Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Urban experience takes an informational turn: mobile internet usage and the unevenness of geosocial activity

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coinciding the widespread deployment of handheld information and communications technologies (ICT) there has been a rapid emergence of mobile Internet applications. Notably, these applications are designed to perform within operating systems that are not only Internet-connected but that are also location-aware and decoupled from any single point in space—design characteristics that enable instantaneous integration of users’ everyday ‘real-world’ experience with an array of Internet-based services. As a consequence, the experience of urban space can be mediated by digital information in ways that have not before been possible. In this article I explore the convergence of ongoing discussions about the digital divide, the nascent class of mobile ICT, and the urban communities that have been most adversely impacted by uneven technological landscapes. Building on this convergence, I argue that it is increasingly important to consider the impacts that pervasive mobile information have on the composition of everyday urban life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London; New York: Verso.

  • Anderson, B. (2010). Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 34(6), 777–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthes, G. (2011). Digital divide persists, Berkeley study shows. Communications of the ACM, 54(8), 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzilai-Nahon, K. (2006). Gaps and bits: Conceptualizing measurements for digital divides. The Information Society, 22(5), 269–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, S. (2011). Geosocial media—Which social networks are using location-based services? http://www.mediabistro.com/alltwitter/geosocial-media_b16370. Accessed December, 2012.

  • Boudreau, J. A. (2007). Making new political spaces: Mobilizing spatial imaginaries, instrumentalizing spatial practices, and strategically using spatial tools. Environment and Planning A, 39(11), 2593–2611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandtzæg, P. B., Heim, J., & Karahasanović, A. (2011). Understanding the new digital divide—A typology of Internet users in Europe. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69(3), 123–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brighenti, A. M. (2012). New media and urban motilities: A territoriologic point of view. Urban Studies, 49(2), 399–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broos, A., & Roe, K. (2006). The digital divide in the playstation generation: Self-efficacy, locus of control and ICT adoption among adolescents. Poetics, 34(4–5), 306–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, E., Henly, J. R., Elliott, D. S., & Irwin, K. (2009). Subjective constructions of neighborhood boundaries: Lessons from a qualitative study of four neighborhoods. Journal of Urban Affairs, 31(4), 461–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S. W., & Kwak, N. (2010). Mobile communication and civic life: Linking patterns of use to civic and political engagement. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 536(520).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinar, A., & Bender, T. (2007). Urban imaginaries: locating the modern city. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cisco. (2011). Cisco visual networking index: Global mobile data traffic forecast update, 2010–2015.

  • Clark, L. S., Demont-Heinrich, C., & Webber, S. A. (2004). Ethnographic interviews on the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6(4), 529–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compaine, B. M. (2001). The digital divide: Facing a crisis or creating a myth? Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Cotten, S., Hale, T., Moroney, M. H., O’Neal, L., & Borch, C. (2011). Using affordable technology to decrease digital inequality. Information, Communication & Society, 14(4), 424–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crang, M., Crosbie, T., & Graham, S. (2006). Variable geometries of connection: Urban digital divides and the uses of information technology. Urban Studies, 43(13), 2551–2570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crook, J. (2011). FCC to strengthen location accuracy requirements for all carriers using E911 By 2019. http://techcrunch.com/2011/10/04/fcc-wants-gps-in-every-phone-by-2018. Accessed December 3, 2011.

  • Devadason, R. (2010). Cosmopolitanism, geographical imaginaries and belonging in North London. Urban Studies, 47(14), 2945–2963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, C., & Shafer, S. (2004). Digital inequality: From unequal access to differentiated use. In K. M. Neckerman (Ed.), Social inequality (PP. 355–400). New York: Russell Sage.

  • Dodge, M., & Kitchin, R. (2013). Crowdsourced cartography: Mapping experience and knowledge. Environment and Planning A, 45(1), 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donald, J. (1999). Imagining the modern city. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, S. (2010). Geographic information science: Emerging research on the societal implications of the geospatial web. Progress in Human Geography, 34(3), 349–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M. (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4), 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, M. (2011). Time machines and virtual portals: The spatialities of the digital divide. Progress in Development Studies, 11(3), 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, M., & Zook, M. (2013). Augmented realities and uneven geographies: Exploring the geolinguistic contours of the web. Environment and Planning A, 45(1), 77–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, A. (2006). Everyware: The dawning age of ubiquitous computing. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunkel, D. J. (2003). Second thoughts: Toward a critique of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 5(4), 499–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haklay, M. (2013). Neogeography and the delusion of democratisation. Environment and Planning A, 45(1), 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haklay, M., Singleton, A., & Parker, C. (2008). Web mapping 2.0: The neogeography of the GeoWeb. Geography Compass, 2(6), 2011–2039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. B., Chipeniuk, R., Feick, R. D., Leahy, M. G., & Deparday, V. (2010). Community-based production of geographic information using open source software and Web 2.0. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24(5), 761–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, K. N. (2010). Internet use and the concentration of disadvantage: Glocalization and the urban underclass. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(8), 1111–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people’s online skills. First Monday, 7(4).

  • Hargittai, E., & Hinnant, A. (2008). Digital inequality: Differences in young adults’ use of the internet. Communication Research, 35(5), 602–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haythornthwaite, C., & Kendall, L. (2010). Internet and community. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(8), 1083–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heine, C. (2011). Foursquare reaches 15M users, triples audience in a year. http://www.clickz.com/clickz/news/2130251/foursquare-reaches-15m-users-triples-audience. Accessed December, 2011.

  • Hudson-Smith, A., Batty, M., Crooks, A., & Milton, R. (2009a). Mapping for the masses accessing Web 2.0 through crowdsourcing. Social Science Computer Review, 27(4), 524–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson-Smith, A., Crooks, A., Gibin, M., Milton, R., & Batty, M. (2009b). NeoGeography and Web 2.0: Concepts, tools and applications. Journal of Location Based Services, 3(2), 118–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, M. K., & Zeitner, V. (2003). Internet use and civic engagement—A longitudinal analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67(3), 311–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B., Brenner, N., & Jones, M. S. (2008). Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(3), 389–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, J.-Y., Qiu, J. L., & Kim, Y.-C. (2001). Internet connectedness and inequality: Beyond the “divide”. Communication Research, 28(4), 507–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, M. (2011). On the social construction of place: Using participatory methods and digital tools to reconceive distressed urban neighborhoods. In S. E. Sutton & S. P. Kemp (Eds.), The paradox of urban space: Inequality and transformation in marginalized communities. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Kelley, M. (2013). The emergent urban imaginaries of geosocial media. GeoJournal, 78(1), 181–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsley, S. (2010). Representing ‘things to come’: Feeling the visions of future technologies. Environment and Planning A, 42(11), 2771–2790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinkenberg, B. (2007). Geospatial technologies and the geographies of hope and fear. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(2), 350–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, D. (1998). Access denied: Preventing information exclusion. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvasny, L. (2006). Cultural (Re)production of digital inequality in a US community technology initiative. Information, Communication & Society, 9(2), 160–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvasny, L., & Keil, M. (2006). The challenges of redressing the digital divide: A tale of two US cities. Information Systems Journal, 16(1), 23–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, C. (2005). Employability, services for unemployed job seekers and the digital divide. Urban Studies, 42(2), 325–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S. B., & Palen, L. (2010). The new cartographers: Crisis map mashups and the emergence of neogeographic practice. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 37(1), 69–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. (2000). Constructing place: Cultural hegemonies and media images of an inner-city neighborhood. Urban Geography, 21(5), 380–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. (2003). Enacting neighborhood. Urban Geography, 24(5), 361–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesch, G. S., & Talmud, I. (2010). Internet connectivity, community participation, and place attachment: A longitudinal study. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(8), 1095–1110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyen, M., Pfaff-Rudiger, S., Dudenhoffer, K., & Huss, J. (2010). The internet in everyday life: A typology of internet users. Media, Culture and Society, 32(5), 873–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. C. (2006). A beast in the field: The Google maps Mashup as GIS/2. Cartographica, 41, 187–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (2011). Digital divide: Segregation is alive and well in social media. Advertising Age, 82(6).

  • Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & Stansbury, M. (2003). Virtual inequality: Beyond the digital divide. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash, G., & Kruse, K. M. (2008). The spaces of the modern city: Imaginaries, politics, and everyday life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raban, J. (1974). Soft city. New York: E.P. Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G., & Jurgenson, N. (2010). Production, consumption, prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer’. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1), 13–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodino-Colocino, M. (2006). Laboring under the digital divide. New Media & Society, 8(3), 487–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe, K. (2006). The digital divide in the twenty-first century: An introduction. Poetics, 34(4–5), 219–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6(3), 341–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Servon, L. J. (2002). Bridging the digital divide: Technology, community, and public policy. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, S. (2009). Digital divide: A discursive move away from the real inequities. The Information Society, 25(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyaert, J., & Gould, N. (2009). Social work and the changing face of the digital divide. British Journal of Social Work, 39(4), 740–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sylvester, D. E., & McGlynn, A. J. (2010). The digital divide, political participation, and place. Social Science Computer Review, 28(1), 64–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapia, A. H., & Ortiz, J. A. (2010). Network hopes municipalities deploying wireless internet to increase civic engagement. Social Science Computer Review, 28(1), 93–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2004). Modern social imaginaries. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, J., & Hacker, K. (2003). The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. The Information Society, 19(4), 315–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warschauer, M. (2003). Dissecting the “Digital Divide”: A case study in Egypt. The Information Society, 19(4), 297–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, T. (2011). Foursquare posts 1 billion checkins. http://mashable.com/2011/09/20/foursquare-one-billion-checkins/. Accessed December, 2011.

  • Wilson, M. W. (2012). Location-based services, conspicuous mobility, and the location-aware future. Geoforum, 43(6), 1266–1275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. W., & Graham, M. (2013). Neogeography and volunteered geographic information: A conversation with Michael Goodchild and Andrew Turner. Environment and Planning A, 45(1), 10–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Washington Tacoma, Tacoma, WA, USA

    Matthew James Kelley

Authors
  1. Matthew James Kelley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew James Kelley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelley, M.J. Urban experience takes an informational turn: mobile internet usage and the unevenness of geosocial activity. GeoJournal 79, 15–29 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9482-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9482-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation