Volume 128, Issue 2 e2022JD037851
Research Article

Limited Skill of Projected Land Precipitation by IPCC Models During 2002−2020

Dan Hu

Dan Hu

Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, China

College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Zhiping Tian

Zhiping Tian

Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Xianmei Lang

Xianmei Lang

Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Dabang Jiang

Corresponding Author

Dabang Jiang

Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, China

National Institute of Natural Hazards, Ministry of Emergency Management of China, Beijing, China

Correspondence to:

D. Jiang,

[email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 January 2023

Abstract

Climate models are widely used to project future climate changes and analyze underlying mechanisms. However, it remains unknown whether the earlier precipitation projections match the subsequent observations in recent decades, which is the scientific basis for the confidence of precipitation projections and associated impacts. Here, we find models in the Third (TAR), Fourth (AR4), and Fifth (AR5) Assessment Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) skillfully project the subsequent climatological changes in global mean land precipitation for 2002–2020, 2008–2020, and 2014–2020 (relative to 1980–1999 climatology) from several to 10 years ahead, respectively. Skillful regional projections are mainly found in the northern mid to high latitudes. IPCC models are less skillful in projecting subsequent changes in land precipitation at regional scales than at global scales, which is likely to be at least partly explained by the lower signal-to-noise ratio.

Key Points

  • Models show robust skills in projecting the subsequent climatological changes in global mean land precipitation from several to 10 years ahead

  • Relative to global scale, models are less skillful in projecting the subsequent climatological changes in precipitation at regional scale

  • The near-term precipitation projections are similar under various emission scenarios

Plain Language Summary

As an important tool, climate models are widely used to project future climate changes and analyze underlying mechanisms. The precondition of this is that the projections of climate models are credible. The most convincing way of validating the credibility of climate projections is to quantify the extent to which past projections agree with subsequent observations. Here, we provide a comprehensive analysis on the skill of past climate models in projecting the subsequent precipitation changes over global land. Results show that models have robust skills in projecting the subsequent climatological changes in global mean land precipitation from several to 10 years ahead. Relative to global scale land, the models are less skillful in projecting the subsequent changes in precipitation at regional scale, although they exhibit some skills in northern mid- to high-latitudes.

Data Availability Statement

All data sets used in this research can be accessed as follows: TAR, AR4, and AR5 model outputs at https://www.ipcc-data.org/sim/gcm_monthly/, CRU precipitation data in Harris et al. (2020), and GPCP precipitation data in Adler et al. (2018).