Skip to main content
Log in

The new world centers of origin of cultivated plants and the archaeological evidence

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Anderson, E. 1952. Plants, man and life. Boston.

  2. Bird, J. 1948. America’s oldest farmers. Nat. Hist.57: 296–303, 334-335.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brooks, R. H., L. Kaplan, H. C. Cutler, and T. W. Whitaker. 1962. Plant material from a cave on the Bio Zape, Durango, Mexico. Amer. Antiq.27: 356–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Callen, E. O. Personal communication.

  5. Cutler, H. C, and T. W. Whitaker. 1961. History and distribution of the cultivated cucurbits in the Americas. Am. Antiq.26: 459–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. De Candolle, A. 1886. (ed. 3) Origine des plantes cultivées. Paris. English edition ed. 2. Origin of cultivated plants. London.

  7. Engel, F. 1960. Un Groupe humain datant de 5,000 ans à Paracas, Pérou. J. Soc. Amer.49: 7–35.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goodspeed, T. H. 1954. The genusNicotiana. Waltham, Massachusetts.

  9. Hutchinson, J. B., R. A. Silow, and S. G. Stephens. 1947. The evolution ofGossypium. New York.

  10. Kaplan, L. 1965. Archeology and domestication in AmericanPhaseolus (Beans). Eeon. Bot.19: 358–368.

    Google Scholar 

  11. —, and R. S. MacNeish. 1960. Prehistoric bean remains from caves in the Ocampo Region of Tamaulipas, Mexico. Bot. Mus. Leafll., Harvard U.19: 33–56.

    Google Scholar 

  12. MacNeish, R. S. 1964. Ancient mesoamerican civilization. Sci.143: 531–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. —, and F. A. Peterson. 1962. The Santa Marta Rock Shelter, Ocozocoautla, Chiapas, Mexico. Pap. New World Archeol. Found.10: 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mangelsdorf, P. C, and R. H. Lister. 1956. Archeological evidence on the evolution of maize in northwestern Mexico. Bot. Mus. Leafl., Harvard U.17: 151–178.

    Google Scholar 

  15. —, R. S. MacNeish, and W. C. Galinat. 1956. Archeological evidence on the diffusion and evolution of maize in northeastern Mexico. Bot. Mus. Leafl., Harvard U.17: 125–150.

    Google Scholar 

  16. —,—, and —. 1964. Domestication of corn. Sci.143: 538–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. -, and R. G. Reeves. 1959. The origin of corn. IV, Place and time of origin. Bot. Mus. Lean., Harvard U.18(10).

  18. —, and C. E. Smith, Jr. 1949. New archeologieal evidence on evolution in maize. Bot. Mus. Lean., Harvard U.13: 213–247.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Merrill, E. D. 1938. Domesticated plants in relation to the diffusion of culture. Bot. Rev.4: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  20. -. 1954. The botany of Cook’s voyages. Chron. Bot. 14(5/6).

  21. Raffauf, R. F., and E. A. Morris. 1960. Persistence of alkaloids in plant tissue. Sci.131: 1047.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sauer, C. O. 1936. American agricultural origins: a consideration of nature and culture. Essays in anthropology: 279–297. Berkeley.

  23. -. 1952. Agricultural origins and dispersals. New York.

  24. Smith, C. C,Jr. 1950. Prehistoric plant remains from Bat Cave. Bot. Mus. Leafl., Harvard IT.14: 157–180.

    Google Scholar 

  25. —. 1966. Archeological evidence for selection in avocado. Econ. Bot.20: 169–175.

    Google Scholar 

  26. -. 1968. Plant remains.In Byers, D. S. (ed.). The prehistory of the Tehuacán Valley. 220–255.

  27. —, and R. S. MacNeish. 1964. Antiquity of American polyploid cotton. Sci.143: 675–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stonor, C. B., and E. Anderson. 1949. Maize among the hill people of Assam. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard.36: 355–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Towle, M. A. 1961. The ethnobotany of pre-Columbian Peru. Viking Fund Publ. Anthrop.30: i-ix, 1-180.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Vavilov, N. I. 1931. Mexico and Central America as the principal center of origin of cultivated plants of the New World. Bull. Appl. Bot. Gen. & PI. Breed.26: 135–199.

    Google Scholar 

  31. —. 1932. The process of evolution in cultivated plants. Proc. 6th Internat. Congr. Gen.1: 331–342.

    Google Scholar 

  32. —. 1949-50. Phytogeographic basis of plant breeding. Chron. Bot.13: 13–54. [English translation by K. Starr Chester.]

    Google Scholar 

  33. Whitaker, T. W., and J. B. Bird. 1949. Identification and significance of cucurbit materials from Huaca Prieta, Peru. Am. Mus. Nov. no.1426: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  34. —, and H. C. Cutler. 1965. Cucurbits and cultures in the Americas. Econ. Bot.19: 344–349.

    Google Scholar 

  35. —,—, and R. S. MacNeish. 1957. Cucurbit remains from three caves near Ocampo, Tamaulipas. Am Antiq.22: 352–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, C.E. The new world centers of origin of cultivated plants and the archaeological evidence. Econ Bot 22, 253–266 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861958

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861958

Keywords

Navigation