Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan

  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A distinction is proposed betweentrust as a cognitive bias in the evaluation of incomplete information about the (potential) interaction partner andassurance as a perception of the incentive structure that leads the interaction partner to act cooperatively. It is hypothesized that trust in this sense helps people to move out of mutually committed relations where the partner's cooperation is assured. Although commitment formation is a rather standard solution to the problems caused by social uncertainty, commitment becomes a liability rather than an asset as opportunity costs increase. Facing increasing opportunity costs, trust provides a springboard in the attempt to break psychological inertia that has been mobilized to maintain committed relations. In conjunction with an assumption that networks of mutually committed relations play a more prominent role in Japanese society than in American society, this hypothesis has been applied to predict a set of cross-national differences between the United States and Japan in the levels of trust and related factors. The results of a cross-national questionnaire survey (with 1,136 Japanese and 501 American respondents) support most of the predictions, and indicate that, in comparison to Japanese respondents, American respondents are more trusting of other people in general, consider reputation more important, and consider themselves more honest and fair. In contrast, Japanese respondents see more utility in dealing with others through personal relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abegglen, J. C. (1958).The Japanese factory: Aspects of its social organization. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof, G. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Qualitative uncertainty and the market mechanism.Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asanuma, B. (1989). Manufacturer-supplier relationships in Japan and the concept of relation-specific skill.Journal of the Japanese and International Economics, 3, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1984).The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. (1983).The logic and limit of trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhide, A., & Stevenson, H. (1990). Why be honest if honesty doesn't pay.Harvard Business Review (September–October) pp. 121–129.

  • Bhide, A., & Stevenson, H. (1992). Trust, uncertainty, and profit.The Journal of Socio-Economics, 21, 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandach, J. L., & Eccles, R. G. (1989). Price, authority, and trust: From ideal types to plural forms.Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 97–118;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. (1979).The Japanese company. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, R. E. (1972). Permanent employment in Japan: Facts and fantasies.Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 26, 615–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1990).Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cusmano, M., & Takeishi, A. (1991). Supplier relations and management: A survey of Japanese, Japanese-transplant, and U.S. auto plants.Strategic Management Journal, 12, 563–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (1988). Trust as a commodity. In D. Gambetta (Ed.),Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 49–72). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M., McTavish, J., & Shaklee, H. (1977). Behavior, communication and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R., Orbell, J., Simmons, R., & van de Kragt, A. (1986). Organizing groups for collective action.American Political Science Review, 80, 1171–1185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. F. (1983).Doing business with the Japanese. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dore, R. (1983). Goodwill and the spirit of market capitalism.British Journal of Sociology, 34, 459–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. (1993).The Japanese vertical keiretsu. How they give Japanese companies a competitive advantage. Paper presented at the Network Conference, September 10–12, Whistler, BC.

  • Frank, R. H. (1988).Passions within reason: The strategic role of the emotions. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellner, E. (1988). Trust, cohesion, and the social order. In D. Gambetta (Ed.),Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 214–237). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach, M. (1987). Business alliances and the strategy of the Japanese firm.California Management Review, 30, 126–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (1991). Trusting persons, trusting institutions. In R. J. Zeckhauser (Ed.),Strategy and choice (pp. 185–209). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (1992). The street-level epistemology of trust.Politics and Society, 21, 505–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorn, G. (1988). Three ironies in trust. In D. Gambetta (Ed.),Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 111–126). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, C., Suzuki, T., Suzuki, G., & Murakami, M. (1982).A study of Japanese national character (Vol. 4). Tokyo: Idemitsushoten. (In Japanese with an English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, N., Jin, N., & Yamagishi, T. (1993). Prisoners dilemma networks: A computer-simulation of strategies.Research in Social Psychology, 8, 33–43. (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, N., Takahashi, N., Watabe, M., & Yamagishi, T. (1994).An experimental study of commitment formation and trust. Paper presented at the XIIIth World Congress of Sociology, Bielefeld, Germany.

  • Helper, S., & Levine, D. (1992). Long-term supplier relations and product-market structure.Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 8, 561–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980).Culture's consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzner, B. (1973). Sociological reflections on trust.Humanitas, 9, 333–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, N., Hayashi, N., & Shinotsuka, H. (1993). An experimental study of prisoner's dilemma network: The formation of commitment in selective dyads.Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 21–30. (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. M. (1973). Components of trust: Note on use of Rotter's scale.Psychological Report, 33, 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H., & Stahelski, A. J. (1970). The social interaction basis of cooperators' and competitors' beliefs about others.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 66–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollock, P. (1993). “An eye for an eye leaves everyone blind”: Cooperation and accounting systems.American Sociological Review, 58, 768–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollock, P. (in press). The emergence of exchange structures: An experimental study of uncertainty, commitment, and trust.American Journal of Sociology.

  • Komorita, S. S., Hilty, J. A., & Parks, C. D. (1991). Reciprocity and cooperation in social dilemmas.Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35, 494–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality.Social Forces, 63, 967–985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, J. R., & Kallenberg, A. L. (1985). Work organization and workforce commitment: A study of plants and employees in the U.S. and Japan.American Sociological Review, 50, 738–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1979).Trust and power. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1988). Familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. In D. Gambetta (Ed.),Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 94–107). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, R. M., & Mannari, H. (1976).Modernization and the Japanese factory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwell, G., & Ames, R. E. (1979). Experiments on the provision of public goods, I: Resources, interest, group size, and the free-rider problem.American Journal of Sociology, 84, 1335–1360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D. M., Wilke, H., Brewer, M. B., Kramer, R. M., Zemke, P. E., & Lui, L. (1983). Individual adaptations and structural change as solutions to social dilemmas.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 293–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miwa, Y. (1990).Firms and industrial organization in Japan. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press. (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Orbell, J. M., & Dawes, R. M. (1991). A “cognitive miser” theory of cooperators' advantage.American Political Science Review, 85, 515–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orbell, J. M., & Dawes, R. M. (1993). Social welfare, cooperators' advantage, and the option of not playing the game.American Sociological Review, 58, 787–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oskamp, S. (1971). Effects of programmed strategies on cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma and other mixed motive games.Journal of Conflict Resolution, 15, 225–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. G. (1981).Theory Z: How American business can meet the Japanese challenge. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rempel, J. K., & Holmes, J. G. (1986, February). How do I trust thee?Psychology Today, pp. 28–34.

  • Rosenberg, M. (1957).Occupations and values. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust.Journal of Personality, 35, 651–665.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sako, M. (1991). The role of “trust” in Japanese buyer-supplier relationships.Ricerche Economiche, 45, 449–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sako, M. (1992).Prices, quality and trust: Inter-firm relations in Britain and Japan. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato, K., & Yamagishi, T. (1986). Psychological factors in the public goods problem: Free-riding and the lack of trust.Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 89–95. (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D. L., Sheppard, B. H., & Cheraskin, L. (1992). Business on a handshake.Negotiation Journal, 8, 365–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J., & Peterson, R. B. (1982). Factors associated with trust in Japanese-American joint ventures.Management International Review, 22, 30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J., Peterson, R. B., Kameda, N., & Shimada, J. (1981). The relationship between conflict resolution approaches and trust: A cross cultural study.Academy of Management Journal, 24, 803–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959).The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. (1989). Self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts.Psychological Review, 96, 269–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. (1990). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. In J. Berman (Ed.),Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1989 (pp. 41–133). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. (1994).Culture and social behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyszka, T., & Grzelak, J. (1976). Criteria of choice in non-constant zero-sum games.Journal of Conflict Resolution, 20, 357–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, F. T. (1971). Joint ventures in Japan.Bulletin No. 30. Tokyo: Sohia University Socio-Economic Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wada, K. (1991). The development of tiered inter-firm relationships in the automobile industry: A case study of Toyota Motor Corporation.Japanese Yearbook on Business History, 8, 23–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watabe, M., Hayashi, N., Jin, N., Takahashi, N., Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1993). Particularistic trust and generalized trust: A questionnaire survey.Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meetings of the Japanese Group Dynamics Association (pp. 126–127). (In Japanese)

  • Williamson, O. E. (1975).Market and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1985).The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. (1971). Reciprocation and other techniques for inducing cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma game.Journal of Conflict Resolution, 15, 167–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrightsman, L. S. (1974).Assumptions about human nature: A social-psychological analysis. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, M., & Yamagishi, T. (1989).Trust, commitment, and the development of network structures. Paper presented at the Workshop for the Beyond Bureaucracy Research Project, December 18–21, Hong Kong.

  • Yamagishi, T. (1986). The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 110–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T. (1988a). The provision of a sanctioning system in the United States and Japan.Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 265–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T. (1988b). Seriousness of social dilemmas and the provision of a sanctioning system.Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T., & Cook, K. S. (1993). Generalized exchange and social dilemmas.Social Psychology Quarterly, 56, 235–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T., Hayashi, N., & Jin, N. (1994). Prisoner's dilemma networks: Selection strategy versus action strategy. In U. Schulz, W. Albers, & U. Mueller (Eds.),Social dilemmas and cooperation (pp. 233–250). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T., & Sato, K. (1986). Motivational bases of the public goods problem.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1993).Trust and commitment as alternative responses to social uncertainty. Paper presented at the Network Conference, September 10–12, Whistler, British Columbia.

  • Yamagishi, T., Yamagishi, M., Hayashi, N., Takahashi, N., & Watabe, M. (in press). Trust and commitment: An experimental study.Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. (In Japanese)

  • Zucker, L. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920.Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 53–111.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan

    Toshio Yamagishi

  2. Osaka International University, Osaka, Japan

    Midori Yamagishi

Authors
  1. Toshio Yamagishi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Midori Yamagishi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The research reported in this paper has been supported by the Institute of Nuclear Safety System, Inc. We would like to thank Professor Jyuji Misumi, the director of the Social System Research Department of the institute, and Mr. Akira Yamada, the associate director of the department, for their constant encouragement and support. We would also like to thank past attendants of the “trust workshops,” also supported by the institute, Professors Karen Cook, Peter Kollock, Mary Brinton, Tatsuya Kameda, Taro Kamioka, Ichiro Numazaki, Motoki Watabe, Kumiko Mori, Nahoko Hayashi, Nobuhito Jin, and Nobuyuki Takahashi. This research has been supported also by Abe Fellowship and a Ministry of Education Scientific Research Grant provided to Toshio Yamagishi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yamagishi, T., Yamagishi, M. Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motiv Emot 18, 129–166 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249397

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249397

Keywords

Search

Navigation