Skip to main content

Serbian Civil Society as an Exclusionary Space: NGOs, the Public and ‘Coming to Terms with the Past’

  • Chapter
Civil Society and Transitions in the Western Balkans

Part of the book series: New Perspectives on South-East Europe Series ((NPSE))

Abstract

One of the most pressing concerns of Serbia’s transition to democracy is the question of responsibility for wars and war crimes committed on the territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1990. The EU has made Serbia’s integration prospects conditional on its full cooperation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY). Serbia has been notoriously reluctant in cooperating with the Tribunal,1 and by extension it is generally understood to be failing to ‘come to terms with its past’. While at the state level this can be observed through the reluctant ICTY cooperation and lack of engagement with transitional justice on part of various post-Milošević: governments, at the societal level the issue is much more contentious.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For example, see J. Subotic (2009) Hijacked Justice: Dealing with the Past in the Balkans (Ithaca: Cornell University Press); E. D. Gordy (2005) ‘Postwar Guilt and Responsibility in Serbia: The Effort to Confront it and the Effort to Avoid it’, in S. Ramet and V. Pavlakovic (eds) Serbia since 1989: Politics and Society under Milosevic and After (Washington, DC: University of Washington Press); V. Peskin (2009) International Justice in Rwanda and the Balkans: Virtual Trials and the Struggle for State Cooperation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  2. For an overview, see P. Hayner (2011) Unspeakable Truths: Transitional Justice and the Challenge of Truth Commissions (Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge); W. Lambourne (2008) ‘Transitional Justice and Peacebuilding after Mass Violence’, International Journal of Transitional Justice, 3(1), pp. 28–48; R. G. Teitel (2003) ‘Theoretical and International Framework: Transitional Justice in New Era’, Fordham International Law Journal, 26(4), pp. 893–906.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Nagy (2008) ‘Transitional Justice as a Global Project: Critical Reflections’, Third World Quarterly, 29(2), pp. 275–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. These include, for example, R. Mani (2002) Beyond Retribution: Seeking Justice in the Shadow of War (Malden, MA: Polity); K. McEvoy and L. McGregor (eds) (2008) Transitional Justice from Below: Grassroots Activism and the Struggle for Change (Oxford: Hart Publishing); Lambourne (2008), op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. G. West (2003) ‘Voices Twice Silenced: Betrayal and Mourning at Colonialism’s End in Mozambique’, Anthropological Theory, 3(3), pp. 343–65, see p. 350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. V. Pupavac (2004) ‘International Therapeutic Peace and Justice in Bosnia’, Social & Legal Studies, 13(3), pp. 377–401, see p. 377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. See, for example, E. Baines (2010) ‘Spirits and Social Reconstruction after Mass Violence: Rethinking Transitional Justice’, African Affairs, 109(436), pp. 409–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Normative aspects of transitional justice are discussed by L. Vinjamuri and J. Snyder (2004) ‘Advocacy and Scholarship in the Study of International War Crimes Tribunals and Transitional Justice’, Annual Review of Political Science, 7(1), pp. 345–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. L. Gibson (2006) ‘Can Truth Reconcile Divided Nations?’ in J. D. Meernik and T. David Mason (eds) Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding in Post-War Societies: Sustaining the Peace (Abingdon: Routledge), pp. 176–95.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Cohen (2001) States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. A. Crocker (1998) ‘Transitional Justice and International Civil Society: Toward a Normative Framework’, Constellations, 5(4), p. 496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Belloni (2001) ‘Civil Society and Peacebuilding in Bosnia and Herzegovina’, Journal of Peace Research, 38(2), pp. 163–80; K. Rupesinghe (ed.) (1995) Conflict Transformation (New York: St Martin’s Press); C. Orujela (2003) ‘Building Peace in Sri Lanka: A Role for Civil Society’, Journal of Peace Research, 40(2), pp. 195–212.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Kopeckyý and C. Mudde (2003) ‘Rethinking Civil Society’, Democratization, 10(3), pp. 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Mertus (1999) ‘Liberal State vs. the National Soul: Mapping Civil Society Transplants’, Social and Legal Studies, 8(1), pp. 121–46; Belloni (2001), op. cit.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. D. Kostovicova (2002) ‘Civil Society and Post-Communist Democratisation: Facing a Double Challenge in Post-Milosevic Serbia’, Journal of Civil Society, 2(1), p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Mercer (2002) ‘NGOs, Civil Society and Democratisation: A Critical Review of Literature’, Progress in Development Studies, 2(1), p. 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Yerkes (2004) ‘Facing the Violent Past: Discussions with Serbia’s Youth’, Nationalities Papers, 32(4), pp. 921–38, see p. 924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Z. Miller (2008) ‘Effects of Invisibility: In Search of the “Economic” in Transitional Justice’, International Journal of Transitional Justice, 2(3), pp. 266–91, see p. 280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. See, for example, A. McHoul and W. Grace (1999) A Foucault Primer: Discourse, Power and the Subject (Dunedin: University of Otago Press) pp. 30–56.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A similar issue is recorded in Argentina by A. Gandsman (2012) ‘Testimonies of Trauma, Human Rights, and the Reproduction of Conventional Knowledge’, paper presented at the Beyond Testimony and Trauma: Oral History in the Aftermath of Mass Violence conference, University of Montréal, 24 March.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See, for example, O. Fridman (2011) ‘”It was like Fighting a War with Our Own People”: Anti-War Activism in Serbia during the 1990s’, Nationalities Papers, 39(4), pp. 507–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cf. M. C. Ferme (2001) The Underneath of Things: Violence, History and the Everyday in Sierra Leone (Berkley, CA: University of California Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. See A. Lüdtke (1993) ‘”Coming to Terms with the Past”: Illusions of Remembering, Ways of Forgetting Nazism in West Germany’, Journal of Modern History, 65(3), pp. 542–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Subotic (2009), op. cit.; D. Orentlicher (2008) Shrinking the Space for Denial: The Impact of the ICTY in Serbia (New York: Open Society Institute); S. P. Ramet (2007) ‘The Denial Syndrome and its Consequences: Serbian Political Culture Since 2000’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 40(1), pp. 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. S. Logar and S. Bogosavljević (2001) ‘Vidjenje istine u Srbiji’, Reč, 62(8), pp. 7–34.

    Google Scholar 

  26. G. Millar (2010) ‘Assessing Local Experiences of Truth-Telling in Sierra Leone: Getting to “Why” through a Qualitative Case Study Analysis’, International Journal of Transitional Justice, 4(3), pp. 477–96, see p. 490; Miller (2008), op. cit., p. 290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. A. L. Smith (2004) ‘Heteroglossia, “Common Sense”, and Social Memory’, American Ethnologist, 1(2), p. 263.

    Google Scholar 

  28. See E. V. Daniel (1996) Charred Lullabies: Chapters in an Anthropography of Violence (Ewing, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. See L. Malkki (1995) Purity and Exile: Violence, Memory and National Cosmology Among Hutu Refugees in Tanzania (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  30. M. Hammersley and P. Atkinson (2004) Ethnography: Principles in Practice (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  31. K. Verdery (1999) Political Lives of Dead Bodies: Reburial and Post-Socialist Change (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  32. N. Dimitrijevic: (2008) ‘Serbia after the Criminal Past: What Went Wrong and What Should be Done’, The International Journal of Transitional Justice, 2(1), p. 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. T. van Dijk (1992) ‘Discourse and the Denial of Racism’, Discourse and Society, 3(1), pp. 87–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. E. Scarry (1985) The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World (New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  35. C. Sorabji (1995) ‘A Very Modern War: Terror and Territory in Bosnia- Herzegovina’, in R. Hinde and H. Watson (eds) War: A Cruel Necessity? The Bases of Institutionalised Violence (London: I. B. Tauris), p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Jelena Obradović-Wochnik

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Obradović-Wochnik, J. (2013). Serbian Civil Society as an Exclusionary Space: NGOs, the Public and ‘Coming to Terms with the Past’. In: Bojicic-Dzelilovic, V., Ker-Lindsay, J., Kostovicova, D. (eds) Civil Society and Transitions in the Western Balkans. New Perspectives on South-East Europe Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137296252_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics