Skip to main content
Log in

Simple new test for presumptive differentiation between genus Candida and genus Prototheca

  • Published:
Mycopathologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A differential test was made between genus Candida and genus Prototheca using a new and very simple differential test.

A total of 59 strains of Candida and 78 strains of Prototheca were used. The basis of the test was the differential use of a disc carrying 60 mcg of Rybostamicin to which all the Candida were resistant and the Prototheca inhibited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnold P, Amearn DG: The sistematics of the genus Prototheca with a description of a new species P. filamenta. Mycologia 64:265–275, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Casal M: Contribución al estudio y diagnóstico microbiológico de las algas patógenas para el hombre del género Prototheca. Laboratorio, 67:421–429, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Casal M, Solis F: First isolation of Prototheca species in Spain. Mycopathologia 74:55–56, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Casal M, Gutierrez J: Investigación preliminar de la acción inhibitoria in vitro de los antibióticos frente a las algas del género Prototheca. Mycopathologia 75:45–49, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Casal M, Gutierrez J: Simple new test for rapid differentiation of Prototheca wickerhamii from Prototheca zopfii. J Clin Microbiol 18:992–993, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Casal M, Zerolo J, Linares MJ, Ibarra A: First human case of posible protothecosis in Spain. Mycopathologia 83:19–20, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Casal M, Linares MJ: Preliminary evaluation of a new test for the rapid differentiation of Candida albicans and Candida stellatoidea. Mycopathologia 81:63–64, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Casal M, Linares MJ: Preliminary investigation of Candida albicans Biovars J Clin Microbiol 18:430–431, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Casal M, Linares MJ: Comparation of six media for production of chlamydospores by Candida albicans. Mycopathologia 76:125–128, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cox E, Wilson JD, Brown P: Protothecosis a case of disseminated algal infection. Lancet 2:379–382, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dagher FJ, Smith AG, Ponkoski D: Skin protothecosis in a patient with renal allograft. Southern Medical Journal, 71:222–224, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Edwards JE, Lehrer RI, Stiehm ER: Severe Candidal infections clinical perspective immune defense mechanism and current concepts of therapy. Ann Internal Med 89:91–106, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Klintworth GK, Fetter B, Nielsen JR: Protothecosis an algal infection: report of a case in man. J Clin Microbiol 2:379–382, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Segal E, Padhye AA, Ajello L: Susceptibility of Prototheca species to antifungal agents. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 10:75–79, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sudman MJ, Kaplan W: Identification of the Prototheca species by immunofluorescence. Appl Microbiol 25:981–990, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wolfe I, Sacks H, Samorodin CS, Robinson H: Cutaneous protothecosis in a patient receiving immunosuppresive therapy. Arch Dermatol 112:829–832, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Casal, M., Gutierrez, J. Simple new test for presumptive differentiation between genus Candida and genus Prototheca . Mycopathologia 94, 3–5 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00437254

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00437254

Keywords

Navigation