Abstract
Seen from the outside, the leadership position in a political party or government is coveted by many. Yet party leadership and, possibly in its wake, a prime-ministership or a presidency are ‘hot seats’ in more than one sense. They are not just hot in terms of the potential for power and authority they bring to those that occupy them; they are also hot in terms of attracting competition and controversy. Leadership of a party is more often than not a precarious possession: not only do political leaders lead their lives constantly in the public eye with all the drawbacks that this entails, but there are also plenty of people ready to criticize their performance. There is no shortage of potential competitors either, all whom are brooding on how and when to take over the top job.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Aarts, K., Blais, A. and Schmitt, H. (eds) (2010) Political Leaders and Democratic Elections (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Alderman, R. K. and Smith, M. J. (1990) ‘Can British prime ministers be given the push by their parties?’, Parliamentary Affairs, 43(3), 260–72.
Andrews, J. and Jackman, R. (2008) ‘If winning isn’t everything, why do they keep score? Consequences of electoral performance for party leaders’, British Journal of Political Science, 38(4), 657–75.
Bennis, W. G. (1989) On Becoming a Leader (London: Century Business).
Blondel, J. and Thibault, J.-L. (eds) (2009) Political Leadership, Parties and Citizens: The Personalisation of Leadership (London: Routledge).
Boyne, G. and Dahya, J. (2002) ‘Executive succession and the performance of public organizations’, Public Administration, 80(1), 179–200.
Bunce, V. (1981) Do New Leaders Make a Difference?: Executive Succession and Public Policy Under Capitalism and Socialism (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Bunce, V. and Roeder, P. (1986) ‘The effects of leadership succession in the Soviet Union’, American Political Science Review, 80(1), 215–24.
Cross, W. and Blais, A. (2008) ‘Who selects the party leader? A cross-national analysis’. Paper presented at the 2008 Elections, Public Opinion and Parties (EPOP) Annual Conference.
Davis, J. W. (1998) Leadership Selection in Six Western Democracies (Westport: Greenwood Press).
Denham, A. and O’Hara, K. (2008) Democratizing Conservative Leadership Selection: From Grey Suits to Grass Roots (Manchester: Manchester University Press).
Easton, D. (1965) A Systems Analysis of Political Life (Chicago: Chicago University Press).
Heppell, T. (2008) Choosing the Tory Leader: Conservative Party Leadership Elections from Heath to Cameron (London: Taurus).
Heppell, T. (2010) Choosing the Labour Leader: Labour Party Leadership elections from Wilson to Brown (London: Taurus).
Kane, J. (2001) The Politics of Moral Capital (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Katz, R. S. and Mair, P. (1995) ‘Changing models of party organization and party democracy: The emergence of the cartel party’, Party Politics, 1(1), 5–28.
Kenig, O. (2009) ‘Democratization of party leadership selection: Do wider selec- torates produce more competitive contests?’, Electoral Studies, 28(2), 240–7.
King, A. (ed.) (2002) Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
LeDuc, L. (2001) ‘Democratizing party leadership selection’, Party Politics, 7(3), 323–41.
Lijphart, A. (1999) Patterns of Democracy (New Haven: Yale University Press).
Marsh, M. (1993) ‘Selecting party leaders in the Republic of Ireland: Taking the lid off party politics’, European Journal of Political Research, 24(3), 295–316.
Panebianco, A. (1988) Political Parties: Organization and Power (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Punnett, R. M. (1992) Selecting the Party Leader: Britain in Comparative Perspective (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf).
Quinn, T. (2005) ‘Leasehold or freehold? Leader eviction rules in the British Conservative and Labour parties’, Political Studies, 53(4), 793–815.
Seldon, A. (1998) Major: A Political Life (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson).
Stark, L. (1996) Choosing a Leader: Party Leadership Contests in Britain from Macmillan to Blair (London: Macmillan).
Turner, J., Subasic, E. and Reynolds, K. (2008) ‘Identity confers power: The new view of leadership in social psychology’, in P. ‘t Hart and J. Uhr (eds) Public Leadership: Perspectives and Practices (Canberra: ANU E Press), pp. 57–72.
Weller, P. (1983) ‘The vulnerability of prime ministers: A comparative perspective’, Parliamentary Affairs, 36(1), 96–117.
Weller, P. (1985) First AmongEquals (Sydney: Allen & Unwin).
Weller, P. (1994) ‘Party rules and the dismissal of prime ministers: Comparative perspectives from Britain, Canada and Australia’, Parliamentary Affairs, 47(2), 133–43.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Matthew Laing and Paul’t Hart
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Laing, M., Hart, P. (2011). Seeking and Keeping the Hot Seat: A Comparative Analysis of Party Leader Successions. In: Hart, P., Uhr, J. (eds) How Power Changes Hands. Understanding Governance series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306431_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306431_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31814-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-30643-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)