Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T23:10:16.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reconsidering Vertical Integration: An Examination of National Political Parties and Their Counterparts in Ontario

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2014

Scott Pruysers
Scott Pruysers*
Affiliation:
Carleton University
*
Department of Political Science, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa Ontario, K1S5B6, email ScottPruysers@cmail.carleton.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reconsiders whether federal and provincial parties are as independent and separate as the literature would suggest. Examining five different types of party personnel (party members, activists, riding presidents, candidates and legislators) this paper explores how federal parties and their counterparts in Ontario have responded to multi-level governance. Rather than embracing “two political worlds,” party personnel have responded to the federal nature of Canadian politics by engaging with parties at multiple levels. Additionally, the paper examines two competing explanations of party integration and seeks to uncover whether differences organizational design or ideological consistency best explain divergent levels of party integration. The experience of the Conservatives demonstrates that vertical integration is not a result of a party's organizational design alone and that a coherent ideology can help to offset a truncated organizational structure.

Résumé

Cet article réexamine si les partis fédéraux et provinciaux sont aussi indépendants et distincts que la documentation le suggère. En examinant cinq différents types de personnel de parti (membres du parti, militants, présidents de comtés, candidats et législateurs), cet article explore la façon dont les partis fédéraux et leurs homologues de l'Ontario ont répondu à la gouvernance multiniveaux. Plutôt que d'épouser deux mondes politiques, le personnel du parti a répondu à la nature fédérale de la politique canadienne en collaborant avec les partis à plusieurs niveaux. De plus, ce document examine deux explications concurrentes de l'intégration aux partis et cherche à découvrir si les différences de conception organisationnelle ou la cohérence idéologique expliquent mieux les niveaux divergents d'intégration aux partis. L'expérience des Conservateurs démontre que l'intégration verticale n'est pas uniquement le résultat de la conception organisationnelle d'un parti et qu'une idéologie cohérente peut aider à compenser une structure organisationnelle tronquée.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 237 - 258
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakvis, Herman. 1991. Regional Ministers: Power and Influence in the Canadian Cabinet. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Bakvis, Herman. 1994. “Political Parties, Party Government and Intrastate Federalism in Canada.” In Parties and Federalism in Australia and Canada ed. Sherman, Campbell. Canberra: Federalism Research Centre.Google Scholar
Bardi, Luciano and Calossi, E.. 2009. “Models of Party Organization and Europarties.” In Activating the Citizen. Dilemmas of Participation in Europe and Canada, ed. DeBardeleben, Joan and Pammett, Jon H.. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Barratt, Mark. 2004. “Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain.” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 9: 30–42.Google Scholar
Bradbury, Jonathan. 2006.“British political parties and devolution: Adapting to multi-level politics in Scotland and Wales.” In Devolution and Electoral Politics, ed. Hough, Dan and Jeffery, Charlie. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Barrie, Doreen and Gibbins, Roger. 1989. “Parliamentary Careers in the Canadian Federal State.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 22 (1): 137–45.Google Scholar
Blake, Donald. 1982. “The Consistency of Inconsistency: Party Identification in Federal and Provincial Politics.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 15 (4): 691–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, Donald. 1985. Two Political Worlds: Parties and Voting in British Columbia. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, Donald, Carty, Kenneth and Erickson, Lynda. 1991. Grassroots Politicians: Party Activists in British Columbia. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Cross, William and Young, Lisa. 2002. “Policy Attitudes of Party Members in Canada: Evidence of Ideological Politics.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 35 (4): 859–80.Google Scholar
Carty, Kenneth. 2002. “The Politics of Tecumseh Corners: Canadian Political Parties as Franchise Organizations.” The Canadian Journal of Political Science 35 (4): 723–45.Google Scholar
Carty, Kenneth and Cross, William. 2006. “Can Stratarchically Organized Parties be Democratic? The Canadian Case.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 16 (2): 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deschouwer, Kris. 2003. “Political Parties in Multi-layered Systems.” European Urban and Regional Studies 10 (3) 213–26.Google Scholar
Detterbeck, Klaus. 2011. “Party Careers in Federal Systems. Vertical Linkages within Austrian, German, Canadian and Australian Parties.” Regional and Federal Studies 21 (2): 245–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detterbeck, Klaus. 2012. Multi-Level Party Politics in Western Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Dyck, Rand. 1991. “Links between Federal and Provincial Parties and Party Systems.” In Representation, Integration, and Political Parties in Canada, ed. Bakvis, Herman. Royal Commission on Electoral Reform and Party Financing. Toronto: Dundurn Press.Google Scholar
Dyck, Rand. 1996. “Relations between Federal and Provincial Parties.” In Canadian Parties in Transition, ed. Tanguay, B. and Gagnon, A.. Scarborough: Nelson.Google Scholar
Esselment, Anna. 2009. “Family Matters: The Role of Partisanship in Federal–Provincial Relations in Canada.” Doctoral dissertation, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.Google Scholar
Esselment, Anna. 2010. “Fighting Elections: Cross-Level Political Party Integration in Ontario.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 43 (4): 871–92.Google Scholar
Esselment, Anna. 2013. “A Little Help from My Friends: The Partisanship Factor and Intergovernmental Negotiations in Canada.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 43: 701–27.Google Scholar
Fabre, Elodie. 2009. “Measuring Party Organization: The Vertical Dimension of the Multi-level Organization of State-Wide Parties in Spain and the UK.” Party Politics 17 (3): 343–63.Google Scholar
Fischer, Jorn, and Stolz, Klaus. 2010. “Patterns of Ministerial Careers across Territorial Levels in Germany.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Montreal.Google Scholar
Government of Canada. 2013. “Members of the House of Commons.” Parliament of Canada. http://www.parl.gc.ca/Parlinfo/Lists/Members.aspx?Language=E&Current=True. (January 10, 2014).Google Scholar
Government of Ontario. 2013. “Past and Present MPPs.” Legislative Assembly of Ontario. http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/members/members_all.do?locale=en. (January 10, 2014).Google Scholar
Hix, Simon and Marsh, Michael. 2011. “Second-Order Effects plus Pan-European Political Swings: An Analysis of European Parliament Elections across Time.” Electoral Studies 30: 4–15.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet and Marks, Gary. 2003. “Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance.” American Political Science Review 97 (2): 233–43.Google Scholar
Huckshorn, Robert J, Gibson, James L., Cotter, Cornelius P., and Bibby, John F.. 1996. “Party Integration and Party Organizational Strength.” The Journal of Politics 48 (4): 980–91.Google Scholar
Jacek, Henry, McDonough, John, Shimziu, Ronald, and Smith, Patrick. 1972. “Congruence of Federal-Provincial Campaign Activity in Party Organizations: The Influence of Recruitment Patterns in 3 Hamilton Ridings.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 5 (2): 190–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Richard and Mair, Peter. 1993. “The evolution of party organization in Europe: The three faces of party organization.” The American Review of Politics 14: 593–617.Google Scholar
Katz, Richard S. and Mair, Peter. 1995. “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party.” Party Politics 1 (1):5–28.Google Scholar
Koop, Royce. 2010. “Professionalism, Sociability, and the Liberal Party in the Constituencies.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 43 (4): 893–913.Google Scholar
Koop, Royce. 2011. Grassroots Liberals: Organizing for Local and National Politics. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Kirchheimer, Otto. 1966. “The transformation of the Western European party systems.” In Political Parties and Political Development, ed. LaPalombara, Joseph and Weiner, Myron. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Poguntke, Thomas, Aylott, Nicholas, Ladrech, Robert and Richard Luther, Kurt. 2007. “The Europeanisation of national party organisations: A conceptual analysis.” European Journal of Political Research 46 (6): 747–71.Google Scholar
Riker, William. 1964. Federalism: Operation, Origin, Significance. Boston, MA: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Savoie, Donald. 1999. Governing from the Centre. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Schmitz, Judith M., Frankel, Robert and Frayer, David J.. 1995. “Vertical Integration without Ownership: Strategic Alliances Offer a Managerial Alternative.” Journal of Marketing: Theory and Practice Summer: 23–30.Google Scholar
Smiley, Donald V. 1976. Canada in Question: Federalism in the Seventies. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.Google Scholar
Stewart, David K. and Carty, R. Kenneth. 2006. “Many Political Worlds? Provincial Parties and Party Systems.” In Provinces: Canadian Provincial Politics, ed. Dunn, Christopher. 2nd ed. Peterborough ON: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Stolz, Klaus. 2003. “Moving up, moving down: Political careers across territorial levels.” European Journal of Political Research 42 (2): 223–48.Google Scholar
Thomas, Paul. 2008. “Leading from the Middle: Manitoba's Role in the Intergovernmental Arena.” Canadian Political Science Review 2 (3): 29–50.Google Scholar
Thorlakson, Lori. 2006. “Party Systems in Multi-level Contexts.” In Devolution and Electoral Politics, ed. Hough, Dan and Jeffery, Charlie. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Thorlakson, Lori. 2009. “Patterns of Party Integration, Influence and Autonomy in Seven Federations.” Party Politics 15 (2): 157–77.Google Scholar
Thorlakson, Lori. 2011.“Measuring vertical integration in parties with multi-level systems data.” Party Politics 19: 713–34.Google Scholar
Volkens, Andrea, Lehmann, Pola, Merz, Nocolas, Regel, Sven and Werner, Annika. 2013. “The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project.” (MRG/CMP/MARPOR) Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).Google Scholar
Wesley, Jared. 2011. Code Politics: Campaigns and Cultures on the Canadian Prairies. Vancouver: UBC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Graham. 2005. Cabinets and First Ministers. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Wolinetz, Steven B. and Carty, R. Ken. 2006. “Disconnected Competition in Canada.” In Devolution and Electoral Politics, ed. Hough, Dan and Jeffery, Charlie. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Lisa and Cross, William. 2002a. “The rise of plebiscitary democracy in Canada.” Party Politics 8: 673–99.Google Scholar
Young, Lisa and Cross, William. 2002b. “Incentives to Membership in Canadian Political Parties.” Political Research Quarterly 55 (3): 547–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar