Skip to main content
Log in

Cost of tokking: the energetics of substrate communication in the tok-tok beetle,Psammodes striatus

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Psammodes striatus, the ‘tok-tok’ beetle, communicates by substrate vibrations produced by tapping its abdomen on the ground. MaleP. striatus responded readily to computer-synthesized vibrations. Oxygen consumption rate (\(\dot V_{O_2 } \)) of individual male beetles (n=3; mean mass 3.01 g) was continually recorded by computer before, during and after tapping communication with the computer, which also counted the beetle's replies. Standard\(\dot V_{O_2 } \) of motionless beetles was also measured, during which time marked discontinuous ventilation was apparent. Since the relation between\(\dot V_{O_2 } \) and tapping rate was linear, it was possible to estimate net cost of tapping (0.0279 μl O2 g−1 tap−1) and minimum cost of tapping (0.0286 μl O2 g−1 tap−1). Kinematic analysis of trains of taps showed constant intertap period (ca. 150 ms) and distinctive amplitude modulation. The efficiency of muscular movement inP. striatus is 23% of metabolic input, assuming no elastic storage. This figure will drop to ca. 5–10% if significant elastic storage takes place. Minimum cost of searching for a mate via pedestrian locomotion is 340 J kg−1 m−2, but drops to 33 J kg−1 m−2 for tapping communication. Similar energetic ratios may play a role in the early stages of the evolution of some communication systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

STT :

computer-synthetized tap train

References

  • Autrum H, Schneider W (1948) Vergleichende Untersuchungen über den Erschütterungssinn der Insekten. Z Vergl Physiol 31:77–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew GA, Lighton JRB (1986) Oxygen consumption during hover-feeding in free-ranging Anna hummingbirds. J Exp Biol 123:191–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew GA, Vleck D, Vleck CM (1981) Instantaneous measurements of oxygen consumption during pre-flight warm-up and post-flight cooling in sphingid and saturniid moths. J Exp Biol 90:17–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew GA, Lighton JRB, Louw GN (1984) Energetics of locomotion and patterns of respiration in tenebrionid beetles from the Namib desert. J Comp Physiol B 155:155–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell PD (1980) Multimodal communication by the blackhorned tree cricketOecanthus nigricornis (Walker) (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Can J Zool 58:1861–1868

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucher TL, Ryan MJ, Bartholomew GA (1981) Oxygen consumption during resting, calling and nest building in the frogPhysalaemus pustulosus. Physiol Zool 55:10–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Burk TE (1982) Evolutionary significance of predation on sexually signalling males. Fla Entomol 65:90–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Cade W (1981) Field cricket spacing, and the phonotaxis of crickets and parasitoid flies to clumped and isolated cricket songs. Z Tierpsych 55:365–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey TM (1981) A comparison of mechanical and energetic estimates of flight cost for hovering sphinx moths. J Exp Biol 91:117–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavagna GA, Mazzanti M, Heglund NC, Citterio G (1985) Storage and release of mechanical energy by active muscle: a non-elastic mechanism? J Exp Biol 115:79–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza LL, Feldman MW (1983) Paradox of the evolution of communication and of social interactivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:2017–2021

    Google Scholar 

  • Depocas F, Hart JS (1957) Use of the Pauling oxygen analyser for measurement of the oxygen consumption of animals in open-circuit systems and in a short-lag, closed-circuit apparatus. J Appl Physiol 10:388–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellington CP (1984) The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. IV. Lift and power requirements. Philos Trans R Soc Ser B 305:145–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellington CP (1985) Power and efficiency of insect flight muscle. J Exp Biol 115:293–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath JE, Josephson RK (1970) Body temperature and singing in the katydidNeoconocephalus robustus (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae). Biol Bull 138:272–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Heglund NC, Cavagna GA (1985) Efficiency of vertebrate locomotory muscles. J Exp Biol 115:283–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry CS (1980) Acoustical communication inChrysopa rufilabris (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), a green lacewing with two distinct calls. Proc Entomol Soc Wash 82:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry CS (1982) Reproductive and calling behavior in two closely related sympatric lacewing species,Chrysopa oculata andChrysopa chi (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Proc Entomol Soc Wash 84 (1):191–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Herreid II CF (1981) Energetics of pedestrian arthropods. In: Herreid II CF, Fourtner CR (eds) Locomotion and energetics in arthropods. Plenum press, New York, pp 491–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Herreid II CF, Full RJ (1984) Cockroaches on a treadmill: aerobic running. Insect Physiol 30:395–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershfield MF, Tinkle DW (1975) Natural selection and the evolution of reproductive effort. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:2227–2231

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill RW (1972) Determination of oxygen consumption by use of the paramagnetic oxygen analyzer. J Appl Physiol 33:261–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Howse PE (1964) The significance of sound produced by the termiteZootermopsis augusticollis Hagen. Anim Behav 12:284–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichikawa T (1976) Mutual communication by substrate vibrations in the mating behavior of planthoppers (Homoptera: Delphacidae). Appl Entomol Zool 11:8–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Inamura S (1982) Social modifications of work efficiency in digging by the antFormica yessensis. J Fac Sci Hokkaido Univ Ser VI Zool 23:128–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishay J, Schwartz J (1965) On the nature of sounds produced within the nest of the oriental hornetVespa orientalis F. Ins Soc 12:383–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Josephson RK (1985) The mechanical power output of a tettigoniid wing muscle during singing and flight. J Exp Biol 117:357–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Keuper A, Kuhne R (1983) The acoustic behavior of the bushcriketTettigonia cantans. II. Transmission of airborne sound and vibration signals in the biotope. Behav Proc 8:125–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Koufopanou V, Bell G (1984) Measuring the cost of reproduction. 4. Predation experiments withDaphnia pulex. Oecologia 64:81–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Klassen F (1973) Stridulation and communication by substrate vibration inGeocarcinus lateralis (Crustacea: Decapoda). J Comp Physiol 83:73–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen L, Zachariassen KE (1980) Behavioral studies on the sensitivity to sound in the desert tenebrionid beetlePhrynocolus somalicus Wilke. Comp Biochem Physiol 65A:223–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Latimer W, Schatral A (1983) The acoustic behavior of the bush cricketTettigonia cantans. I. Behavioural responses to sound and vibration. Behav Proc 8:113–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence PO (1981) Host vibration: a cue to host location by the parasiteBiosteres longicaudatus. Oecologia 48:249–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy A (1964) The accuracy of the bubble meter method for gas flow measurements. J Scient Instrum 41:449–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Lighton JRB (1985) Minimum cost of transport and ventilatory patterns in three African beetles. Physiol Zool 58:390–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Markl H, Fuchs S (1972) Klopfsignale mit Alarmfunktion bei Rossameisen (Camponotus, Formicidae, Hymenoptera). Z Vergl Physiol 76:204–225

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNally RC, Young D (1981) Song energetics of the bladder cicada,Cystosoma saundersii. J Exp Biol 90:185–196

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNally RC, Doolan JM (1982) Comparative reproductive energetics of the sexes in the cicadaCystosoma saundersii. Oikos 39:179–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller PL (1981) Ventilation in active and in inactive insects. In: Herreid II CF, Fourtner CR (eds) Locomotion and energetics in arthropods. Plenum Press, New York, pp 367–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Mook JH, Bruggemann CG (1968) Acoustic communication byLipura lucens (Diptera: Chloropidae). Ent Exp Appl 11:397–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris GK (1980) Calling display and mating behavior ofCopiphora rhinoceros Pielet (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Anim Behav 28:42–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Prestwich KN, Walker TS (1981) Energetics of singing in crickets: Effect of temperature in three trilling species (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). J Comp Physiol 143:199–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Punt A, Parser WJ, Kuchlein J (1957) Oxygen uptake in insects with cyclic carbon dioxide release. Biol Bull 112:108–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupprecht R (1968) Das Trommeln der Plecopteren. Z Vergl Physiol 59:38–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Nielsen K (1972) Locomotion: Energy cost of swimming, flying and running. Science 177:222–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneiderman HA (1960) Discontinuous respiration in insects: role of the spiracles. Biol Bull 119:494–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobodchikoff CN, Spangler HG (1979) Two types of sound production inEupsophulus castaneus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Coleopt Bull 33:239–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangler HG (1984) Silence as a defense against predatory bats in two species of calling insects. SW Nat 29:481–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens ED, Josephson RK (1977) Metabolic rate and body temperature in singing katydids. Physiol Zool 50:31–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka M (1984) A physical characterisation of biological information and communication system model of ecosystems. J Theor Biol 110:619–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor CR, Heglund NC, Maloiy GMO (1982) Energetics and mechanics of terrestrial locomotion. I. Metabolic energy consumption as a function of speed and body size in birds and mammals. J Exp Biol 97:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschinkel WR, Doyen JT (1976) Sound production by substratal tapping in beetles of the genusEusattus (Tentyriidae: Coniontini). Coleopt Bull 30:331–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Weis-Fogh K (1959) Elasticity in arthropod locomotion: a neglected subject, illustrated by the wing system of insects. XVth Int Congr Zool 41:257–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiliams GC (1966) Natural selection, the costs of reproduction and a refinement of Lack's principle. Am Nat 100:687–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfield IJ, Townsend CR (1983) The cost of copepod reproduction: increased susceptibility to fish predation. Oecologia 60:406–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Zachariassen KE (1976) Communication by sound between desert tenebrionids. Norw J Ent 24:35–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler DD, Stewart KW (1985) Drumming behavior of five stonefly (Plecoptera) species from central and western North America. Ann Entomol Soc Am 78:717–722

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lighton, J.R.B. Cost of tokking: the energetics of substrate communication in the tok-tok beetle,Psammodes striatus . J Comp Physiol B 157, 11–20 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00702723

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00702723

Keywords

Navigation