Skip to main content

The Emergence of the Party System in Poland—From Instability to Permanent Rivalry Patterns

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Party Organization and Communication in Poland

Abstract

Party system in post-communist Poland was born in 1989, and since then, it has evolved significantly. This chapter provides an analysis of how Polish political parties functioned after 2001, which is preceded by an adumbration of the system’s development before that date. It uses the concept of institutionalisation to determine why some formations failed while others survived and became permanent features in the partisan competition. It also employs the classic models of political parties so as to place the analysis in a well-known and understood conceptual framework. The final part of the chapter is devoted to identifying entry barriers that new entities face when attempting to break into the Polish political market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Since the 2001 reform, the financial dependence of Polish parties on state subventions has almost no parallel in Europe (Casal Bértoa and Walecki 2018: 46).

  2. 2.

    Due to formal discrepancies, in 2016, the Supreme Court ruled that the Modern was not eligible for a public subvention. Hence, the party needed to seek other sources of funding. However, many private donors considered its founder the main guarantor of its success. Therefore, upon his removal, they chose to withdraw their financial support.

  3. 3.

    For a discussion of the differences in the democratisation process, including the patterns of forming parties in Western Europe vs. in post-communist countries, see: Offe (1991) or Grabowska (2006).

  4. 4.

    They examined parties included in the Political Party Database (PPDB). See also https://www.politicalpartydb.org.

  5. 5.

    See https://wspieraj.nowoczesna.org (accessed on 31 January 2020). The financial report for 2018 indicates that the party was funded solely from membership fees and private donations (Nowoczesna 2019).

  6. 6.

    In another part of this book, the readers will find our analysis of  what do party elites and members think about membership, as well as their roles and functions in the organisation (see Chapter 6).

  7. 7.

    This sentence is a quotation from Władysław Bartoszewski (former Minister of Foreign Affairs) and can be found on the party’s website, as an opening to the ‘about us’ section. https://platforma.org/o-nas (accessed on 31 January 2020).

  8. 8.

    The pyramid is structured as follows: The top tier is made up of parties in the government, the middle tier is parties represented in the parliament, and the bottom tier consists of parties present at the electoral level on the ground and those that are not represented at a national level.

  9. 9.

    There are 41 constituencies for parliamentary elections in Poland, which means that registering a nationwide list requires collecting signatures from at least 21 constituencies.

  10. 10.

    There were 30 committees formed by parties, one coalition committee and 57 non-partisan committees.

  11. 11.

    PiS’ strategy for the 2015 and 2019 elections envisioned a tri-partisan coalition under the name of the United Right and a pragmatic approach, i.e. registration of a single, PiS candidate list, with other coalition members granted a certain share of slots. Had the two smaller coalition members registered their own lists, they would have probably failed to reach the threshold, and the bloc’s overall number of mandates would have been lower. Although PiS enjoyed solid support among voters on its own, this move allowed the party and its partners to maximise their gains and, therefore, their ability to govern.

  12. 12.

    Calculated through the following equation for the ‘effective number of electoral parties’ index: y = –1,0122x + 11009, R² = 0,6035.

  13. 13.

    More about parties’ relations with the media can be found in Chapter 7.

References

  • Alberski, R. (2010). Ewolucja systemu wyborczego w Polsce. In A. Antoszewski, A. Kolodia, & K. Kowalczyk (Eds.), Transformacja w Polsce i na Ukrainie (pp. 147, 151–152). Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnicza ATUT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoszewski, A. (1999). Ideologia. In A. Antoszewski, & R. Herbut (Eds.), Leksykon politologii (pp. 171–172). Wrocław: atla2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoszewski, A. (2004). Wzorce rywalizacji politycznej we współczesnych demokracjach europejskich. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arter, D., & Kestilä-Kekkonen, E. (2014). Measuring the extent of party institutionalisation: The case of a populist entrepreneur party. West European Politics, 37(5), 932–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bielanowska, J. (2020). Ideology. In J. Marszałek-Kawa & D. Plecka (Eds.), The dictionary of political knowledge (pp. 172–178). Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calise, M. (2015). The personal party: An analytical framework. Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana Di Scienza Politica, 45(3), 301–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carty, K. (2002). The politics of Tecumseh Corners: Canadian political parties as franchise organizations. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 35(4), 723–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carty, K. (2004). Parties as franchise systems. The stratarchical organizational imperative. Party Politics, 10(1), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casal Bértoa, F., & Walecki M. (2018). Party regulation and reshaping of party politics in Poland. In F. Casal Bértoa, & I. van Biezen (Eds.), The regulation of post-communist party politics (pp. 31–55). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casal Bértoa, F., & van Biezen, I. (Eds.). (2018). The regulation of post-communist party politics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duverger, M. (1954). Political parties. Their organization and activity in the modern state. London: Neuhen & CO LTD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendźwiłł, A., Bukowska, G., Haman, J., Sawicki, A., & Zbieranek, J. (2017). Finanse polskich partii. Resource document. Fundacja im. S. Batorego. _Finansowanie.pdf. Accessed 29 December 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherghina, S., Iancu, A., & Soare, S. (2018). Party membership and its conceptualization in democratizing European countries: An introduction. In S. Gherghina, A. Iancu, & S. Soare (Eds.), Party members and their importance in non-EU countries (pp. 1–20). London and New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grabowska, M. (2006). Partie polityczne w Polsce po 1989 roku. In J. Wasilewski (Ed.), Współczesne społeczeństwo polskie. Dynamika zmian (pp. 231–273). Warszawa: Scholar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunther, R., & Diamond, L. (2003). Species of political parties a new typology. Party Politics, 9(2), 167–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmel, R., & Svåsand, L. G. (1993). Party leadership and party institutionalization: Three phases of development. West European Politics, 16(2), 67–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmel, R., & Svåsand, L. G. (Eds.). (2019). Institutionalisation of political parties comparative cases. ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmel, R., Svåsand, L. G., & Mjelde, H. (2016). Party institutionalization and de-institutionalization: Concepts and indicators. Paper prepared for ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops. Pisa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidar, K., & Saglie, J. (2003). Predestined parties? Organizational change in Norwegian political parties, Party Politics, 9(2), 219–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janda, K. (1980). Political parties: A cross-national analysis. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R., & Mair, P. (1995). Changing models of party organization and party democracy: The emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics, 1(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068895001001001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R., & Mair, P. (2018). Democracy and the cartelization of political parties. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from Cadmus, European University Institute Research Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/58944. Accessed 10 January 2020.

  • Kirchheimer, O. (1966). The transformation of Western European party systems. In J. LaPalombara & M. Weiner (Eds.), Political parties and political developments (pp. 177–200). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosowska-Gąstoł, B., & Sobolewska-Myślik, K. (2019). Does novelty necessarily mean change? New political parties within the Polish party system. Politics in Central Europe, 15(1), 81–113. https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2019-0004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostadinova, T., & Levitt, B. (2014). Toward a theory of personalist parties: Concept formation and theory building. Politics & Policy, 42(4), 490–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubisz-Muła, Ł. (2013). Rozwiązywanie się polskich partii politycznych w latach 1990–2009. In A. Czwołek, M. Nowak-Paralusz, & K. Gawron-Tabor (Eds.), Partie i systemy partyjne Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej. Dwie dekady doświadczeń (pp. 159–180). Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P., & Katz, R. (1997). Party organization, party democracy and the emergence of the cartel party. In P. Mair (Ed.), Party system change. Approaches and interpretations (pp. 93–119). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P., Müller, W. C., & Plasser, F. (Eds.). (2004). Political parties and electoral change: Party responses to electoral markets. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446216224.

  • McQuail, D. (2003). Media accountability and freedom of publication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalak, B. (2012). Badanie zależności pomiędzy systemem wyborczym a systemem partyjnym przy wykorzystaniu metody indeksowej. Przypadek mieszanych systemów wyborczych w Rosji i na Ukrainie oraz proporcjonalnej reprezentacji w Polsce. Atheneum Polskie Studia Politologiczne, 36, 94–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowoczesna. (2019). Sprawozdanie o źródłach pozyskanych środków finansowych, w tym kredytach bankowych i warunkach ich uzyskania oraz o wydatkach poniesionych ze środków funduszu wyborczego w poprzednim roku kalendarzowym. https://www.pkw.gov.pl/pliki/1559638339_63_spr_362_Nowoczesna.pdf. Accessed 31 January 2020.

  • Offe, C. (1991). Capitalism by democratic design? Democratic theory facing the triple transition in East Central Europe. Social Research, 58(4), 865–892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacześniak, A. (2014). Europeizacja polskich partii politycznych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panebianco, A. (1988). Political parties: Organization and power. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piechocka, A., Królicka, B., & Sojak, R. (2018). Medialna sfera publiczna we współczesnej Polsce – ocena z perspektywy modelu liberalno-przedstawicielskiego. Studia Socjologiczne, 3, 127–152. https://doi.org/10.24425/122475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R., & Mackie, T. T. (1988). Do parties persist or fail? The big trade-off facing organizations. In K. Lawson & P. H. Merkl (Eds.), When parties fail: Emerging alternative organizations (pp. 533–558). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schedler, A. (1998). What is democratic consolidation? Journal of Democracy, 9(2), 91–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebők, M., Horváth, A., & Balázs, M. Á. (2019). Electoral reforms, entry barriers and the structure of political markets: A comparative analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 58(2), 741–768. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skotnicki, K. (2016). Finansowanie partii politycznych w Polsce. Toruńskie Studia Polsko-Włoskie XII – Studi Polacco – Italiani Di Toruń XII, 75–92. https://doi.org/10.12775/tsp-w.2016.005.

  • Sobolewska-Myślik, K., Kosowska-Gąstoł, B., & Borowiec, P. (2010). Struktury organizacyjne polskich partii politycznych. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokół, W. (2018). Dynamika zmian system partyjnego w Polsce. In M. Pietraś, I. Hofman, & S. Michałowski (Eds.), Państwo w czasach zmian (pp. 63–82). Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statut SLD. (2019). Statut Sojuszu Lewicy Demokratycznej, adopted by the party Congress on February 16, 2019. Retrived from https://sld.org.pl/images/dokumenty/STATUT_konwencja20190216.pdf. Accessed 31 January 2020.

  • Szczerbiak, A. (2001). Poles together? Emergence and development of political parties in post-communist Poland. Budapest: CEU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Biezen, I., & Rashkova, E. R. (2014). Deterring new party entry? The impact of state regulation on the permeability of party systems. Party Politics, 20(6), 890–903. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812458616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, P., Poguntke, T., & Scarrow, S. (2017). Conclusion. The study of party organization. In S. Scarrow, P. Webb, & T. Poguntke (Eds.), Organizing political parties. Representation, participation, and power (pp. 307–320). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wincławska, M., & Brodzińska-Mirowska, B. (2016). Niewykorzystane szanse. Polskie partie polityczne w działaniu. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlgemuth, M. (1999). Entry barriers in politics, or: Why politics, like natural monopoly, is not organised as an ongoing market-process. The Review of Austrian Economics, 12, 175–200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007816209593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohlgemuth, M. (2000). Political entrepreneurship and bidding for political monopoly. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 10, 273–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michał Jacuński .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jacuński, M., Brodzińska-Mirowska, B., Pacześniak, A., Wincławska, M. (2021). The Emergence of the Party System in Poland—From Instability to Permanent Rivalry Patterns. In: Party Organization and Communication in Poland. Political Campaigning and Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59993-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics