Abstract
Introduction
Adamowicz and colleagues recently proposed to use “a consistent definition of recovery that captures a broad-based return to health with assessments of both fatigue and function as well as the patients’ perceptions of his/her recovery status” for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS).
Methods
A qualitative analysis of case definitions for Myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) and CFS and methods to assess the symptoms and clinical status of ME and CFS patients objectively.
Results
The criteria of CFS define a heterogeneous disorder. ME, often used interchangeably with CFS, is principally defined by muscle weakness, cognitive impairment etc., but above all post-exertional “malaise”: a long-lasting increase in symptoms, e.g. muscle pain and cognitive deficits, after a minor exertion. The principle symptom of CFS however is “chronic fatigue”. Since post-exertional “malaise” is not obligatory for CFS, only part of the CFS patients meet the diagnostic criteria for ME, while not all ME patients qualify as CFS patients. There are several accepted methods to assess characteristic symptoms and the clinical status of ME and CFS patients using objective measures, e.g. (repeated) cardiopulmonary exercise tests.
Conclusion
To resolve the debate about the clinical status, proposed effectiveness of therapies and recovery in ME and CFS, it is crucial to accurately diagnose patients using well-defined criteria for ME and CFS and an objective assessment of various typical symptoms, since subjective measures such as “fatigue” will perpetuate the debate.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamowicz, J. L., Caikauskaite, I., & Friedberg, F. (2014). Defining recovery in chronic fatigue syndrome: A critical review. Quality of Life Research,. doi:10.1007/s11136-014-0705-9.
Twisk, F. N. M. (2014). The status of and future research into myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome: The need of accurate diagnosis, objective assessment, and acknowledging biological and clinical subgroups. Frontiers in Physiology, 5, 109. doi:10.3389/fphys.2014.00109.
Snell, C. R., Stevens, S. R., Davenport, T. E., & VanNess, J. M. (2013). Discriminative validity of metabolic and workload measurements to identify individuals with chronic fatigue syndrome. Physical Therapy, 93(11), 1484–1492. doi:10.2522/ptj.20110368.
Keller, B. A., Pryor, J. L., & Giloteaux, L. (2014). Inability of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome patients to reproduce VO2 peak indicates functional impairment. Journal of Translational Medicine, 12, 104. doi:10.1186/1479-5876-12-104.
White, P. D., Goldsmith, K. A., Johnson, A. L., Potts, L., Walwyn, R., DeCesare, J. C., et al. (2011). Comparison of adaptive pacing therapy, cognitive behaviour therapy, graded exercise therapy, and specialist medical care for chronic fatigue syndrome (PACE): a randomised trial. The Lancet, 377(9768), 823–836. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60096-2.
Troosters, T., Gosselink, R., & Decramer, M. (1999). Six minute walking distance in healthy elderly subjects. European Respiratory Journal, 14(2), 270–274. doi:10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.14b06.x.
Council of approval with regards to rehabilitation contracts with CFS reference centers. [Akkoordraad in het kader van de revalidatieovereenkomsten inzake ten laste neming door Referentiecentra van patiënten lijdend aan het Chronisch vermoeidheidssyndroom] [Dutch]. Evaluation Report (2002–2004) with respect to Rehabilitation Contracts between the RIZIV and the CFS Reference Centers [Evaluatierapport (2002–2004) met betrekking tot de uitvoering van de revalidatieovereenkomsten tussen het Comité van de verzekering voor geneeskundige verzorging (ingesteld bij het Rijksinstituut voor Ziekte- en invaliditeitsverzekering) en de Referentiecentra voor het Chronisch vermoeidheidssyndroom (CVS)] [Dutch]. July 2006.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Twisk, F.N.M. A definition of recovery in myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome should be based upon objective measures. Qual Life Res 23, 2417–2418 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0737-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0737-1