Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Do union members receive compensating differentials? The case of employment security

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Labor Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents evidence in the ongoing examination of whether or not union wage effects represent, in part, premiums to unpleasant aspects of unionized work. Three major empirical results follow: first, approximately one-sixth of the union differential can be attributed to the greater employment risk of union members; second, nearly one-half of the union return, and over one-third of the non-union return, to union density can simultaneously be attributed to employment risk; and, third, union members, on balance, receive larger premiums for employment risk. Such results extend previous work which argues that unions help reveal preferences about workplace public goods. In addition, they support those who contend that union density proxies other relevant omitted variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abowd, John and Orley Ashenfelter. “Anticipated Unemployment, Temporary Layoffs, and Compensating Wage Differentials.” inStudies in Labor Markets, ed. Sherwin Rosen. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antos, Joseph. “Union Spillovers and Bargaining Strength Effects on White-Collar Pay: Fact or Artifact?” Mimeographed. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Labor Statistics, March 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashenfelter, Orley and Michael Taussig. “Notes on Documentation of ‘Alternative Estimates of Union-Nonunion Wage Differentials.’” Mimeographed. Princeton: Princeton University, Industrial Relations Section, May 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Charles. “Equalizing Differences in the Labor Market.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 95 (February 1980): 113–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, William and Lawrence Katz. “Interindustry Wage Differences and Industry Characteristics.” National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 2014, September 1986.

  • Duncan, Greg J. and Frank P. Stafford. “Do Union Members Receive Compensating Wage Differentials?”American Economic Review 70 (June 1980): 355–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. “Do Union Members Receive Compensating Wage Differentials? Reply,”American Economic Review 72 (September 1982): 868–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, Robert. “Earnings-Risk as a Compensating Differential.”Southern Economic Journal 47 (July 1981): 156–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Richard and James Medoff. “The Impact of the Percentage Organized on Union and Non-Union Wages.”Review of Economics and Statistics 63 (November 1981): 561–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, Barry T. and John T. Addison.The Economic Analysis of Unions: New Approaches and Evidence. Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, Barry T. and John L. Neufeld. “Nominal and Real Wage Differentials and the Effects of Industry and SMSA Density: 1973–1983.”Journal of Human Resources 22 (Winter 1987): 137–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, Lawrence M. “The Effects of Unions on the Earnings of Nonunion Workerrs.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 31 (January 1978): 205–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____ “Union Spillover Effects on Unorganized Workers.”Journal of Human Resources 15 (Winter 1980): 144–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokkelenberg, Edward and Donna Sockell. “Union Membership in the United States, 1973–1981.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 38 (July 1985): 497–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, H. Gregg.Union Relative Wage Effects: A Survey. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Allan. “Occupational Choice, Risk aversion and Wealth.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 28 (July 1975): 586–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, Duane E. “Do Union Members Receive Compensating Wage Differentials? Note.”American Economic Review 71 (December 1981): 1049–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, William J., Robert Newman, and James Cunningham. “The Effect of the Extent of Unionism on Union and Nonunion Wages.”Journal of Labor Research 6 (Winter 1985): 21–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Sherwin. “Trade Union Power, Threat Effects, and the Extent of Organization.”Review of Economic Studies 36 (April 1969): 185–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout, C. M. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditure.”Journal of Political Economy 64 (October 1956): 416–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, Kip. “Wealth Effects and Earnings Premiums for Job Hazards.”Review of Economics and Statistics 60 (August 1978): 108–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Wisconsin, 53201, Milwaukee, WI

    John S. Heywood

Authors
  1. John S. Heywood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The author thanks Randall Crane for reading an earlier draft, Mohanty Madhu for research assistance, and an anonymous referee for helpful suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heywood, J.S. Do union members receive compensating differentials? The case of employment security. Journal of Labor Research 10, 271–283 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685271

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685271

Keywords

Search

Navigation