Volume 60, Issue 1 p. 155-160
Special Issue on Bullying in Adolescence; Edited by Ann Hagell

Ethnic differences in bullying victimization and psychological distress: A test of an ecological model

Siyon Rhee

Corresponding Author

Siyon Rhee

California State University, Los Angeles, USA

Research Interests: Health and Mental Health; Child Welfare and Domestic Violence among Asian families with Immigration Backgrounds.

Corresponding author.Search for more papers by this author
Sei-Young Lee

Sei-Young Lee

California State University, Los Angeles, USA

Research Interests: Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, Dual Jurisdiction Youth with Child Welfare and Juvenile Justice, Child Welfare System Involvement.

Search for more papers by this author
Sook-Hee Jung

Sook-Hee Jung

Handong Global University, South Korea

Research Interests: Rehabilitation and Recovery for Mental Illness; Spiritual Well-Being in Social Work Practice; Prevention and Early Intervention in the Field of Mental Illness; Prevention of Suicide and Violence.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 August 2017
Citations: 35
Included in the Special Issue on Bullying in Adolescence.

ABSTRACT

This study examines ethnic differences in the prevalence of bullying victimization by peers as well as the associations between bullying victimization and psychological distress with relevant ecological factors including parental supervision, school support, and community safety. The study utilized the 2011–2012 California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) Adolescents Data, which was collected in the United States using a multi-stage stratified sampling design with a Random Digit-Dial method. The final study sample contained a total of 2367 adolescents, comprised of 48.7% Whites, followed by 35.8% Latinos, 11.1% Asians, and 4.4% African Americans. About 49.3% were males with an overall mean age of 14.6 (sd = 1.7). Results showed that there were significant differences in rates of bullying victimization among the four surveyed ethnic subgroups of adolescents. Black adolescents reported the highest and Asian adolescents the lowest level of victimization. The results of the SEM test using the calibration sample revealed an adequate fit to the data (CFI = 0.95, RMSEA = 0.04, Δχ2/Δdf = 2.99). Separate model tests with the four subgroups of adolescents revealed good fits with the subsample data with the exception of the subsample of African Americans. Additionally, results show that factors associated with psychological distress vary widely among the White, Latino and Asian subgroups.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.