Skip to main content
Log in

The Eurosceptic Europeanization of public spheres: print and social media reactions to the 2014 European Parliament elections

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Comparative European Politics Aims and scope

Abstract

The present study tests the theoretical claim that Eurosceptics contribute to the Europeanization of national public spheres. Although advocating a renationalization of European politics, Eurosceptic parties can engender public media debates of transnational or European relevance. Through a comparative research design of two national cases (Sweden and Denmark), we examine the public discourse on the day following the 2014 European Parliament elections across three media: print, Twitter, and Facebook. Separating the discussions of Eurosceptic issues and actors from other topics of the election coverage, we find that the discourses about Euroscepticism exhibit a higher degree of Europeanization in four of the six media analyzed. Moreover, while we detect significant differences in valence between the Swedish and Danish press when reporting about the Eurosceptics, such national variation is much less pronounced on the social networking sites. The findings suggest, firstly, that Eurosceptics’ contestation of the EU may have the unintended effect of giving national media debates a stronger European dimension. Secondly, the study warrants moderate optimism for the Europeanization potential of social media vis-à-vis traditional media structures: Print media was more Europeanized in scope, whereas social media publics were more aligned in their sentiment toward Euroscepticism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barberá, P., M. Piccirilli, A. Geisler, and W. van Atteveldt. 2017. Rfacebook: Access to Facebook API via R. R package version 0.6.15. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Rfacebook.

  • Barberá, P., and G. Rivero. 2014. Understanding the political representativeness of Twitter users. Social Science Computer Review.

  • Bennett, W.L., and S. Iyengar. 2008. A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication 58(4): 707–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossetta, M., A. Dutceac Segesten, and H.-J. Trenz. 2017. Transnational citizen engagement through social networking media: The factual, the ideological, and the moral style. In Social media and European politics: Rethinking power and legitimacy in the digital era, ed. Asimina Michailidou, and Mauro Barisione. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brüggemann, M., and K. Kleinen von Königslöw. 2007. Let’s talk about Europe’: Explaining vertical and horizontal Europeanization in the quality press. TranState working papers.

  • Brüggemann, M., S. Sifft, K.K. Königslöw, B. Peters, and A. Wimmel. 2008. Segmented Europeanization: Trends and patterns in the transnationalization of public spheres in Europe. In Public deliberation and public culture: The writings of Bernhard Peters, 1993–2005, ed. H. Wessler, 196–212. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wilde, P. 2011. No polity for old politics? A framework for analyzing the politicization of European integration. Journal of European Integration 33(5): 559–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Wilde, P., and C. Lord. 2016. Assessing actually-existing trajectories of EU politicisation. West European Politics 39(1): 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demker, M. 2012. Scandinavian right-wing parties. Diversity more than convergence? In Mapping the extreme right in contemporary Europe from local to transnational, ed. EGaBJ Andrea Mammone, 239–253. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutceac Segesten, A., and M. Bossetta. 2016. A typology of political participation online: How citizens used Twitter to mobilize during the 2015 British general elections. Information, Communication & Society. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1252413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, F., and J. Strömbäck. 2014. Mediatization of politics: Understanding the transformation of Western Democracies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhards, J., and M.S. Schäfer. 2010. Is the internet a better public sphere? Comparing old and new media in the USA and Germany. New Media & Society 12(1): 143–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, D.C., and P. Mancini. 2004. Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Highfield, T., S. Harrington, and A. Bruns. 2013. Twitter as a technology for audiencing and fandom: The #Eurovision phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society 16(3): 315–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungherr, A. 2014. The logic of political coverage on Twitter: Temporal dynamics and content. Journal of communication 64(2): 239–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kevin, D. 2003. Europe in the media: A comparison of reporting, representation, and rhetoric in national media systems in Europe. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, A.B. 2007. Media markets in Scandinavia: Political economy aspects of convergence and divergence. Nordicom Review(Jubilee issue): 121–134.

  • Mazzoleni, G., and W. Schulz. 1999. “Mediatization” of politics: A challenge for democracy? Political communication 16(3): 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCombs, M. (1997). Building consensus: The news media's agenda-setting roles. Political Communication 14(4): 433–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messing, S., and S.J. Westwood. 2014. Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research 41(8): 1042–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mjøs, O.J., T. Syvertsen, H. Moe, and G.S. Enli. 2014. The media welfare state: Nordic media in the digital era. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe, H., and A.O. Larsson. 2013. Untangling a complex media system: A comparative study of Twitter-linking practices during three Scandinavian election campaigns. Information, Communication & Society 16(5): 775–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papacharissi, Z., and M. de Fatima Oliveira. 2012. Affective news and networked publics: The rhythms of news storytelling on# Egypt. Journal of Communication 62(2): 266–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfetsch, B., S. Adam, and B. Eschner. 2008. The contribution of the press to Europeanization of public debates: A comparative study of issue salience and conflict lines of European integration. Journalism 9(4): 465–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, C. 2003. The Europeanization of public policy. In The politics of Europeanization, ed. K. Featherstone, and C. Radaelli, 27–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T. 2014. Introduction: European public spheres. In European public spheres: Politics is back, ed. T. Risse, 1–26. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sifft, S., M. Brüggemann, K. Kleinen von Königslöw, B. Peters, and A. Wimmel. 2007. Segmented Europeanization: Exploring the legitimacy of the European Union from a public discourse perspective. JCMS. Journal of Common Market Studies 45(1): 127–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statham, P., and H.J. Trenz. 2013. The politicization of Europe: Contesting the constitution in the mass media. London; New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenz, H.-J. 2008. Media: The unknown player in European integration. In Media, democracy and European culture, ed. I. Bondebjerg, and P. Madsen, 49–64. London: Intellect Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treib, O. 2014. The voter says no, but nobody listens: Causes and consequences of the Eurosceptic vote in the 2014 European elections. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(10): 1541–1554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twitter. 2014. European Parliament: How did the European Parliament use Twitter to inform, inspire and engage voters ahead of elections? https://biz.Twitter.com/success-stories/European-parliament. Accessed April 22 2015.

  • Twittercensus. 2014. Presentation Twitter census. http://twittercensus.se/presentation-twittercensus-2014/. Accessed Dec 2016.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anamaria Dutceac Segesten.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dutceac Segesten, A., Bossetta, M. The Eurosceptic Europeanization of public spheres: print and social media reactions to the 2014 European Parliament elections. Comp Eur Polit 17, 361–379 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-017-0099-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-017-0099-5

Keywords

Navigation