ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Room-Temperature Lasing from Monolithically Integrated GaAs Microdisks on Silicon

Cite this: ACS Nano 2018, 12, 3, 2169–2175
Publication Date (Web):January 24, 2018
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b07911

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

  • Open Access

Article Views

2858

Altmetric

-

Citations

58
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (4 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Additional functionalities on semiconductor microchips are progressively important in order to keep up with the ever-increasing demand for more powerful computational systems. Monolithic III–V integration on Si promises to merge mature Si CMOS processing technology with III–V semiconductors possessing superior material properties, e.g., in terms of carrier mobility or band structure (direct band gap). In particular, Si photonics would strongly benefit from an integration scheme for active III–V optoelectronic devices in order to enable low-cost and power-efficient electronic–photonic integrated circuits. We report on room-temperature lasing from AlGaAs/GaAs microdisk cavities monolithically integrated on Si(001) using a selective epitaxial growth technique called template-assisted selective epitaxy. The grown gain material possesses high optical quality without indication of threading dislocations, antiphase boundaries, or twin defects. The devices exhibit single-mode lasing at T < 250 K and lasing thresholds between 2 and 18 pJ/pulse depending on the cavity size (1–3 μm in diameter).

We recently entered the zettabyte era; that is, the annual global Internet data traffic passed 1000 exabytes (1 billion terabytes). Until the year 2020 this number will even increase to 2.3 zettabytes every year, (1) however, at the expense of a drastically increased power consumption of integrated circuits (ICs). Moreover, since 2016, the semiconductor industry research plan is not centered on device scaling anymore, i.e., improving the chip performance followed by the application. Thus, the integration of additional, value-added functionalities on future silicon dies and reducing the power consumption at the same time will be key for upcoming strategies, which will start with the application defining the functionality of future Si-based chips. (2) This in turn will require the integration of a large variety of devices such as amplifiers, ultralow power switches, and especially optoelectronic devices on the very same Si substrate to benefit from the maturity and low cost of the CMOS technology platform. In particular, approaches including the usage of massless photons instead of electrons for the data transfer on- and off-chip promise higher speed at lower power consumption. (3,4) In order to shed light on Si chips and make such electronic–photonic integrated circuits (EPICs) a reality, high-performance waveguides, (5) modulators, (6) and photodetectors (7) in Si or group IV photonics have already been developed. However, the deleterious impact of threading dislocations introduced by the lattice mismatch between Si and III–V material has strongly complicated the realization of coherent on-chip laser sources being the last missing piece to enable fully integrated EPICs. In this context, the most obvious solution would be to use group IV materials, where Ge as well as its alloys with Sn plays a primary role, due to the possibility to turn them into direct band gap semiconductors and gain media. (8−10) Very recently, direct band gap Ge1–xSnx epilayers with x < 0.13 and optically pumped GeSn laser devices were demonstrated. (11,12) However, electrically pumped lasing at room temperature in direct band gap group IV semiconductors is still rather challenging. III–V electrically pumped lasers are well-established for telecommunication and other applications, but the large-scale integration of III–V laser diodes on a Si platform is hampered by various obstacles, although significant progress was achieved in heterogeneous and monolithic integration of III–V gain material on Si. (13−17) Since traditional heteroepitaxy typically suffers from large differences of the crystal lattices and thermal expansion—resulting in defective layers—several techniques were developed in order to suppress and/or confine the defective interface layer close to the substrate and ensure a nearly defect-free device layer. This includes the growth of thick buffer layers, (18−21) nanowires, (13,15) and/or masked substrates (22) that leads to a significantly reduced density of crystal defects and dislocations. A promising integration path was recently demonstrated using selective area growth in trenches (22) and in prepatterned V-grooves, (23) which resulted in an optically and electrically driven laser on Si(001), respectively. Another approach is based on bonding of ex-situ fabricated III–V photonic components, (16) which recently made significant progress regarding yield and device lifetime. (24)
In this paper, we present the monolithic integration of III–V semiconductors for photonic devices on Si, based on a selective epitaxial growth technique (template-assisted selective epitaxy, TASE) that had been successfully developed for nanoelectronic devices. (25−28) The basic concept relies on the idea of a single and small-area nucleation of the III–V material on Si—with any substrate orientation—within hollow SiO2 template structures of arbitrary shapes. This procedure allows for direct III–V heteroepitaxy on Si without typical defects such as threading dislocations or antiphase boundaries, avoiding the usage of thick buffer layers, and, thus, could enable large-scale optoelectronics integration. A necessity of adapting the TASE process to photonic devices, though, is to increase the dimensions of the templates and resulting III–V structures while maintaining the material quality. Here we report on optimized template designs, fabrication steps, and active materials compared to the nanoelectronics analogue (25,29) and demonstrate the integration of AlGaAs/GaAs microdisk structures as active photonic devices. Optically pumped lasing up to room temperature is achieved along with temperature-stable lasing threshold and lasing peak position.

Results and Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Laser Fabrication

In order to monolithically integrate III–V semiconductor gain material, we employ the TASE growth technique presented and discussed elsewhere. (25,26,30) This approach promises nearly defect-free heteroepitaxy of III–V material on Si substrates. As laser gain material GaAs with an AlGaAs cladding deposited by MOCVD is used. The fabrication steps of the GaAs/AlGaAs microdisk devices are illustrated in Figure 1. Standard Si(001) substrates are used and thermally oxidized (approximately 130 nm SiO2 oxide thickness) to provide a high refractive index mismatch between the GaAs (nGaAs = 3.6) and the surrounding medium (nSiO2 = 1.5), thus enabling a simulated cavity Q-factor of ∼730. Subsequently, holes (100 nm diameter) were etched through the oxide using a CHF3/O2 reactive ion etching (RIE) dry etch process as shown schematically in Figure 1a. Next, an etch stop layer of 2–3 nm Al2O3 as well as a sacrificial amorphous Si (α-Si) layer were deposited. A 5 × 5 μm2 mesa structure centered on top of the etched holes was patterned using e-beam lithography and an HBr/O2-based inductively coupled plasma (ICP) etch process (see Figure 1b). These squares were covered with SiO2 (which is called a template in the following) using atomic layer deposition (ALD, 20 nm) and plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD, 120 nm), and four template openings are defined and etched into the oxide as indicated in Figure 1c and d. The size and shape of the openings ensure efficient precursor supply during growth while mechanically stabilizing the hollow oxide template. Afterward the sacrificial Si inside the templates and holes is etched (see Figure 1e) using XeF2. Prior to the metalorganic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) growth step (Figure 1f) the Al2O3 etch stop layer as well as the native SiO2 were etched using BHF while forming a hydrogen passivation on the Si surface. We grew two different samples for this study; both growth processes start with GaAs growth at 600 °C and a V–III ratio of 30 (sample A, 90 min; sample B, 30 min) using trimethylgallium (TMGa) and tert-butylarsine (TBAs) finalized with an AlGaAs/GaAs shell adding trimethylaluminum (TMAl). Whereas microdisk devices from sample B are approximately 1 μm in diameter, cavities from sample A are typically 3 times larger.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Fabrication of the GaAs microdisk laser. (a) Etching holes in a thermally oxidized Si(001) wafer using an RIE dry etching step. (b) Deposition and patterning of amorphous Si (α-Si). (c) Covering of the α-Si with ALD (20 nm) and PECVD (120 nm) SiO2. (d) Patterning and RIE etching of template openings. (e) Selective etching of the sacrificial α-Si layer using XeF2. (f) Finally, the hollow SiO2 cavities are filled using selective epitaxy (MOCVD).

Morphological Analysis

In order to investigate the crystalline quality, orientation, and the seed area, we cut out several TEM lamellas from microdisk devices using Ga focused-ion beam (FIB) etching at accelerating voltages of 30 and 5 kV. The samples were investigated by scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) using a double spherical aberration corrected JEOL ARM200F operating at 200 kV and equipped with a JEOL Dry SD100GV silicon drift detector with 100 mm2 detection area for energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analyses. The chemical maps obtained by EDX are presented in the Supporting Information, Figure S1, while annular dark field (ADF) images are shown in Figure 2. For those images, a convergence semiangle of 25 mrad was used in combination with an ADF detector with inner and outer collection semiangles of 90 and 370 mrad, respectively. Images obtained with an ADF are shown in Figure 2, while EDX images are presented in the Supporting Information, Figure S1.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) Cross-sectional ADF-STEM image of a microdisk from sample B. The insets display the fast Fourier transform images from the left and right segments as well as from the seed of the GaAs crystal. (b) Top-view scanning electron micrograph of the investigated device. (c) ADF-STEM micrograph along the [11–2] direction after high-frequency noise reduction using a Gaussian low-pass filter for noise reduction. (d) Ball-and-stick model of the GaAs crystal along the [11–2] direction.

In Figure 2a a cross-sectional STEM of a microdisk from sample B is presented and a top-view scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of the same device is shown in Figure 2b. This is the device on which we carried out the optical characterization presented in Figures 4 and 5. The disk radius is approximately 1 μm, whereas its thickness and the oxide thickness underneath amount to ∼335 nm and ∼140 nm, respectively. Following the various processing and wet etching steps, the seed hole diameters are typically slightly extended and measure approximately 120 nm. The contrast gradient across (top to bottom) the GaAs region originates from a thickness variation from the sample preparation. Moreover, several Ga residues are visible as dark spots. The high-resolution ADF-STEM micrographs as well as their fast Fourier transform images (insets of Figure 2a) reveal identical crystal orientation throughout the entire III–V crystal, denoting monocrystalline growth without amorphous or polycrystalline segments. Moreover, we do not observe any crystal defects such as threading dislocations, antiphase boundaries, or planar defects for this laser device. For this study we investigated seven devices, and Figure S2 shows an example of a nonlasing device. For in-depth planar defect analysis of TASE-grown GaAs, we refer to our recent work. (31) The top-view SEM image (Figure 2b) shows well-defined facets. However, the entire crystal is tilted by 8° and rotated toward the (11–2) plane, as shown in Figure 2d, compared to the Si substrate. We believe that this unexpected tilt and rotation of the crystal might stem from a damaged Si surface from RIE overetching, as evidenced by the noticeable Si recess in the seed hole as well as the observation of defective crystals as shown in Figure S2.

Figure 3

Figure 3. (a, b) 3D FDTD and 2D mode simulations, respectively, indicating higher order modes (mode 120), a group index of 7.6, and a Q-factor of 1650. (c) Photoluminescence (PL) spectra of a 3 μm device measured at 80 K. The inset shows a schematic view of the optical excitation and light detection. (d) Light-in light-out curve as well as the fwhm as a function of excitation at 80 K. (e) Room-temperature PL spectra and light-in light-out curve (inset) of another device from sample A.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Optical characteristics of MD lasers from sample B at (a) room temperature and 10 K (see inset). (b) Temperature-dependent light-in light-out curves. The temperature-dependent lasing threshold is shown in the inset.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Temperature-dependent PL spectra (a) above the lasing threshold at 4.2 pJ per pulse and (b) below the lasing threshold at 1.3 pJ per pulse of a device from sample B. (c) PL peak position as a function of temperature following Varshni’s law.

Optical Characterization of the GaAs/AlGaAs/GaAs Microdisk Lasers

The microdisk resonators were optically excited using a pulsed (15 ps pulse length every 10 ns) supercontinuum laser with center wavelengths of 705 and 710 nm close to the expected laser emission of the devices. The emission is collected from the top. A scheme of the measurement procedure is illustrated in the inset of Figure 3c. According to 3D finite difference time domain (FDTD) simulations of the cavity field decay using randomly oriented dipole emitters (see Supplementary Figure S4) and disk dimensions extracted from the TEM results, a clear mode profile is established, as presented in Figure 3a. The enhanced reflectivity of the high-order mode supported by the 3 μm nanodisk cavity (32) and the high refractive index mismatch between the GaAs nanodisk and the surrounding media results in a simulated cavity Q-factor of 1650. Additionally, 2D mode simulations using a commercial Helmholtz equation solver (Lumerical) show that a high-order (120) mode displayed in Figure 3b resembles the mode profile found with the FDTD simulation using the random-dipole method. Figure 3c shows photoluminescence (PL) spectra with a spectral resolution of ∼0.1 nm as a function of optical excitation at 80 K for a 3 μm microdisk device. Whereas the spontaneous emission dominating at low excitations is centered around 840 nm—being in good agreement with the low-temperature GaAs band gap—whispering gallery modes (WGM) appear above an excitation of 15 pJ per pulse. The integrated PL intensity as a function of excitation—light-in light-out (LL) curve—exhibits a clear kink along with a strong line width reduction at a lasing threshold of 18 pJ/pulse (see Figure 3d). Another device from sample A, shown in Figure 3e, exhibits lasing even up to room temperature with a similar lasing threshold. The corresponding LL curve features a typical S-shape behavior, which, accompanied by the strong line width narrowing, constitutes a clear signature of the room-temperature lasing operation of the device.
The temperature-dependent optical characterization of a microdisk laser device from sample B is presented in Figure 4. This monocrystalline device (cf. Figure 2) is 1 μm in diameter with a thickness of approximately 335 nm. The excitation-dependent room-temperature as well as low-temperature (10 K) PL spectra are displayed in Figure 4a and its inset, respectively. We found that the lasing thresholds of these smaller devices extracted from the LL curves (Figure 4b) are significantly lower (2.5–3.0 pJ/pulse) compared to the values observed for devices from sample A. Comparing the lasing thresholds measured for the 1 μm (2 pJ/pulse) and the 3 μm (18 pJ/pulse) microdisks we find a ∼9× higher lasing threshold for the large devices. As both devices are fabricated under the same growth conditions, we expect similar material qualities. Therefore, we conclude that either the different cavity confinement or simply the 9× larger gain volume of the 3 μm disk is responsible for the enhanced pumping energy required for the lasing operation of the larger device. The FDTD simulations presented in Figure S4 show that the cavity Q factor of the 1 μm disk (Q = 1430) and Q factor of the 3 μm disk (Q = 1650) are very similar. Since we optimized the laser spot size for the maximum photoluminescence intensity for each of the devices, we assume a constant excitation power per area for a given excitation laser power. Therefore, we believe that the 9× higher lasing threshold measured for the large device is mainly related to the scaling (9×) of the gain material volume, which is in excellent agreement with our experimental results. Remarkably, we observed that between 10 and 300 K the lasing peak position moves only very slightly from 830 to 836 nm (see Figure 5a), whereas the peak of the spontaneous emission follows Varshni’s law. Furthermore, we observe single-mode operation without any mode hopping up to 250 K and attribute the maximum shift of the lasing mode, ΔλT = 6 nm, to the temperature-induced refractive index change. (33) However, at room temperature, multimode lasing operation with a free spectral range (FSR) of 20 nm as shown in Figure 4a is observed. Additionally, as shown in the inset of Figure 4b, the lasing threshold is very insensitive to changes of the lattice temperature and increases only marginally from 2.5 pJ/pulse to 3.0 pJ/pulse for a temperature increase from 10 K to 300 K, corresponding to an extremely high characteristic temperature of T0 = 1500 K, which is more than 1 order of magnitude larger than for III–V quantum dot microdisk lasers. (33−35) We believe that due to the small diameter of the device and, thus, large FSR, only one (T < 250 K) or two modes (300 K) lie within the gain spectrum while providing sufficiently low cavity losses to enable lasing. As can be seen in Figure 5a, the spontaneous emission curve exhibits a very broad fwhm of ∼70 nm even at 10 K and shows a very strong high-energy tail that extends far beyond 800 nm. This slow decay of the high-energy tail cannot only be explained by thermal carrier activation, which corresponds to kBT = 0.86 meV (0.5 nm) at 10 K and, therefore, is a clear signature for an inequilibrium between the lattice temperature and the carrier temperature in the gain material caused by, for example, electron–electron collisions. However, as can be seen in Figure 5a, this strong spectral broadening of the material gain is very beneficial for the temperature stability of the device, as despite the Varshni shift and thermal depopulation, the overlap of the material gain and lasing cavity mode remains high if the temperature is increased.

Conclusion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

In summary, we demonstrated the monolithic integration of GaAs-based microdisk lasers on Si using template-assisted selective epitaxy. We developed a template process and design that enables the direct epitaxy of monocrystalline, μm-large III–V microdisks on Si(001) with high optical quality. The devices show unambiguous lasing action up to room temperature with thresholds between 2 and 18 pJ/pulse depending on the cavity size. Thus, TASE-grown gain materials and photonic devices on Si(001) represent a promising large-scale integration path toward electrically actuated lasers for merging electronics with photonics in order to reduce power consumption, i.e., via optical interconnects, and to enrich the functionality of future Si ICs.

Methods

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The AlGaAs/GaAs growth was conducted in a Veeco P150 MOCVD system at 60 Torr using H2 carrier gas, TMGa, TMAl, and TBAs as precursors. Prior to loading, the samples were etched in diluted hydrofluoric acid (HF) in order to remove the native oxide on the Si seed surface within the templates. Typical growth times were between 60 and 90 min. The dimensions of the AlGaAs/GaAs microdisks were measured after growth by inspection in a Hitachi SU8000 SEM. For the optical characterization of the microdisk lasers we used a home-built microphotoluminescence setup. The samples were excited using a pulsed supercontinuum light source with a repetition rate of 80 MHz and a typical pulse duration of 10 ps, which was filtered to a 5 nm spectral window around 720 nm. In order to reduce the degradation of the structures subject to the excitation light, we employed a chopper wheel to reduce the total number of excitation pulses by a factor of approximately 40. To avoid parasitic signals from the excitation source in the wavelength range of the microdisk emission between 800 and 900 nm, we used a 750 nm short-pass filter in the excitation path and a 750 nm long-pass filter in the detection path. The excitation light was focused onto the sample using a 50× Olympus objective, and the photoluminescence signal was collected with the same objective mounted inside a He-flow cryostat underneath a window opening, which provides optical access. The samples were glued onto the coldfinger, which can be moved in the x- and y-direction using a closed-loop piezo actuator stage. The objective can be moved in the z-direction using another piezo actuator to adjust the focus. The photoluminescence spectra of the microdisks were recorded using a liquid nitrogen cooled InGaAs line detector array with 1024 pixels mounted to a spectrometer with a focal length of 500 mm and an 850/mm grating. The photoluminescence signal is guided to the spectrometer and focused to the entrance slit with a width of ∼25 μm. An imaging system consisting of a halogen light source to illuminate the sample, a 20 cm lens to focus the image of the sample onto a CCD camera, a beam splitter to separate the two optical paths, and a semitransparent pellicle to add the imaging system to the excitation and detection paths was used to provide orientation on the sample and to record images of the microdisk emission using a 750 nm long-pass filter in front of the CCD. Samples for transmission electron microscopy were prepared by means of a dual-beam focused FEI Helios Nanolab 450S FIB. The samples were subsequently investigated by STEM using a double spherical aberration corrected JEOL ARM200F operating at 200 kV equipped with a JEOL Dry SD100GV silicon drift detector with 100 mm2 detection area for EDX analyses. ADF images were taken using a convergence semiangle of 25 mrad in combination with an ADF detector with inner and outer collection semiangles of 90 and 370 mrad, respectively.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b07911.

  • Additional information on TEM and EDX analyses as well as FDTD simulations (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Benedikt F. Mayer - IBM Research−Zürich, Säumerstrasse 4, 8803 Rüschlikon, Switzerland
    • Heinz Schmid - IBM Research−Zürich, Säumerstrasse 4, 8803 Rüschlikon, SwitzerlandOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-0228-4268
    • Marilyne Sousa - IBM Research−Zürich, Säumerstrasse 4, 8803 Rüschlikon, Switzerland
    • Johannes Gooth - IBM Research−Zürich, Säumerstrasse 4, 8803 Rüschlikon, SwitzerlandPresent Address: Max Planck Institute for the Chemical Physics of Solids, Noethnitzer Straße 40, 01187 Dresden, GermanyOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-4062-3232
    • Heike Riel - IBM Research−Zürich, Säumerstrasse 4, 8803 Rüschlikon, Switzerland
    • Kirsten E. Moselund - IBM Research−Zürich, Säumerstrasse 4, 8803 Rüschlikon, Switzerland Email: [email protected]
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program under Grant Agreement No. 704045 “MODES” (Marie Curie Post-Doctoral Research Fellowship), No. 641023 “NanoTandem”, and the ERC Starting Grant project under Grant Agreement No. 678567 “PLASMIC”. The authors would also like to thank Dr. M. D. Rossell from the Electron Microscopy Center (EMPA), Dübendorf, Switzerland, for fruitful discussions, S. Reidt for TEM lamella preparation, and M. Tschudy for his support.

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 35 other publications.

  1. 1
    Cisco. The Zettabyte Era: Trends and Analysis http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/vni-hyperconnectivity-wp.html (accessed Jun 7, 2017).
  2. 2
    Waldrop, M. M. The Chips Are down for Moore’s Law. Nature 2016, 530, 144147,  DOI: 10.1038/530144a
  3. 3
    Green, W.; Assefa, S.; Rylyakov, A.; Schow, C.; Horst, F.; Vlasov, Y. CMOS Integrated Silicon Nanophotonics: An Enabling Technology for Exascale Computing. In Advanced Photonics; OSA: Washington, D.C., 2011; p IME1.
  4. 4
    Masini, G.; Capellini, G.; Witzens, J.; Gunn, C. A 1550nm, 10Gbps Monolithic Optical Receiver in 130nm CMOS with Integrated Ge Waveguide Photodetector. In 2007 4th IEEE International Conference on Group IV Photonics; IEEE, 2007; pp 13.
  5. 5
    Xia, F.; Sekaric, L.; Vlasov, Y. Ultracompact Optical Buffers on a Silicon Chip. Nat. Photonics 2007, 1, 6571,  DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2006.42
  6. 6
    Xu, Q.; Schmidt, B.; Pradhan, S.; Lipson, M. Micrometre-Scale Silicon Electro-Optic Modulator. Nature 2005, 435, 325327,  DOI: 10.1038/nature03569
  7. 7
    Assefa, S.; Xia, F.; Vlasov, Y. A. Reinventing Germanium Avalanche Photodetector for Nanophotonic on-Chip Optical Interconnects. Nature 2010, 464, 8813,  DOI: 10.1038/nature08813
  8. 8
    Von den Driesch, N.; Stange, D.; Wirths, S.; Mussler, G.; Holländer, B.; Ikonic, Z.; Hartmann, J. M.; Stoica, T.; Mantl, S.; Grützmacher, D.; Buca, D. Direct Bandgap Group IV Epitaxy on Si for Laser Applications. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 46934702,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01327
  9. 9
    Stange, D.; Wirths, S.; von den Driesch, N.; Mussler, G.; Stoica, T.; Ikonic, Z.; Hartmann, J. M.; Mantl, S.; Grützmacher, D.; Buca, D. Optical Transitions in Direct-Bandgap Ge1-x Snx Alloys. ACS Photonics 2015, 2, 15391545,  DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.5b00372
  10. 10
    Stange, D.; Wirths, S.; Geiger, R.; Schulte-Braucks, C.; Marzban, B.; von den Driesch, N.; Mussler, G.; Zabel, T.; Stoica, T.; Hartmann, J.-M.; Mantl, S.; Grützmacher, D.; Buca, D. Optically Pumped GeSn Microdisk Lasers on Si. ACS Photonics 2016, 3, 12791285,  DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00258
  11. 11
    Wirths, S.; Geiger, R.; von den Driesch, N.; Mussler, G.; Stoica, T.; Mantl, S.; Ikonic, Z.; Luysberg, M.; Chiussi, S.; Hartmann, J. M.; Sigg, H.; Faist, J.; Buca, D.; Grützmacher, D. Lasing in Direct-Bandgap GeSn Alloy Grown on Si. Nat. Photonics 2015, 9, 8892,  DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2014.321
  12. 12
    Al-Kabi, S.; Ghetmiri, S. A.; Margetis, J.; Pham, T.; Zhou, Y.; Dou, W.; Collier, B.; Quinde, R.; Du, W.; Mosleh, A.; Liu, J.; Sun, G.; Soref, R. A.; Tolle, J.; Li, B.; Mortazavi, M.; Naseem, H. A.; Yu, S.-Q. An Optically Pumped 2.5 μm GeSn Laser on Si Operating at 110 K. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 109, 171105,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4966141
  13. 13
    Mayer, B.; Janker, L.; Loitsch, B.; Treu, J.; Kostenbader, T.; Lichtmannecker, S.; Reichert, T.; Morkötter, S.; Kaniber, M.; Abstreiter, G.; Gies, C.; Koblmüller, G.; Finley, J. J. Monolithically Integrated High-β Nanowire Lasers on Silicon. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 152156,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03404
  14. 14
    Mayer, B.; Rudolph, D.; Schnell, J.; Morkötter, S.; Winnerl, J.; Treu, J.; Müller, K.; Bracher, G.; Abstreiter, G.; Koblmüller, G.; Finley, J. J. Lasing from Individual GaAs-AlGaAs Core-Shell Nanowires up to Room Temperature. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2931,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3931
  15. 15
    Saxena, D.; Mokkapati, S.; Parkinson, P.; Jiang, N.; Gao, Q.; Tan, H. H.; Jagadish, C. Optically Pumped Room-Temperature GaAs Nanowire Lasers. Nat. Photonics 2013, 7, 963968,  DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2013.303
  16. 16
    Hofrichter, J.; Morf, T.; Porta, A. La; Raz, O.; Dorren, H. J. S.; Offrein, B. J. A Single InP-on-SOI Microdisk for High-Speed Half-Duplex On-Chip Optical Links. Opt. Express 2012, 20, B365B370,  DOI: 10.1364/OE.20.00B365
  17. 17
    Liang, D.; Fiorentino, M.; Okumura, T.; Chang, H. H.; Spencer, D. T.; Kuo, Y. H.; Fang, A. W.; Dai, D.; Beausoleil, R. G.; Bowers, J. E. Electrically-Pumped Compact Hybrid Silicon Microring Lasers for Optical Interconnects. Opt. Express 2009, 17, 2035520364,  DOI: 10.1364/OE.17.020355
  18. 18
    Luxmoore, I. J.; Toro, R.; Del Pozo-Zamudio, O.; Wasley, N. A.; Chekhovich, E. A.; Sanchez, A. M.; Beanland, R.; Fox, A. M.; Skolnick, M. S.; Liu, H. Y.; Tartakovskii, A. I. III-V Quantum Light Source and Cavity-QED on Silicon. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 1239,  DOI: 10.1038/srep01239
  19. 19
    Groenert, M. E.; Pitera, A. J.; Ram, R. J.; Fitzgerald, E. A. Improved Room-Temperature Continuous Wave GaAs/AlGaAs and InGaAs/GaAs/AlGaAs Lasers Fabricated on Si Substrates via Relaxed Graded GexSi1-x Buffer Layers. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B: Microelectron. Process. Phenom. 2003, 21, 1064,  DOI: 10.1116/1.1576397
  20. 20
    Shi, B.; Zhu, S.; Li, Q.; Wan, Y.; Hu, E. L.; Lau, K. M. Continuous-Wave Optically Pumped 1.55 μm InAs/InAlGaAs Quantum Dot Microdisk Lasers Epitaxially Grown on Silicon. ACS Photonics 2017, 4, 204210,  DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00731
  21. 21
    Chen, S.; Li, W.; Wu, J.; Jiang, Q.; Tang, M.; Shutts, S.; Elliott, S. N.; Sobiesierski, A.; Seeds, A. J.; Ross, I.; Smowton, P. M.; Liu, H. Electrically Pumped Continuous-Wave III–V Quantum Dot Lasers on Silicon. Nat. Photonics 2016, 10, 307311,  DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2016.21
  22. 22
    Wang, Z.; Tian, B.; Pantouvaki, M.; Guo, W.; Absil, P.; Van Campenhout, J.; Merckling, C.; Van Thourhout, D. Room-Temperature InP Distributed Feedback Laser Array Directly Grown on Silicon. Nat. Photonics 2015, 9, 837842,  DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2015.199
  23. 23
    Norman, J.; Kennedy, M. J.; Selvidge, J.; Li, Q.; Wan, Y.; Liu, A. Y.; Callahan, P. G.; Echlin, M. P.; Pollock, T. M.; Lau, K. M.; Gossard, A. C.; Bowers, J. E. Electrically Pumped Continuous Wave Quantum Dot Lasers Epitaxially Grown on Patterned, on-Axis (001) Si. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 3927,  DOI: 10.1364/OE.25.003927
  24. 24
    Doussiere, P. Laser Integration on Silicon. In 2017 IEEE 14th International Conference on Group IV Photonics (GFP); IEEE, 2017; pp 169170.
  25. 25
    Schmid, H.; Borg, M.; Moselund, K.; Gignac, L.; Breslin, C. M.; Bruley, J.; Cutaia, D.; Riel, H. Template-Assisted Selective Epitaxy of III–V Nanoscale Devices for Co-Planar Heterogeneous Integration with Si. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 233101,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4921962
  26. 26
    Borg, M.; Schmid, H.; Moselund, K. E.; Signorello, G.; Gignac, L.; Bruley, J.; Breslin, C.; Das Kanungo, P.; Werner, P.; Riel, H. Vertical III-V Nanowire Device Integration on Si(100). Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 19141920,  DOI: 10.1021/nl404743j
  27. 27
    Czornomaz, L.; Uccelli, E.; Sousa, M.; Deshpande, V.; Djara, V.; Caimi, D.; Rossell, M. D.; Erni, R.; Fompeyrine, J. Confined Epitaxial Lateral Overgrowth (CELO): A Novel Concept for Scalable Integration of CMOS-Compatible InGaAs-on-Insulator MOSFETs on Large-Area Si Substrates. VLSI Technol. (VLSI Technol. 2015 Symp. 2015, xx, T172T173,  DOI: 10.1109/VLSIT.2015.7223666
  28. 28
    Borg, M.; Schmid, H.; Moselund, K. E.; Cutaia, D.; Riel, H. Mechanisms of Template-Assisted Selective Epitaxy of InAs Nanowires on Si. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 117, 144303,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4916984
  29. 29
    Cutaia, D.; Moselund, K. E.; Schmid, H.; Borg, M.; Olziersky, A.; Riel, H. Complementary III–V Heterojunction Lateral NW Tunnel FET Technology on Si. In 2016 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology; IEEE, 2016; Vol. xx, pp 12.
  30. 30
    Schmid, H.; Cutaia, D.; Gooth, J.; Wirths, S.; Bologna, N.; Moselund, K. E.; Riel, H. Monolithic Integration of Multiple III-V Semiconductors on Si for MOSFETs and TFETs. In 2016 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM); IEEE, 2016; pp 3.6.13.6.4.
  31. 31
    Knoedler, M.; Bologna, N.; Schmid, H.; Borg, M.; Moselund, K. E.; Wirths, S.; Rossell, M. D.; Riel, H. Observation of Twin-Free GaAs Nanowire Growth Using Template-Assisted Selective Epitaxy. Cryst. Growth Des. 2017, 17, 62976302,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.7b00983
  32. 32
    Chen, R.; Tran, T.-T. D.; Ng, K. W.; Ko, W. S.; Chuang, L. C.; Sedgwick, F. G.; Chang-Hasnain, C. Nanolasers Grown on Silicon. Nat. Photonics 2011, 5, 170175,  DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2010.315
  33. 33
    Shi, B.; Zhu, S.; Li, Q.; Tang, C. W.; Wan, Y.; Hu, E. L.; Lau, K. M. 1.55 μm Room-Temperature Lasing from Subwavelength Quantum-Dot Microdisks Directly Grown on (001) Si. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 110, 121109,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4979120
  34. 34
    Wan, Y.; Li, Q.; Liu, A. Y.; Gossard, A. C.; Bowers, J. E.; Hu, E. L.; Lau, K. M. Temperature Characteristics of Epitaxially Grown InAs Quantum Dot Micro-Disk Lasers on Silicon for on-Chip Light Sources. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 109, 11104,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4955456
  35. 35
    Ide, T.; Baba, T.; Tatebayashi, J.; Iwamoto, S.; Nakaoka, T.; Arakawa, Y. Room Temperature Continuous Wave Lasing in InAs Quantum-Dot Microdisks with Air Cladding. Opt. Express 2005, 13, 16151620,  DOI: 10.1364/OPEX.13.001615

Cited By

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article is cited by 58 publications.

  1. Enrico Brugnolotto, Heinz Schmid, Vihar Georgiev, Marilyne Sousa. In-Plane III–V Nanowires on Si(1 1 0) with Quantum Wells by Selective Epitaxy in Templates. Crystal Growth & Design 2023, 23 (11) , 8034-8042. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.3c00806
  2. Wei Wen Wong, Naiyin Wang, Bryan D. Esser, Stephen A. Church, Li Li, Mark Lockrey, Igor Aharonovich, Patrick Parkinson, Joanne Etheridge, Chennupati Jagadish, Hark Hoe Tan. Bottom-up, Chip-Scale Engineering of Low Threshold, Multi-Quantum-Well Microring Lasers. ACS Nano 2023, 17 (15) , 15065-15076. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c04234
  3. Preksha Tiwari, Anna Fischer, Markus Scherrer, Daniele Caimi, Heinz Schmid, Kirsten E. Moselund. Single-Mode Emission in InP Microdisks on Si Using Au Antenna. ACS Photonics 2022, 9 (4) , 1218-1225. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.1c01677
  4. Wei Wen Wong, Zhicheng Su, Naiyin Wang, Chennupati Jagadish, Hark Hoe Tan. Epitaxially Grown InP Micro-Ring Lasers. Nano Letters 2021, 21 (13) , 5681-5688. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c01411
  5. Simone Tommaso Šuran Brunelli, Aranya Goswami, Brian Markman, Hsin-Ying Tseng, Mark Rodwell, Chris Palmstrøm, Jonathan Klamkin. Horizontal Heterojunction Integration via Template-Assisted Selective Epitaxy. Crystal Growth & Design 2019, 19 (12) , 7030-7035. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.9b00843
  6. Tejendra Dixit, Ankit Arora, Ananth Krishnan, K. Lakshmi Ganapathi, Pramoda K. Nayak, M. S. Ramachandra Rao. Near Infrared Random Lasing in Multilayer MoS2. ACS Omega 2018, 3 (10) , 14097-14102. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b01287
  7. Yanjun Liu, Chunxiang Xu, Zhu Zhu, Daotong You, Ru Wang, Feifei Qin, Xiaoxuan Wang, Qiannan Cui, Zengliang Shi. Controllable Fabrication of ZnO Microspheres for Whispering Gallery Mode Microcavity. Crystal Growth & Design 2018, 18 (9) , 5279-5286. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.8b00716
  8. Zhao Yan, Qiang Li. Recent progress in epitaxial growth of dislocation tolerant and dislocation free III–V lasers on silicon. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 2024, 57 (21) , 213001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ad26cd
  9. Yuanbo Cheng, Zongyan Zuo, Jinshan Yao, Kedong Zhang, Yang Lu, Chen Li, Yu Deng, Xuejin Zhang, Hong Lu, Yan‐Feng Chen. Room Temperature NUV‐To‐NIR Up‐ and Down‐Conversion Photoluminescence in Erbium‐Doped GaAs. Advanced Optical Materials 2024, 12 (4) https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202301616
  10. Lingyu Jiang, Qixiao Sui, Deqing Niu, Lulu Gao, Yingjie Shen, Lige Liu, Qingliang Zhang, Ruijun Lan. FAPbBr3/GaAs Heterojunction Saturable Absorber for Nd:GdVO4 Passively Q-Switched Lasers. Infrared Physics & Technology 2024, 81 , 105200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2024.105200
  11. Ying Xue, Jie Li, Yi Wang, Ke Xu, Zengshan Xing, Kam Sing Wong, Hon Ki Tsang, Kei May Lau. In‐Plane 1.5 µm Distributed Feedback Lasers Selectively Grown on (001) SOI. Laser & Photonics Reviews 2024, 18 (1) https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.202300549
  12. Preksha Tiwari, Noelia Vico Triviño, Heinz Schmid, Kirsten E Moselund. Review: III–V infrared emitters on Si: fabrication concepts, device architectures and down-scaling with a focus on template-assisted selective epitaxy. Semiconductor Science and Technology 2023, 38 (5) , 053001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6641/ac9f60
  13. Bozhang Dong. Introduction. 2023, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17827-6_1
  14. Ying Xue, Yu Han, Yi Wang, Jie Li, Jingyi Wang, Zunyue Zhang, Xinlun Cai, Hon Ki Tsang, Kei May Lau. High-speed and low dark current silicon-waveguide-coupled III-V photodetectors selectively grown on SOI. Optica 2022, 9 (11) , 1219. https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.468129
  15. Wei Wen Wong, Stephen Church, Chennupati Jagadish, Naiyin Wang, Patrick Parkinson, Hark Hoe Tan. Selective Area Epitaxy of InP/InAsP Multi-Quantum Well Micro-Ring Lasers. 2022, 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPC53466.2022.9975650
  16. Max Trippel, Jürgen Bläsing, Matthias Wieneke, Armin Dadgar, Gordon Schmidt, Frank Bertram, Jürgen Christen, André Strittmatter. Laser-assisted local metal–organic vapor phase epitaxy. Review of Scientific Instruments 2022, 93 (11) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0092251
  17. Yu Han, Hyundai Park, John Bowers, Kei May Lau. Recent advances in light sources on silicon. Advances in Optics and Photonics 2022, 14 (3) , 404. https://doi.org/10.1364/AOP.455976
  18. Yanxing Jia, Jun Wang, Qing Ge, Haijing Wang, Jiachen Li, Chunyang Xiao, Rui Ming, Bojie Ma, Zhuoliang Liu, Hao Zhai, Feng Lin, Weiyu He, Yisu Yang, Kai Liu, Yongqing Huang, Xiaomin Ren. Monolithic integration of 1.3 μm asymmetric lasers grown on silicon and silicon waveguides with tapered coupling. Laser Physics 2022, 32 (9) , 096201. https://doi.org/10.1088/1555-6611/ac8c41
  19. Stephen A. Church, Ruqaiya Al-Abri, Patrick Parkinson, Dhruv Saxena. Optical characterisation of nanowire lasers. Progress in Quantum Electronics 2022, 85 , 100408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pquantelec.2022.100408
  20. Wei Wen Wong, Chennupati Jagadish, Hark Hoe Tan. III–V Semiconductor Whispering-Gallery Mode Micro-Cavity Lasers: Advances and Prospects. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 2022, 58 (4) , 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1109/JQE.2022.3151082
  21. Davide Colucci, Marina Baryshnikova, Yuting Shi, Yves Mols, Muhammad Muneeb, Yannick De Koninck, Didit Yudistira, Marianna Pantouvaki, Joris Van Campenhout, Robert Langer, Dries Van Thourhout, Bernardette Kunert. Unique design approach to realize an O-band laser monolithically integrated on 300 mm Si substrate by nano-ridge engineering. Optics Express 2022, 30 (8) , 13510. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.454795
  22. Mikhail Eremenko, Nikita Shandyba, Natalia Chernenko, Sergey Balakirev, Maxim Solodovnik, Oleg Ageev, , . Investigation of GaAs MBE growth on FIB-modified Si(100). 2022, 59. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2624404
  23. Zhao Yan, Yu Han, Liying Lin, Ying Xue, Chao Ma, Wai Kit Ng, Kam Sing Wong, Kei May Lau. A monolithic InP/SOI platform for integrated photonics. Light: Science & Applications 2021, 10 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-021-00636-0
  24. Wei Wen Wong, Zhicheng Su, Naiyin Wang, Chennupati Jagadish, Hark Hoe Tan. Epitaxially-grown InP micro-ring lasers. 2021, 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISLC51662.2021.9615777
  25. Aranya Goswami, Brian Markman, Simone T. Šuran Brunelli, Shouvik Chatterjee, Jonathan Klamkin, Mark Rodwell, Chris J. Palmstrøm. Confined lateral epitaxial overgrowth of InGaAs: Mechanisms and electronic properties. Journal of Applied Physics 2021, 130 (8) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0050802
  26. Jessica Afalla, Elizabeth Ann Prieto, Horace Andrew Husay, Karl Cedric Gonzales, Gerald Catindig, Aizitiaili Abulikemu, Armando Somintac, Arnel Salvador, Elmer Estacio, Masahiko Tani, Muneaki Hase. Effect of heteroepitaxial growth on LT-GaAs: ultrafast optical properties. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 2021, 33 (31) , 315704. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ac04cc
  27. Preksha Tiwari, Anna Fischer, Svenja Mauthe, Enrico Brugnolotto, Noelia Vico Trivino, Marilyne Sousa, Daniele Caimi, Heinz Schmid, Kirsten E. Moselund. InGaAs microdisk cavities monolithically integrated on Si with room temperature emission at 1530 nm. 2021, 1-1. https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEO/Europe-EQEC52157.2021.9541796
  28. Tianyi Tang, Jiaqian Sun, Wenkang Zhan, Bo Xu, Chao Zhao. III–V Optoelectronic Devices Grown on Silicon. 2021, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/3527600434.eap856
  29. Xiaoming Yuan, Dong Pan, Yijin Zhou, Xutao Zhang, Kun Peng, Bijun Zhao, Mingtang Deng, Jun He, Hark Hoe Tan, Chennupati Jagadish. Selective area epitaxy of III–V nanostructure arrays and networks: Growth, applications, and future directions. Applied Physics Reviews 2021, 8 (2) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0044706
  30. Yu Han, Ying Xue, Zhao Yan, Kei May Lau. Selectively Grown III-V Lasers for Integrated Si-Photonics. Journal of Lightwave Technology 2021, 39 (4) , 940-948. https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2020.3041348
  31. Philipp Staudinger, Svenja Mauthe, Noelia Vico Triviño, Steffen Reidt, Kirsten E Moselund, Heinz Schmid. Wurtzite InP microdisks: from epitaxy to room-temperature lasing. Nanotechnology 2021, 32 (7) , 075605. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/abbb4e
  32. Preksha Tiwari, Pengyan Wen, Daniele Caimi, Svenja Mauthe, Noelia Vico Triviño, Marilyne Sousa, Kirsten E. Moselund. Scaling of metal-clad InP nanodisk lasers: optical performance and thermal effects. Optics Express 2021, 29 (3) , 3915. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.412449
  33. Patrick Parkinson. Physics and applications of semiconductor nanowire lasers. 2021, 389-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822083-2.00010-1
  34. Yingtao Hu, Di Liang, Raymond G. Beausoleil, . An advanced III-V-on-silicon photonic integration platform. Opto-Electronic Advances 2021, 4 (9) , 200094-200094. https://doi.org/10.29026/oea.2021.200094
  35. Katsuhiro Tomioka, Junichi Motohisa, Takashi Fukui. Rational synthesis of atomically thin quantum structures in nanowires based on nucleation processes. Scientific Reports 2020, 10 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67625-y
  36. Aranya Goswami, Simone T. Šuran Brunelli, Brian Markman, Aidan A. Taylor, Hsin-Ying Tseng, Kunal Mukherjee, Mark Rodwell, Jonathan Klamkin, Chris J. Palmstrøm. Controlling facets and defects of InP nanostructures in confined epitaxial lateral overgrowth. Physical Review Materials 2020, 4 (12) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.123403
  37. Yu Han, Kei May Lau. III–V lasers selectively grown on (001) silicon. Journal of Applied Physics 2020, 128 (20) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0029804
  38. Xiaoming Yuan, Naiyin Wang, Zhenzhen Tian, Fanlu Zhang, Li Li, Mark Lockrey, Jun He, Chennupati Jagadish, Hark Hoe Tan. Facet-dependent growth of InAsP quantum wells in InP nanowire and nanomembrane arrays. Nanoscale Horizons 2020, 5 (11) , 1530-1537. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NH00410C
  39. P. Tiwari, S. Mauthe, N. Vico Trivino, P. Staudinger, M. Scherrer, P. Wen, D. Caimi, M. Sousa, H. Schmid, K. E. Moselund, Q. Ding, A. Schenk. Scaled III-V optoelectronic devices on silicon. 2020, 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1109/NUSOD49422.2020.9217747
  40. Yu Han, Zhao Yan, Ying Xue, Kei May Lau. Micrometer-scale InP selectively grown on SOI for fully integrated Si-photonics. Applied Physics Letters 2020, 117 (5) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0015130
  41. Ting‐Yuan Chang, Hyunseok Kim, Brian T. Zutter, Wook‐Jae Lee, Brian C. Regan, Diana L. Huffaker. Orientation‐Controlled Selective‐Area Epitaxy of III–V Nanowires on (001) Silicon for Silicon Photonics. Advanced Functional Materials 2020, 30 (30) https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202002220
  42. Yu Han, Zhao Yan, Wai Kit Ng, Ying Xue, Kar Wei Ng, Kam Sing Wong, Kei May Lau. III–V micro- and nano-lasers deposited on amorphous SiO2. Applied Physics Letters 2020, 116 (17) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0008144
  43. Yu Han, Zhao Yan, Wai Kit Ng, Ying Xue, Kam Sing Wong, Kei May Lau. Bufferless 1.5  µm III-V lasers grown on Si-photonics 220  nm silicon-on-insulator platforms. Optica 2020, 7 (2) , 148. https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.381745
  44. Svenja Mauthe, Noelia Vico Trivino, Yannick Baumgartner, Marilyne Sousa, Daniele Caimi, Thilo Stoferle, Heinz Schmid, Kirsten Emilie Moselund. InP-on-Si Optically Pumped Microdisk Lasers via Monolithic Growth and Wafer Bonding. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 2019, 25 (6) , 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2019.2915924
  45. Bei Shi, Yu Han, Qiang Li, Kei May Lau. 1.55-μm Lasers Epitaxially Grown on Silicon. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 2019, 25 (6) , 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2019.2927579
  46. Hyun Kum, Doeon Lee, Wei Kong, Hyunseok Kim, Yongmo Park, Yunjo Kim, Yongmin Baek, Sang-Hoon Bae, Kyusang Lee, Jeehwan Kim. Epitaxial growth and layer-transfer techniques for heterogeneous integration of materials for electronic and photonic devices. Nature Electronics 2019, 2 (10) , 439-450. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-019-0314-2
  47. Yannick Baumgartner, Noelia Vico Trivino, Daniele Caimi, Svenja Mauthe, Kirsten E. Moselund, Heinz Schmid, Marilyne Sousa, Thilo Stoferle, Philipp Staudinger, Preksha Tiwari. Novel Integration Approach for III-V Microdisk Cavities on Si. 2019, 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1109/GROUP4.2019.8853880
  48. Svenja Mauthe, Kirsten E. Moselund, Noelia Vico Trivino, Yannick Baumgartner, Philipp Staudinger, Preksha Tiwari, Marilyne Sousa, Daniele Caimi, Thilo Stoferle, Heinz Schmid. Novel Integration Approach for III-V Microdisk Cavities on Si. 2019, 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1109/GROUP4.2019.8926061
  49. Benedikt F. Mayer, Stephan Wirths, Svenja Mauthe, Philipp Staudinger, Marilyne Sousa, Joel Winiger, Heinz Schmid, Kirsten E. Moselund. Microcavity Lasers on Silicon by Template-Assisted Selective Epitaxy of Microsubstrates. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters 2019, 31 (13) , 1021-1024. https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2019.2916459
  50. S. Mauthe, H. Schmid, K. E. Moselund, N. Vico Trivino, M. Sousa, P. Staudinger, Y. Baumgartner, P. Tiwari, T. Stoferle, D. Caimi, M. Scherrer. Monolithic integration of III-V microdisk lasers on silicon. 2019, 32-33. https://doi.org/10.1109/OMN.2019.8925128
  51. Yu Han, Ying Xue, Kei May Lau. Selective lateral epitaxy of dislocation-free InP on silicon-on-insulator. Applied Physics Letters 2019, 114 (19) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5095457
  52. Dries Van Thourhout, Yuting Shi, Marina Baryshnikova, Yves Mols, Nadezda Kuznetsova, Yannick De Koninck, Marianna Pantouvaki, Joris Van Campenhout, Robert Langer, Bernardette Kunert. Nano-ridge laser monolithically grown on (001) Si. 2019, 283-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.semsem.2019.07.002
  53. Svenja Mauthe, Philipp Staudinger, Noelia Vico Trivino, Marilyne Sousa, Thilo Stöferle, Heinz Schmid, Kirsten E. Moselund. Monolithically Integrated InP-on-Si Microdisk Lasers with Room-Temperature Operation. 2019, SM3J.1. https://doi.org/10.1364/CLEO_SI.2019.SM3J.1
  54. Owen Marshall, Mark Hsu, Zhechao Wang, Bernardette Kunert, Christian Koos, Dries Van Thourhout. Heterogeneous Integration on Silicon Photonics. Proceedings of the IEEE 2018, 106 (12) , 2258-2269. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2018.2858542
  55. S. Sant, A. Schenk, B. Mayer, S. Wirths, S. Mauthe, H. Schmid, K. E. Moselund. Modeling whispering gallery mode III–V micro-lasers monolithically integrated on silicon. 2018, 79-80. https://doi.org/10.1109/NUSOD.2018.8570258
  56. Bernardette Kunert, Yves Mols, Marina Baryshniskova, Niamh Waldron, Andreas Schulze, Robert Langer. How to control defect formation in monolithic III/V hetero-epitaxy on (100) Si? A critical review on current approaches. Semiconductor Science and Technology 2018, 33 (9) , 093002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6641/aad655
  57. Ying Wang, Xinyuan Zhou, Zaixing Yang, Fengyun Wang, Ning Han, Yunfa Chen, Johnny Ho. GaAs Nanowires Grown by Catalyst Epitaxy for High Performance Photovoltaics. Crystals 2018, 8 (9) , 347. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst8090347
  58. M. Sousa, S. Mauthe, B. Mayer, S Wirths, H. Schmid, K.E. Moselund. Monolithic Integration of III-V on Si Applied to Lasing Micro-Cavities: Insights from STEM and EDX. 2018, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/NANO.2018.8626223
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Fabrication of the GaAs microdisk laser. (a) Etching holes in a thermally oxidized Si(001) wafer using an RIE dry etching step. (b) Deposition and patterning of amorphous Si (α-Si). (c) Covering of the α-Si with ALD (20 nm) and PECVD (120 nm) SiO2. (d) Patterning and RIE etching of template openings. (e) Selective etching of the sacrificial α-Si layer using XeF2. (f) Finally, the hollow SiO2 cavities are filled using selective epitaxy (MOCVD).

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. (a) Cross-sectional ADF-STEM image of a microdisk from sample B. The insets display the fast Fourier transform images from the left and right segments as well as from the seed of the GaAs crystal. (b) Top-view scanning electron micrograph of the investigated device. (c) ADF-STEM micrograph along the [11–2] direction after high-frequency noise reduction using a Gaussian low-pass filter for noise reduction. (d) Ball-and-stick model of the GaAs crystal along the [11–2] direction.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. (a, b) 3D FDTD and 2D mode simulations, respectively, indicating higher order modes (mode 120), a group index of 7.6, and a Q-factor of 1650. (c) Photoluminescence (PL) spectra of a 3 μm device measured at 80 K. The inset shows a schematic view of the optical excitation and light detection. (d) Light-in light-out curve as well as the fwhm as a function of excitation at 80 K. (e) Room-temperature PL spectra and light-in light-out curve (inset) of another device from sample A.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Optical characteristics of MD lasers from sample B at (a) room temperature and 10 K (see inset). (b) Temperature-dependent light-in light-out curves. The temperature-dependent lasing threshold is shown in the inset.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Temperature-dependent PL spectra (a) above the lasing threshold at 4.2 pJ per pulse and (b) below the lasing threshold at 1.3 pJ per pulse of a device from sample B. (c) PL peak position as a function of temperature following Varshni’s law.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 35 other publications.

    1. 1
      Cisco. The Zettabyte Era: Trends and Analysis http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/vni-hyperconnectivity-wp.html (accessed Jun 7, 2017).
    2. 2
      Waldrop, M. M. The Chips Are down for Moore’s Law. Nature 2016, 530, 144147,  DOI: 10.1038/530144a
    3. 3
      Green, W.; Assefa, S.; Rylyakov, A.; Schow, C.; Horst, F.; Vlasov, Y. CMOS Integrated Silicon Nanophotonics: An Enabling Technology for Exascale Computing. In Advanced Photonics; OSA: Washington, D.C., 2011; p IME1.
    4. 4
      Masini, G.; Capellini, G.; Witzens, J.; Gunn, C. A 1550nm, 10Gbps Monolithic Optical Receiver in 130nm CMOS with Integrated Ge Waveguide Photodetector. In 2007 4th IEEE International Conference on Group IV Photonics; IEEE, 2007; pp 13.
    5. 5
      Xia, F.; Sekaric, L.; Vlasov, Y. Ultracompact Optical Buffers on a Silicon Chip. Nat. Photonics 2007, 1, 6571,  DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2006.42
    6. 6
      Xu, Q.; Schmidt, B.; Pradhan, S.; Lipson, M. Micrometre-Scale Silicon Electro-Optic Modulator. Nature 2005, 435, 325327,  DOI: 10.1038/nature03569
    7. 7
      Assefa, S.; Xia, F.; Vlasov, Y. A. Reinventing Germanium Avalanche Photodetector for Nanophotonic on-Chip Optical Interconnects. Nature 2010, 464, 8813,  DOI: 10.1038/nature08813
    8. 8
      Von den Driesch, N.; Stange, D.; Wirths, S.; Mussler, G.; Holländer, B.; Ikonic, Z.; Hartmann, J. M.; Stoica, T.; Mantl, S.; Grützmacher, D.; Buca, D. Direct Bandgap Group IV Epitaxy on Si for Laser Applications. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 46934702,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01327
    9. 9
      Stange, D.; Wirths, S.; von den Driesch, N.; Mussler, G.; Stoica, T.; Ikonic, Z.; Hartmann, J. M.; Mantl, S.; Grützmacher, D.; Buca, D. Optical Transitions in Direct-Bandgap Ge1-x Snx Alloys. ACS Photonics 2015, 2, 15391545,  DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.5b00372
    10. 10
      Stange, D.; Wirths, S.; Geiger, R.; Schulte-Braucks, C.; Marzban, B.; von den Driesch, N.; Mussler, G.; Zabel, T.; Stoica, T.; Hartmann, J.-M.; Mantl, S.; Grützmacher, D.; Buca, D. Optically Pumped GeSn Microdisk Lasers on Si. ACS Photonics 2016, 3, 12791285,  DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00258
    11. 11
      Wirths, S.; Geiger, R.; von den Driesch, N.; Mussler, G.; Stoica, T.; Mantl, S.; Ikonic, Z.; Luysberg, M.; Chiussi, S.; Hartmann, J. M.; Sigg, H.; Faist, J.; Buca, D.; Grützmacher, D. Lasing in Direct-Bandgap GeSn Alloy Grown on Si. Nat. Photonics 2015, 9, 8892,  DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2014.321
    12. 12
      Al-Kabi, S.; Ghetmiri, S. A.; Margetis, J.; Pham, T.; Zhou, Y.; Dou, W.; Collier, B.; Quinde, R.; Du, W.; Mosleh, A.; Liu, J.; Sun, G.; Soref, R. A.; Tolle, J.; Li, B.; Mortazavi, M.; Naseem, H. A.; Yu, S.-Q. An Optically Pumped 2.5 μm GeSn Laser on Si Operating at 110 K. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 109, 171105,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4966141
    13. 13
      Mayer, B.; Janker, L.; Loitsch, B.; Treu, J.; Kostenbader, T.; Lichtmannecker, S.; Reichert, T.; Morkötter, S.; Kaniber, M.; Abstreiter, G.; Gies, C.; Koblmüller, G.; Finley, J. J. Monolithically Integrated High-β Nanowire Lasers on Silicon. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 152156,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03404
    14. 14
      Mayer, B.; Rudolph, D.; Schnell, J.; Morkötter, S.; Winnerl, J.; Treu, J.; Müller, K.; Bracher, G.; Abstreiter, G.; Koblmüller, G.; Finley, J. J. Lasing from Individual GaAs-AlGaAs Core-Shell Nanowires up to Room Temperature. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2931,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3931
    15. 15
      Saxena, D.; Mokkapati, S.; Parkinson, P.; Jiang, N.; Gao, Q.; Tan, H. H.; Jagadish, C. Optically Pumped Room-Temperature GaAs Nanowire Lasers. Nat. Photonics 2013, 7, 963968,  DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2013.303
    16. 16
      Hofrichter, J.; Morf, T.; Porta, A. La; Raz, O.; Dorren, H. J. S.; Offrein, B. J. A Single InP-on-SOI Microdisk for High-Speed Half-Duplex On-Chip Optical Links. Opt. Express 2012, 20, B365B370,  DOI: 10.1364/OE.20.00B365
    17. 17
      Liang, D.; Fiorentino, M.; Okumura, T.; Chang, H. H.; Spencer, D. T.; Kuo, Y. H.; Fang, A. W.; Dai, D.; Beausoleil, R. G.; Bowers, J. E. Electrically-Pumped Compact Hybrid Silicon Microring Lasers for Optical Interconnects. Opt. Express 2009, 17, 2035520364,  DOI: 10.1364/OE.17.020355
    18. 18
      Luxmoore, I. J.; Toro, R.; Del Pozo-Zamudio, O.; Wasley, N. A.; Chekhovich, E. A.; Sanchez, A. M.; Beanland, R.; Fox, A. M.; Skolnick, M. S.; Liu, H. Y.; Tartakovskii, A. I. III-V Quantum Light Source and Cavity-QED on Silicon. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 1239,  DOI: 10.1038/srep01239
    19. 19
      Groenert, M. E.; Pitera, A. J.; Ram, R. J.; Fitzgerald, E. A. Improved Room-Temperature Continuous Wave GaAs/AlGaAs and InGaAs/GaAs/AlGaAs Lasers Fabricated on Si Substrates via Relaxed Graded GexSi1-x Buffer Layers. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B: Microelectron. Process. Phenom. 2003, 21, 1064,  DOI: 10.1116/1.1576397
    20. 20
      Shi, B.; Zhu, S.; Li, Q.; Wan, Y.; Hu, E. L.; Lau, K. M. Continuous-Wave Optically Pumped 1.55 μm InAs/InAlGaAs Quantum Dot Microdisk Lasers Epitaxially Grown on Silicon. ACS Photonics 2017, 4, 204210,  DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00731
    21. 21
      Chen, S.; Li, W.; Wu, J.; Jiang, Q.; Tang, M.; Shutts, S.; Elliott, S. N.; Sobiesierski, A.; Seeds, A. J.; Ross, I.; Smowton, P. M.; Liu, H. Electrically Pumped Continuous-Wave III–V Quantum Dot Lasers on Silicon. Nat. Photonics 2016, 10, 307311,  DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2016.21
    22. 22
      Wang, Z.; Tian, B.; Pantouvaki, M.; Guo, W.; Absil, P.; Van Campenhout, J.; Merckling, C.; Van Thourhout, D. Room-Temperature InP Distributed Feedback Laser Array Directly Grown on Silicon. Nat. Photonics 2015, 9, 837842,  DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2015.199
    23. 23
      Norman, J.; Kennedy, M. J.; Selvidge, J.; Li, Q.; Wan, Y.; Liu, A. Y.; Callahan, P. G.; Echlin, M. P.; Pollock, T. M.; Lau, K. M.; Gossard, A. C.; Bowers, J. E. Electrically Pumped Continuous Wave Quantum Dot Lasers Epitaxially Grown on Patterned, on-Axis (001) Si. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 3927,  DOI: 10.1364/OE.25.003927
    24. 24
      Doussiere, P. Laser Integration on Silicon. In 2017 IEEE 14th International Conference on Group IV Photonics (GFP); IEEE, 2017; pp 169170.
    25. 25
      Schmid, H.; Borg, M.; Moselund, K.; Gignac, L.; Breslin, C. M.; Bruley, J.; Cutaia, D.; Riel, H. Template-Assisted Selective Epitaxy of III–V Nanoscale Devices for Co-Planar Heterogeneous Integration with Si. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 233101,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4921962
    26. 26
      Borg, M.; Schmid, H.; Moselund, K. E.; Signorello, G.; Gignac, L.; Bruley, J.; Breslin, C.; Das Kanungo, P.; Werner, P.; Riel, H. Vertical III-V Nanowire Device Integration on Si(100). Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 19141920,  DOI: 10.1021/nl404743j
    27. 27
      Czornomaz, L.; Uccelli, E.; Sousa, M.; Deshpande, V.; Djara, V.; Caimi, D.; Rossell, M. D.; Erni, R.; Fompeyrine, J. Confined Epitaxial Lateral Overgrowth (CELO): A Novel Concept for Scalable Integration of CMOS-Compatible InGaAs-on-Insulator MOSFETs on Large-Area Si Substrates. VLSI Technol. (VLSI Technol. 2015 Symp. 2015, xx, T172T173,  DOI: 10.1109/VLSIT.2015.7223666
    28. 28
      Borg, M.; Schmid, H.; Moselund, K. E.; Cutaia, D.; Riel, H. Mechanisms of Template-Assisted Selective Epitaxy of InAs Nanowires on Si. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 117, 144303,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4916984
    29. 29
      Cutaia, D.; Moselund, K. E.; Schmid, H.; Borg, M.; Olziersky, A.; Riel, H. Complementary III–V Heterojunction Lateral NW Tunnel FET Technology on Si. In 2016 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology; IEEE, 2016; Vol. xx, pp 12.
    30. 30
      Schmid, H.; Cutaia, D.; Gooth, J.; Wirths, S.; Bologna, N.; Moselund, K. E.; Riel, H. Monolithic Integration of Multiple III-V Semiconductors on Si for MOSFETs and TFETs. In 2016 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM); IEEE, 2016; pp 3.6.13.6.4.
    31. 31
      Knoedler, M.; Bologna, N.; Schmid, H.; Borg, M.; Moselund, K. E.; Wirths, S.; Rossell, M. D.; Riel, H. Observation of Twin-Free GaAs Nanowire Growth Using Template-Assisted Selective Epitaxy. Cryst. Growth Des. 2017, 17, 62976302,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.7b00983
    32. 32
      Chen, R.; Tran, T.-T. D.; Ng, K. W.; Ko, W. S.; Chuang, L. C.; Sedgwick, F. G.; Chang-Hasnain, C. Nanolasers Grown on Silicon. Nat. Photonics 2011, 5, 170175,  DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2010.315
    33. 33
      Shi, B.; Zhu, S.; Li, Q.; Tang, C. W.; Wan, Y.; Hu, E. L.; Lau, K. M. 1.55 μm Room-Temperature Lasing from Subwavelength Quantum-Dot Microdisks Directly Grown on (001) Si. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 110, 121109,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4979120
    34. 34
      Wan, Y.; Li, Q.; Liu, A. Y.; Gossard, A. C.; Bowers, J. E.; Hu, E. L.; Lau, K. M. Temperature Characteristics of Epitaxially Grown InAs Quantum Dot Micro-Disk Lasers on Silicon for on-Chip Light Sources. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 109, 11104,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4955456
    35. 35
      Ide, T.; Baba, T.; Tatebayashi, J.; Iwamoto, S.; Nakaoka, T.; Arakawa, Y. Room Temperature Continuous Wave Lasing in InAs Quantum-Dot Microdisks with Air Cladding. Opt. Express 2005, 13, 16151620,  DOI: 10.1364/OPEX.13.001615
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b07911.

    • Additional information on TEM and EDX analyses as well as FDTD simulations (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect