Abstract
As Chapters 1 and 2 have illustrated, the Left Party went through a challenging and decidedly unpredictable first 15 years in existence. By 2005 it appeared, in spite of its inglorious past in the GDR, to have found a place in contemporary German politics, and it is undoubtedly becoming an ever more ‘normal’ part of the German party system. Thus far we have mapped out the roller coaster ride that the Left Party has experienced in everyday practical politics. We have also illustrated that the Left Party’s successes and failures have been analysed by political scientists in different ways; some have persisted in seeing it as a dangerous, populist, extremist party on the fringes of democratic acceptability, others as a milieu-based protest party articulating fuzzily defined eastern German interests, while yet more have, as we have seen, concentrated on analysing the party’s progress through the prism of left-wing politics. While all have had some merit, the results of the 2005 federal election, the merger of the PDS and the WASG into Die Linke and the establishment of the new party as a serious actor with genuine long-term prospects indicate that an approach based on the latter may now have the most mileage. Finally, thus far we have also concentrated primarily on the past rather than the future, avoiding any analysis of what problems, predicaments and dilemmas the ‘new’ Left Party is likely to be faced with. This chapter makes a start in rectifying this.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
3 Aims and Ambitions: Policy, Office, Votes and the Left Party
Tim Bale and Richard Dunphy, ‘In from the Cold: Left Parties, Policy, Office and Votes in Advanced Liberal Democracies since 1989’, paper presented to University of Sussex’s Centre for the Study of Parties and Democracy conference on the non-social democratic left and government participation’, University of Sussex, 12 September 2006.
Robert Michels, Political Parties. A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy ( New York: Dover Publications, 1959 ), p. 32.
Robert Michels, 1959, p. 163. For a more detailed application of the Michels’s work to the case of the Left Party, see Stuart Graham, The Party of Democratic Socialism and the Temptations of Parliamentary Democracy ( Birmingham: University of Birmingham, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, 2001 ).
For particular scathing criticisms of Michels’s assumptions about the generalisability of his model see Duncan Hallas, ‘Towards a Revolutionary Socialist Party’, in Duncan Hallas (ed.), Party and Class (London: Pluto, 1971). Available on http://marxists.de/party/hallas/party.htm (viewed on 4 August 2006).
Richard S. Katz and Peter Mair, ‘Changing Models of Party Organisation and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party’, Party Politics, 1, 1995: 5–28
For a biting critique of their ideas see Herbert Kitschelt, ‘Citizens, Politicians, and Party Cartelization: Political Representation and State Failure in Post-Industrial Democracies’, European Journal of Political Research, 37, 2000: 149–179.
Gordon Hands, ‘Robert Michels and the Study of Political Parties’, British Journal of Political Science, 1, 1971: 155–172.
Richard S. Katz and Peter Mair, ‘The Ascendancy of the Party in Public Office: Party Organizational Change in Twentieth-Century Democracies’, in Richard Gunther, Jose Ramon Montero, and Juan J. Linz (eds), Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002 ), pp. 113–135.
Peter Gay, The Dilemma of Democratic Socialism: Eduard Bernstein’s Challenge to Marx (New York: Columbia University Press, 1952), p. ix.
For more on interpretivism, see Mark Bevir and R. A. W. Rhodes, ‘Interpretive Theory’, in David Marsh and Gerry Stoker (eds), Theory and Methods in Political Science ( London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002 ) pp. 131–152.
For exceptions see Kate Hudson, European Communism since 1989 ( London: Macmillan, 2000 )
Anna Bosco, ‘Four Actors in Search of a Role: The Southern European Communist Parties’, in P. Nikiforos Diamandouros and Richard Gunther (eds), Parties, Politics and Democracy in the New Southern Europe ( Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001 )
Stuart Gapper, From Eastern European Communist Successor to Western European Socialist Party? Germany’s Party of Democratic Socialism in a Comparative Context, 1990–2002 ( Birmingham: University of Birmingham, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, 2002 )
Richard Dunphy, Contesting Capitalism? Left Parties and European Integration ( Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2004 )
Luke March and Case Mudde, ‘What’s Left of the Radical Left? The European Radical Left after 1989: Decline and Mutation’, Comparative European Politics, 3 (1), 2005: 23–49.
An important, if little studied, exception to the general trend of electoral decline is AKEL in Cyprus. AKEL remains a Volkspartei in a way that no other self-proclaimed radical Left Party does. See Richard Dunphy and Tim Bale, ‘Red flag still flying? Explaining AKEL — Cyprus’s communist anomaly’, Party Politics, 12 (4), 2006: 129–146.
See Kaare Strum, ‘A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties’, American Journal of Political Science, 34 /2, (1990): 566–568
Kaare Strom and Wolfgang C. Müller, ‘Political Parties and Hard Choices’, in Wolfgang C. Müller and Kaare Strom (eds), Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions, ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999 ), pp. 5–9
Stephen B. Wolinetz, ‘Beyond the Catch-All Party: Approaches to the Study of Parties and Party Organization in Contemporary Democracies’, in Richard Gunther, Jose Montero and Juan Linz (eds), Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002 ), pp. 150–153.
A potential fourth aim — that of simply holding the party together as a coherent unit — is also sometimes mentioned alongside these three. See Gunnar Sjöblom, Party Strategies in a Multiparty System (Lund: Studentlitteratur, 1968). See also Strom and Müller, ‘Political Parties and Hard Choices’, p. 31.
Michael Laver and Norman Schofield, Multi-Party Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe ( Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1990 ), p. 10.
Elmar Wiesendahl, Parteien in Perspektive. Theoretische Ansichten der Organisationswirklichkeit politischer Parteien ( Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1998 ), pp. 219–249
Elmar Wiesendahl, ‘Changing Party Organisations in Germany: How to Deal with Uncertainty and Organised Anarchy’, German Politics, 8 (2), 1999: 117.
Karl Weick, ‘Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 21 (1), 1976: 5.
Nils Brunsson, The Organisation of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organisations ( New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1989 ), p. 27.
Robert Harmel and Kenneth Janda, ‘An Integrated Theory on Party Goals and Party Change’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6 /3 (1994): 269.
See Frank L. Wilson, ‘The Sources of Party Change: The Social Democratic Parties of Britain, France, Germany and Spain’, in Kay Lawson (ed.), How Political Parties Work: Perspectives form Within ( Westport und London: Praeger, 1994 ), p. 264
Robert Harmel and Alexander C. Tan, ‘Party Actors and Party Change: Does Factional Dominance Matter?’, European Journal of Political Research, 42 /3, (2003): 409–424.
Dan Hough, The Fall and Rise of the PDS in Eastern Germany ( Birmingham: Birmingham University Press, 2002 ), p. 22.
Dan Hough, 2002, p. 17. See also Michael Gerth, Die PDS und die ostdeutsche Gesellschaft im Trans formationsprozess. Wahlerfolge und politisch-kulturelle Kontinuitäten ( Hamburg: Dr. Kovac, 2003 ), p. 139.
Angelo Panebianco, Political Parties: Organisation and Power ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988 ), pp. 247–250.
Abram de Swann, Coalition Theories and Cabinet Formation ( Amsterdam. Elsevier, 1973 )
William H. Riker, ‘Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions’, American Political Science Review, 74, 1980: 432–446; Michael Laver and Norman Schofield, 1990
Michael Laver and Kenneth Shepsle, ‘Government Coalitions and Intraparty Politics’, British Journal of Politics Science, 20 (4), 1990: 489–507
Ian Budge and Hans Kerman, Parties and Democracy: Coalition Formation and Government Functioning in Twenty States ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990 ).
Lawrence Dodd, Coalitions in Parliamentary Government ( Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976 ).
William M Downs, Coalition Government Subnational Style ( Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1998 ), p. 20
See also Robert Axelrod, Conflict of Interest ( Chicago: Markham, 1970 )
George Tsebelis, Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics ( Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990 ).
Michael Laver, ‘Theories of Coalition Formation and Local Government Coalitions’, in Colin Mellors and Bert Pijnenburg (eds), Political Parties and Coalitions in European Local Government ( London: Routledge, 1989 ), p. 16.
See for example William Riker, The Theory of Political Coalitions ( New Haven: Yale University Press, 1962 )
Michael Leiserson, ‘Factions and Coalitions in One-Party Japan’, American Political Science Review, 62, 1968: 770–787
Michael Leiserson, ‘Game Theory and the Study of Coalition Behaviour’, in Sven Groennings, E. W. Kelly and Michael Leiserson (eds), The Study of Coalition Behaviour ( New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1970 )
Robert Axelrod, 1970; Abram de Swann, 1973; Laver and Shepsle, 1990; David Austen-Smith and Jeffery Banks, ‘Stable Governments and the Allocation of Party Portfolios’, American Political Science Review, 82, 1990: 891–906
Norman Schofield, ‘Political Competition and Multiparty Coalition Governments’, European. Journal of Political Research, 23, 1993: 1–33.
See Klaus von Beyme, ‘Governments, Parliaments and the Structure of Power in Political Parties’, in Hans Daalder and Peter Mair (eds) Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change (London: Sage, 1983); Laver and Schofield, 1990, p. 70.
For an analysis of rising levels of regionalisation in the German party system, see Charlie Jeffery and Dan Hough, ‘Germany: An Erosion of Federal-Länder Linkages?’ in Dan Hough and Charlie Jeffery (eds), Devolution and Electoral Politics ( Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2006 ).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Dan Hough, Michael Koß and Jonathan Olsen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hough, D., Koß, M., Olsen, J. (2007). Aims and Ambitions: Policy, Office, Votes and the Left Party. In: The Left Party in Contemporary German Politics. New Perspectives in German Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592148_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592148_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28537-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59214-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)