Skip to main content

Introducing Time, Temporality and Societal Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Time, Consumption and the Coordination of Everyday Life

Part of the book series: Consumption and Public Life ((CUCO))

  • 662 Accesses

Abstract

The time squeeze, captured in popular and academic debates as an experience of a shortage of time in which to conduct the activities that matter most to people, has become a pervasive concern of contemporary societies. This is sometimes presented as a matter of time scarcity that results from increasing demands on and opportunities for how we use time. Other accounts focus on processes of acceleration—the speeding-up of activities and capacity to do more of them simultaneously creates feelings of time pressure. Regardless of the emphasis, the experience of a time squeeze is associated with a wide range of social problems and is often identified as either a cause or barrier to their solution. This chapter provides a summary of the many ways in which the ‘time squeeze’ is associated with societal problems. It provides a summary of theories of time and how it relates to society before providing an overview of the content and core arguments contained within this book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adam, B. (1989). Feminist Social Theory Needs Time. Reflections on the Relation between Feminist Thought, Social Theory and Time as an Important Parameter in Social Analysis. Sociological Review, 37, 458–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adam, B. (1990). Time and Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adam, B. (1995). Timewatch: The Social Analysis of Time. London: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adam, B. (1998). Timescapes of Modernity: The Environment and Invisible Hazards. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adam, B. (2004). Time. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, R. (2004). The Hanged Man: A Story of Miracle, Memory, and Colonialism in the Middle Ages. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1992). Intimations of Postmodernity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2001). Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Conseqeuences. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, W. (1992). The Problem of Time in Sociology: An Overview of the Literature on the State of Theory and Research on the Sociology of Time, 1900–82. Time & Society, 1, 81–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1979). Algeria 1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colville, R. (2016). The Great Acceleration: How the World is Getting Faster. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D. (2000). The Rise of ‘the Toddler’ as Subject and as Merchandising Category in the 1930s. In M. Gottdiener (Ed.), The New Means of Consumption (pp. 111–130). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEMOS. (1995). The Time Squeeze. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1915). The Elementary Forms of Religious Life: A Study in Religious Sociology (J. W. Swain, Trans.). London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1992). Time: An Essay. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans-Pritchard, E. (1969). The Neur. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershuny, J. (2000). Changing Times: Work and Leisure in Post-industrial Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershuny, J. (2005). Busyness as the Badge of Honor for the New Superordinate Working Class. Social Research, 72(2), 287–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillis, J. R. (1996). A World of Their Own Making: Myth, Ritual and the Quest for Family Values. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleick, J. (1999). Faster: The Acceleration of Just About Everything. New York: Abacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1989). The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, R. (2003). Network Time and the New Knowledge Epoch. Time & Society, 12(2/3), 225–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1927). Being and Time (J. Stambaugh, Trans.). New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, P. (1993). About Time: The Revolution in Work and Family Life. Rivers Oram Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R. (1997). The Time Bind: When Home Becomes Work and Work Becomes Home. CA Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockey, J., & James, A. (2003). Social Identities Across the Life Course. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, S. B. (1970). The Harried Leisure Class. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1976). The Future Cannot Begin: Temporal Structures in Modern Society. Social Research, 43, 130–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, K. (1952). The Problem of Generations. In K. Mannheim (Ed.), Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge Kegan & Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. (1976). The Time Famine. In S. Parker (Ed.), The Sociology of Leisure. Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J., & Godbey, G. (1997). Time for Life: The Surprising Ways That Americans Use Their Time. Pennsylvania State Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, H. (2017). De-Synchronization, Dynamic Stabilization, Dispositional Squeeze: The Problem of Temporal Mismatch. In J. Wajcman & N. Dodd (Eds.), The Sociology of Speed: Digital, Organizational, and Social Temporalities (pp. 25–41). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. (2010). The Timespace of Human Activity: On Performance, Society, and History as Interminate Teleological Events. Plymouth: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schor, J. (1992). The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of Leisure. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulte, B. (2015). Overwhelmed: How to Work, Love and Play When No One Has the Time. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southerton, D. (2013). Temporal Rhythms, Habits and Routines: From Consumer Behaviour to the Temporal Ordering of Practices. Time and Society, 22(3), 335–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, O., & Gershuny, J. (2018). Speed-Up Society? Evidence from the UK 2000 and 2015 Time Use Diary Surveys. Sociology, 52, 20–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabboni, S. (2001). The Idea of Social Time in Norbert Elias. Time & Society, 10(1), 5–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Tienoven, T. P. (2019). A Multitude of Natural, Social and Individual Time. Time & Society, 28(3), 971–994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wajcman, J. (2015). Pressed for Time: The Acceleration of Life in Digital Capitalism. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warde, A., Cheng, S.-L., Olsen, W., & Southerton, D. (2007). Changes in the Practice of Eating: A Comparative Analysis of time-use. Acta Sociologica, 50(4), 365–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerubavel, E. (1979). Patterns of Time in Hospital Life: A Sociological Perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerubavel, E. (1981). Hidden Rhythms: Schedules and Calendars in Social Life. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerubavel, E. (1982). The Standardization of Time: A Sociohistorical Perspective. American Journal of Sociology, 88, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dale Southerton .

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Southerton, D. (2020). Introducing Time, Temporality and Societal Change. In: Time, Consumption and the Coordination of Everyday Life. Consumption and Public Life. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-60117-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-60117-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-230-57251-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-60117-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics