Book contents
-
Frontmatter
-
Contents
-
Preface
-
Map of Indonesia
-
Glossary
- 1
A Distinctive Path
- 2
Democratization Before Renovation
- 3
Creeping Reform
- 4
A Game of Inches
- 5
Anomalies, Ironies, Regularities, and Surprises
- 6
The Shape of the New System
- 7
Low-Quality Democracy and Its Discontents
- 8
Causes, Consequences, and the Consequences of the Consequences
-
Index
- References
8 - Causes, Consequences, and the Consequences of the Consequences
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2013
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Map of Indonesia
- Glossary
- 1 A Distinctive Path
- 2 Democratization Before Renovation
- 3 Creeping Reform
- 4 A Game of Inches
- 5 Anomalies, Ironies, Regularities, and Surprises
- 6 The Shape of the New System
- 7 Low-Quality Democracy and Its Discontents
- 8 Causes, Consequences, and the Consequences of the Consequences
- Index
- References
Summary
There is no single correct path to constitutional democracy, and there is no single set of institutional choices that is best for constitutional democracy in the face of major social divisions. On both counts, finding the best course begins with an assessment of where the society and polity have been historically and where they stand at the time of transition. Admittedly, this is a vague formulation, but the Indonesian case helps identify the relevant variables.
Those who advocate extensive public participation in constitution making and/or creation of separate, independent bodies for constitutional drafting are propounding a prescription that is surely right for many countries but would not have been right for Indonesia. Against the received history of deadlock in the Konstituante, which paved the way for dictatorship, and against the possibility of a secular-nationalist and military veto of dramatic, one-shot constitutional reform, Indonesia’s course of gradual, intramural reform was a reasonable choice.
Similarly, those who advocate either proportional representation or plurality or majority-runoff elections as the universally valid electoral choice will have to rest easy in the knowledge that those systems provide different sets of costs and benefits in various contexts, and they will have to contend with Indonesia’s demonstration that, in combination, both systems can produce a useful institutional mix for governing a society with a particular cleavage structure. The same goes for other uniform strictures, such as those against presidentialism, an institution that functions in Indonesia to create cross-cleavage alliances. A configuration of institutions that reinforces multipolar fluidity and intergroup alliances against the danger of bifurcation must be accounted a success.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
-
Constitutional Change and Democracy in Indonesia , pp. 261 - 296Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013
References
Journal of Democracy, vol. 2, no. 3 (Summer 1991
and , eds., The Failure of Presidential Democracy (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994)
, “Comparative Democratization: Big and Bounded Generalizations,” Comparative Political Studies, vol. 33, nos. 6/7 (August–September 2000), pp. 703–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “Presidents, Parties, and Policy Competition,” Journal of Politics, vol. 71, no. 4 (October 2009), pp. 1435–47, at p. 1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Presidents vs. Parliaments,” Journal of Democracy, vol. 1, no. 4 (Fall 1990)
, Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004), pp. 45–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
, Democracy and the Market (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), pp. 83–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Reason, Interest, Rationality, and Passion in Constitution Drafting,” Perspectives on Politics, vol. 6, no. 4 (December 2008), pp. 675–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “The Sunni Moment,” Wall Street Journal, December 14, 2005
, The Decline of Constitutional Democracy in Indonesia (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1962), pp. 521, 538, 552.Google Scholar
, Leadership and Culture in Indonesian Politics (Sydney: Allen and Unwin, 1996), pp. 181–83.Google Scholar
, “Lessons” of the Past: The Use and Misuse of History in American Foreign Policy (London: Oxford University Press, 1973)Google Scholar
and , Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics (2d ed.; Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983), p. 187.Google Scholar
, “The Fourth Wave of Democracy and Dictatorship: Noncooperative Transitions in the Postcommunist World,” World Politics, vol. 54, no. 2 (January 2002), pp. 212–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds., Party Systems and Voter Alignments (New York: Free Press, 1965).
, “The Transformation of West European Party Systems,” in and , eds., Political Parties and Political Development (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966), pp. 177–200.Google Scholar
and , “Indonesia: Personalities, Parties, and Voters,” Journal of Democracy, vol. 21, no. 2 (April 2010), pp. 35–45 at p. 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Indonesia: The Irony of Success,” Journal of Democracy, vol. 21, no. 2 (April 2010), pp. 20–34 at p. 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Mapping the Religious and Secular Parties in South Sulawesi and Tanah Toraja, Sulawesi, Indonesia,” RSIS Working Paper no. 213, Singapore, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technical University, November 12, 2010.
, “Presidential-Election Rules in Latin America: Is Plurality or Runoff Better for Democracy?” unpublished paper, George Washington University, February 2011.
and , “Rehabilitating Duverger’s Theory: Testing the Strategic and Mechanical Effects of Electoral Laws,” Comparative Political Studies, vol. 39, no. 6 (August 2006), pp. 679–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “Electoral Institutions, Cleavage Structures, and the Number of Parties,” American Journal of Political Science, vol. 41, no. 1 (January 1997), pp. 149–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy,” Comparative Political Studies, vol. 26, no. 2 (July 1993), pp. 198–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “Institutional Design and Democratic Consolidation in the Third World,” Comparative Political Studies, vol. 30, no. 2 (April 1997), pp. 123–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “The Surprising Success of Multiparty Presidentialism,” Journal of Democracy, vol. 23, no. 3 (July 2012), pp. 156–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Parties and Party Systems (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976), pp. 124–26, 288–89Google Scholar
, “European Political Parties: The Case of Polarized Pluralism,” in and , eds., Political Parties and Political Development (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966), pp. 137–76.Google Scholar
, “Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Difference?” in and , eds., The Failure of Presidential Democracy (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994), pp. 3–87.Google Scholar
, Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
, The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975).Google Scholar
, “Constitutional Design: Proposals versus Processes,” in , ed., The Architecture of Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Parties and Decision-making in the Indonesian Parliament,” Australian Journal of Asian Law, vol. 10, no. 2 (December 2008), pp. 159–83.Google Scholar
and , “Changing Models of Party Organization: The Emergence of the Cartel Party,” Party Politics, vol. 1, no. 1 (January 1995), pp. 5–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Indonesia’s Accountability Trap: Party Cartels and Presidential Power after Democratic Transition,” Indonesia, no. 78 (October 2004), pp. 61–92Google Scholar
, “The Making of the Indonesian Multiparty System: A Cartelized Party System and Its Origin,” Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University, 2008
, “Unbuilding Blocs: Cleavages and Cartelization in Indonesian Party Politics,” paper prepared for the workshop on Political Parties in the Developing World, Princeton University, April–May 2010, pp. 20–24
, “Reading the Election Results,” in , , and , eds., The State of India’s Democracy (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007), pp. 24–44Google Scholar
, “Presiden Yudhoyono dan Demokrasi Mataraman,” Kompas.com, October 15, 2009.
, The Theory of Political Coalitions (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1962), pp. 33–39Google Scholar
and , Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
, ed., Routledge Handbook of South Asian Politics (London: Routledge, 2010), pp. 67–82
, Ethnic Groups in Conflict (Berkley: University of California Press, 2000), pp. 369–78.Google Scholar
et al., eds., The Study of Coalition Behavior (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1970), pp. 445–65
, “Electoral Systems: A Primer for Decision Makers,” Journal of Democracy, vol. 14, no. 4 (October 2003), pp. 115–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds., Collective Wisdom (forthcoming, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013)
, “Clearing and Strengthening the Channels of Constitution-Making,” in , ed., Comparative Constitutional Design (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 15–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Legislatures as Constituent Assemblies,” in and , eds., The Least Examined Branch: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 181–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and , “Does the Process of Constitution-Making Matter?” Annual Review of Law and Social Science, vol. 5 (2009), pp. 201–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Constitutionalism and Dictatorship: Pinochet, the Junta, and the 1980 Constitution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , Democratization and the Politics of Constitution-Making in Turkey (Budapest: Central European University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
, “Islam and Democratization in Turkey: Secularism and Trust in a Divided Society,” Democratization, vol. 16, no. 6 (December 2009), pp. 1194–1213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Turkey’s Role Reversals,” Wilson Quarterly, vol. 34, no. 3 (Summer 2010), pp. 28–33.Google Scholar
, “Constitution-Making Gone Wrong,” paper presented at the George Washington University Comparative Constitutional Law Roundtable, Washington, DC, March 2, 2012
, “Bolivia’s Constitutional Breakdown,” Journal of Democracy, vol. 19, no. 4 (October 2008), pp. 110–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “Ethnicity and Politics in Bolivia,” Ethnopolitics, vol. 4, no. 3 (September 2005), pp. 269–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Iraq’s Constitutional Process II: An Opportunity Lost,” United States Institute of Peace Special Report no. 155, Washington, DC, 2005
, “Constitutional Choices in Taiwan: Implications of Global Trends,” Illinois Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series, no. 06–01, Champaign-Urbana, January 2006
, “Taiwan in 2001: Stalemated on All Fronts,” Asian Survey, vol. 42, no. 1 (January–February 2002), pp. 29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar