Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cross-sectional imaging: current status and future potential in adult celiac disease

  • Review
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Celiac disease (CD), triggered by exposure to gluten in genetically susceptible individuals, is an immune-mediated small bowel disease affecting about 1% of the population worldwide. But the prevalence of CD varies with age, sex, and location. A strict gluten-free diet remains the primary treatment for CD, currently. Most of patients with CD respond well to gluten-free diet with good prognosis, while some patients fail to get symptomatic relief or histological remission (e.g., nonresponsive or refractory CD). Because of heterogeneous clinical appearance, the diagnosis of CD is difficult. Moreover, malignant complications and poor outcomes accompanied with refractory CD present great challenges in disease management. Over the past three decades, cross-sectional imaging techniques (computed tomography [CT] and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) play an important role in small bowel inflammatory and neoplastic diseases. Compared with endoscopic techniques, cross-sectional imaging permits clearly presentation of both intraluminal and extraluminal abnormalities. It provides vascular and functional information, thus improving the possibility as diagnostic and follow-up tool. The value of cross-sectional imaging for patients with suspected or confirmed CD has been gradually demonstrated. Studies revealed that certain features suggested by cross-sectional imaging could help to establish the early diagnosis of CD. Besides, the potential contributions of cross-sectional imaging may lie in the evaluation of disease activity and severity, which helps guiding management strategies. The purpose of this review is to provide current overviews and future directions of cross-sectional imaging in adult CD, thus facilitating the understanding and application in clinical practice.

Clinical relevance statement

In this review, we systematically summarized the existing knowledge of cross-sectional imaging in adult CD and analyzed their possible roles in clinical practice, including disease diagnosis, complication identification, treatment evaluation, and prognostic prediction.

Key Points

• Regarding a condition described as “celiac iceberg”, celiac disease remains underdiagnosed and undertreated.

• Cross-sectional imaging is helpful in clinical management of celiac disease, including disease diagnosis, complication identification, treatment evaluation, and prognostic prediction.

• Cross-sectional imaging should be considered as the valuable examination in patients suspected from celiac disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CD:

Celiac disease

EATL:

Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma

EmA:

Endomysial antibody

GFD:

Gluten-free diet

RCD:

Refractory celiac disease

TTG:

Tissue transglutaminase

VCE:

Video capsule endoscopy

References

  1. Catassi C, Verdu EF, Bai JC, Lionetti E (2022) Coeliac disease. Lancet 399:2413–2426

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Singh P, Arora A, Strand TA et al (2018) Global prevalence of celiac disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 16:823-836.e822

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. King JA, Jeong J, Underwood FE et al (2020) Incidence of celiac disease is increasing over time: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 115:507–525

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fasano A (2003) Celiac disease–how to handle a clinical chameleon. N Engl J Med 348:2568–2570

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. See J, Murray JA (2006) Gluten-free diet: the medical and nutrition management of celiac disease. Nutr Clin Pract 21:1–15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Penny HA, Baggus EMR, Rej A, Snowden JA, Sanders DS (2020) Non-responsive coeliac disease: a comprehensive review from the NHS England national centre for refractory coeliac disease. Nutrients 12:216

  7. Pinto-Sanchez MI, Silvester JA, Lebwohl B et al (2021) Society for the Study of Celiac Disease position statement on gaps and opportunities in coeliac disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 18:875–884

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hujoel IA, Murray JA (2020) Refractory celiac disease. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 22:18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Li XH, Mao R, Huang SY et al (2018) Characterization of degree of intestinal fibrosis in patients with Crohn disease by using magnetization transfer MR imaging. Radiology 287:494–503

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Deepak P, Fletcher JG, Fidler JL et al (2016) Radiological response is associated with better long-term outcomes and is a potential treatment target in patients with small bowel Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol 111:997–1006

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Olano C (2021) A deep dive into the submerged ‘coeliac iceberg.’ Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 18:748

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lebwohl B, Green PHR, Söderling J, Roelstraete B, Ludvigsson JF (2020) Association between celiac disease and mortality risk in a Swedish population. JAMA 323:1277–1285

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bibbins-Domingo K, Grossman DC, Curry SJ et al (2017) Screening for celiac disease: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA 317:1252–1257

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Weyenberg SJB, Mulder CJJ, Van Waesberghe J (2015) Small bowel imaging in celiac disease. Dig Dis 33:252–259

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lomoschitz F, Schima W, Schober E, Turetschek K, Kaider A, Vogelsang H (2003) Enteroclysis in adult celiac disease: diagnostic value of specific radiographic features. Eur Radiol 13:890–896

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Markova I, Kluchova K, Zboril R, Mashlan M, Herman M (2010) Small bowel imaging - still a radiologic approach? Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 154:123–132

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Algin O, Evrimler S, Arslan H (2013) Advances in radiologic evaluation of small bowel diseases. J Comput Assist Tomogr 37:862–871

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Masselli G, Gualdi G (2012) MR imaging of the small bowel. Radiology 264:333–348

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Soyer P, Boudiaf M, Dray X et al (2009) CT enteroclysis features of uncomplicated celiac disease: retrospective analysis of 44 patients. Radiology 253:416–424

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tomei E, Marini M, Messineo D et al (2000) Computed tomography of the small bowel in adult celiac disease: the jejunoileal fold pattern reversal. Eur Radiol 10:119–122

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sheedy SP, Barlow JM, Fletcher JG et al (2017) Beyond moulage sign and TTG levels: the role of cross-sectional imaging in celiac sprue. Abdom Radiol (NY) 42:361–388

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Paolantonio P, Tomei E, Rengo M, Ferrari R, Lucchesi P, Laghi A (2007) Adult celiac disease: MRI findings. Abdom Imaging 32:433–440

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gonda TA, Khan SU, Cheng J, Lewis SK, Rubin M, Green PH (2010) Association of intussusception and celiac disease in adults. Dig Dis Sci 55:2899–2903

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Scholz FJ, Behr SC, Scheirey CD (2007) Intramural fat in the duodenum and proximal small intestine in patients with celiac disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:786–790

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Scholz FJ, Afnan J, Behr SC (2011) CT findings in adult celiac disease. Radiographics 31:977–992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Göya C, Dündar İ, Özgökçe M et al (2022) Does contrast-enhanced computed tomography raise awareness in the diagnosis of the invisible side of celiac disease in adults? Abdom Radiol (NY) 47:1750–1761

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tomei E, Semelka RC, Braga L et al (2006) Adult celiac disease: what is the role of MRI? J Magn Reson Imaging 24:625–629

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Horsthuis K, Bipat S, Bennink RJ, Stoker J (2008) Inflammatory bowel disease diagnosed with US, MR, scintigraphy, and CT: meta-analysis of prospective studies. Radiology 247:64–79

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bartusek D, Valek V, Husty J, Uteseny J (2007) Small bowel ultrasound in patients with celiac disease. Retrospective study. Eur J Radiol 63:302–306

  30. Magalotti D, Volta U, Bonfiglioli A, Ramilli S, Berzigotti A, Zoli M (2003) Splanchnic haemodynamics in patients with coeliac disease: effects of a gluten-free diet. Dig Liver Dis 35:262–268

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fraquelli M, Sciola V, Villa C, Conte D (2006) The role of ultrasonography in patients with celiac disease. World J Gastroenterol 12:1001–1004

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Van Weyenberg SJ, Meijerink MR, Jacobs MA, van Kuijk C, Mulder CJ, van Waesberghe JH (2011) MR enteroclysis in refractory celiac disease: proposal and validation of a severity scoring system. Radiology 259:151–161

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Romacho T, Elsen M, Röhrborn D, Eckel J (2014) Adipose tissue and its role in organ crosstalk. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 210:733–753

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Brousse N, Meijer JW (2005) Malignant complications of coeliac disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 19:401–412

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cellier C, Delabesse E, Helmer C et al (2000) Refractory sprue, coeliac disease, and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma. French Coeliac Disease Study Group. Lancet 356:203–208

  36. Biagi F, Lorenzini P, Corazza GR (2000) Literature review on the clinical relationship between ulcerative jejunoileitis, coeliac disease, and enteropathy-associated T-cell. Scand J Gastroenterol 35:785–790

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hadithi M, Al-toma A, Oudejans J, van Bodegraven AA, Mulder CJ, Jacobs M (2007) The value of double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with refractory celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol 102:987–996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Boudiaf M, Jaff A, Soyer P, Bouhnik Y, Hamzi L, Rymer R (2004) Small-bowel diseases: prospective evaluation of multi-detector row helical CT enteroclysis in 107 consecutive patients. Radiology 233:338–344

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Froehlich JM, Waldherr C, Stoupis C, Erturk SM, Patak MA (2010) MR motility imaging in Crohn’s disease improves lesion detection compared with standard MR imaging. Eur Radiol 20:1945–1951

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Freeman HJ (2010) Mesenteric lymph node cavitation syndrome. World J Gastroenterol 16:2991–2993

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Holmes GK (1986) Mesenteric lymph node cavitation in coeliac disease. Gut 27:728–733

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Huppert BJ, Farrell MA, Kawashima A, Murray JA (2004) Diagnosis of cavitating mesenteric lymph node syndrome in celiac disease using MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1375–1377

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Howat AJ, McPhie JL, Smith DA et al (1995) Cavitation of mesenteric lymph nodes: a rare complication of coeliac disease, associated with a poor outcome. Histopathology 27:349–354

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ruch Y, Labidi A, Martin A et al (2019) Mesenteric lymph node cavitation in celiac disease: report of four cases and literature review. Rev Med Interne 40:536–544

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Marafini I, Monteleone G, Stolfi C (2020) Association between celiac disease and cancer. Int J Mol Sci 21:4155

  46. Al Somali Z, Hamadani M, Kharfan-Dabaja M, Sureda A, El Fakih R, Aljurf M (2021) Enteropathy-associated T cell lymphoma. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 16:140–147

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. van de Water JM, Nijeboer P, de Baaij LR et al (2015) Surgery in (pre)malignant celiac disease. World J Gastroenterol 21:12403–12409

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Mallant M, Hadithi M, Al-Toma AB et al (2007) Abdominal computed tomography in refractory coeliac disease and enteropathy associated T-cell lymphoma. World J Gastroenterol 13:1696–1700

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Lohan DG, Alhajeri AN, Cronin CG, Roche CJ, Murphy JM (2008) MR enterography of small-bowel lymphoma: potential for suggestion of histologic subtype and the presence of underlying celiac disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:287–293

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hoffmann M, Vogelsang H, Kletter K, Zettinig G, Chott A, Raderer M (2003) 18F-Fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography ([18F]FDG-PET) for assessment of enteropathy-type T cell lymphoma. Gut 52:347–351

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Hadithi M, Mallant M, Oudejans J, van Waesberghe JH, Mulder CJ, Comans EF (2006) [18F]FDG PET versus CT for the detection of enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma in refractory celiac disease. J Nucl Med 47:1622–1627

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. See JA, Kaukinen K, Makharia GK, Gibson PR, Murray JA (2015) Practical insights into gluten-free diets. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 12:580–591

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Haines ML, Anderson RP, Gibson PR (2008) Systematic review: the evidence base for long-term management of coeliac disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 28:1042–1066

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Verdu EF, Schuppan D (2021) Co-factors, microbes, and immunogenetics in celiac disease to guide novel approaches for diagnosis and treatment. Gastroenterology 161:1395-1411.e1394

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ludvigsson JF, Bai JC, Biagi F et al (2014) Diagnosis and management of adult coeliac disease: guidelines from the British Society of Gastroenterology. Gut 63:1210–1228

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Hindryckx P, Levesque BG, Holvoet T et al (2018) Disease activity indices in coeliac disease: systematic review and recommendations for clinical trials. Gut 67:61–69

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Masselli G, Picarelli A, Di Tola M et al (2010) Celiac disease: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 256:783–790

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Göya C, Dündar İ, Özgökçe M et al (2021) Evaluation of celiac disease with uniphasic and multiphasic dynamic MDCT imaging. Abdom Radiol (NY) 46:5564–5573

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Picarelli A, Borghini R, Marino M et al (2020) Visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue as markers of local and systemic inflammation: a comparison between celiac and obese patients using MRI. Tech Coloproctol 24:553–562

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Mårild K, Söderling J, Lebwohl B et al (2022) Association of celiac disease and inflammatory bowel disease: a nationwide register-based cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol 117:1471–1481. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000001834

  61. Baum T, Cordes C, Dieckmeyer M et al (2016) MR-based assessment of body fat distribution and characteristics. Eur J Radiol 85:1512–1518

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. AlZaim I, Hammoud SH, Al-Koussa H, Ghazi A, Eid AH, El-Yazbi AF (2020) Adipose tissue immunomodulation: a novel therapeutic approach in cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. Front Cardiovasc Med 7:602088

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Packova B, Kovalcikova P, Pavlovsky Z et al (2020) Non-invasive prediction of persistent villous atrophy in celiac disease. World J Gastroenterol 26:3780–3791

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Rubio-Tapia A, Murray JA (2010) Classification and management of refractory coeliac disease. Gut 59:547–557

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Malamut G, Afchain P, Verkarre V et al (2009) Presentation and long-term follow-up of refractory celiac disease: comparison of type I with type II. Gastroenterology 136:81–90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Al-Bawardy B, Barlow JM, Vasconcelos RN et al (2017) Cross-sectional imaging in refractory celiac disease. Abdom Radiol (NY) 42:389–395

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Tomei E, Diacinti D, Stagnitti A et al (2012) MR enterography: relationship between intestinal fold pattern and the clinical presentation of adult celiac disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 36:183–187

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Radmard AR, Hashemi Taheri AP, Salehian Nik E et al (2017) MR enterography in nonresponsive adult celiac disease: correlation with endoscopic, pathologic, serologic, and genetic features. J Magn Reson Imaging 46:1096–1106

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Sidhu R, Sanders DS, Morris AJ, McAlindon ME (2008) Guidelines on small bowel enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy in adults. Gut 57:125–136

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Xin L, Liao Z, Jiang YP, Li ZS (2011) Indications, detectability, positive findings, total enteroscopy, and complications of diagnostic double-balloon endoscopy: a systematic review of data over the first decade of use. Gastrointest Endosc 74:563–570

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Van Weyenberg SJ, Van Waesberghe JH, Ell C, Pohl J (2009) Enteroscopy and its relationship to radiological small bowel imaging. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 19:389–407

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Al-Toma A, Volta U, Auricchio R et al (2019) European Society for the Study of Coeliac Disease (ESsCD) guideline for coeliac disease and other gluten-related disorders. United European Gastroenterol J 7:583–613

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Peiris D, Wills M (2020) Imaging of the small bowel: a review of current practice. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 81:1–10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work has received funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82270693, 82070680, 82072002).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xin-yue Wang and Zhoulei Li contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 58 Zhongshan II Road, Guangzhou, 510080, People’s Republic of China

    Xin-yue Wang, Zhoulei Li, Si-yun Huang, Xiao-di Shen & Xue-hua Li

Authors
  1. Xin-yue Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhoulei Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Si-yun Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiao-di Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xue-hua Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xue-hua Li.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Xue-hua Li.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was not required for this manuscript because it is a review and no subjects were investigated.

Ethical approval

Institutional review board approval was not required because it is a review and no subjects were investigated.

Methodology

• Multicenter study

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 158 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Xy., Li, Z., Huang, Sy. et al. Cross-sectional imaging: current status and future potential in adult celiac disease. Eur Radiol 34, 1232–1246 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-10175-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-10175-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation