Abstract
In order to better understand why some children retaliate when they feel provoked and others do not, the present study identified “pacifistically-oriented” children who made negative interpretations in response to unambiguous provocations, yet did not endorse revenge goals, and compared them to “revenge-seeking” children who also made negative interpretations but did endorse revenge goals. Groups were identified based on seventh graders’ (N = 367; 54.77% male; 22.89% racial/ethnic minority) responses to hypothetical situations in which a peer excluded and insulted them. Comparing these groups revealed that Pacifists endorsed relationship-maintaining goals and emotion regulation goals more highly than Revenge-Seekers. Revenge-Seekers reported more anger and endorsed beliefs about negative reciprocity and aggression being legitimate more highly than Pacifists. Additionally, Revenge-Seekers were more disrespect sensitive than were Pacifists, based on a measure of vigilance for signs of disrespect and expectations that others would disrespect them. Together these findings point to social-cognitive and emotion-related processes that may inhibit revenge-seeking in unambiguous provocation situations, even when children interpret the peer’s behavior quite negatively.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
-
The pattern of results for the ANOVAs examining acceptance and popularity, as well as the MANOVA for the behavioral nominations, were the same when nominations and acceptance ratings were standardized within gender and team.
References
Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street. New York: Norton.
Asher, S. R., MacEvoy, J. P., & McDonald, K. L. (2008). Children’s peer relations, social competence, and school adjustment: A social tasks and social goals perspective. In M. L. Maehr, S. Karabenick & T. Urdan (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement, Vol. 15: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 357–390). Bingley: Emerald.
Asher, S. R., & McDonald, K. L. (2009). The behavioral basis of acceptance, rejection, and perceived popularity. In K. H. Rubin, W. Bukowski & B. Laursen (Eds.), The handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 232–248). New York: Guilford.
Astor, R. A. (1994). Children’s moral reasoning about family and peer violence: The role of provocation and retribution. Child Development, 65, 1054–1068. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00802.x.
Bandura, A. (2016). Moral disengagement: How people do harm and live with themselves. New York: Worth.
Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2003). Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: Implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes. Psychological Methods, 8, 338–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.3.338.
Berkowitz, L. (1989). Frustration-aggression hypothesis: Examination and reformulation. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.1.59.
Card, N. A., & Little, T. D. (2006). Proactive and reactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis of differential relations with psychosocial adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 466–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025406071904.
Chung, T. Y., & Asher, S. R. (1996). Children’s goals and strategies in peer conflict situations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 42, 125–147. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23090523.
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00660.x.
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Rose, A. J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 102–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00343.x.
Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.18.4.557.
Crick, N., & Dodge, K. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74.
DeBono, A., & Muraven, M. (2014). Rejection perceptions: Feeling disrespected leads to greater aggression than feeling disliked. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.05.014.
Dirks, M. A., Suor, J. H., Rusch, D., & Frazier, S. L. (2014). Children’s responses to hypothetical provocation by peers: Coordination of assertive and aggressive strategies. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 42, 1077–1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-014-9862-0.
Downey, G., & Feldman, S. I. (1996). Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1327–1343. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1327.
Downey, G., Freitas, A. L., Michaelis, B., & Khouri, H. (1998). The self-fulfilling prophecy in close relationships: Rejection sensitivity and rejection by romantic partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 545–560. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.545.
Duncan, R. D. (1999). Peer and sibling aggression: An investigation of intra- and extrafamilial bullying. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 871–886. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626099014008005.
Ebesutani, C., Drescher, C. F., Reise, S. P., Heiden, L., Hight, T. L., Damon, J. D., & Young, J. (2012). The importance of modeling method effects: Resolving the (uni)dimensionality of the loneliness questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 186–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.627967.
Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., & Flanagan, C., et al. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage–environment fit on young adolescents’ experience in school and in families. American Psychologist, 48, 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003066X.48.2.90.
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Nyman, M., Bernzweig, J., & Pinuelas, A. (1994). The relations of emotionality and regulation to children’s anger-related reactions. Child Development, 65, 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00738.x.
Eisenberger, R., Lynch, P., Aselage, J., & Rohdieck, S. (2004). Who takes the most revenge? Individual differences in negative reciprocity norm endorsement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 787–799. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264047.
Erdley, C. A., & Asher, S. R. (1996). Children’s social goals and self-efficacy perceptions as influences on their responses to ambiguous provocation. Child Development, 67, 1329–1344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01799.x.
Erdley, C. A., & Asher, S. R. (1998). Linkages between children’s beliefs about the legitimacy of aggression and their behavior. Social Development, 7, 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00070.
Farrell, A. D., Mays, S., Bettencourt, A., Erwin, E. H., Vulin-Reynolds, M., & Allison, K. W. (2010). Environmental influences on fighting versus nonviolent behavior in peer situations: A qualitative study with urban African American Adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46, 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9331-z.
Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., & Hymel, S. (2014). Moral disengagement among children and youth: A meta-analytic review of links to aggressive behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 40, 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21502.
Gouldner, A. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 176–177. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2092623.
Guerra, N. (2012). Can we make violent behavior less adaptive for youth? Human Development, 55, 105–106. https://doi.org/10.1159/000339725.
Hair, J. F., & Black, W. (2000). Cluster analysis. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics (pp. 147–206). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
Horowitz, R. (1983). Honor and the American dream: Culture and identity in a Chicano community. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.
Hoza, B., Waschbusch, D. A., Pelham, W. E., Molina, B. S. G., & Milich, R. (2000). Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity disordered and control boys’ responses to social success and failure. Child Development, 71, 432–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00155.
Huesmann, L. R., & Guerra, N. G. (1997). Children’s normative beliefs about aggression and aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 408–419. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.408.
Hymel, S., Closson, L. M., Caravita, S. C. S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2014). Social status among peers: From sociometric attraction to peer acceptance to perceived popularity. In P. K. Smith & C. H. Hart (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood social development: Second edition (pp. 375–392). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
Jaggi, L., & Kliewer, W. (2016). “Cause that’s the only skills in school you need”: A qualitative analysis of revenge goals in poor urban youth. Journal of Adolescent Research, 31, 32–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558415569728.
Kloep, M. (1999). Love is all you need? Focusing on adolescents’ life concerns from an ecological point of view. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.1998.0200.
LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2010). Developmental changes in the priority of perceived status in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 19, 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14679507.2008.00522.x.
Leary, M. R., Koch, E., & Hechenbleikner, N. (2001). Emotional responses to interpersonal rejection. In M. R. Leary (Ed.), Interpersonal rejection (pp. 145–166). New York: Oxford University Press.
Leary, M. R., Springer, C., Negel, L., Ansell, E., & Evans, K. (1998). The causes, phenomenology, and consequences of hurt feelings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1225–1237. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1225.
Lochman, J. E., Wayland, K. K., & White, K. J. (1993). Social goals: Relationship to adolescent adjustment and to social problem solving. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 21, 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00911312.
MacEvoy, J. P. (2006). Hurt feelings in children’s friendships: Associations with social cognitions, behavior, and adjustment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
MacEvoy, J. P., & Asher, S. R. (2012). When friends disappoint: Boys’ and girls’ responses to transgressions of friendship expectations. Child Development, 83, 104–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01685.x.
Magnusson, D. (1998). The logic and implications of a person-oriented approach. In R. B. Cairns, L. R. Bergman & J. Kagan (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual (pp. 33–64). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Malti, T., & Krettenauer, T. (2013). The relation of moral emotion attributions to prosocial and antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 84(2), 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01851.x.
McCullough, M. E. (2008). Beyond revenge: The evolution of the forgiveness instinct. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
McDonald, K. L., & Asher, S. R. (2013). College students’ revenge goals across friend, romantic partner, and roommate contexts: The role of interpretations and emotions. Social Development, 22, 499–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00650.x.
McDonald, K. L., & Asher, S. R. (in press). Peer acceptance, peer rejection, and popularity: Social cognitive and behavioral perspectives. In K. H. Rubin, W. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), The Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. Second edition. New York: Guilford.
McDonald, K. L., & Lochman, J. E. (2012). Predictors and outcomes associated with trajectories of revenge goals from fourth grade through seventh grade. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40, 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-011-9560-0.
Miller, D. T. (2001). Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 527–553. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.527.
Nisbett, R. E., & Cohen, D. (1996). Culture of honor: The psychology of violence in the south. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Ojanen, T., Gronroos, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2005). Applying the interpersonal circumplex model to children’s social goals: Connections with peer reported behavior and sociometric status. Developmental Psychology, 41, 699–710.
Orobio De Castro, B., Veerman, J. W., Koops, W., Bosch, J. D., & Monshouwer, H. J. (2002). Hostile attribution of intent and aggressive behavior: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 73, 916–934. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00447.
Parker, J. G., Low, C. M., Walker, A. R., & Gamm, B. K. (2005). Friendship jealousy in young adolescents: Individual differences and links to sex, self-esteem, aggression, and social adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 41, 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.1.235.
Parkhurst, J. T., & Asher, S. R. (1992). Peer rejection in middle school: Subgroup differences in behavior, loneliness, and interpersonal concerns. Developmental Psychology, 28, 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.28.2.231.
Parkhurst, J. T., & Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 18, 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431698018002001.
Pellegrini, A. D., & Bartini, M. (2000). A longitudinal study of bullying, victimization, and peer affiliation during the transition from primary school to middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 699–725. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037003699.
Pettit, G. S., Lansford, J. E., Malone, P. S., Dodge, K. A., & Bates, J. E. (2010). Domain specificity in relationship history, social-information processing, and violent behavior in early adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017991.
Posada, R., & Wainryb, C. (2008). Moral development in a violent society: Colombian children’s judgments in the context of survival and revenge. Child Development, 79, 882–898. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01165.x.
Quiggle, N. L., Garber, J., Panak, W. F., & Dodge, K. A. (1992). Social information processing in aggressive and depressed children. Child Development, 63, 1305–1320. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131557.
Recchia, H. E., Rajput, A., & Peccia, S. (2015). Children’s interpretations of ambiguous provocation from their siblings: Comparisons with peers and links to relationship quality. Social Development, 4, 782–797. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12119.
Renshaw, P. D., & Asher, S. R. (1982). Social competence and peer status: The distinction between goals and strategies. In K. H. Rubin & H. S. Ross (Eds.), Peer relationships and social skills in childhood (pp. 375–395). New York: Springer.
Renshaw, P. D., & Asher, S. R. (1983). Children’s goals and strategies for social interaction. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 353–374. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23086266.
Rose, A. J., & Asher, S. R. (1999). Children’s goals and strategies in response to conflicts within a friendship. Developmental Psychology, 35, 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.69.
Rose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 98–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98.
Rothbart, M., & Bates, J. (2006). Temperament. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon & L. M. Richard (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3, Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed.,pp. 99–166). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Samson, J. E., Ojanen, T., & Hollo, A. (2012). Social goals and youth aggression: Meta-analysis of prosocial and antisocial goals. Social Development, 21, 645–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2012.00658.x.
Slaby, R. G., & Guerra, N. G. (1988). Cognitive mediators of aggression in adolescent offenders: 1. Assessment. Developmental Psychology, 24, 580–588. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.26.2.269.
Smetana, J. G., Campione-Barr, N., & Yell, N. (2003). Children’s moral and affective judgments regarding provocation and retaliation. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 209–236. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23096228.
Stewart, E. A., & Simons, R. L. (2006). Structure and culture in African American adolescent violence: A partial test of the “code of the street” thesis. Justice Quarterly, 23, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820600552378.
Tofighi, D., & Enders, C. K. (2008). Identifying the correct number of classes in growth mixture models. In G. R. Hancock & K. M. Samuelsen (Eds.), Advances in latent variable mixture models (pp. 317–341). Greenwhich, CT: Information Age.
Troop-Gordon, W., & Ladd, G. W. (2005). Trajectories of peer victimization and perceptions of the self and schoolmates: Precursors to internalizing and externalizing problems. Child Development, 76, 1072–1091. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00898.x.
Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2003). “Isn’t it fun to get the respect that we’re going to deserve?” Narcissism, social rejection, and aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202239051.
Wang, J., Iannotti, R. J., & Nansel, T. R. (2009). School bullying among adolescents in the United States: Physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45, 368–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.03.021.
Werner, N. E., & Nixon, C. L. (2005). Normative beliefs and relational aggression: An investigation of the cognitive bases of adolescent aggressive behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-4306-3.
Wurpts, I. C., & Geiser, C. (2014). Is adding more indicators to a latent class analysis beneficial or detrimental? Results of a Monte-Carlo study. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00920.
Yeager, D. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., Tirri, K., Nokelainen, P., & Dweck, C. S. (2011). Adolescents’ implicit theories predict desire for vengeance: Correlational and experimental evidence. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1090–1107. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023769.
Zakriski, A. L., & Coie, J. D. (1996). A comparison of aggressive-rejected and nonaggressive-rejected children’s interpretations of self-directed and other-directed rejection. Child Development, 67, 1048–1070. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01782.x.
Zeman, J., Cassano, M., Perry-Parrish, C., & Stegall, S. (2006). Emotion regulation in children and adolescents. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 27, 155–168.
Acknowledgements
This article is based on an unpublished doctoral dissertation submitted to Duke University by the first author. The authors wish to thank dissertation committee members Philip Costanzo, Rick Hoyle, Mark Leary, Martha Putallaz, and Neil Vidmar for their contributions. The authors also would like to thank the children who participated in the study, the schools and teachers who helped to facilitate data collection, William Frye who helped with data collection, and Molly Stroud Weeks and Dan Blalock who helped with data entry.
Authors' Contributions
KM and SA conceived of the study and designed the study. KM collected the data and performed the statistical analyses. KM and SA collaborated on the interpretation of the findings and jointly wrote the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
The research reported in this manuscript was supported in part by: 1) a dissertation fellowship to the first author funded by a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Training Grant (T32 HD007376 19) to the Center for Developmental Science at the University of North Carolina; and 2) a dissertation fellowship to the first author from the Kenan Institute for Ethics at Duke University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Consistent with Federal Regulation 45.46.116, and with approval by the Duke University Institutional Review Board, parents were informed about the study and were asked to contact the researchers or the school if they had any questions or did not want their child to participate. Children also gave their assent before every data collection session.
Additional information
Data Sharing Declaration
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McDonald, K.L., Asher, S.R. Pacifists and Revenge-Seekers in Response to Unambiguous Peer Provocation. J Youth Adolescence 47, 1907–1925 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0767-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0767-4