Book contents
-
The Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology
-
The Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology
-
Copyright page
-
Dedication
-
Contents
-
Figures
-
Tables
-
Contributors
- Part I
Foundations of Political Psychology
- Part II
The Politics of Intergroup Attitudes
- 11
Authoritarianism
- 12
A Political Psychology of Ethnocentrism
- 13
Collective Narcissism
- 14
Demographic Change, White Decline, and the Changing Nature of Racial Politics in Election Campaigns
- 15
Macro-diversity and Intergroup Attitudes
- 16
The Persistence of Gender in Campaigns and Elections
- 17
The Politics of Abortion, Pregnancy, and Motherhood
- 18
Religiosity and Openness to Authoritarian Governance
- 19
The Consequences of Moral Conviction in Politics
- 20
The Political Psychology of National Identity
- 21
The Political Dynamics of Immigration Opinion Worldwide
- 22
International and Individual Differences in Support for Human Rights
- Part III
Contemporary Challenges to Democracy
- Part IV
Diversifying Perspectives in Political Psychology
-
Index
- References
18 - Religiosity and Openness to Authoritarian Governance
from Part II - The Politics of Intergroup Attitudes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 February 2022
By
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Part I Foundations of Political Psychology
- Part II The Politics of Intergroup Attitudes
- 11 Authoritarianism
- 12 A Political Psychology of Ethnocentrism
- 13 Collective Narcissism
- 14 Demographic Change, White Decline, and the Changing Nature of Racial Politics in Election Campaigns
- 15 Macro-diversity and Intergroup Attitudes
- 16 The Persistence of Gender in Campaigns and Elections
- 17 The Politics of Abortion, Pregnancy, and Motherhood
- 18 Religiosity and Openness to Authoritarian Governance
- 19 The Consequences of Moral Conviction in Politics
- 20 The Political Psychology of National Identity
- 21 The Political Dynamics of Immigration Opinion Worldwide
- 22 International and Individual Differences in Support for Human Rights
- Part III Contemporary Challenges to Democracy
- Part IV Diversifying Perspectives in Political Psychology
- Index
- References
Summary
Are religious citizens more open to authoritarian governance than secular citizens within countries around the world? This chapter reviews survey evidence relevant to this question.While findings do suggest that religious commitment and belief strength are often associated with greater openness to authoritarian governance, a number of common methodological choices complicate interpretation of these results. Several recommendations are offered for future research, such as distinguishing professed democracy support and support of authoritarian actions as outcome variables and providing greater scrutiny of potential suppressor situations arising from simultaneous inclusion of intercorrelated religiosity predictors. Finally, while the link between religiosity and anti-democratic sentiment is open to debate, it is clear that a broad-based sociocultural conservatism – of which religious commitment is a part – is a robust individual-level predictor of openness to authoritarian governance.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
-
The Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology , pp. 284 - 297Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Adorno, T., Frenkel-Brenswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. Harper. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0058772Google Scholar
Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2(2), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr0202_5Google Scholar
Bartels, L. M. (2020). Ethnic antagonism erodes Republicans’ commitment to democracy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(37), 22752–22759. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2007747117Google Scholar
Batson, C. D., & Ventis, W. L. (1982). The religious experience: A social-psychological perspective. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ben-Num Bloom, P., & Arikan, G. (2012). A two-edged sword: The differential effect of religious belief and religious social context on attitudes towards democracy. Political Behavior, 34(2), 249–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-011-9157-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Nun Bloom, P., & Arikan, G. (2013a). Religion and support for democracy: A cross- national test of the mediating mechanisms. British Journal of Political Science, 43(2), 375–397. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000427Google Scholar
Ben-Nun Bloom, P., & Arikan, G. (2013b). Priming religious belief and religious social behavior affects support for democracy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(3), 368–382. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/eds030Google Scholar
Bratton, M. (2010). The meanings of democracy: Anchoring the ‘D-word’ in Africa. Journal of Democracy, 21(4), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2010.0006Google Scholar
Canetti-Nisim, D. (2004). The effect of religiosity on endorsement of democratic values: The mediating influence of authoritarianism. Political Behavior, 26, 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-004-0901-3Google Scholar
Ciftci, S. (2010). Modernization, Islam, or social capital: What explains attitudes toward democracy in the Muslim world? Comparative Political Studies, 43(11), 1442–1470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010371903Google Scholar
Diamond, L. (2008). The spirit of democracy: The struggle to build free societies throughout the world. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Drutman, L., Diamond, L., & Goldman, J. (2018). Follow the leader: Exploring American support for democracy and authoritarianism. Democracy Fund Voter Study Group. https://www.voterstudygroup.org/publication/follow-the-leader.Google Scholar
Egan, P. J. (2020). Identity as dependent variable: How Americans shift their identities to align with their politics. American Journal of Political Science, 64(3), 699–716. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, C. G., & Musick, M. A. (1993). Southern intolerance: A fundamentalist effect? Social Forces, 72(2), 379–398. https://doi.org/10.2307/2579853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. L., & Gouws, A. (2005). Overcoming intolerance in South Africa: Experiments in democratic persuasion. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550331Google Scholar
Graham, M. H., & Svolik, M. W. (2020). Democracy in America? Partisanship, polarization, and the robustness of support for democracy in the United States. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 392–409. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000052Google Scholar
Harvey, P. (2016). Civil rights movements and religion in America. In Oxford research encyclopedia of religion. https://oxfordre.com/religion/view/0.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.001.0001/acrefore-9780199340378-e-492Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. Simon & Schuster. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20045621Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. (2003). How solid is mass support for democracy – and how can we measure it? PS: Political Science & Politics, 36(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096503001689Google Scholar
Jamal, A., & Tessler, M. (2008). The Democracy Barometers (Part II): Attitudes in the Arab world. Journal of Democracy, 19(1), 97–111. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48600101Google Scholar
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In Pervin, L. A. & John, O. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102–138). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. K., Rowatt, W. C., & LaBouff, J. (2010). Priming Christian religious concepts increases racial prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550609357246Google Scholar
Karpov, V. (1999). Religiosity and political tolerance in Poland. Sociology of Religion, 60(4), 387–402. https://doi.org/10.2307/3712022Google Scholar
Kiewiet de Jonge, C. P. (2016). Should researchers abandon questions about ‘democracy’? Evidence from Latin America. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(3), 694–716. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirsch, H., & Welzel, C. (2019). Democracy misunderstood: Authoritarian notions of democracy around the globe. Social Forces, 98(1), 59–92. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.99041Google Scholar
Layman, G. C., & Green, J. C. (2006). Wars and rumours of wars: The contexts of cultural conflict in American political behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 36(1), 61–89.Google Scholar
Leak, G. K., & Fish, S. (1989). Religious orientation, impression management, and self-deception: Toward a clarification of the link between religiosity and social desirability. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28(3), 355–359. https://doi.org/10.2307/1386746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, S. I., Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., & Teorell, J. (2014). V-Dem: A new way to measure democracy. Journal of Democracy, 25(3), 159–169.Google Scholar
Ludeke, S., Johnson, W., & Bouchard Jr, T. J. (2013). ‘Obedience to traditional authority’: A heritable factor underlying authoritarianism, conservatism and religiousness. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(4), 375–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.03.018Google Scholar
Malka, A. (2013). Religion and domestic political attitudes around the world. In Saroglou, V. (Ed.), Religion, personality, and social behavior (pp. 230–254). Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Malka, A., Lelkes, A., Bakker, B. N., & Spivack, E. (2020). Who is open to authoritarian governance within Western democracies? Perspectives on Politics. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592720002091.Google Scholar
Margolis, M. F. (2018). From politics to the pews: How partisanship and the political environment shape religious identity. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226555812Google Scholar
Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226524689.001.0001Google Scholar
McFarland, S. G. (1989). Religious orientations and the targets of discrimination. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28(3), 324–336. https://doi.org/10.2307/1386743Google Scholar
Meyer, K., Tope, D., & Price, A. M. (2008). Religion and support for democracy: A cross-national examination. Sociological Spectrum, 28(5), 625–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732170802206260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, S. V. (2017). Economic threats or societal turmoil? Understanding preferences for authoritarian political systems. Political Behavior, 39(2), 457–478.Google Scholar
Miller, S. M., & Davis, N. T. (2021). The effect of white social prejudice on support for American democracy. Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics, 6(2), 334–351.Google Scholar
Norenzayan, A., & Shariff, A. F. (2008). The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science, 322(5898), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1158757Google Scholar
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2011). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791017Google Scholar
Patrikios, S. (2008). American Republican religion? Disentangling the causal link between religion and politics in the US. Political Behavior, 30(3), 367–389. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40213322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philpott, D. (2007). Explaining the political ambivalence of religion. American Political Science Review, 101(3), 505–525. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055407070372Google Scholar
Razmyar, S., & Reeve, C. L. (2013). Individual differences in religiosity as a function of cognitive ability and cognitive style. Intelligence, 41(5), 667–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.09.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Şandor, S. D., & Popescu, M. (2008). Religiosity and values in Romania. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 4(22), 171–180.Google Scholar
Saroglou, V., & Cohen, A. B. (2013). Cultural and cross-cultural psychology of religion. In Paloutzian, R. F. & Park, C. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 330–353). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Smidt, C., & Penning, J. M. (1982). Religious commitment, political conservatism, and political and social tolerance in the United States: A longitudinal analysis. Sociological Analysis, 43, 231–246.Google Scholar
Sullivan, J. L., Piereson, J., & Marcus, G. E. (1982). Political tolerance and American democracy. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tessler, M. (2002). Do Islamic orientations influence attitudes toward democracy in the Arab world? Evidence from Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, and Algeria. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 43(3–5), 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/002071520204300302Google Scholar
Tessler, M. (2010). Religion, religiosity and the place of Islam in political life: Insights from the Arab barometer surveys. Middle East Law and Governance, 2(2), 221–252. https://doi.org/10.1163/187633710X500748Google Scholar
Vance, T., Maes, H. H., & Kendler, K. S. (2010). Genetic and environmental influences on multiple dimensions of religiosity. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 198(10), 755–761. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181f4a07cGoogle Scholar
Welzel, C. (2013). Freedom rising. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139540919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wulff, D. M. (1997). Psychology of religion: Classic & contemporary (2nd ed.). Hamilton Printing.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M., Silberman, J., & Hall, J. A. (2013). The relation between intelligence and religiosity: A meta-analysis and some proposed explanations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(4), 325–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313497266Google Scholar