Skip to main content

Knowledge Production/Transfer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Situational Diversity

Part of the book series: Global Diversities ((GLODIV))

  • 137 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, the author analyses processes of differentiation within situations of knowledge production and transfer. Therefore, he focuses specifically on two examples from the two neighbourhoods. The first example is the analysis of the city population by the City of Stuttgart in the 1970s. This analysis had the aim of gaining knowledge about the immigrated inhabitants in order to plan different measures. The second example is a research project about Pollokshields that had the aim of gaining general knowledge about the quality of life experience of people framed as an ethnic minority. In his analysis, the author takes aspects like the process of categorisation, information infrastructures as well as localisation of differences into account. Moreover, he shows how the topic of migration has changed statistics and the work of municipal administrations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Knowledge, which is accessible only in the head of a person, I understand here as not existing (cf. the comments on the public nature of practices by Schmidt 2012, pp. 226–263).

  2. 2.

    Knowledge has become a key term within Anthropology and Cultural Studies in ideas such as symbolic orders and orders of knowledge. In this sense, knowledge has become almost a synonym for culture (Reckwitz 2008, p. 84). Barth raised the question of the difference between knowledge and culture: “Indeed, it does focus on many of the same data and seeks to analyse many of the same phenomena. But in calling it knowledge rather than culture I think that we ethnographers will analyse it differently and find ourselves disaggregating our received category of culture in distinctive ways that hinge on what our ideas of ‘knowledge’ evoke. Knowledge provides people with materials for reflection and premises for action, whereas ‘culture’ too readily comes to embrace also those reflections and those actions” (Barth 2002, p. 1).

  3. 3.

    To visit “foreign” places is also a type of knowledge production and communication. However, because of its specific features, it will be discussed in the next section.

  4. 4.

    On the history of immigration and emigration in Baden-Württemberg, see the anthology and monograph by Karl-Heinz Meier-Braun and Reinhold Weber (2009) and the anthology by Mathias Beer (2014).

  5. 5.

    The present study could also be described in a similar way to the presentation carried out here. It argues in favour of truth-spots, about the presentation of the districts of Pollokshields and Nordbahnhofviertel, which should lead to systematic insights into the subject of diversity through specific methodological steps. On how certain places become focus points of research and the potential of over-research see Neal et al. (2016).

  6. 6.

    The following information on the Central Register of Foreigners are the investigations and comments by Helmut Bäumler (1996), Franz Scheuerer (1987), Christian Streit (1996) and Thilo Weichert (1998, 2000). All authors take a critical look at the register from a data protection perspective. In 2008, the European Court of Justice ruled that the storage and processing of European Union citizens’ data in the Central Register of Foreigners infringes Community law (European Court of Justice 2008).

References

Research Material

  • Ausländerbericht: Babbel, Herbert u.a. [authors]. 1976. Ausländische Einwohner in Stuttgart: Arbeitsergebnis der Projektgruppe ‘Ausländer-Bericht’ der Stadt Stuttgart. Stuttgart: Stadt Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conversation Michael Pacione, 19 May 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • GR-Drucksache Nr. 1090/1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 214/1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 16/1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview with Elke Winter [pseud.], 14 May 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • PG 23: N.A. 1990. Soutside Housing: The Chairman Reports. Pollokshields Guardian, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonderheft: Kaiser, Klaus. 1979. Ausländische Einwohner in Stuttgart: Entwicklung und Struktur. Sonderhefte des Statistischen Informationsdienstes 3. Stuttgart: Statistisches Amt.

    Google Scholar 

Bibliography

  • Aspinall, Peter J. 2009. The Future of Ethnicity Classifications. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 35 (9): 1417–1435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Answer Formats in British Census and Survey Ethnicity Questions: Does Open Response Better Capture ‘Superdiversity’? Sociology 46 (2): 354–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Do the ‘Asian’ Categories in the British Censuses Adequately Capture the Indian Sub-continent Diaspora Population? South Asian Diaspora 5 (2): 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspinall, Peter J., and Miri Song. 2013. Is Race a ‘Salient…’ or ‘Dominant Identity’ in the Early 21st Century: The Evidence of UK Survey Data on Respondentsʼ Sense of Who They Are. Social Science Research 42 (2): 547–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, Fredrik. 2002. An Anthropology of Knowledge. Current Anthropology 43 (1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bäumler, Helmut. 1996. Kritische Anmerkungen zum Ausländerzentralregister. Bewährungshilfe: Fachzeitschrift für Bewährungs-, Gerichts- und Straffälligenhilfe 43 (3): 240–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, Mathias, ed. 2014. Baden-Württemberg—eine Zuwanderungsgeschichte. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendix, Regina, and Gisela Welz, eds. 2002. Kulturwissenschaft und Öffentlichkeit: Amerikanische und deutschsprachige Volkskunde im Dialog. Frankfurt am Main: Inst. für Kulturanthropologie und Europäische Ethnologie der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Susan Leigh Star. 2008. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 2003. Die Wahrheit und die juristischen Formen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gammerl, Benno. 2018. Subjects, Citizens and Others: Administering Ethnic Heterogeneity in the British and Habsburg Empires, 1867–1918. New York and Oxford: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, Thomas F. 2006. City as Truth-Spot: Laboratories and Field-Sites in Urban Studies. Social Studies of Science 36 (1): 5–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, Ian. 1986. Making Up People. In Reconstructing Individualism: Autonomy, Individuality, and the Self in Western Thought, ed. Thomas C. Heller and Christine Brooke-Rose, 222–236. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995. The Looping Effects of Human Kind. In Causal Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Debate, ed. Dan Sperber, David Premack, and Ann J. Premack, 351–394. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Suzanne M. 2015. Super-Diverse Street: A ‘Trans-Ethnography’ Across Migrant Localities. Ethnic and Racial Studies 38 (1): 22–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, Ulrich. 2003. Geschichte der Ausländerpolitik in Deutschland: Saisonarbeiter, Zwangsarbeiter, Gastarbeiter, Flüchtlinge. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, Klaus. 1996. Kommunalstatistik in Stuttgart: Ein entwicklungsgeschichtlicher Abriss. In Die Kommunalstatistik auf dem Weg ins nächste Jahrhundert: Beiträge zum 100jährigen Bestehen des Statistischen Amtes, ed. Landeshauptstadt Stuttgart, Statistisches Amt in Verbindung mit dem Presse- und Informationsdienst, 46–48. Stuttgart: Statist. Amt d. Stadt Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 2002. Zirkulierende Referenz: Bodenstichproben aud demUrwald des Amazonas. In Die Hoffnung der Pandora: Untersuchungen zur Wirklichkeit der Wissenschaft, 36–95. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibing, Eberhard. 1996. Zusammenarbeit zwischen Landes- und Kommunalstatistik. In Die Kommunalstatistik auf dem Weg ins nächste Jahrhundert: Beiträge zum 100jährigen Bestehen des Statistischen Amtes, ed. Landeshauptstadt Stuttgart, Statistisches Amt in Verbindung mit dem Presse- und Informationsdienst, 35–45. Stuttgart: Statist. Amt d. Stadt Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonhard, Jörn, and Ulrike von Hirschhausen. 2009. Empires und Nationalstaaten im 19. Jahrhundert. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindner, Rolf. 2004. Walks on the Wild Side: Eine Geschichte der Stadtforschung. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandal, Santanu. 2013. Community Safety of Ethnic Minorities: The Lived Experience of the Pakistani Scottish Community in Scotland. PhD diss., School of Applied Social Sciences (HASS), University of Strathclyde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier-Braun, Karl-Heinz, and Reinhold Weber. 2009. Kleine Geschichte der Ein- und Auswanderung in Baden-Württemberg. Leinfelden-Echterdingen: DRW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, Annemarie. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neal, Sarah, Giles Mohan, Allan Cochrane, and Katy Bennett. 2016. “‘You can’t move in Hackney without bumping into an anthropologist’: why certain places attract research attention.” Qualitative Research 16 (5): 491–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz, Andreas. 2008. Die Transformation der Kulturtheorien: Zur Entwicklung eines Theorieprogramms. 2nd ed. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuerer, Franz. 1987. Immigranten und Flüchtlinge: Die gläsernen Menschen. In Vorsicht Volkszählung! Erfaßt, vernetzt und ausgezählt, ed. Roland Appel and Dieter Hummel, 3rd ed., 171–179. Köln: Kölner Verlagsblatt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Robert. 2012. Soziologie der Praktiken: Konzeptionelle Studien und empirische Analysen. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Severin-Barboutie, Bettina. 2012. Stadt—Migration—Transformation: Stuttgart und Lyon im Vergleich. In Das ‘Gastarbeiter’-System: Arbeitsmigration und ihre Folgen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und Westeuropa, ed. Jochen Oltmer, Axel Kreienbrink, and Carlos Sanz Díaz, 233–245. München: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streit, Christian. 1996. Entwicklung, Bedeutung und Rechtsgrundlagen des Ausländerzentralregisters. Bewährungshilfe: Fachzeitschrift für Bewährungs-, Gerichts- und Straffälligenhilfe 43 (3): 229–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weichert, Thilo. 1998. Kommentar zum Ausländerzentralregistergesetz. Neuwied: Luchterhand.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Der BigBrotherAward der KategorieLebenswerk geht an das Bundesverwaltungsamt in Köln für sein Ausländerzentralregister. Accessed 29 June 2018. https://bigbrotherawards.de/2000/lebenswerk-bundesverwaltungsamt.

  • Welz, Gisela. 1996. Inszenierungen kultureller Vielfalt: Frankfurt am Main und New York City. Berlin: Akadademie Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Mensch-Umwelt-Beziehungen: Zur Gegenstandskonstruktion der Frankfurter Kulturökologie. In Epistemische Orte: Gemeinde und Region als Forschungsformate, ed. Gisela Welz, Antonia Davidovic-Walther, and Anja S. Weber, 197–209. Frankfurt am Main: Universität Frankfurt Institut für Kulturanthropologie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Will, Anne-Kathrin. 2019. The German Statistical Category ‘Migration Background’: Historical Roots, Revisions and Shortcomings. Ethnicities 19 (3): 535–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Klückmann, M. (2020). Knowledge Production/Transfer. In: Situational Diversity. Global Diversities. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54791-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54791-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-54790-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-54791-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics