Abstract
Family-related migration has been the main channel of legal entry to many major immigrant-receiving countries since the 1970s (Kofman, 2004). In 2005, around 40–60 per cent of long-term migrants in these countries (except Japan and the UK) were actually family-related migrants (International Organization for Migration [IOM], 2008, p. 157). The number of children among them is difficult to determine (White, Loire, Tyrrell, & Carpena-Méndez, 2011, p. 1160), but the prevalence of family-related migration in many countries today strongly suggests the presence of child migrants (accompanied or non-accompanied). These young people originate from various countries, mostly in the global South. They move not only to classical immigration countries, such as the US and Canada, but also to newly emerging ones, like Italy and Japan. In their destination country, they are compelled to deal with a variety of ‘contexts of reception’ (Portes & Rumbaut, 2001): the immigration policy, the school system, the immigration history of their ethnic group and its position in the existing social order, and so on. The plurality of places of origin and destination of these young migrants underscores their diversified and differentiated ‘routes’ (Clifford, 1997), which raises significant empirical, theoretical, and methodological questions. How does family-related migration affect the life trajectories, sociality, and identity of children? How can we capture the lived experiences of young migrants who have undergone childhoods within two or more different social settings due to migration? In what way should we approach their childhoods thus characterized by individual and familial mobilities?
[I]f contemporary migrant populations are not to appear as mute, passive straws in the political-economic winds, we need to listen to a wide range of ‘travel stories’ (not ‘travel literature’ in the bourgeois sense).
(Clifford, 1997, p. 38)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alitolppa-Niitamo, A. (2002). The generation in-between: Somali youth and schooling in metropolitan Helsinki. Intercultural Education, 13 (3), 275–290.
Bartley, A., & Spoonley, P. (2008). Intergenerational transnationalism: 1.5 generation Asian migrants in New Zealand. International Migration, 46 (4), 63–84.
Bluebond-Langner, M., & Korbin, J. (2007). Challenges and opportunities in the anthropology of childhoods: An introduction to ‘children, childhoods, and childhood studies’. American Anthropologist, 109 (2), 241–246.
Carling, J., Menjívar, C., & Schmalzbauer, L. (2012). Central themes in the study of transnational parenthood. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38 (2), 191–217.
Castles, S. (2000). Ethnicity and globalization. London: Sage.
Clifford, J. (1997). Routes: Travel and translation in the late twentieth century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Coe, C., Reynolds, R., Boehm, D., Hess, J., & Rae-Espinoza, H. (2009). Everyday ruptures: Children, youth, and migration in global perspective. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
Commission on Filipinos Overseas [CFO]. (2013a). Number of registered Filipino emigrants by age: 1981–2013. Retrieved August 11, 2014, from http://www.cfo.gov.ph/images/stories/pdf/by_age2013.pdf.
Commission on Filipinos Overseas [CFO]. (2013b). Stock estimate of overseas Filipinos as of December 2012. Retrieved August 11, 2014, from http://www.cfo.gov.ph/images/stories/pdf/StockEstimate2012.pdf.
Crawley, H. (2009). Between a rock and a hard place: Negotiating age and identity in the UK asylum system. In N. Thomas (Ed.), Children, politics and communication: Participation at the margins (pp. 89–106 ). Bristol: The Policy Press.
Crawley, H. (2010). ‘No one gives you a chance to say what you are thinking’: Finding space for children’s agency in the UK asylum system. Area, 42(2), 162–169.
Danico, M. (2004). The 1.5 generation: Becoming Korean American in Hawaii. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
Dobson, M. (2009). Unpacking children in migration research. Children’s Geographies, 7 (3), 355–360.
Dreby, J. (2007). Children and power in Mexican transnational families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69 (4), 1050–1064.
Dreby, J. (2010). Divided by borders: Mexican migrants and their children. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Fresnoza-Flot, A. (2015). The bumpy landscape of family reunification: Experiences of first and 1.5-generation Filipinos in France. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41 (7), 1152–1171.
Gardner, K. (2012). Transnational migration and the study of children: An introduction. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38 (6), 889–912.
Hage, G. (2005). A not so multi-sited ethnography of a not so imagined community. Anthropological Theory, 5, 463–475.
Hardman, C. (2001 [1973]). Can there be an anthropology of children? Childhood, 8(4), 501–517.
Heindbrink, L. (2014). Migrant youth, transnational families, and the state: Care and contested interests. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hirschfeld, L. (2002). Why don’t anthropologists like children? American Anthro-pologist, 104 (2), 611–627.
Holloway, S., & Valentine, G. (2000). Spatiality and the new social studies of childhood. Sociology, 34 (4), 763–783.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. (1994). Gendered transitions: Mexican experiences of immigration. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
International Organization for Migration [IOM]. (2008). World migration 2008: Managing labour mobility in the evolving global economy. New Delhi: Academic Foundation.
James, A., & James, A. L. (2004). Constructing childhood: Theory, policy and social practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
James, A., & Prout, A. (Eds.). (1997). Constructing and reconstructing childhood. London: Falmer Press.
Jenks, C. (1996). Childhood. London: Routledge.
Knörr, J. (Ed.). (2005). Childhood and migration: From experience to agency. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.
Knörr, J., & Nunes, A. (2005). Introduction. In J. Knörr (Ed.), Childhood and migration: From experience to agency (pp. 9–21 ). New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.
Kofman, E. (2004). Family-related migration: A critical review of European studies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30 (2), 243–262.
Levitt, P., & Jaworsky, B. (2007). Transnational migration studies: Past developments and future trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 129–156.
Levitt, P., & Waters, M. C. (Eds.). (2002). The changing face of home: The transnational lives of the second generation. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Mahler, S., & Pessar, P. (2006). Gender matters: Ethnographers bring gender from the periphery toward the core of migration studies. International Migration Review, 40 (1), 27–63.
Mand, K. (2010). ‘I’ve got two houses. One in Bangladesh and one in London… everybody has’: Home, locality and belonging(s). Childhood, 17(2), 273–287.
Marcus, G. (1998). Ethnography through thick and thin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Morokva´sic, M. (1984). Birds of passage are also women … International Migration Review, 18 (4), 886–907.
Myers, D., Xin, G., & Emeka, A. (2009). The gradient of immigrant age-at arrival effects on socioeconomic outcomes in the U.S. International Migration Review, 43 (1), 205–229.
Ní Laoire, C., Carpena-Méndez, F., Tyrrell, N., & White, A. (2011). Childhood and migration in Europe: Portraits of mobility, identity and belonging in contemporary Ireland. Farnham, Surrey and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (1996). Narrating the self. Annual Review ofAnthropology, 25, 19–43.
Olwig, K. F. (1999). Narratives of the children left behind: Home and identity in globalized Caribbean families. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 25 (2), 267–284.
Olwig, K. F. (2007). Caribbean journeys: An ethnography of migration and home in three family networks. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
Orellana, M. F., Thorne B., Chee, A., & Lam, W. S. E. (2001). Transnational childhoods: The participation of children in processes of family migration. Social Problems, 48 (4), 572–591.
Ortner, S. (1996). Making gender: The politics and erotics of culture. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Oswell, D. (2013). The agency of children: From family to global human rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Park, K. (1999). ‘I really do feel I’m 1.5!’: The construction of self and community by young Korean Americans. Amerasia Journal, 25(1), 139–163.
Parreiïas, R. (2001). Servants ofglobalization.Women, migration and domestic work. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Parreiïas, R. (2005). Children ofglobal migration: Transnational families and gendered woes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Parreiïas, R. (2008). The force of domesticity: Filipina migrants and globalization. New York and London: New York University Press.
Pessar, P., & Mahler, S. (2003). Transnational migration: Bringing gender in. International Migration Review, 37 (3), 812–846.
Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. (2001). Legacies: The story of the immigrant second generation. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Portes, A., & Zhou, M. (1993). The new second generation: Segmented assimilation and its variants among post-1965 immigrant youth. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 530, 74–98.
Prout, A., & James, A. (1997). A new paradigm for the sociology of childhood?: Provenance, promise and problems. In A. James & A. Prout (Eds.), Constructing and reconstructing childhood (pp. 7–33 ). London: Falmer Press.
Punch, S. (2012). Studying transnational children: A multi-sited, longitudinal, ethnographic approach. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(6), 1007– 1023.
Remennick, L. (2003). The 1.5 generation of Russian immigrants in Israel: Between integration and sociocultural retention. Diaspora, 12 (1), 39–66.
Rumbaut, R. (1991). The agony of exile: A study of the migration and adaptation of Indochinese refugee adults and children. In F. Ahern & J. Athey (Eds.), Refugee children: Theory, research, and service (pp. 53–91 ). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Rumbaut, R. (2004). Ages, life stages, and generational cohorts: Decomposing the immigrant first and second generations in the United States. International Migration Review, 38 (3), 1160–1205.
Rumbaut, R., & Portes, A. (Eds.). (2001). Ethnicities: Children of immigrants in America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Silvey, R., & Lawson, V. (1999). Placing the migrants. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89 (1), 121–132.
Suárez-Orozco, C., & Suárez-Orozco, M. (2001). Children of immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Veale, A., & Donà, G. (Eds.). (2014). Child and youth migration: Mobility-in-migration in an era ofglobalization. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Waters, M., & Jiménez, T. (2005). Assessing immigrant assimilation: New empiri-cal and theoretical challenges. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 105–125.
White, A., Loire, C., Tyrrell, N., & Carpena-Méndez, F. (2011). Children’s roles in transnational migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37 (8), 1159–1170.
Zentgraf, K., & Chinchilla, N. (2012). Transnational family separation: A frame-work for analysis. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38 (2), 345–366.
Zhou, M. (1997). Growing up American: The challenge confronting immigrant children and children of immigrants. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 63–95.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Itaru Nagasaka and Asuncion Fresnoza-Flot
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nagasaka, I., Fresnoza-Flot, A. (2015). Introduction. In: Nagasaka, I., Fresnoza-Flot, A. (eds) Mobile Childhoods in Filipino Transnational Families. Migration, Diasporas and Citizenship Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137515148_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137515148_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-56682-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51514-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)