Skip to main content
  • 36 Accesses

Abstract

Along with wet rice cultivation, commodity extraction and plantation economies have historically been the socioeconomic formations that permanently transformed landscapes. Plantation economies and extractive economies were based in part on slave labour. These economies profoundly transformed local and, in some cases, regional landscapes and their living environments. In contrast, the causal contribution of slavery to global change is difficult to determine empirically. In the context of Anthropocene scholarship, the emphasis on slavery contributes to a “provincialization” of the Anthropocene concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Antweiler, C. (2022). On dependence, dependency, and a dependency turn. An essay with systematic intent. Bonn: Excellence cluster beyond slavery and freedom (concept paper 2). https://www.dependency.uni-bonn.de/en/publications/bcdsss-publishing-series/bcdssconcept-papers. Accessed 19 Mar 2022.

  • Baldwin, A., & Erickson, B. (2021). Introduction: Whiteness, coloniality, and the Anthropocene. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 38(1), 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendik-Keymer, J. D. (2020). Involving anthroponomy in the Anthropocene: On decoloniality. Routledge (Routledge Research in the Anthropocene).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carney, J. A. (2021). Subsistence in the Plantationocene: Dooryard gardens, agrobiodiversity, and the subaltern economies of slavery. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 48(5), 1075–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. (2016). The birth of the Anthropocene. The University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, H., & Todd, Z. (2017). On the importance of a date, or decolonizing the Anthropocene. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 16(4), 761–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, M. W. (2020). The whites are enemies of heaven. Climate Caucasianism and Asian ecological protection. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, D. Q., van Etten, J., Manning, K., Castillo, C. K., Kingwell-Banham, E., Weisskopf, A., Qin, L., Sato, Y.-I., & Hijmans, R. J. (2011). The contribution of Rice agriculture and livestock pastoralism to prehistoric methane levels: An archaeological assessment. The Holocene, 21, 743–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble. In Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D., Ishikawa, N., Gilbert, S. F., Olwig, K., Tsing, A. L., & Bubandt, N. O. (2016). Anthropologists are talking – About the Anthropocene. Ethnos. Journal of Anthropology, 81(3), 535–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, M. W. (2021). Mapping Water in Dominica. Enslavement and Environment under Colonialism. University of Washington Press. (Culture, Place, and Nature: Studies in Anthropology and Environment).

    Google Scholar 

  • Joralemon, D. (1982). New world depopulation and the case of disease. Journal of Anthropological Research, 38, 108e127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, A., Brierley, C., Maslin, M. A., & Lewis, S. L. (2019). Earth system impacts of the European arrival and great dying in the Americas after 1492. Quarternary Science Reviews, 207, 13–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, S. L., & Maslin, M. A. (2018). The human planet. How we created the Anthropocene. Yale University Press (also London: Pelican Books).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martens, R. L., & Robertson, B. (2021). How the soil remembers plantation slavery. https://edgeeffects.net/soil-memory-plantationocene/

  • Mintz, S. (1985). The sweetness of power. The place of sugar in modern history. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S. S., Alewaert, M., Gómez, P. F., & Mittman, G. (2021). Plantation legacies. https://edgeeffects.net/plantation-legacies-plantationocene/

  • Simpson, M. (2020). The Anthropocene as colonial discourse. Environment & Planning D: Society and Space, 38(1), 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G. C. (1985). The Rani of Sirmur: An essay in reading the archives. History and Theory, 24(3), 247–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, Z. (2015). Indigenizing the Anthropocene. In H. Davis & E. Turpin (Eds.), Art in the Anthropocene. Encounters mong aesthetics, politics, environments and epistemologies (Critical climate change) (pp. 241–254). Open Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, K. P. (2017). Indigenous climate change studies: Indigenizing futures, decolonizing the Anthropocene. https://kylewhyte.marcom.cal.msu.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2018/07/IndigenousClimateChangeStudies.pdf

  • Yusoff, K. (2018). A billion black Anthropocenes or none. University of Minnesota Press (Forerunners: Ideas First).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Antweiler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Antweiler, C. (2023). Slavery. In: Wallenhorst, N., Wulf, C. (eds) Handbook of the Anthropocene. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25910-4_250

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics