Abstract
This chapter positions political communication research within the broader field of visual research methods. Visual political communication research has its roots in a broad range of humanities and social science disciplines. Despite the emergence of a visual culture, the use of visual data in social research is still limited and lacks a systematic framework for the analysis of such data. The author begins this chapter by outlining a taxonomy of interdisciplinary research based on the origin and outlet of visual data. He then focuses specifically on visual political communication through social media, as this is now a ubiquitous and potent political phenomenon. He then reviews ten recently published analyses of visual social media data and examines the emerging patterns and gaps. The chapter concludes with recommendations that could help strengthen both the role of visual data in political communication research and our analysis of such data.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adi, A., Gerodimos, R., & Lilleker, D. G. (2018). ‘Yes We Vote’: Civic mobilisation and impulsive engagement on Instagram. Javnost—The Public, 25(3), 315–332.
Aelbrecht, W. (2015). Decline and renaissance: Photographing Detroit in the 1940s and 1980s. Journal of Urban History, 41, 307–325.
Baldwin-Philippi, J. (2018). The technological performance of populism. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818797591.
Bell, P. (2012). Content analysis of visual images. In J. Hughes (Ed.), SAGE visual methods (Vol. 3, pp. 31–58). London: Sage.
Bock, A., Isermann, H., & Knieper, T. (2011). Quantitative content analysis of the visual. In J. Hughes (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of visual research methods (pp. 265–282). London: Sage.
Bossetta, M. (2018). The digital architectures of social media: Comparing political campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 U.S. election. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(2), 471–496.
Buckingham, D. (2012). Creative’ visual methods in media research: Possibilities, problems and proposals. In J. Hughes (Ed.), SAGE visual methods (Vol. 1). London: Sage.
Burkhardt, G., et al. (2003). EnGauge 21st century skills: Literacy in the digital age. http://pict.sdsu.edu/engauge21st.pdf.
Caple, H. (2013). Photojournalism: A social semiotic approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Carlson, E. D., Engebretson, J., & Chamberlain, R. M. (2012). Photovoice as a social process of critical consciousness. In J. Hughes (Ed.), SAGE visual methods (Vol. 4, pp. 131–150). London: Sage.
Casas, A., & Williams, N. W. (2018). Images that matter: Online protests and the mobilizing role of pictures. Political Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912918786805.
Chalfen, R. (2011a). Differentiating practices of participatory visual media production. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of visual research methods (pp. 186–200). London: Sage.
Chalfen, R. (2011b). Looking two ways: Mapping the social scientific study of visual culture. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of visual research methods (pp. 24–48). London: Sage.
Clark-Ibáñez, M. (2007). Inner-city children in sharper focus: Sociology of childhood and photo elicitation interviews. In G. Stanczak (Ed.), Visual research methods (pp. 167–196). London: Sage.
Collier, J., & Collier, M. (1986). Visual anthropology: Photography as a research method. Albuquerque: UNM Press.
David, E. (2007). Signs of resistance: Marking public space through a renewed cultural activism. In G. Stanczak (Ed.), Visual research methods (pp. 225–254). London: Sage.
Driscoll, K., & Thorson, K. (2015). Searching and clustering methodologies: Connecting political communication content across platforms. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 659(1), 134–148.
El-Nawawy, M., & Elmasry, M. H. (2016). The signs of a strongman: A semiotic and discourse analysis of Abdelfattah Al-Sisi’s Egyptian presidential campaign. International Journal of Communication, 10, 2275–2296.
Frank, L. K., Harrison, R., Hellersberg, E., MacHover, K., & Steiner, M. (1951). Personality development in adolescent girls. Monographs of the Society for the Research in Child Development, 16(1), 1–316.
Friedman, A. (2016). Three-year-old photographers: Educational and parental mediation as a basis for visual literacy via digital photography in early childhood. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 8(1), 15–31.
Gerodimos, R. (2015). At the edge of the present (film: 16 mins, produced by R. Gerodimos). http://vimeo.com/gerodimos/edge.
Gerodimos, R. (2018). Youth and the city: Reflective photography as a tool of urban voice. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 10(1), 82–103.
Gerodimos, R., & Justinussen, J. (2015). Obama’s 2012 Facebook campaign: Political communication in the age of the like button. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(2), 113–132.
Gotschi, E., Delve, R., & Freyer, B. (2009). Participatory photography as a qualitative approach to obtain insights into farmer groups. Field Methods, 21, 290–308.
Grigor, T., & Katchi.db, R. (2015). Debris of what-would-have-been: A photo-essay concerning deindustrialization in hyper-capitalist and post-socialist cities. Journal of Urban History, 41, 294–306.
Gubrium, A., & Harper, K. (2013). Participatory visual and digital methods. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26.
Harper, D. (2012). Framing photographic ethnography: A case study. In J. Hughes (Ed.), SAGE visual methods (Vol. 2, pp. 111–134). London: Sage.
Henny, L. M. (2012). Trend report: Theory and practice of visual sociology. In J. Hughes (Ed.), SAGE visual methods (Vol. 1, pp. 1–64). London: Sage.
Hinthorne, L. L. (2012). A picture is worth a thousand words. Using the visual interpretation narrative exercise to elicit non-elite perceptions of democracy. Field Methods, 24(3), 348–364.
Hughes, J. (Ed.). (2012). SAGE visual methods. London: Sage.
Kautt, Y. (2018). Practice and structure as concepts of a sociology of visual communication: Toward a methodology of visual and structural analysis. Qualitative Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418792022.
Kharroub, T., & Bas, O. (2015). Social media and protests: An examination of Twitter images of the 2011 Egyptian revolution. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815571914
Lapenta, F. (2011). Some theoretical and methodological views on photo-elicitation. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of visual research methods (pp. 201–213). London: Sage.
Larsson, A. O. (2017). Skiing all the way to the polls: Exploring the popularity of personalized posts on political Instagram accounts. Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517741132.
Malherbe, N., Suffla, S., Seedat, M., & Bawa, U. (2016). Visually negotiating hegemonic discourse through Photovoice: Understanding youth representations of safety. Discourse & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516664255.
Margolis, E., & Pauwels, L. (Eds.). (2011). The SAGE handbook of visual research methods. London: Sage.
Neumayer, C., & Rossi, L. (2018). Images of protest in social media: Struggle over visibility and visual narratives. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4293–4310.
O’Neill, S. J. (2013). Image matters: Climate change imagery in US, UK and Australian newspapers. Geoforum, 49, 10–19.
Orellana, M. F. (1999). Space and place in an urban landscape: Learning from children’s views of their social worlds. Visual Sociology, 14(1/2), 73–89.
Parry, K. (2010). A visual framing analysis of British press photography during the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict. Media, War & Conflict, 3(1), 67–85.
Parry, K. (2011). Images of liberation? Visual framing, humanitarianism and British press photography during the 2003 Iraq invasion. Media, Culture & Society, 33(8), 1185–1201.
Pauwels, L. (2011). An integrated conceptual framework for visual social research. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of visual research methods (pp. 3–23). London: Sage.
Pearce, W., Özkula, S. M., Greene, A. K., Teeling, L., Bansard, J. S., Omena, J. J., & Rabello, E.T. (2018). Visual cross-platform analysis: Digital methods to research social media images. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1486871
Prins, E. (2012). Participatory photography: A tool for empowerment or surveillance? In J. Hughes (Ed.), SAGE visual methods (Vol. 4, pp. 221–238). London: Sage.
Rabikowska, M. (2010). Whose street is it anyway? Visual ethnography and self-reflection. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 13(1), 58–83.
Samuels, J. (2007). When words are not enough: Eliciting children’s experiences of Buddhist monastic life through photographs. In G. Stanczak (Ed.), Visual research methods (pp. 197–224). London: Sage.
Schiller, J., & Tillett, B. (2004). Using digital images with young children: Challenges of integration. Early Child Development and Care, 174, 401–414.
Smit, R., Heinrich, A., & Broersma, M. (2018). Activating the past in the Ferguson protests: Memory work, digital activism and the politics of platforms. New Media & Society, 20(9), 3119–3139.
Stanczak, G. (Ed.). (2007). Visual research methods: Image, society, and representation. London: Sage.
Suchar, C. S. (1988). Photographing the changing material culture of a gentrified community. Visual Sociology, 3(2), 17–22.
Suchar, C. S. (1992). Icons and images of gentrification: The changed material culture of an urban community: Gentrification and Urban Change. Research in Urban Sociology, 2, 165–192.
Tunstall, S., Tapsell, S., & House, M. (2004). Children’s perceptions of river landscapes and play: What children’s photographs reveal. Landscape Research, 29, 181–204.
Wagner, J. (2011). Visual studies and empirical social inquiry. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of visual research methods (pp. 49–71). London: Sage.
Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health, Education & Behaviour, 24, 369–387.
Wang, C. C., Morrel-Samuels, S., Hutchison, P. M., Bell, L., & Pestronk, R. M. (2004). Flint photovoice: Community building among youths, adults, and policymakers. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 911–913.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gerodimos, R. (2019). The Interdisciplinary Roots and Digital Branches of Visual Political Communication Research. In: Veneti, A., Jackson, D., Lilleker, D.G. (eds) Visual Political Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18729-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18729-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18728-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18729-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)