Abstract
Approximately one-half to three-quarters of university students commit some form of cheating, plagiarism, or collusion. Typical university responses are policy statements containing definitions plus punishment procedures. This paper collates a portfolio of strategies and tactics that seek to design-out, deter, and discourage academic misconduct. It finds many routine tactics exist, from silence and the use of large halls for major exams, to restrictions on electronic devices. Others are less consistently adopted, such as splitting lengthy exams in two to discourage washroom-visits where cheating takes place. The portfolio of tactics is framed in the context of crime opportunity theory and the 25 techniques of situational crime prevention. It is proposed that more consistent application of tactics focusing on environmental design, curricular design, and class management offer significant potential for reducing misconduct. Future research should seek to evaluate and enhance such interventions.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Teaching and Learning Centre at Simon Fraser University for pump-prime funding for this research, and a range of colleagues who supported the work and provided input and ideas. Input from Hanele Jantti, Linda Williams, Jo Hinchliffe, Michael Lockett, and Greg Baker is particularly appreciated.
Disclosure statement
The authors have no potential conflict of interest.