Skip to main content
Log in

Brand credibility and marketplace globalization: The role of perceived brand globalness and localness

  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consumers in Western markets are increasingly critical towards globalization and re-embrace local values. Companies thus must decide whether to continue to pursue global branding strategies and/or rejuvenate local branding strategies. To explore the implications of market globalization for consumer preferences, we use signaling theory to investigate the role of perceived brand globalness (PBG) and brand localness (PBL) as signals of brand credibility, related downstream effects and boundary conditions, across two countries with differing levels of globalization. In globalized markets, PBG is a weaker signal of brand credibility than PBL, whereas in globalizing markets, the two signals are of equal importance.

Resume

Les consommateurs des marchés occidentaux sont de plus en plus critiques à l’égard de la mondialisation et adoptent à nouveau des valeurs locales. Les entreprises doivent donc décider si elles veulent continuer à appliquer des stratégies de marques mondiales et/ou rajeunir les stratégies de marques locales. Pour explorer les implications de la mondialisation des marchés sur les préférences des consommateurs, nous utilisons la théorie des signaux pour étudier le rôle de la perception de la marque mondialisée (PMM) et de la perception de la marque localisée (PML) comme signaux de la crédibilité des marques, des effets en aval connexes et des conditions limites, dans deux pays ayant des niveaux de mondialisation différents. Sur les marchés mondialisés, la PMM est un signal de crédibilité de la marque plus faible que la PML, alors que sur les marchés en voie de mondialisation, les deux signaux sont d’égale importance.

Resumen

Los consumidores en mercados occidentales son cada vez más críticos hacia la globalización y re-adoptan los valores locales. Las empresas por lo tanto deben decidir si continúan aplicando estrategias globales de mercado y/o rejuvenecen las estrategias locales de marca. Para explorar las implicaciones de la globalización de mercado para las preferencias de los consumidores, usamos la teoría de la señalización para investigar el papel de la globalización percibida de la marca (PBG por sus iniciales en inglés) y lo local percibido de la marca (PBL por sus iniciales en inglés) como una señal de credibilidad de marca, los efectos descendentes relacionados y las condiciones límite, en dos países con diferentes niveles de globalización. En los mercados globalizados, el papel de la globalización percibida de la marca es una señal más débil de la credibilidad de la marca que lo local percibido de la marca, mientras que en los mercados en vía de globalización, las dos señales son de igual importancia.

Resumo

Consumidores nos mercados ocidentais são cada vez mais críticos em relação a globalização e retomam valores locais. Empresas devem, portanto, decidir se continuam a buscar estratégias globais de marca e/ou rejuvenescer estratégias locais de marca. Para explorar as implicações da globalização do mercado para preferências do consumidor, usamos a teoria da sinalização para investigar o papel da globalidade da marca percebida (PBG) e da localidade da marca (PBL) como sinais de credibilidade da marca, efeitos a jusante relacionados e condições de contorno, em dois países com diferentes níveis de globalização. Em mercados globalizados, PBG é um sinal mais fraco de credibilidade da marca do que PBL, enquanto em mercados globalizados, os dois sinais são de igual importância.

摘要

西方市场的消费者们越来越对全球化持批评态度,并重新拥抱本地价值观。公司因此必须决定是否继续奉行全球品牌战略和/或重振本地品牌战略。为了探索市场全球化对消费者偏好的影响, 我们使用信号理论来研究作为品牌可信度信号的可感知的品牌全球性(PBG)和品牌本地性(PBL)的作用, 两个不同全球化水平国家之间相关的下游影响及边界条件。在已全球化的市场中, PBG的品牌可信度较PBL弱, 而在全球化处于进行时的市场中,这两个信号则同等重要。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaka, M., & Alden, D. L. 2010. Global brand positioning and perceptions—International advertising and global consumer culture. International Journal of Advertising, 29(1): 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alden, D. L., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Batra, R. 1999. Brand positioning through advertising in Asia, North America, and Europe: The role of global consumer culture. Journal of Marketing, 63(1): 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alden, D. L., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Batra, R. 2006. Consumer attitudes toward marketplace globalization: Structure, antecedents and consequences. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(3): 227–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, J. J. 2002. The psychology of globalization. American Psychologist, 57(10): 774–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. 2005. Consumer culture theory (CCT): Twenty years of research. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4): 868–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balabanis, G., & Diamantopoulos, A. 2004. Domestic country bias, country-of-origin effects, and consumer ethnocentrism: A multidimensional unfolding approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(1): 80–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balabanis, G., & Diamantopoulos, A. 2008. Brand origin identification by consumers: A classification perspective. Journal of International Marketing, 16(1): 39–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balabanis, G., & Diamantopoulos, A. 2011. Gains and losses from the misperception of brand origin: The role of brand strength and country-of-origin image. Journal of International Marketing, 19(2): 95–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch, F., Riefler, P., & Diamantopoulos, A. 2016. A taxonomy and review of positive consumer dispositions toward foreign countries and globalization. Journal of International Marketing, 24(1): 82–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batra, R., Ramaswamy, V., Alden, D. L., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Ramachander, S. 2000. Effects of brand local and nonlocal origin on consumer attitudes in developing countries. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9(2): 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, S. E., & Talpade, S. 1994. Adolescent influence in family decision making: A replication with extension. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2): 332–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behling, O., & Law, K. S. 2000. Translating questionnaires and other research instruments: Problems and solutions. Series: Quantitative applications in the social sciences, No. 133. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. 1988. Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2): 139–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bello, D., Leung, K., Radebaugh, Tung. R. L., & van Witteloostuijn, A. 2009. From the editors: Student samples in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(3): 361–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergh, A., & Nilsson, T. 2014. Is globalization reducing absolute poverty? World Development, 62(C): 42–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beverland, M. B., & Farrelly, F. J. 2010. The quest for authenticity in consumption: Consumers’ purposive choice of authentic cues to shape experienced outcomes. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5): 838–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, W., & Kirmani, A. 1993. A consumer-side experimental examination of signaling theory: Do consumers perceive warranties as signals of quality? Journal of Consumer Research, 20(1): 111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, S. M., & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. 2006. Marketing renaissance: How research in emerging markets advances marketing science and practice. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(4): 337–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder, B. J., Phillips, L. W., & Tybout, A. M. 1981. Designing research for application. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(2): 197–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavusgil, S. T., & Cavusgil, E. 2012. Reflections on international marketing: Destructive regeneration and multinational firms. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(2): 202–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavusgil, S. T., Deligonul, S., Kardes, I., & Cavusgil, E. (2018). Middle-Class consumers in emerging markets: Conceptualization, propositions, and implications for international marketers. Journal of International Marketing, 26(3): 94–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chabowski, B. R., Samiee, S., & Hult, G. T. M. 2013. A bibliometric analysis of the global branding literature and a research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(6): 622–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S.-J., van Witteloostuijn, A., & Eden, L. 2010. From the editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2): 178–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase-Dunn, C., Kawano, Y., & Brewer, B. D. 2000. Trade globalization since 1795: Waves of integration in the world-system. American Sociological Review, 65(1): 77–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheema, A., & Kaikati, A. M. 2010. The effect of need for uniqueness on word of mouth. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(3): 553–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. F. 2007. Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3): 464–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. 2002. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2): 233–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. C. 2000. Environmental globalization. In J. S. Nye, & J. D. Donahue (Eds.), Governance in a globalizing world: 86–108. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, M., & Bartsch, F. 2019. Global consumer culture: Epistemology and ontology. International Marketing Review, 36(4): 556–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta, H., Ailawadi, K., & van Heerde, H. 2017. How well does consumer-based brand equity align with sales-based brand equity and marketing-mix response? Journal of Marketing, 81(3): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davvetas, V., & Diamantopoulos, A. 2016. How product category shapes preferences toward global and local brands: A schema theory perspective. Journal of International Marketing, 24(4): 61–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davvetas, V., Sichtmann, C., & Diamantopoulos, A. 2015. The impact of perceived brand globalness on consumers’ willingness to pay. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32(4): 431–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Meulenaer, S., Dens, N., & De Pelsmacker, P. 2015. Which cues cause consumers to perceive brands as more global? A conjoint analysis. International Marketing Review, 32(6): 606–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirbag, M., Sahadev, S., & Mellahi, K. 2010. Country image and consumer preference for emerging economy products: The moderating role of consumer materialism. International Marketing Review, 27(3): 141–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimofte, C. V., Johansson, J. K., & Ronkainen, I. A. 2008. Cognitive and affective reactions of U.S. consumers to global brands. Journal of International Marketing, 16(4): 113–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreher, A. 2006. Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Applied Economics, 38(10): 1091–1110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drolet, A. L., & Morrison, D. G. 2001. A practitioner’s comment on Aimee L. Drolet and Donald G. Morrison’s Do we really need multiple-item measures in service research?. Journal of Service Research, 3(3): 196–204.

  • Erdem, T., & Swait, J. 1998. Brand equity as a signaling phenomenon. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(2): 131–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdem, T., & Swait, J. 2004. Brand credibility, brand consideration, and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1): 191–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdem, T., Swait, J., & Louviere, J. 2002. The impact of brand credibility on consumer price sensitivity. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19(1): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdem, T., Swait, J., & Valenzuela, A. 2006. Brands as signals: A cross-country validation study. Journal of Marketing, 70(1): 34–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Financial Times. 2017. Foreign buyers bet on South Korea reforms. https://www.ft.com/content/-dcabbb4a–d1bc-11e6-9341-7393bb2e1b51. Accessed 26 April 2018.

  • Financial Times. 2018. Donald Trump leads a global revival of nationalism. https://www.ft.com/-content/-59a37a38-7857-11e8-8e67-1e1a0846c475. Accessed 17 February 2019.

  • Fischer, M., Völckner, F., & Sattler, H. 2010. How important are brands? A cross-category, cross-country study. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(5): 823–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, C., & Diamantopoulos, A. 2009. Using single-item measures for construct measurement in management research: Conceptual issues and application guidelines. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 69(2): 195–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ger, G. 1999. Localizing in the global village: Local firms competing in global markets. California Management Review, 41(4): 64–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. 2017. Globalization in the age of Trump. Harvard Business Review, 95(4): 112–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gignac, G. E., & Szodorai, E. T. 2016. Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102: 74–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gürhan-Canli, Z., Sarıal-Abi, G., & Hayran, C. 2018. Consumers and brands across the globe: Research synthesis and new directions. Journal of International Marketing, 26(1): 96–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gygli, S., Haelg, F., Potrafke, N., & Sturm, J.-E. 2019. The KOF Globalisation Index—revisited. Review of International Organizations, 14(3): 543–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habich, J., & Nowotny, V. 2017. A closer look at globalization—Roots and remedies. In Background Paper for the 16th Trilogue Salzburg (pp. 7–19).

  • Halkias, G., Davvetas, V., & Diamantopoulos, A. 2016. The interplay between country stereotypes and perceived brand globalness/localness as drivers of brand preference. Journal of Business Research, 69(9): 3621–3628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiman, G. W. 1998. Understanding research methods and statistics: An integrated introduction to psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemphill, J. F. 2003. Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. American Psychologist, 58(1): 78–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herz, M. F., & Diamantopoulos, A. 2013. Activation of country stereotypes: Automaticity, consonance, and impact. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(4): 400–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D. B., Quelch, J. A., & Taylor, E. L. 2004. How global brands compete. Harvard Business Review, 82(9): 68–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, R. 2000. Globalization cultural consequences. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 570(1): 140–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1): 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, F., & Spence, M. 2017. Why globalization stalled and how to restart it. Foreign Affairs, 96(4): 54–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hultman, M., Robson, M. J., & Katsikeas, C. S. 2009. Export product strategy fit and performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Marketing, 17(4): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Interbrand. 2018. Best global brands 2018. https://www.interbrand.com/best-brands/best-global-brands/2018/ranking/. Accessed 31 December 2018.

  • International Monetary Fund. 2018. World economic outlook, April 2018. https://www.imf.org/en/-Publications/WEO/Issues/2018/03/20/~/media/Files/Publications/WEO/2018/April/text.ashx?la=en. Accessed 4 September 2018.

  • Jain, S. C. 1989. Standardization of international marketing strategy: Some research hypotheses. Journal of Marketing, 53(1): 70–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. L. 1993. Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kihlstrom, R. E., & Riordan, M. 1984. Advertising as a signal. Journal of Political Economy, 92(3): 427–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjeldgaard, D., & Askegaard, S. 2006. The glocalization of youth culture: The global youth segment as structures of common difference. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(2): 231–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. G., Ettenson, R., & Morris, M. D. 1998. The animosity model of foreign product purchase: An empirical test in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Marketing, 62(1): 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, G., & Kapferer, J.-N. 1985. Measuring consumer involvement profiles. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(1): 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. 2001. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1): 114–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, T., Won, S., & Kim, K. 2017. Consumers’ cognitive and affective responses to brand origin misclassifications: Does confidence in brand origin identification matter? Journal of Business Research, 80: 197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merz, M. A., He, Y., & Alden, D. L. 2008. A categorization approach to analyzing the global consumer culture debate. International Marketing Review, 25(2): 166–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E., van Witteloostuijn, A., & Beugelsdijk, S. 2017. What’s in a p? Reassessing best practices for conducting and reporting hypothesis-testing research. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(5): 535–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. 1998-2015. Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

  • Norris, P. 2000. Global governance and cosmopolitan citizens. In J. S. Nye, & J. D. Donahue (Eds.), Governance in a globalizing world: 86–108. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2017. Towards a better globalisation: How Germany can respond to the critics. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Özsomer, A. 2012. The interplay between global and local brands: A closer look at perceived brand globalness and local iconness. Journal of International Marketing, 20(2): 72–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özsomer, A., & Altaras, S. 2008. Global brand purchase likelihood: A critical synthesis and an integrated conceptual framework. Journal of International Marketing, 16(4): 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özsomer, A., Batra, R., Chattopadhyay, A., & ter Hofstede, F. 2012. A global brand management roadmap. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(1): 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, N., Heslop, L. A., & Bamossy, G. 1990. A comparative image analysis of domestic versus imported products. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 7(4): 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petricevic, O., & Teece, D. J. 2019. The structural reshaping of globalization: Implications for strategic sectors, profiting from innovation, and the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies 50(9): 1487–1512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5): 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potrafke, N. 2015. The evidence on globalisation. The World Economy, 38(3): 509–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. 2011. Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16(2): 93–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putrevu. S., & Lord, K. R. 1994. Comparative and noncomparative advertising: Attitudinal effects under cognitive and affective involvement conditions. Journal of Advertising, 23(2): 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, N., Simintiras, A. C., & Diamantopolous, A. 2003. Theoretical justification of sampling choices in international marketing research: Key issues and guidelines for researchers. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(1): 80–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riefler, P. 2012. Why consumers do (not) like global brands: The role of globalization attitude, GCO and global brand origin. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(1): 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G. 2007. The globalization of nothing (vol. 2) Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. 2018. Populism and the economics of globalization. Journal of International Business Policy, 1(1/2): 12–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samiee, S. 2019. Reflections on global brands, global consumer culture and globalization. International Marketing Review, 36(4): 536–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samiee, S., Shimp, T. A., & Sharma, S. 2005. Brand origin recognition accuracy: Its antecedents and consumers’ cognitive limitations. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(4): 379–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuiling, I., & Kapferer, J.-N. 2004. Real differences between local and international brands: Strategic implications for international marketers. Journal of International Marketing, 12(4): 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, J. N. 2011. Impact of emerging markets on marketing: Rethinking existing perspectives and practices. Journal of Marketing, 75(4): 166–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimp, T. A., & Sharma, S. 1987. Consumer ethnocentrism: Construction and validation of the CETSCALE. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(3): 280–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrauger, S. 1975. Responses to evaluations as a function of initial self-perceptions. Psychological Bulletin, 82(4): 581–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sichtmann, C., Davvetas, V., & Diamantopoulos, A. 2019. The relational value of perceived brand globalness and localness. Journal of Business Research, 104: 597–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sichtmann, C., & Diamantopoulos, A. 2013. The impact of perceived brand globalness, brand origin image, and brand origin-extension fit on brand extension success. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(5): 567–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M. J. 1982. Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3): 287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M. 1974. Market signaling: Information transfer in hiring and related screening processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, R., & Shocker, A. D. 1991. Brand equity: A perspective on its meaning and measurement. Working Paper Series, Report Number 91-124. Cambridge: Marketing Science Institute.

  • Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. 2019a. Global versus local consumer culture: Theory, measurement, and future research directions. Journal of International Marketing, 27(1): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. 2019b. The uncertain future of globalization: Implications for global consumer cultures and global brands. International Marketing Review, 36(4): 524–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., Batra, R., & Alden, D. L. 2003. How perceived brand globalness creates brand value. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(1): 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. 1998. Assessing measurement invariance in cross‐national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1): 78–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & de Jong, M. G. 2010. A global investigation into the constellation of consumer attitudes toward global and local products. Journal of Marketing, 74(6): 18–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strizhakova, Y., & Coulter, R. A. 2013. The ‘green’ side of materialism in emerging BRIC and developed markets: The moderating role of global cultural identity. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30(1): 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strizhakova, Y., & Coulter, R. A. 2015. Drivers of local relative to global brand purchases: A contingency approach. Journal of International Marketing, 23(1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strizhakova, Y., Coulter, R. A., & Price, L. L. 2008. Branded products as a passport to global citizenship: Perspectives from developed and developing countries. Journal of International Marketing, 16(4): 57–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strizhakova, Y., Coulter, R. A., & Price, L. L. 2011. Branding in a global marketplace: The mediating effects of quality and self-identity brand signals. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28(4): 342–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strizhakova, Y., Coulter, R. A., & Price, L. L. 2012. The young adult cohort in emerging markets: Assessing their glocal cultural identity in a global marketplace. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(1): 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian, A., & Kessler, M. 2013. The hyperglobalization of trade and its future. PIIE Working Paper Series, No. 13-6: 1-66.

  • Suwelack, T., Hogreve, J., & Hoyer, W. D. 2011. Understanding money-back guarantees: Cognitive, affective, and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Retailing, 87(4): 462–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swoboda, B., & Hirschmann, J. 2016. Does being perceived as global pay off? An analysis of leading foreign and domestic multinational corporations in India, Japan, and the United States. Journal of International Marketing, 24(3), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swoboda, B., Pennemann, K., & Taube, M. 2012. The effects of perceived brand globalness and perceived brand localness in China: empirical evidence on Western, Asian, and domestic retailers. Journal of International Marketing, 20(4): 72–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swoboda, B., Puchert, C., & Morschett, D. 2016. Explaining the differing effects of corporate reputation across nations: A multilevel analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(4): 454–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. 2016a. League of nationalists. November 19: 51–54.

  • The Economist. 2016b. The new nationalism. November 19: 11.

  • Tirole, J. 1990. The theory of industrial organization. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torelli, C. J., & Ahluwalia, R. 2012. Extending culturally symbolic brands: A blessing or a curse? Journal of Consumer Research, 38(5): 933–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torelli, C., & Cheng, S. 2011. Cultural meanings of brands and consumption: A window into the cultural psychology of globalization. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(5): 251–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsiros, M., & Mittal, V. 2000. Regret: A model of its antecedents and consequences in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(4): 401–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, A., Coeurderoy, R., & Matt, T. 2018. The future of international business research on corporate globalization that never was…. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(9): 1101–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verlegh, P. W. J. 2007. Home country bias in product evaluation: The complementary roles of economic and socio-psychological motives. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(3): 361–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verlegh, P. W. J., & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. 1999. A review and meta-analysis of country-of-origin research. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20(5): 521–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wald, A. 1943. Tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters when the number of observations is large. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 54(3): 426–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. 1988. Umbrella branding as a signal of new product quality: An example of signalling by posting a bond. RAND Journal of Economics, 19(3): 458–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westjohn, S. A., Magnusson, P., & Zhou, J. X. 2015. Does the value of global brands apply to both foreign and domestic-based global brands? In S. Zou, H. Xu, & L. H. Shi (Eds.), Advances in international marketing 25: 267–286. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widaman, K. F., & Reise, S. P. 1997. Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In K. J. Bryant, M. Windle, & S. G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research: 281–324. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Winit, W., Gregory, G., Cleveland, M., & Verlegh, P. 2014. Global vs local brands: How home country bias and price differences impact brand evaluations. International Marketing Review, 31(2): 102–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witt, M. A. 2019. De-globalization: Theories, predictions, and opportunities for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(7): 1053–1077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, V. R., & Darling, J. R. 1993. The marketing challenges of the newly independent republics: Product competitiveness in global markets. Journal of International Marketing, 1(1): 77–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2018. World Bank country and lending groups. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/-knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups. Accessed 4 September 2018.

  • Xie, Y., Batra, R., & Peng, S. 2015. An extended model of preference formation between global and local brands: The role of identity expressiveness, trust, and affect. Journal of International Marketing, 23(1): 50–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • YouGov. 2016. YouGov survey results, October 2016. https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/-cumulus_uploads/-document/emt4t4eijk/International%20Toplines_W.pdf. Accessed 3 September 2018.

  • Zhou, N., & Belk, R. W. 2004. Chinese consumer readings of global and local advertising appeals. Journal of Advertising, 33(3): 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Constantine Katsikeas, Aysegül Özsomer, Mario Pandelaere, the Area Editor and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable feedback on previous versions of this article. Special thanks go to Kyungae Kim, Soyoung Yun, and Bom Kim for their help in collecting the data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timo Mandler.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information accompanies this article on the Journal of International Business Studies website (www.palgrave.com/ journals).

Accepted by Saeed Samiee, Area Editor, 24 January 2020. This article has been with the authors for four revisions.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 606 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mandler, T., Bartsch, F. & Han, C.M. Brand credibility and marketplace globalization: The role of perceived brand globalness and localness. J Int Bus Stud 52, 1559–1590 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00312-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00312-2

Keywords

Navigation