Skip to main content

The Evolution of Decision-Making in the British Labour Party: From Grassroots to Netroots?

  • Chapter
New Technology, Organizational Change and Governance

Abstract

When it comes to branding, marketing, and election victories, the revamped British Labour Party, also known as ‘New’ Labour, undoubtedly stood, until very recently, as a success story which other political parties wished to emulate. However, it is also now a largely discredited organization, which was defeated at the polls in May 2010 and whose members have been leaving in their droves, a disaffection which the 6 per cent post-election surge is unlikely to significantly counter.1 It is the contention of this chapter that while the business-inspired reforms account to a large extent for the success of the New Labour brand by raising the organization’s responsiveness to a range of stakeholders, such as voters and supporters, who had not previously been prioritized, the modernizers’ attachment to a technical, managerial conception of people management contained, from the very start, the seeds of future decay. The lessons drawn from the rise and fall of New Labour therefore provide a unique insight into the potentially disastrous effects of some of the most popular tenets of change management in organizations in general, notably the deleterious impact of the Party’s growing disregard for the role of members and activists in achieving the organization’s main goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Avril, E. (2007). Du Labour au New Labour. Le changement vu de l’intérieur, Lille: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avril, E. (2011). ‘Word of mouth, word of mouse: la campagne des Travaillistes à l’heure des «premières élections numériques» en Grande-Bretagne’, in Avril, E. and Schnapper, P. (eds.), Les Elections législatives britanniques de 2010, Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique, 16(1), Spring 2011: 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. (2000). The Innovator’s Dilemma, New York, NY: HarperBusiness Essentials.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M., Payne, A., and Ballantyne, D. (1991). Relationship Marketing: Bringing Quality, Customer Service and Marketing Together, Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S. (2005). ‘New Mediation and Direct Representation: Reconceptualising Representation in the Digital Age’, New Media & Society, 7(2): 177–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duverger, M. (1951). Les Partis politiques, Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2000). New Labour, New Language?, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, D., and Webb, P. (2000). ‘Political Parties as Campaign Organizations’, in Dalton, R. And Wattenberg, M. (eds.), Parties Without Partisans, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 102–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R., and Ward, S. (2000). ‘A Proposed Methodology for Measuring the Function and Effectiveness of Political Web-Sites’, Social Science Computer Review, 18(3): 301–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, J., Horrocks, I., and Tops, P.W. (2000). Democratic Governance and New Technology. Technologically Mediated Innovations, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, N. and Lilleker, D. (2009). ‘Building an Architecture of Participation?: Political Parties and Web 2.0 in Britain’, Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 6(3/4): 232–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R.S. and Crotty, W.J. (2006). Handbook of Party Politics, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R.S. and Mair, P. (1995). ‘Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: the Emergence of the Cartel Party’, Party Politics, 1(1): 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchheimer, O. (1966). ‘The Transformation of the Western European Party Systems’, in Lapalombara, J. and Weiner, M. (eds.), Political Parties and Political Development, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, R.A. and Casey, M.-A. (2000). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • LABOUR PARTY (1997a). Partnership in Power. Policy Making Process.

    Google Scholar 

  • LABOUR PARTY (1997b). Building a Healthy Party.

    Google Scholar 

  • LABOUR PARTY (2010). Partnership into Power. Review of Labour Party Policy Making.

    Google Scholar 

  • LABOUR PARTY (2011). Refounding Labour to Win. A Party for the New Generation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lees-Marshment, J. (2001). Political Marketing and British Political Parties: the Party’s Just Begun, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lees-Marshment, J. (2004). The Political Marketing Revolution, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessig, L. (1999). Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace, New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilleker, D. (2005). ‘Political Marketing: The Cause of an Emerging Democratic Deficit in Britain?’ in Wymer, W. Jr. and Lees-Marshment, J. (eds.), Current Issues in Political Marketing, Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press, pp. 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusoli, W. and Ward, S. (2003). ‘Digital Rank-and-File: Party Activists’ Perceptions and Use of the Internet’, Paper given at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P. and van Biezen, I. (2001). ‘Party Membership in Twenty European Democracies’, Party Politics, 7(1): 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelson, P., and Liddle, R. (1996). The Blair Revolution: Can New Labour Deliver? London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margetts, H. (2006). ‘The Cyber Parties’, in Katz, R.S. and Crotty, W.J. (eds.), Handbook of Party Politics, London: Sage, pp. 528–535.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.K. and Kendall, P.L. (1946). ‘The Focused Interview’, American Journal of Sociology, 51: 541–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P., Curtice, J., et al. (1999). On Message. Communicating the Campaign, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panebianco, A. (1988). Political Parties: Organization and Power, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, T. (2004). Modernising the Labour Party. Organizational Change since 1983, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, M. (2005). Building New Labour: The Politics of Party Organization, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scammell, M. (1999). ‘Political Marketing: Lessons for Political Science’, Political Studies, XLVII: 718–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scammell, M. (2003). ‘Citizen Consumers: Towards a New Marketing of Politics?’ in Corner, J. and Pels, D. (eds.), Media and the Restyling of Politics: Consumerism, Celebrity, Cynicism, London: Sage, pp. 117–136.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scarrow, S. (1994). ‘The “Paradox of Enrolment”: Assessing the Costs and Benefits of Party Memberships’, European Journal of Political Research, 25(1): 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarrow, S. (2000). ‘Parties without Members? Party Organization in a Changing Electoral Environment’, in Dalton, R. and Wattenberg, M. (eds.), Parties Without Partisans, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 79–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarrow, S. (2005a). ‘Political Parties and Democracy: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives’, National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, Implementing Intra-Party Democracy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarrow, S. (2005b). Implementing Intra-Party Democracy (Political Parties and Democracy in Theoretical Perspectives Series), Washington, DC: NDI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyd, P., and Whiteley, P. (2002). New Labour’s Grassroots: The Transformation of the Labour Party Membership, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, S., Lusoli, W., and Gibson, R. (2002). ‘Virtually Participating: A Survey of Online Party Members’, Information Polity, 7: 199–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteley, P. and Seyd, P. (1998). ‘The Dynamics of Party Activism in Britain: A Spiral of Demobilization?’, British Journal of Political Science, 28: 113–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wring, D. (2005). The Politics of Marketing the Labour Party, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Emmanuelle Avril

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Avril, E. (2013). The Evolution of Decision-Making in the British Labour Party: From Grassroots to Netroots?. In: Avril, E., Zumello, C. (eds) New Technology, Organizational Change and Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137264237_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics