Skip to main content

European Integration as a Social Democratic Project

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
European Integration and the Crisis of Social Democracy
  • 142 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter sets the scene for the remainder of the book (which seeks to put flesh on the bones of the argument outlined at the end of Chap. 1). Therefore, it looks back at the origins and development of the European integration project arguing that parties of the left were never its main protagonists but rather adjusted themselves to it before later becoming its more or less enthusiastic supporters when in the 1990s, it appeared to offer an alternative to national Keynesianism as a road to the achievement of social democratic ambitions. These developments, however, made it increasingly difficult for parties of the left to distinguish themselves from their opponents on the right, thus adding to the other factors involved in their long-term electoral decline, explored in Chap. 3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The position is one with deep roots on the left. In 1949, Italian Communist Party leader, Palmiro Togliatti, for example, had during the course of a parliamentary debate re-affirmed his party’s basic position that only through the socialist transformation of society was the economic and political unification of Europe possible (Laneri 2017). In other words, the European institutions were unavailable as vehicles for a socialist project: they were un-reformable.

  2. 2.

    This position too is one with deep roots. The PCI deputy and former Resistance-fighter, Antonio Giolitti, expressed his party’s opposition to Italy’s involvement in the European Coal and Steel Community with the argument that it would damage the Italian steel industry to the benefit of the French and German industries (Laneri 2017).

  3. 3.

    Judgement of the Court of 15 July 1964. Flaminio Costa v E.N.E.L. Reference for a preliminary ruling: Giudice conciliatore di Milano—Italy. Case 6-64. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61964 CJ0006

  4. 4.

    Meanwhile integration theories (e.g. Haas 1958; Moravcsik 1998; Pierson 1996), by offering to explain the process, implicitly hypothesise what the future will look like, so implying that there is something inevitable about this process all else equal.

  5. 5.

    The term used to refer to a range of civil-society organisations and interest groups that emerged in the late 1940s to advocate European unity.

  6. 6.

    For example, at the eighth PCI Congress in December 1956, ‘Togliatti devoted only one minute of his speech to Europe, almost as if to emphasise how marginal an issue it was’ (Maggiorani 1998: 47).

  7. 7.

    Through the successive rounds of global trade negotiations held under the auspices of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade.

  8. 8.

    From James Callaghan’s speech to the Labour Party annual conference, 1976, available at http://www.britishpoliticalspeech.org/speech-archive.htm?speech=174

  9. 9.

    For example, March (2013: 4) notes that the PES ‘played a critical role in getting the Employment Chapter inserted into the 1997 Amsterdam Treaty and developing the 1999 European Employment Pact’.

  10. 10.

    Only the European parliament is organised along partisan lines and its role in relation to the Commission and the Council is not the same as that of a national parliament in relation to its executive branch. Meanwhile, the Council provides a forum for intergovernmental bargaining in which interest inevitably trumps ideology. ‘Calls by Belgian and French socialists during the Amsterdam Treaty negotiations, for example, to provide protection for public services (state-run public utilities) from the vagaries of the EU’s competition policy have little relevance in states where these services are now in the private sector (the UK) or have been for generations (the Netherlands). Thus trying to mobilize sister parties around an issue that is clearly leftist—at least to Belgian and French socialists—found only minimal support’ (Ladrech 2000: 9–10).

References

  • Beichelt, T. (2004), ‘Euro-Skepticism in the EU-accession countries’, Comparative European Politics 2(1): 29–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, Sheri (2020), ‘Social democracy can save the world again’, Foreign policyhttps://foreignpolicy.com/2020/01/15/social-democracy-save-world-again-socialism/

  • Bitumi, Alessandra (2018), ‘“An uplifting tale of Europe”. Jacques Delors and the contradictory quest for a European social model in the Age of Reagan’, Journal of Transatlantic Studies, https://doi.org/10.1080/14794012.2018.1482709

  • Bogdanor, Vernon (2013), ‘Britain and the Continent’ recording of Gresham College lecture available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJ4d8SVY9Hw

  • Bogdanor, Vernon (2014), ‘From the European Coal and Steel Community to the Common Market’, recording of Gresham College lecture available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cETz_eOYBj0&t=1728s

  • Carlotti, Benedetta (2018), ‘The odd couple: analyzing the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) and Italian Five Stars Movement’s (FSM’s) European-Union opposition in the European Parliament’, Italian Political Science Review 48(2): 197–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespy, A. and N. Verschueren (2009), ‘From Euroscepticism to resistance to European integration: an interdisciplinary perspective’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society 10(3): 377–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, Colin (2013), Making capitalism fit for society. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, Colin (2018), The Globalization Backlash, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinan, Desmond (2004), Europe Recast: A History of European Union, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dunphy, Richard (2004), Contesting capitalism? Left parties and European integration, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunphy, Richard and Luke March (2019), The European Left Party, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, Larry (2018), ‘Leftwing Brexiters want out from the ‘transnational juggernaut’’, the Guardian, 30 September, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/sep/30/leftwing-brexiters-want-out-from-the-transnational-juggernaut

  • Featherstone, Kevin (1986), Socialist Parties and European Integration: A Comparative History, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, Kevin (1999), ‘The British Labour Party from Kinnock to Blair: Europeanism and Europeanization’, paper prepared for the European Community Studies Association conference, 2–5 June, Pittsburgh USA, http://aei.pitt.edu/2266/1/002348_1.PDF

  • Ginsborg, Paul (1990), A History of Contemporary Italy: Society and Politics 1943–1988, Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Ernst (1958), The Uniting of Europe, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Stuart (2011), ‘The Neo-liberal Revolution: Thatcher, Blair, Cameron—The long march of neoliberalism continues’, Soundings, 28: 9–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, David (2008), Beyond the Nation State: Parties in the Era of European Integration, illustrated edition, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Michael and Knut Roder (2021), ‘Social democracy and Euroscepticism: the integration trap’ pp.19–41 in James L. Newell (ed.), Europe and the Left: Resisting the Populist Tide, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, Liesbet and Gary Marks (2009), ‘A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science, 39 (1): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ignazi, Piero (2017), Party and Democracy: The Uneven Road to Party Legitimacy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Richard and Peter Mair (1995), ‘Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party’, Party Politics, 1(1): 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H., E. Grande, R. Lachat, M. Dolezal, S. Bornschier, and F. Timotheos (2006), ‘Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: Six European countries compared’, European Journal of Political Research, 45: 921–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladrech, Robert (2000), Social Democracy and the Challenge of European Union, Boulder, Colo. and London: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laneri, Calogero (2017), ‘Il Partito Comunista Italiano e il processo di integrazione europea: una ricostruzione storica’, il Becco, 3 January, https://archivio.ilbecco.it/politica/sinistre/item /3482-il-partito-comunista-italiano-e-il-processo-di-integrazione-europea-una-ricostruzione-storica.html

  • Lapovitsas, Costas (2019), The Left Case Against the EU, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, L. and S. Scheingold (1970), Europe’s Would-be Polity, Englewood Cliff: Prentice-Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Loth, W. (2008), ‘Explaining European Integration. The Contribution from Historians’, Journal of European Integration History, 14(1): 8–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lourie, Julia (1997), ‘The Social Chapter’, House of Commons research paper 97/102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggiorani, Mauro (1998), L’Europa degli altri: Comunisti italiani e integrazione europea (1957–1969), Rome: Carocci editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, Peter (1984), ‘Party Politics in Contemporary Europe: A Challenge to Parties’, West European Politics, 7: 170–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, Peter (1998), Party system change: approaches and interpretations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manin, Bernard (1997), The Principles of Representative Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • March, Luke (2013), ‘All anti-neo-liberal now? The Party of European Socialists, European Greens and European Left Party respond to the crisis’, paper prepared for the annual conference of the UK Political Studies Association, 25–27 March, Cardiff, https://www.psa.ac.uk /sites/default/files/905_447.pdf

  • Meredith, Stephen (2013), ‘The Oratory of James Callaghan: “We used to think that you could spend your way out of a recession…”’, http://clok.uclan.ac.uk/11234/5/5974_Meredith.pdf

  • Milward, Alan S., (1992), The European Rescue of the Nation State, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milward, Alan S., F.M.B. Lynch, R. Ranieri, R. Romero and V. Sørensen, The Frontier of National Sovereignty: History and Theory 1945–1992, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, Andrew (1998), The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, Andrew (2016), ‘Capsule review: Religion and the Struggle for European Union: Confessional Culture and the Limits of Integration’, Foreign Affairs, September/October, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/capsule-review/2016-08-10/religion-and-struggle-european-union-confessional-culture-and

  • Mudde, C. and P. Kopecký (2002), ‘The two sides of Euroscpeticism: Party positions on European integration in east central Europe’, European Union Politics 3(3): 297–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, Susana (2016), ‘European Parliament’, Centre Virtuel de la Connaissance sur l’Europe (CVCE), 9 July, https://www.cvce.eu/obj/european_parliament-en-ad6a0d57-08ef-427d-a715-f6e3bfaf775a.html

  • Nelsen, Brent F. and James L. Guth (2015), Religion and the Struggle for European Union: Confessional Culture and the Limits of Integration, Washington DC: Georgetown University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, James L. (2019b), ‘Meanings and Messages: Social Democrats and the EU’s Legitimation Crisis in the 2019 Election Campaign’, Comunicazione Politica, 3/2019, pp.301–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, James L. (2019c), Silvio Berlusconi: A Study in Failure, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul (1996), ‘The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis’, Comparative Political Studies, 29(2): 123–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reif, Karlheinz and Hermann Schmitt (1980), ‘Nine second-order national elections: A conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results’, European Journal of Political Research, 8(1): 3–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schildberg, Cäcilie et al. (2014), Europe and Social Democracy, Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/iez/10723.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Senior Nello, Susan (2012), The European Union: Economics, Policies and History, 3rd edition, Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skrzypek, Ania (2013), ‘Winning for Real: the Next Left taking the Chance to Shape Europe for the 21st century - 10 fundamental challenges’, Foundation for European Progressive Studies, https://www.feps-europe.eu/Assets/Publications/PostFiles/352.pdf

  • Stern, Stefan (2019), ‘The great Brexit “up yours”: How three decades of euroscepticism made the UK go full tabloid’, 21 August, politics.co.uk, https://www.politics.co.uk/comment-analysis/2019/08/21/the-great-brexit-up-yours-how-three-decades-of-euroscepticis

  • Vasilopoulou, S. (2009), ‘Varieties of Euroscepticism: the case of the European extreme right’, Journal of Contemporary European Research, 5(1): 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wainwright, Hillary (2018), ʻSocialism beyond borders’, Red Pepper, 6 November, https://www.redpepper.org.uk/socialism-beyond-borders/

  • Whyman, Philip (2018), The Left Case for Brexit, London: Civitas, https://civitas.org.uk/publications/the-left-case-for-brexit/

    Google Scholar 

  • Worth, Jon (2006), ‘What is a ‘Social Europe?’’, The New Federalist, 22 August, https://www.thenewfederalist.eu/what-is-a-social-europe?lang=fr

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Newell, J.L. (2022). European Integration as a Social Democratic Project. In: European Integration and the Crisis of Social Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08822-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics