Abstract
It is obvious that climate change has become a serious threat to humankind. Unfortunately, even though the scientists are near unanimity—which is rarely achieved in other fields—it is not seen as such by the masses. This chapter investigates the climate change consensus achieved between scientists, politicians, and the public. It maintains that the political aspect is the weak link, since courageous political decisions that benefit future generations can cause great dissatisfaction, among those who are potential voters and sponsors. Furthermore, the lack of a global understanding of what is sustainable impedes potential political agreements. This study clarifies that the public perception on the scientific consensus is largely inferior to the reality; even in highly educated populations, due to policies, educational programs, misinformation, and cultural difference. The study also shows that measuring consensus leads to a false debate about the value reached. Fuzzy logic is used to capture humans’ perceptions and proposes achieving the consensus by minimizing weighted incoherencies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anon (1983) Changing climate: report of the Carbon Dioxide Assessment Committee. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Arvesen A, Bright RM, Hertwich EG (2011) Considering only first-order effects? How simplifications lead to unrealistic technology optimism in climate change mitigation. Energy Policy 39(11):7448–7454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.013
Bakshi BR (2019) Sustainable engineering: principles and practice. Cambridge University Press
Bedford D, Cook J (2013) Agnotology, scientific consensus, and the teaching and learning of climate change: a response to Legates, Soon and Briggs. Sci Edu 22(8):2019–2030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9608-3
Bender MJ, Simonovic SP (1997) Consensus as the measure of sustainability. Hydrol Sci J 42(4):493–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626669709492049
Berry EM, Dernini S, Burlingame B et al (2015) Food security and sustainability: can one exist without the other? Public Health Nutr 18(13):2293–2302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136898001500021X
Bier VM (1990) Is fuzzy set theory more general than probability theory? In: Proceedings of ISUMA ’90, the first international symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, College Park, MD, 1990
Black M (1963) Reasoning with loose concepts. Dialogue 2(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S001221730004083X
Bogaert P, van Oers H, Oyen HV (2018) Towards a sustainable EU health information system infrastructure: a consensus driven approach. Health Policy 122(12):1340–1347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.10.009
Bolsen T, Druckman JN (2018) Do partisanship and politicization undermine the impact of a scientific consensus message about climate change? Group Processes Intergr Relat 21(3):389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217737855
Braat L (1991) The predictive meaning of sustainability indicators. In: Kuik O, Verbruggen H (eds) In search of indicators of sustainable development, environment & management. Springer, Dordrecht
Bray D (2010) The scientific consensus of climate change revisited. Environ Sci Policy 13(5):340–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.04.001
Bray D, von Storch H (2007) The perspectives of climate scientists on global climate change. GKSS, Geesthacht
Brewer PR, McKnight J (2017) “A statistically representative climate change debate”: satirical television news, scientific consensus, and public perceptions of global warming. Atl J Commun 25(3):166–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2017.1324453
Briggs B (2013) Introduction to consensus. Vervante
Brulle RJ (2018) The climate lobby: a sectoral analysis of lobbying spending on climate change in the USA, 2000 to 2016. Clim Change 149(3):289–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2241-z
Caffey RH, Kazmierczak RF, Avault JW (2000) Developing consensus indicators of sustainability for southeastern United States Aquaculture. Available via SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=242312. Accessed 20 May 2021
Carlton JS, Perry-Hill R, Huber M et al (2015) The climate change consensus extends beyond climate scientists. Environ Res Lett 10(9):094025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/094025
Cartwright LE (2000) Selecting local sustainable development indicators: does consensus exist in their choice and purpose? Plan Pract Res 15(1–2):65–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/713691874
Chapman L (2007) Transport and climate change: a review. J Trans Geogr 15(5):354–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.11.008
Charney JG, Arakawa AD Baker J et al (1979) Carbon dioxide and climate: a scientific assessment. National Academy of Sciences. https://www.bnl.gov/envsci/schwartz/charney_report1979.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2021
Colston NM, Vadjunec JM (2015) A critical political ecology of consensus: on ‘teaching both sides’ of climate change controversies. Geoforum 65:255–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.08.006
Cook J, Nuccitelli D, Green SA et al (2013) Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environ Res Lett 8(2):024024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024
Cook J, Oreskes N, Doran PT et al (2016) Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. Environ Res Lett 11(4):048002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002
Cook J, van der Linden S, Maibach E et al (2019) The consensus handbook. Center for Climate Change Communication. George Mason University
Corsi I, Winther-Nielsen M, Sethi R et al (2018) Ecofriendly nanotechnologies and nanomaterials for environmental applications: key issue and consensus recommendations for sustainable and ecosafe nanoremediation. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 154:237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.02.037
Cortés G, Eugenia M (2014) Relaying the message of climate change: the IPCC experts comment on media coverage of scientific consensus. Interact Stud Commun Cult 5(1):41–50. https://doi.org/10.1386/iscc.5.1.41_1
Depledge J (2013) The organization of global negotiations: constructing the climate change regime. Routledge
Díaz Estévez M, de Frutos García RA, Peña Moya J (2014) Communication of the scientific consensus on climate change to the citizenship: knowledge and perception of Young University students from five countries regarding the media treatment of global warming. Interact Stud Commun Cult 5(1):51–70. https://doi.org/10.1386/iscc.5.1.51_1
Ding J, Xu Z, Liao H (2017) Consensus-reaching methods for hesitant fuzzy multiple criteria group decision making with hesitant fuzzy decision making matrices. Front Inf Technol Electron Eng 18(11):1679–1692. https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1601546
Doelle M, Sinclair AJ (2006) Time for a new approach to public participation in EA: promoting cooperation and consensus for sustainability. Environ Impact Assess Rev 26(2):185–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2005.07.013
Donini LM, Dernini S, Lairon D et al (2016) A consensus proposal for nutritional indicators to assess the sustainability of a healthy diet: the mediterranean diet as a case study. Front Nutr 3:37. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2016.00037
Doran PT, Zimmerman MK (2009) Examining the scientific consensus on climate change. Eos, Trans Am Geophys Union 90(3):22–23. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009EO030002
Drewnowski A (2018) The Chicago consensus on sustainable food systems science. Front Nutr 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2017.00074
Dumane PR, Sarate AD, Chavan SS (2019) Sustainability assessment by use of fuzzy logic—a review. In: Iyer B, Nalbalwar S, Pathak N (eds) Computing, communication and signal processing, Advances in intelligent systems and computing, vol 810. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1513-8_38
Eakin H, Connors JP, Wharton C et al (2017) Identifying attributes of food system sustainability: emerging themes and consensus. Agric Human Values 34(3):757–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-016-9754-8
El Alaoui M (2021) Fuzzy TOPSIS: logic, approach and case studies. CRC Press. 216p. ISBN: 978-0-367-76748-8. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003168416
El Alaoui M (2018) SMART grid evaluation using fuzzy numbers and TOPSIS. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 353(1):012019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/353/1/012019
El Alaoui M (2020a) A fuzzy multiplicative performance indicator to measure circular economy efficiency. Int J Math Eng Manag Sci 5(6):1118–1127
El Alaoui M (2020b) Fuzzy goal programming for biodiesel production. Int J Green Energy 17(10):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2020.1779075
El Alaoui M, Ben-azza H (2017) Aggregation of performance indicators for supply chain and fuzzy logic extensions applied to green supply chain. In: 2017 International Colloquium on Logistics and Supply Chain Management (LOGISTIQUA), Rabat, Morocco, 2017
El Alaoui M, El Yassini K (2020) Fuzzy similarity relations in decision making. In: Handbook of research on emerging applications of fuzzy algebraic structures, pp 369–385. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0190-0.ch020
El Alaoui M, Ben-azza H, Zahi A (2016) New multi-criteria decision-making based on fuzzy similarity, distance and ranking. In: Proceedings of the third international Afro-European Conference for Industrial Advancement — AECIA 2016, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer, Cham
El Alaoui M, Ben-azza H, El Yassini K (2018a) Optimal weighting method for fuzzy opinions. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Paris, France, July 26–27, 2018
El Alaoui M, Ben-azza H, El Yassini K (2018b) Optimal weighting method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy opinions. Notes Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets 24(3):106–110. https://doi.org/10.7546/nifs.2018.24.3.106-110
El Alaoui M, El Yassini K, Ben-azza H (2018c) Enhancing MOOCs peer reviews validity and reliability by a fuzzy coherence measure. In: SCA '18: proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Smart City Applications, October 2018. https://doi.org/10.1145/3286606.3286834
El Alaoui M, Ben-azza H, El Yassini K (2019a) Achieving consensus in interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Procedia Comput Sci 148:218–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.01.064
El Alaoui M, Ben-azza H, El Yassini K (2019b) Fuzzy TOPSIS with Coherent measure: applied to a closed loop agriculture supply chain. In: Ezziyyani M (ed), Advanced Intelligent Systems for Sustainable Development (AI2SD’2018), Advances in intelligent systems and computing. Springer
El Alaoui M, El Yassini K, Ben-azza H (2019c) Peer assessment improvement using fuzzy logic. In: Ahmed MB, Boudhir AA, Younes A (eds) Innovations in Smart Cities applications edition 2, Lecture notes in intelligent transportation and infrastructure. Springer
El Alaoui M, El Yassini K, Ben-azza H (2019d) Type 2 fuzzy TOPSIS for agriculture MCDM problems. Int J Sust Agric Manag Inf 5(2/3):112–130. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSAMI.2019.10023177
Ellis EC (2018) Anthropocene: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York
Figge F, Thorpe AS, Givry P et al (2018) Longevity and circularity as indicators of eco-efficient resource use in the circular economy. Ecol Econ 150:297–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.030
Frame DJ, Stone DA (2013) Assessment of the first consensus prediction on climate change. Nat Clim Change 3(4):357–359. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1763
Friman M (2016) Consensus rationales in negotiating historical responsibility for climate change. Int Environ Agreem Politics Law Econ 16(2):285–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-014-9258-1
Gil Solá A, Vilhelmson B, Larsson A (2018) Understanding sustainable accessibility in urban planning: themes of consensus, themes of tension. J Transp Geogr 70:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.05.010
Gödel K (1931) Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik 38(1):173–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01700692
Grego P (2007) Venus and mercury, and how to observe them. Springer
Grzegorzewski P, Mrówka E (2005) Trapezoidal approximations of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets Syst 153(1):115–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2004.02.015
Gunaratna KL (2018) Climate change: the scientific consensus. In: Gunaratna KL (ed) Towards equitable progress: essays from a South Asian perspective, South Asia economic and policy studies. Springer, Singapore
Gupta J (1997) The climate change convention and developing countries: from conflict to consensus? Springer, Dordrecht
Hák T, Janoušková S, Moldan B (2016) Sustainable development goals: a need for relevant indicators. Ecol Indic 60:565–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003
Herrera-Viedma E, Cabrerizo FJ, Kacprzyk J et al (2014) A review of soft consensus models in a fuzzy environment. Inf Fusion 17:4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2013.04.002
Houghton JT, Jenkins GJ, Ephraums JJ (1990) Climate change: the IPCC scientific assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg
Jørgensen S, Pedersen LJT (2018) The circular rather than the linear economy. In: RESTART sustainable business model innovation. Palgrave studies in sustainable business in association with future earth. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91971-3_8
Kay S (2008) Social consensus under attack. Int Union Rights 15(1):24–25
Kerr JR, Wilson MS (2018a) Changes in perceived scientific consensus shift beliefs about climate change and GM food safety. PLOS ONE 13(7):e0200295. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200295
Kerr JR, Wilson MS (2018b) Perceptions of scientific consensus do not predict later beliefs about the reality of climate change: a test of the gateway belief model using cross-lagged panel analysis. J Environ Psychol 59:107–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.08.012
Keseru I, Bulckaen J, Macharis C et al (2016) Sustainable consensus? The NISTO evaluation framework to appraise sustainability and stakeholder preferences for mobility projects. Transp Res Procedia 14:906–915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.070
Klir GJ (1987) Where do we stand on measures of uncertainty, ambiguity, fuzziness, and the like? Fuzzy Sets Syst 24(2):141–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(87)90087-X
Klir GJ (1989) Is There More to Uncertainty Than Some Probability Theorists Might Have Us Believe? Int J Gen Syst 15(4):347–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081078908935057
Kunkle KA, Monroe MC (2019) Cultural cognition and climate change education in the U.S.: why consensus is not enough. Environ Educ Res 25(5):633–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1465893
Landzettel M, Bommelt W (2019) La fin de l’alimentation: Comment le changement climatique va bouleverser ce que nous mangeons. Vuibert
Langan M, Price S (2016) The EU and ‘pro-poor’ contributions to sustainable development in the post-2015 consensus. Third World Thematics A TWQ J 1(4):431–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802014.2016.1327797
Lee HS (2002) Optimal consensus of fuzzy opinions under group decision making environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 132(3):303–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(02)00056-8
Lee GE, Loveridge S, Winkler JA (2018) The influence of an extreme warm spell on public support for government involvement in climate change adaptation. Ann Am Assoc Geogr 108(3):718–738. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2017.1375888
Legates DR, Soon W, Briggs WM et al (2015) Climate consensus and ‘misinformation’: a rejoinder to agnotology, scientific consensus, and the teaching and learning of climate change. Sci Educ 24(3):299–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9647-9
Li Y, Chen J, Feng L (2013) Dealing with uncertainty: a survey of theories and practices. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 25(11):2463–2482. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2012.179
Li YL, Wang R, Chin KS (2019) New failure mode and effect analysis approach considering consensus under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-03706-5
Luckhurst J (2018) The shifting global economic architecture: decentralizing authority in contemporary global governance. Palgrave Macmillan
MacDonald GH, Abarbanel H, Carruthers P et al (1979) The Long term impact of atmospheric carbon dioxide on climate. JASON technical report JSR-78-07. SRI International, Arlington
Machin A (2013) Negotiating climate change: radical democracy and the illusion of consensus. Zed Books
Madumere N (2017) Public enlightenment and participation – a major contribution in mitigating climate change. Int J Sust Built Environ 6(1):9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.10.003
Maibach E, Myers T, Leiserowitz A (2014) Climate scientists need to set the record straight: there is a scientific consensus that human-caused climate change is happening. Earth’s Future 2(5):295–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013EF000226
Matsuura M, Baba K (2016) Consensus building for long-term sustainability in the non-North American context: reflecting on a stakeholder process in Japan. Negot Confl Manag Res 9(3):256–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12076
Maurer EP, Adam JC, Wood AW (2009) Climate model based consensus on the hydrologic impacts of climate change to the Rio Lempa Basin of Central America. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 13(2):183–194. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-183-2009
McCown CA (2014) The development of consensus-based standards for wood preservatives/protectants and treated wood products. In: Deterioration and protection of sustainable biomaterials. vol 1158, ACS symposium series. American Chemical Society
Michaels PJ, Knappenberger PC (1996) The United Nations intergovernmental panel on climate change and the scientific “consensus” on global warming. Energy Environ 7(4):333–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X9600700403
Nierenberg N, Tschinkel WR, Tschinkel VJ (2010) Early climate change consensus at the national academy: the origins and making of changing climate. Hist Stud Nat Sci 40(3):318–349. https://doi.org/10.1525/hsns.2010.40.3.318
OECD (2006) Environment at a glance OECD environmental indicators: OECD environmental indicators. OECD Publishing
Oppenheimer M (2014) Warming goal: still the best indicator. Nature 514:434–434. https://doi.org/10.1038/514434a
Oreskes N (2004) The scientific consensus on climate change. Science 306(5702):1686–1686. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103618
Oreskes N (2018) The scientific consensus on climate change: how do we know we’re not wrong? In: Lloyd EA, Winsberg E (eds) Climate modelling: philosophical and conceptual issues. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65058-6_2
Ouest, JS, Lafon C (2016) Notre quotidien en 2050: Comment le réchauffement climatique bouleverse notre futur. Journal Sud Ouest
Özkan İ, Türkşen IB (2014) Uncertainty and fuzzy decisions. In: Banerjee S, Erçetin SS, Tekin A (eds) Chaos theory in politics, understanding complex systems. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8691-1_2
Pearce W, Brown B, Nerlich B et al (2015) Communicating climate change: conduits, content, and consensus. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 6(6):613–626. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.366
Pepermans Y, Maeseele P (2014) Democratic debate and mediated discourses on climate change: from consensus to de/politicization. Environ Commun 8(2):216–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.906482
Planck M (1949) The meaning and limits of exact science. Science 110(2857):319–327. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.110.2857.319
Poff NL, Brown CM, Grantham TE et al (2016) Sustainable water management under future uncertainty with eco-engineering decision scaling. Nat Clim Change 6(1):25–34. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2765
Powell J (2019) Scientists reach 100% consensus on anthropogenic global warming: bulletin of science. Technol Soc. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467619886266
Reddock J (2017) Seeking consensus on universal health coverage indicators in the sustainable development goals. J Health Serv Res Policy. https://doi.org/10.1177/1355819617704676
Rodrigues MG (2015) Bringing local voices to the global negotiation table: norm dissemination and consensus building on tropical forests and climate change. New Glob Stud 9(2):125–157
Rosenzweig C (2013) Handbook of climate change and agroecosystems: global and regional aspects and implications. World Sci
Salehyan I (2008) From climate change to conflict? No consensus yet. J Peace Res 45(3):315–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343308088812
Sapountzaki K, Wassenhoven L (2005) Consensus building and sustainability: some lessons from an adverse local experience in Greece. Environ Dev Sustain 7(4):433–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-004-2376-0
Sarzynski A (2015) Public participation, civic capacity, and climate change adaptation in cities. Urban Clim 14:52–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2015.08.002
Segura-Salazar J, Tavares LM (2018) Sustainability in the minerals industry: seeking a consensus on its meaning. Sustainability 10(5):1429. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051429
Shearman R (1990) The meaning and ethics of sustainability. Environ Manage 14(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394014
Sinclair AJ, Smith DL (1999) Policy review the model forest program in Canada: building consensus on sustainable forest management? Soc Nat Resour 12(2):121–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/089419299279795
Singh RK, Murty HR, Gupta SK, Dikshit AK (2012) An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol Indic 15(1):281–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.01.007
Skalna I, Rębiasz B, Gaweł B et al (2015) Advances in fuzzy decision making – theory and practice. Springer, Cham
Smol JP, Douglas MSV (2007) From controversy to consensus: making the case for recent climate change in the arctic using lake sediments. Front Ecol Environ 5(9):466–474. https://doi.org/10.1890/060162
Stanhill G (2007) Climate change: controversy and consensus. Weather 62(5):137–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/wea.32
Subramanian M (2019) Anthropocene now: influential panel votes to recognize Earth’s new epoch. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01641-5
Tan Y, Cai Z, Qi H (2010) A process-based performance analysis for closed-loop agriculture supply chain. In: 2010 international conference on intelligent system design and engineering application. vol 1, 2010
Tol RSJ (2016) Comment on ‘Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature’. Environ Res Lett 11(4):048001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048001
Upham P (2000) Scientific consensus on sustainability: the case of the natural step. Sustain Dev 8(4):180–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1719(200011)8:4<180::AID-SD143>3.0.CO;2-R
van der Linden SL, Leiserowitz AA, Feinberg GD et al (2014) How to communicate the scientific consensus on climate change: plain facts, pie charts or metaphors? Clim Change 126(1):255–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1190-4
van der Linden SL, Leiserowitz AA, Feinberg GD et al (2015) The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: experimental evidence. PLOS ONE 10(2):e0118489. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118489
van der Sluijs JP, van Est R, Riphagen M (2010) Beyond consensus: reflections from a democratic perspective on the interaction between climate politics and science. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2(5):409–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.10.003
Vihma A (2015) Climate of consensus: managing decision making in the un climate change negotiations. Rev Eur Comp Int Environ Law 24(1):58–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12093
von Schirnding YE (2002) Health-and-environment indicators in the context of sustainable development. Can J Public Health 93(1):S9–S15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03405112
Wallis AM (2006) Sustainability indicators: is there consensus among stakeholders? Int J Environ Sustain Dev 5(3):287–296. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESD.2006.010898
Walther GR, Hughes L, Vitousek P et al (2005) Consensus on climate change. Trends Ecol Evol 20(12):648–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.10.008
World Commission On Environment and Development (1987) Our Common Fut, 1st edn. Oxford University Press
Xu W, Khoshroo N, Bjornlund H et al (2014) Effects of ‘grain for green’ reforestation program on rural sustainability in China: an AHP approach to peasant consensus of public land use policies. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 28(4):867–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-012-0592-y
Xu Y, Sun H, Wang H (2016) Optimal consensus models for group decision making under linguistic preference relations. Int Trans Oper Res 23(6):1201–1228. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12154
Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
Zheng K, Lou HH, Huang Y (2013) Sustainability under severe uncertainty: a probability-bounds-analysis-based approach. In: Jawahir IS, Sikdar SK, Huang Y (eds) Treatise on sustainability science and engineering. Springer, Dordrecht
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
El Alaoui, M., Eslamian, S. (2022). Sustainable Consensus in an Uncertain Environment. In: Furze, J.N., Eslamian, S., Raafat, S.M., Swing, K. (eds) Earth Systems Protection and Sustainability. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85829-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85829-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85828-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85829-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)