Philosophy, 37(3), 464–482.
Caney, S. (2010). Climate change and the duties of the advantaged. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 13(1), 203–228.
Carley, S., & Konisky, D. M. (2020). The justice and equity implications of the clean energy transition. Nature Energy, 5(8), 569–577.
Cattaneo, C., Beine, M., Fröhlich, C. J., Kiveton, D., Martinez-Zarzoso, I., Mastrorillo, M., et al. (2019). Human migration in the era of climate change. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 13(2), 189–206.
Chandna, A., Gergele, O., & Ahuja, S. (2021). Why manufacturers must rethink their supply chains in Southeast Asia. EY, February 22. https://www.ey.com/en_vn/supply-chain/why-manufacturers-must-rethink-their-supply-chains-in-southeast-asia
Conley, H.A., Newlin, C., Wall, C., & Lohsen, A. (2021). Russia’s climate gamble: The pursuit and contradiction of its Arctic ambitions. Center for Strategies & International Studies (CSIS). https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/publication/210924_Conley_Russia%27s_Climate_Gamble.pdf?PehRoHxLxSI_CzhQ8sI.ssO0AwQeXAXF
Corvino, F. (2022). Why we need future generations: A Defence of direct intergenerational reciprocity. Economics & Philosophy, online first, pp. 1–28.
Davis, S. J., & Caldeira, K. (2010). Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions. PNAS, 107(12), 5687–5692.
Duus-Otterström, G., & Hjorthen, F. D. (2019). Consumption-based emissions accounting: The normative debate. Environmental Politics, 28(5), 866–885.
ECB. (2021). ECB economy-wide climate stress test. Occasional Paper Series, N. 281, September. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpops/ecb.op281~05a7735b1c.en.pdf
Gardiner, S. M. (2011a). A perfect moral storm: The ethical tragedy of climate change. Oxford University Press.
Gardiner, S. M. (2011b). Rawls and climate change: Does Rawlsian political philosophy pass the global test? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 14(2), 125–151.
Gauthier, D. (1986). Morals by agreement. Clarendon Press.
Glanemann, N., Willner, S. N., & Levermann, A. (2020). Paris climate agreement passes the cost-benefit test. Nature Communications, 11, 110.
Gosseries, A. (2001). What do we owe the next generation(s)? Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 35, 293–354.
Hardin, G. (1998). Extensions of ‘the tragedy of the commons’. Science, 280(5364), 682–683.
Heyd, D. (2009). A value or an obligation? Rawls on justice to future generations. In A. Gosseries & L. M. Meyer (Eds.), Intergenerational justice. Oxford University Press.
Hilbe, C., Wu, B., Traulsen, A., & Nowak, M. A. (2014). Cooperation and control in multiplayer social dilemmas. PNAS, 111(46), 16425–16430.
Hobbes, T. (1996 [1651). Leviathan (Ed. Gaskin, J. C. A). Oxford University Press.
Howard, P., & Schwartz, J. (2017). Jason, think global: International reciprocity as justification for a global social cost of carbon. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 42, 203–295.
Hume, D. (1978 [1740]). A treatise of human nature. Oxford University Press.
IPCC. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of climate change – Summary for policymakers. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGIII_SummaryForPolicymakers.pdf
Karakaya, E., Yılmaz, B., & Alataş, S. (2019). How production-based and consumption-based emissions accounting systems change climate policy analysis: The case of CO2 convergence. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(16), 16682–16694.
Karlsson, M., Alfredsson, E., & Westling, N. (2020). Climate policy co-benefits: A review. Climate Policy, 20(3), 292–316.
Khan, S., & Park, K. W. K. (2009). Contagion in the stock markets: The Asian financial crisis revisited. Journal of Asian Economics, 20(5), 561–569.
Kim, H. (2019). An extension of Rawls’s theory of justice for climate change. International Theory, 11(2), 160–181.
Klaser, K., Sacconi, L., & Faillo, M. (2021). John Rawls and compliance to climate change agreements: Insights from a laboratory experiment. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 21, 531–551.
Köberle, A. C., Vandyck, T., Guivarch, C., et al. (2021). The cost of mitigation revisited. Nature Climate Change, 11, 1035–1045.
Mayrhofer, J. P., & Gupta, G. (2016). The science and politics of co-benefits in climate policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 57, 22–30.
McKinnon, C. (2012). Climate change and future justice precaution, compensation and triage. Routledge.
McKinnon, C. (2015). Climate justice in a carbon budget. Climatic Change, 133, 375–384.
McKinsey. (2022). The Net-Zero Transition: What it would cost, what it could bring. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability/our-insights/the-net-zero-transition-what-it-would-cost-what-it-could-bring
Mendelsohn, R., & Dinar, A. (1999). Climate change, agriculture, and developing countries: Does adaptation matter? World Bank Research Observer, 14(2), 277–293.
Metcalf, G. E., & Stock, J. H. (2017). Integrated assessment models and the social cost of carbon: A review and assessment of U.S. experience. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11(1), 80–99.
Meyer, L. H., & Roser, D. (2010). Climate justice and historical emissions. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 13(1), 229–253.
Mintz-Woo, K., & Leroux, J. (2021). What do climate change winners owe, and to whom? Economics and Philosophy, 37(3), 462–483.
Moss, J., & Robyn, K. (2019). Historical emissions and the carbon budget. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 36(2), 268–289.
Noorka, I. R., & Heslop-Harrison, J. S. (2015). Agriculture and climate change in Southeast Asia and the Middle East: Breeding, climate change adaptation, agronomy, and water security. In W. Leal Filho (Ed.), Handbook of climate change adaptation. Springer.
Paavola, J. (2012). Climate change: Th e ultimate tragedy of the commons? In D. H. Cole & E. Ostrom (Eds.), Property in land and other resources (pp. 417–433). Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Page, E. A. (2006). Climate change, justice and future generations. Edward Elgar.
Page, E. A. (2011). Climatic justice and the fair distribution of atmospheric burdens: A conjunctive account. The Monist, 94(3), 412–432.
Rawls, J. (1985). Justice as fairness: Political not metaphysical. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 14(3), 223–251.
Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (2nd Rev. ed.). The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Rigaud, K. K, de Sherbinin, A., Jones, B., Bergmann, J., Clement, V., Ober, K., Schewe, J., Adamo, S., McCusker, B., Heuser, S., & Midgley, A. (2018). Groundswell: Preparing for internal climate migration. The World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/29461
Ritchie, H. (2019). How do CO2 emissions compare when we adjust for trade? Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/consumption-based-co2
Ritchie, H., & Roser, M. (2020). CO2 emissions. In H. Ritchie & M. Roser (Eds.), CO2 and GHG emissions. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions
Rivera-Castro, F. (2014). Circumstances of justice. In J. Mandle & D. Reidy (Eds.), The Cambridge Rawls lexicon (pp. 92–96). Cambridge University Press.
Sanderson, B. M., & O’Neill, B. C. (2020). Assessing the costs of historical inaction on climate change. Scientific Reports, 10, 9173.
Sangiovanni, A. (2008). Justice and the priority of politics to morality. Journal of Political Philosophy, 16(2), 137–164.
Scheffler, S. (2013). Death and the afterlife. Oxford University Press.
Scheffler, S. (2018). Why worry about future generations? Oxford University Press.
Shue, H. (2015). Historical responsibility, harm prohibition, and preservation requirement: Core practical convergence on climate change. Moral Philosophy and Politics, 2(1), 7–31.
Statista. (2022). Carbon dioxide emissions in 2010 and 2020, by select country. https://www.statista.com/statistics/270499/co2-emissions-in-selected-countries/
Steel, D., DesRoches, C. T., & Mintz-Woo, K. (2022). Climate change and the threat to civilization. PNAS, 119(42), e2210525119.
Swiss Re. (2021). The economics of climate change: no action not an option. https://www.swissre.com/institute/research/topics-and-risk-dialogues/climate-and-natural-catastrophe-risk/expertise-publication-economics-of-climate-change.html
The White House. (2021). Report On The Impact Of Climate Change On Migration. https://reliefweb.int/report/world/report-impact-climate-change-migration-october-2021
UNFCCC. (2021). Climate Change Danger to South Asia’s Economy. https://unfccc.int/news/climate-change-danger-to-south-asias-economy
Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Tirado Herrero, S., Dubash, N. K., & Lecocq, f. (2014). Measuring the co-benefits of climate change mitigation. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 39(1), 549–582.
Vlerick, M. (2020). The evolution of social contracts. Journal of Social Ontology, 5(2), 181–203.
Williges, K., Meyer, L. H., Steininger, K. W., & Kirchengast, G. (2022). Fairness critically conditions the carbon budget allocation across countries. Global Environmental Change, 74, 1–20.
Wood, P. J. (2011). Climate change and game theory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1219, 153–170.
Zestos, G. K. (2015). The global financial crisis from US subprime mortgages to European sovereign debt. Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Corvino, F. (2023). Climate Change and the Circumstances of Justice. In: Pellegrino, G., Di Paola, M. (eds) Handbook of Philosophy of Climate Change. Handbooks in Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16960-2_88-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16960-2_88-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16960-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16960-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities