Skip to main content
Log in

“This is not a party”: elements for a sociology of movementism based on the case of La France Insoumise

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
French Politics Aims and scope

Abstract

European political parties are facing a slow erosion of their electoral and activist base. Due to multiple interrelated factors, traditional parties have become increasingly disembedded from society. In an attempt to escape this decline, several political organisations that emerged after the 2008 crisis have taken a movementist turn. These organisations (1) present themselves as “movements” rather than “parties”, (2) provide strategic support to social movements, and (3) explore a way of operating that is intended to contrast with that of traditional parties, and which values freedom of movement. Podemos, the Five Star Movement and La France Insoumise are emblematic of these developments; La République en Marche too, albeit in a slightly different form. This article proposes a novel conceptualisation of movementism, proceeding in two steps. In the first step, drawing on 36 months of research and around a hundred interviews with La France Insoumise, we will show what movementism means for the actors who claim to be part of it, stressing the plurality of meanings attributed to this phenomenon. In the second step, drawing on a comparative approach that sets La France Insoumise into a broader landscape, we will propose an ideal type of the “movementist party”—one capable of opening up a new field of inquiry for political scientists and sociologists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Interview with Clémentine Autain, conducted on 22 October 2020.

  2. Interview with François Cocq, conducted on 20 June 2019.

  3. Interview with Nicolas Framont, conducted on 28 January 2019.

  4. Interview conducted on 18th September 2018 with a collaborator of the France Insoumise parliamentary group who had been an activist in the Left Party for several years and who wished to remain anonymous.

  5. Most French political parties have a statute that explicitly permits any grouping (“tendance”, or tendency) within the party to set up its own organisation inside the party. This “droit de tendance”—literally “right to [create a] tendency”—means that within the party there are several organisations, several groupings (e.g. a right grouping, a left grouping), each with their own elected representatives among the leadership and their own funding. This allows pluralism and democracy to thrive within the party. But in LFI, this “droit de tendance” does not exist; indeed the statutes explicitly state that members do not have this right.

  6. Manuel Bompard, Interview in Regards (“La Midinale”), 11 June 2019, available at http://www.regards.fr/la-midinale/article/manuel-bompard-federer-le-peuple-c-est-ramener-la-gauche-au-peuple.

  7. Interview with Gabriel Amard, conducted on 1st April 2019.

  8. Interview with Taha Bouhafs, conducted on 17 October 2019.

  9. Interview with Baptiste Mongis, conducted on 25 September 2018.

  10. Interview with Laëtitia Pison, conducted on 18 January 2019.

  11. Interview with Séverine Enjolras, conducted on 31 October 2018.

  12. Quoted in Mediapart, 18 May 2017.

  13. Data from declarations to the Haute Autorité pour la Transparence de la Vie Publique.

  14. Jean-Luc Mélenchon, “The people and the movement”, blog post, 2 November 2016.

  15. Interview with Mathieu Bosque, conducted on 19 October 2018.

References

  • Abrial, S., C. Alexandre, C. Bedock, et al. 2022. Control or participate? The yellow vests’ democratic aspirations through mixed methods analysis. French Politics 20: 479–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Achury, S., S.E. Scarrow, K. Kosiara-Pedersen, and E. van Haute. 2020. The consequences of membership incentives: Do greater political benefits attract different kinds of members? Party Politics 26 (1): 56–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, Luc, and Eve Chiapello. 1999. Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bué, Nicolas, and Rafael Cos. 2021. The uses of party manifestos in France. French Politics 19: 450–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervera-Marzal, Manuel. 2018. Podemos, un parti-mouvement ? Mouvements. 97: 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervera-Marzal, Manuel. 2021. Le populisme de gauche, sociologie de la France insoumise. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Close, C., and S. Gherghina. 2019. Rethinking intra-party cohesion: Towards a conceptual and analytical framework. Party Politics 25 (5): 652–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn-Bendit, Daniel. 2013. Pour supprimer les partis politiques!? Réflexions d’un apatride sans parti. Arles: Editions Indigènes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Combes, Hélène. 2005. Faire parti(e): Construction et positionnement du PRD dans le système politique mexicain. Revue Internationale De Politique Comparée 12 (3): 331–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, Russel, and Martin Wattenberg, eds. 2000. Parties without partisans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, Donatella, et al. 2017. Movement parties against austerity. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deschouwer, Kris. 2008. New parties in government. In Power for the first time. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Waele, Jean-Michele., and Daniel-Louis. Seiler. 2012. Les partis de la gauche anticapitaliste en Europe. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolez, Bernard, Julien Fretel, and Rémi. Lefebvre, eds. 2019. L’entreprise Macron. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dousson, Jérémy. 2018. Un populisme à l’italienne ? Comprendre le Mouvement 5 étoiles. Paris: Les Petits matins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duverger, Maurice. 1992. Les partis politiques. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Errejon, Iñigo. 2015. Du style Tuerka à la campagne de Podemos., in Podemos, Sûr que nous pouvons!, ed. Dominguez, Ana, Gimenez, Luis, 53–76. Montpellier: Indigènes éditions.

  • Escalona, Fabien. 2018. La reconversion partisane de la social-démocratie européenne. Paris: Dalloz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Jo. 1972. The tyranny of structurelessness. Berkeley Journal of Sociology 17: 151–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A., and C. Friedberg. 2021. Personalized politics and weakened parties—an axiom? Evidence from the Israeli case. Party Politics 27 (2): 258–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauja, Anika. 2016. Party reform. The causes, challenges and consequences of organizational changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gerbaudo, Paolo. 2019. The digital party. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giugni, Marco. 2004. Social protest and policy change: Ecology, antinuclear and peace movements in comparative perspectives. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gougou, Florent, and Simon Persico. 2017. A new party system in the making? The 2017 French presidential election. French Politics 15: 303–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hlousek, Vit, Lubomir Kopecek, and Petra Vodova. 2020. The rise of entrepreneurial parties in European politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ignazi, Piero. 2020. The four knights of intra-party democracy: A rescue for party delegitimation. Party Politics 26 (1): 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Robert, and Peter Mair. 1995. Changing models of party organization and party democracy : The emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics 1 (1): 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • König, P.D., and T. Waldvogel. 2021. Ni gauche ni droite? Positioning the candidates in the 2017 French presidential election. French Politics 19: 281–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriegel, Annie. 1970. Les communistes français. Essai d’ethnographie politique. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavau, George. 1969. Le parti communiste dans le système politique français. Cahiers de la FNSP, 175.

  • Lefebvre, Rémi. 2020. Des partis en apesanteur sociale. In La fin des partis?, ed. Igor Martinache and Frédéric. Sawicki, 53–70. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, Rémi. 2018. Vers un nouveau modèle partisan ? Entre déclassement des partis de gouvernement et avènement des partis-mouvements. Cahiers de la recherche sur les droits fondamentaux 16: 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macron, Emmanuel. 2011. Les labyrinthes du politique. Que peut-on attendre pour 2012 et après ? Esprit 4: 106–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macron, Emmanuel. 2017. Révolutions. Paris: Pocket.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinache, Igor, and Frédéric. Sawicki. 2020. La fin des partis? Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melenchon, Jean-Luc. 2016. Le choix de l’insoumission. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michels, Robert. 2015. Sociologie du parti dans la démocratie moderne. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischi, Julian. 2020. Le parti des communistes. Histoire du Parti communiste français de 1920 à nos jours. Paris: Hors d’atteinte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Sigmund. 1956. Modern political parties: Approaches to comparative politics. Illinois: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, Clause. 1985. New social movements : Challenging the politics of institutional boundaries. Social Research 52 (4): 817–868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offerle, Michel. 2017. Les partis meurent longtemps. Le Monde.

  • Ostrogorski, Moisei. 1993. La démocratie et les partis politiques. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, H.H., and G. Rahat. 2021. Political personalization and personalized politics within and beyond the behavioural arena. Party Politics 27 (2): 211–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellen, Cédric. 2013. Des difficultés d’entrer en politique : le mouvement Samoobrona dans la Pologne postcommuniste. Critique internationale 1 (58): 133–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, Thomas, and Julia Cagé. 2023. Une histoire du conflit politique. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleyers, Geoffrey. 2012. Le succès des réseaux dans les mouvements sociaux contemporains: un malentendu fonctionnel? In Agir-en-réseau, ed. Dumoulin, David, Pepin-Lehalleur, Marielle. 45–60. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes

  • Pudal, Bernard. 1989. Prendre parti. Pour une sociologie historique du PCF. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reungoat, E., F. Buton, and C. Jouhanneau. 2022. Becoming political while avoiding politics: A study of Yellow Vests first-timers. French Politcs 20: 395–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrschneider, Robert. 1993. Impact of Social Movements on European Party Systems. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 528: 157–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, Marshall. 1982. The apotheosis of Captain Cook. In Between belief and transgression: Structuralist essays in religion, history, and myth, ed. Michael Izard and Pierre Smith, 73–102. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, Marshall. 1999. Two or three things that I know about culture. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 5 (3): 399–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarrow, Susan. 2014. Beyond party members. Changing approaches to partisan mobilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Subirats, Joan. 2015. Desbordar el “dentro”-"fuera" ? Teknokultura 12 (1): 161–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theviot, Anaïs. 2016. Towards a standardization of campaign strategies dictated by the Obama ‘model’? The case of ‘American-style’ canvassing during the 2012 French presidential election campaign. French Politics 14: 158–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theviot, Anaïs. 2018. Faire campagne sur internet. Lille: Presses du Septentrion.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1994. Political writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1995. Economie et société, tome 1. Paris: Pocket.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Cervera-Marzal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This research has been realized with the financial support of the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique - FNRS through the MIS project n°40020682.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cervera-Marzal, M. “This is not a party”: elements for a sociology of movementism based on the case of La France Insoumise. Fr Polit 22, 24–44 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41253-023-00233-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41253-023-00233-0

Keywords

Navigation