Publication Cover
LEUKOS
The Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society
Volume 16, 2020 - Issue 1
1,850
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Assessing the Impact of LED Lighting on the Stability of Selected Yellow Paint Formulations

, , &
Pages 67-85 | Received 15 Mar 2018, Accepted 02 Jan 2019, Published online: 11 Mar 2019

ABSTRACT

Light emitting diodes (LEDs) are steadily finding application in an increasing number of museums and heritage institutions, providing energy-efficient solutions for collections display. Although there is a business case to be made for moving toward LED lighting, the safe display of objects must also be ensured. Identifying vulnerable pigments and paints ensures that future preservation strategies will be put in place, avoiding acerbation of damage and reducing the need for conservation. In the first part of our research we investigate color shift and molecular alterations in three yellow paints, namely, lead chromate sulfate, arsenic sulfide, and cadmium sulfide in linseed oil and gum arabic binders. Following an artificial aging regime, color shift was evaluated using colorimetry and molecular alterations were monitored using attenuated total reflectance–Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy coupled with multivariate analysis. Up to 80 Mlux h the lead chromate samples in linseed oil displayed equivalent color shifts approximating 10 ∆E00 on exposure to the three artificial aging regimes. Color shift has been attributed to the formation of lead oxides evidenced by the appearance of a mid-infrared spectral band at 470 cm−1 assigned to PbO2. Above 80 Mlux h the formation of lead oxides was exacerbated by exposure to one particular LED. Arsenic sulfide in linseed oil displayed color shifts intensified by both types of LED. Above 40 Mlux h there was a discernible color shift in all samples, with the two LEDs displaying ∆E00 values two times higher than those displayed by the tungsten halogen samples. The alterations have been attributed to the formation of As2O3, which is known to form in the presence of wavelengths shorter than 428 nm. Cadmium sulfides in both linseed oil and gum arabic paints did not display discernible color shifts or the presence of degradation products.

1. Introduction

Solid-state lighting systems, commonly known as light emitting diodes (LEDs), are steadily finding application in an increasing number of museums and heritage institutions, providing energy-efficient solutions for collection display. Spurred on by the increased risk of obsolescence of tungsten halogen (TH) lamps and the large outlay of money required for the migration of English Heritage’s current lighting systems, our research is directed toward assessing whether particular pigments and binder compositions are vulnerable to chemical alterations, enhanced fading, and discoloration when subject to different solid-state lighting environments.

Lighting is a key component in the overall energy performance assessment of a historic building (de Santoli Citation2015). In 2014, LEDs were estimated to consume one-sixth the energy of incandescent sources and one-third compared to compact fluorescent sources, and this was expected to improve further as LED technology matures (Solais Citation2014). The long life of LED illuminants, and consequent less frequent replacement (compared to tungsten), has two main benefits: it minimizes physical risk to artifacts from ladders and platforms (Druzik and Michalski Citation2012) and it reduces maintenance costs, which can be especially costly in the vicinity of high-value display items (Thorseth et al. Citation2012). LED lighting systems operate at much lower temperatures than traditional incandescent lamps. As such, the energy required for cooling systems designed to counter the heat generated from incandescent light sources is much reduced, and it has been stated that for every 3 W of power saved when moving to LEDs a further 1 W is saved from the cost of environmental control (Druzik and Michalski Citation2012).

The research presented here aligns with English Heritage’s policy for Climate Change and the Historic House (English Heritage Citation2012) through studying the impact of different options for climate change mitigation and adaptation. Through the investigation of energy-efficient lighting alternatives for the historic house environment, a significant contribution can be made toward national and international targets for climate change (Department of Energy & Climate Change Citation2012; Department of Trade and Industry Citation2007). Based on estimated annual reductions in energy costs per equivalent lamp, moving from tungsten lighting to LED lighting could theoretically establish an energy and monetary savings in the region of 85%, to be offset against the cost per unit of replacement. However, the aged electrical systems within historic houses, coupled with the limitations on controlling temperatures, will reduce the expected operational life of the lamps. Additionally, many historic interiors have much lower artificial lighting density than museums and galleries and therefore total potential savings may prove less significant than previously reported (Arkinson Citation2011; ARUP Citation2010; Druzik and Michalski Citation2012). Nonetheless, a move to LED lighting could prove financially beneficial, coupled with a significant reduction in CO2 emissions. Although there is a business case to be made for moving toward LED lighting within English Heritage properties, the safe display of objects must also be ensured. Identifying vulnerable pigments and paints will enable future preservation strategies to be put in place, avoiding acerbation of damage and reducing the need for conservation.

With LED for collection lighting still in its infancy, there can be large differences in properties between lighting systems, which may pose problems for collections management and display (Druzik and Michalski Citation2012). One of the major concerns regarding the move from tungsten lighting to LEDs relates to the spectral power distribution output of phosphor-coated shortwave chip LEDs, with some lamps emitting a significant intensity of radiation at wavelengths nearing the ultraviolet region of the spectrum. For museum and gallery applications, white LEDs containing violet chips are not deemed appropriate because these have an intense emission peak at 405 nm, close to the demarcation of ultraviolet (UV) radiation (Druzik and Michalski Citation2012; Padfield Citation2014). Therefore, blue chip LEDs are favored for museum and gallery applications. This is due to their primary emission being centered at approximately 450 nm and concomitant broad phosphorescent emissions at longer wavelengths (Druzik and Michalski Citation2012; Padfield Citation2014; Padfield et al. Citation2013). Although the intensity of short-wavelength emissions (405 nm) is greatly reduced when compared to violet chip LEDs, the presence of emission peaks in the 450 nm region may still be damaging. In a recent survey on museum lighting selection (Garside et al. Citation2017) it was suggested that the peak at 450 nm should not exceed three times the height of the broad phosphorescent emission. Current U.S Government guidelines for the display of works of art suggest that the peak at 450 nm should not exceed 50% of the maximum power in the spectral power distribution (Miller and Druzik Citation2012).

It is acknowledged that historic house environments routinely display works under UV-filtered daylight conditions, with a relative spectral power distribution below the 500 nm region higher than that in blue chip LEDs. However, photosensitive objects are restricted to locations where daylight penetration factors often approach zero. In such cases, local lighting often relies on tungsten to illuminate such objects. The output of tungsten bulbs is concentrated at the lower frequency red end of the spectral distribution. Although dyes and photographs have been assessed and are not adversely affected by exposure to blue chip LEDs when compared to tungsten, previous work indicates that certain pigments might be at risk (Lerwill et al. Citation2014, Citation2015). Assessing material stability is generally based on reflectance spectra exhibiting weak absorption around the 450 nm region; however, this does not definitively indicate stability.

The work presented here is derived from a larger research project aimed at assessing the impact of blue chip LED lighting on the stability of a number of artists’ pigments and paints. The project included a 12-month light aging study, exposing a range of paint samples to five lighting environments, namely, UV-filtered natural daylight; tungsten halogen; two LEDs; and darkness (control samples). Samples were periodically analyzed using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and colorimetry, providing information on molecular alterations and color shift, respectively. Due to the large data set (total of 1620 samples), this project employed a multivariate analytical (MVA) approach, such as partial least squares (PLS). MVA was used to highlight molecular changes in the pigments and paints and to establish whether structural modifications were associated with color shift, exposure, and exposure type.

In this article, we specifically report on three yellow pigmented linseed oil and watercolor paint formulations, namely, lead chrome sulfate (chrome yellow), arsenic sulfide (orpiment), and cadmium sulfide (cadmium yellow). The oil paint and watercolor samples were prepared according to recipes reported in original treaties and accounts (Masschelein-Kleiner Citation1995) and are outlined in Section 2.2. These samples were exposed to accelerated aging regimes following a 9-month drying period.

2. Methodology

English Heritage defined the collection of interest as broadly Old Masters (oil paints) and British watercolors from the 18th century onwards. References detailing the palette of artists belonging to these groups were sought (e.g., Kirby et al. Citation1996; Ormsby et al. Citation2005; Townsend Citation1993, Citation1994). The references were assembled and prioritized, which generated a preliminary list of 100 pigments. To narrow down the list of pigments, it was decided to examine pigments that were mentioned in at least two light deterioration experiments and at least two palette reviews and had reflectance spectra indicating potential sensitivity to bluer light (Kirby et al. Citation1996), meaning that the pigment was thought to be light sensitive and was typically used in the types of work of interest. Consequently, some pigments with reflectance spectra of potential interest were discounted due to their relative rarity on the palette. For example, zinc yellow [K2O.4ZnCrO4.H2O] has an absorption peak at 585 nm, which has been shown to change during aging (Casadio et al. Citation2008). However, Kühn and Curran report that its use was not widespread and chrome yellow was more commonly used (Kühn and Curran Citation1986).

Although our broader research project encompassed 12 different pigments (supplemental data 1) and three paint binding media, here we present the results relating only to selected yellow watercolor and oil paints, namely, lead chrome sulfate (chrome yellow), arsenic sulfide (orpiment), and cadmium sulfide (cadmium yellow). Further results from the broader project will be published in due course.

2.1. Light exposure chambers

Accelerated aging was undertaken using purpose-built light boxes designed and manufactured by Complete Lighting Systems. Accelerated exposure provides insight into the long-term performance of different lighting regimes, within a short time period. Given the sector’s misgivings about LEDs, the aim of this project was to establish the extent to which paint stability differs on exposure to LED lighting relative to the tungsten lighting currently employed within English Heritage historic house environments. Current English Heritage guidelines restrict the use of LEDs with a 450 nm emission greater than 33% of the broad phosphoresce and with a full width at half height greater than 20 nm. Two LED lighting systems were therefore selected to interrogate the importance of these guidelines. These were compared against an accelerated tungsten lighting regime and a dark control environment. The color metrics for each light source () and normalized spectral power distributions () were measured using a GL Optic Spectis Touch 5.0 in situ within each chamber. Where applicable the UV filters were in place during measurement.

Table 1. Color metrics for the four light sources.

Fig. 1. Spectral power distribution of UV-filtered dichroic halogen lamp (TH), LED1, LED2, and UV-filtered daylight, scaled to the human phototopic sensitivity function (Padfield Citation2014).

Fig. 1. Spectral power distribution of UV-filtered dichroic halogen lamp (TH), LED1, LED2, and UV-filtered daylight, scaled to the human phototopic sensitivity function (Padfield Citation2014).

A further set of samples was exposed in real time to daylight to establish the relative color shift. Samples were exposed to UV-filtered daylight and periodically analyzed using colorimetry ( and ). Total exposure levels were dependent on seasonal weather conditions, but exposures reaching 5.4 Mlux h were achieved over the duration of the experiment.

Table 2. Average illuminance, temperature, and relative humidity exposure at each sampling interval.

All samples were dried in the dark for 9 months at 20.1 ± 1.9°C and 42.8 ± 7.1% relative humidity (RH) prior to initial analysis and subsequent exposure. Separate sets of samples were exposed to the three artificial light sources, giving an illuminance at the sample surface of 47–50,000 lux. This was taken to be reciprocal because it is well below the level at which Del Hoyo-Melendez and Mecklenburg (Citation2011) demonstrated the relationship to break down. Lux levels, temperature, and relative humidity during the periods of exposure were monitored using Elsec 765C environmental loggers. Data were acquired every 10 min and the average values at each sampling interval for each chamber are included in . Diffusion tubes were used to monitor ozone and NOx levels in each chamber throughout the period of exposure.

The two LED light boxes were cooled using both passive and active measures, namely, heat sinks and a fan system. The TH lamps were cooled using off the shelf heat sinks and fans. The halogen lamps were UV-filtered using a 4-mm polycarbonate sheet placed between the lamps and the samples. The control samples were masked from light exposure (dark) with metal foil and placed within the TH light chamber, exposing them to the ambient temperature and RH conditions.

2.2. Sample preparation

2.2.1. Pigments

The lead chromate sulfate was supplied by BASF, cadmium sulfide was supplied by Kremer Pigments, and the arsenic sulfide was an archival pigment from the Material Studies Laboratory, University College London. In all three cases their identity was confirmed using X-ray fluorescence and polarized light microscopy.

2.2.2. Watercolor paints

Powder pigments were ground in deionized water to a thick, smooth paste, wetting with ethanol if necessary to avoid clumping. Gum arabic was dissolved in water in a 1:2 w/w solution. The two were mixed together in a 1:1 v/v ratio and then diluted with a varying amount of water to achieve a thin wash on paper. Paints were diluted so that a similar tone, or lightness, was achieved across all pigments. Paints were brushed out onto Arches 88 300 gsm paper in two strokes.

2.2.3. Oil paints

Pigment powder was ground to a paste with sufficient Roberson cold-pressed linseed oil according to its oil absorption index values quoted in the Artists’ Pigments series (Feller Citation1986; Fitzhugh Citation1997; Roy Citation1993). For painting out, if necessary, a paint vehicle (one part turpentine to two parts linseed oil) was added dropwise to achieve a similar consistency across all pigment mixtures. A manganese drier was added to poor drying paints at approximately 5% of the oil volume. The average pigment volume concentration was around 0.36 (). Paint layers were drawn out onto a Teflon support with a flexible plastic edge and were of a thickness sufficient to give complete covering power.

Table 3. Average pigment volume concentration.

2.3. Colorimetry

Following 9 months of drying in the dark, initial colorimetry analysis was undertaken for each paint sample, with three replicate measurements on each sample taken before and after aging. Markers were used to ensure that the sampling window could be repositioned on the same sampling location.

2.3.1. Color difference

Reflectance spectra and colorimetric coordinate measurements were taken using a Konica Minolta CM-2600d color meter. The sample area was 3 mm in diameter, with an observer angle of 10°, a geometry that includes the specular reflectance component of the color measurement. The data were collected in L*a*b* CIE coordinates using the standard illuminant D65. These coordinates refer to lightness (L*), red–green (a*), and yellow–blue (b*). The color difference (∆E00) between a reference and a sample was calculated following the CIE ∆E 2000 method set out by Luo et al. (Citation2001).

Fixing a CIE ∆E (∆E) value for “just noticeable change” is problematic because the eye is variably sensitive to different parts of the color spectrum (Padfield Citation2014), which is difficult to account for in color metrics (CIE Citation2004). Literature values for perceptible color shift (∆E) range from 1 to 5 (Berger-Schunn Citation1994; Del Hoyo-Melendez and Mecklenburg Citation2011; Habekost Citation2013; Johnston-Feller Citation2001). With this in mind, here we set a boundary of ∆E00 = 2 as a clear discernible color shift. For reference, this boundary has been marked as a horizontal dashed line on all color shift plots.

Although the colorimeter allows for repositioning of the analysis location via a small viewing window, it has been previously shown (Luxford and Thickett Citation2012; Saunders and Kirby Citation2008) that limits of repeatability can be in the region of ∆E00 ≈ 2, which indicates that a measurement error in the region of human tolerance could be expected. Therefore, consecutive color measurements on three sample spots were taken to determine the ∆E00 repeatability range for each control sample. The repeatability error for each paint is included in and is an indication of the degrees of error in repositioning on the analysis window and sample homogeneity. For each pigment/binder combination only color shifts above the repeatability ∆E00 values presented can be ascribed to a real alteration in color. The same is true when establishing differences between the exposure type; that is, with certainty that a particular lamp has performed better or worse than another, the lamps must exceed the specific ∆E00 repeatability value for a particular sample composition.

Table 4. Measured error of repeatability of ∆E00 for the control samples.

2.3.2. Change index

Lunz et al. (Citation2016) describe a damage index as “the fraction of the exposure that is required for a light source to induce the same level of color change” (p. 5). In their work, values greater than one indicate a damage potential greater than the base source, although they describe their index as a “fraction” of the exposure. Lunz et al. (Citation2016) quote a single damage index value, assuming exponential behavior across all samples.

Interpreting Lunz et al.’s (Citation2016) work, we report a similar change indexFootnote1 calculated at specific exposures; a single value for each curve was not possible given the varied fading behaviors across the sample sets. The change index (CI) gives the fraction of time required by each illuminant to reach an equivalent ∆E00 value, relative to the TH source, for each individual pigment:

(1) Δ E 00 , r e f   e x p o s u r e C I r e f = Δ E 00 ,   u n k o w n   e x p o s u r e C I u n k n o w n , (1)

where C I r e f = 1.00.

Tungsten halogen exposure intervals of 2.4, 4.5, and 19.1 Mlux h were chosen as reference change indices, avoiding extremely high exposure values that fall within regions of autoretardation for some samples. In contrast to Lunz et al. (Citation2016), values greater than one indicate that it takes longer for equivalent change to be reached with the alternative source than for tungsten; that is, such a light source may be less damaging to that pigment. The score does not consider total irradiance but only illumination, and this complexity should be acknowledged when comparing lighting systems (Cuttle Citation1996). It should also be borne in mind that being a fraction, and therefore unitless, it does not highlight whether the color shift is perceptible. The change index tables provide only a guide and needs to be cross-referenced with the color shift curves.

2.4. Fourier transform infrared–attenuated total reflectance

To identify the chemical alterations associated with light-induced change, mid-infrared analysis was carried out using a Bruker Alpha Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR) fitted with a Bruker Platimum diamond attenuated total reflectance (ATR) accessory, using Bruker OPUS software version 7.5. A scan range of 400–4000 cm−1 was employed, with a wavenumber resolution of 2 cm−1 and scan accumulation of 32. Three replicates of each sample were acquired and averaged using Thermo-Scientific GRAMS AI software version 9.1. FTIR analysis was carried out on all oil-based samples by removing them from the Teflon substrate using a 3-mm Harris micropunch and analyzed with the exposed paint surface in contact with the analysis crystal.

FTIR analysis was carried out on all oil-based samples. The gum arabic paint samples were omitted from FTIR analysis because the intense signal from the paper substrate masked the relatively weak signal from the binder and pigments.

2.5. Multivariate analysis—Principal component analysis and partial least squares

Principal component analysis (PCA) and PLS were used to relate chemical changes to exposure type, duration, and color shift. Due to the large data set generated, this multivariate approach was aimed at mapping spectral variations displayed across the infrared spectral region and determining correlations across the sample set.

The initial PCA data matrix (X) was composed of rows of FTIR spectral data corresponding to the number samples in each data set, with each column of the matrix corresponding to the number of variables, in this case wavenumber. In this work, a 35 × 3 529 X matrix was constructed for each pigment/oil binder composition relating to 35 samples (seven sampling intervals for dark, daylight, TH, LED1, and LED2) and 3529 wavenumbers. Individual matrices were constructed for each pigment/oil binder composition to enable comparisons between the lighting systems. This aimed to highlight inherent clustering related to exposure type and duration and establish the key variables impacting on such differences in principal component space.

Partial least squares is a regression method based on an iterative algorithm between two matrices, X and Y. As before, the X matrix relates to the spectral responses. Accompanying each X matrix were two 35 × 1 Y matrices for PLS regression corresponding to the independent responses (1) level of exposure (Mlux h) and (2) color shift (∆E00).

PCA and PLS were carried out using Camo Unscrambler X version 10.3. All FTIR spectra were preprocessed to reduce variability caused by differences in scattering and background noise. All data were smoothed using a Savitzky-Golay filter, fitting a second-order polynomial with an 11-point symmetric window (Savitzky and Golay Citation1964). The smoothed spectra were then subsequently normalized using standard normal variate (Fearn et al. Citation2009; Muehlethaler et al. Citation2011). Unless otherwise stated, PCA and PLS were carried out on spectra spanning the entire mid-infrared region from 400 to 4000 cm−1, with a wavenumber resolution of 2 cm−1, equating to a total of 3529 variables. Later iterations were performed on smaller, truncated regions of the spectrum determined by the PCA loadings and PLS regression coefficient plots of individual models. The data were mean centered and the models validated using the full cross-validation method (Esbensen Citation2002).

Overly optimistic calculations of principal components is as a common problem within MVA (De Maesschalck et al. Citation1999). Therefore, each model was calculated with a total of seven components; however, later principal components were often dominated by interference and therefore are not reported on.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Lead chromate sulfate (PbCrO4∙xPbSO4) in gum arabic

Color shift across all sample exposures appeared to be equivalent and followed similar patterns of change; the TH lamps performed somewhat better at exposures exceeding 4.5 Mlux h (). On initial exposure there is a relatively rapid change in ∆E00, reaching levels of ∆E00 ≈ 3.5 at exposures of 9.5 Mlux h. After this point there is an apparent plateau in ∆E00 across all samples until the final sampling interval of 150 Mlux h, where LED1 displays a slight increase in ∆E00. Across all sampling intervals the TH samples display higher standard deviations compared to the other sample sets. When considering that the reproducibility error is low for lead chromate sulfate in gum arabic, this indicates sample inhomogeneity.

Fig. 2. Color shift (∆E00) for lead chromate sulfate in gum arabic exposed to TH, LED1, and LED2. Horizontal dashed line denotes a clear discernible color shift.

Fig. 2. Color shift (∆E00) for lead chromate sulfate in gum arabic exposed to TH, LED1, and LED2. Horizontal dashed line denotes a clear discernible color shift.

The changes in color are due to a decrease in the L* and b* coordinates, both of which follow a pattern of behavior similar to that of ∆E00: an initial decrease in L* and b* followed by a plateau. The samples display a rapid darkening, which is independent of exposure type, and a shift to a more blue hue (−b*; ).

Fig. 3. Color shift (∆a* and ∆b*) for lead chromate sulfate in gum arabic exposed to TH, LED1, and LED2.

Fig. 3. Color shift (∆a* and ∆b*) for lead chromate sulfate in gum arabic exposed to TH, LED1, and LED2.

Up to 0.5 Mlux h the samples exposed to daylight exhibit a marginally higher color shift compared to those exposed to TH, LED1, and LED2, although ∆E00 is borderline with levels of discernible change. Between 1 and 4.8 Mlux h all four light exposures are equivalent ().

3.2. Lead chromate sulfate (PbCrO4∙xPbSO4) in linseed oil

On exposure to tungsten halogen, the samples display a perceptual increase in ∆E00 up to exposure levels of 37.5 Mlux h (). After this exposure, the color shift plateaus and remains constant (within error) up to 150 Mlux h. This color shift is due to a significant decrease in the L*, a*, and b* coordinates, namely, a darkening of the paint coupled with a shift in hue to a more green and blue paint layer ( and supplemental material 2). This behavior is mirrored by the samples exposed to both LED lamps; color shift is equivalent across all samples when accounting for repeatability error, standard deviation, and levels of discernible change. At 150 Mlux h there is a slight increase and divergence in ∆E00 values for the LED1 samples, which is mirrored in the L*, a*, and b* coordinates.

Fig. 4. Color shift (∆E00) for lead chromate sulfate in linseed oil exposed to TH, LED1, and LED2. Horizontal dashed line denotes a clear discernible color shift.

Fig. 4. Color shift (∆E00) for lead chromate sulfate in linseed oil exposed to TH, LED1, and LED2. Horizontal dashed line denotes a clear discernible color shift.

Fig. 5. Color shift (∆a* and ∆b*) for lead chromate sulfate in linseed oil exposed to TH, LED1, and LED2.

Fig. 5. Color shift (∆a* and ∆b*) for lead chromate sulfate in linseed oil exposed to TH, LED1, and LED2.

The alterations in color displayed at low to moderate exposures are not significantly different between the three artificial aging regimes. At 150 Mlux h there is a divergence in the values of ∆E00, with LED1 displaying marginally poorer performance and discernible difference compared to the LED2 and TH samples. It is worth noting that at exposures above 9.5 Mlux h the color shift in the gum arabic samples is approximately two-thirds lower than that in the equivalent linseed oil samples. Although it might be reasonable to expect greater change in watercolor layers due to the double exposure through reflection of the paper, the large contribution from the underlying paper in the translucent watercolor will have a significant impact on ∆E00 compared to the opaque linseed oil paint. The dominance of the paper through the thin watercolor layers might also cause a less perceptible change.

The samples exposed to filtered daylight exhibit a significant increase in ∆E00 compared to the TH, LED1, and LED2 samples. The deviations are higher but still significant after daylight exposure, with ∆E00 values averaging 6.2 at 2.3 Mlux h, compared to ∆E00 ≈ 2.4 for the other three exposures. At low exposure levels the daylight samples exhibit a marked increase in ∆E00 relative to the artificially aged samples ().

Table 5. Change index: Fraction of exposure required to induce an equivalent color change to the TH reference at a given exposure (Mlux h).

The FTIR analysis shows the appearance of a spectral band centered at 470 cm−1 with increasing exposure, which is attributed to the formation of PbO2 (; Gautam et al. Citation2012). The exact route of this photochemical reaction is still not fully understood, but it has been proposed that lead chromate is reduced to chrome oxide and lead oxide (Erkens et al. Citation2001; Monico et al. Citation2011). Whatever the precise mechanism, it is clear from the spectra that the Pb-O band at 470 cm−1 increases with exposure time across all artificial exposures, namely, TH, LED1, and LED2.

Fig. 6. Lead chromate sulfate expanded spectra for control (black) and TH, LED1, and LED2 samples at exposure intervals 4 and 9.

Fig. 6. Lead chromate sulfate expanded spectra for control (black) and TH, LED1, and LED2 samples at exposure intervals 4 and 9.

The distinct relationship between exposure and the increase across this particular spectral region was further interrogated using PLS to determine whether the measured levels of exposure (Mlux h) could be quantitatively correlated with the FTIR spectra and the formation of PbO2. A PLS model was calculated regressing the variable region from 400 to 650 cm−1 against Mlux h for the control, TH, LED1, and LED2 samples.

The corresponding regression coefficients for the first and third axes were shown to be influenced by 470 cm−1, in addition to an inverse relationship between variables 595 cm−1 and 610 cm−1 in the case of the third axis (supplemental material 3). The bands at 595 cm−1 and 610 cm−1 are attributed to SO42− bending modes (Lane Citation2007), and the intensity of these were also shown by Monico et al. (Citation2011) to invert during the aging of lead chromate sulfate.

The FTIR analysis and PLS regression demonstrate the increasing presence of degradation products in the lead chromate sulfate, namely, lead oxide (). Direct correlations were found between the spectral aging patterns, specifically the spectral band centered at 470 cm−1, and the duration of exposure and color shift. This correlation (R2 = 0.94) was particularly evident in the samples exposed to LED1 and is in keeping with the marginally higher ∆E00 values shown at high exposures to LED1 ().

Fig. 7. Lead chromate sulfate PLS predicted versus measured validation line for Mlux h with three factors for LED1. Regression line (gray) R2 = 0.94 and target line (black) R2 = 1.00.

Fig. 7. Lead chromate sulfate PLS predicted versus measured validation line for Mlux h with three factors for LED1. Regression line (gray) R2 = 0.94 and target line (black) R2 = 1.00.

3.3. Arsenic sulfide (As2S3) in gum arabic

The repeatability error is low compared to the degree of color shift in the arsenic sulfide samples kept in the dark, suggesting that the fluctuations in ∆E00 are not due to sampling errors ( and ). However, the standard deviation is large. It should be borne in mind that orpiment is a ground mineral pigment and the particle size range is broad, giving a heterogeneous surface topography. Differences in color shift are likely to be influenced by alterations in scattering as a result of drying, which is physical change. On initial exposure the dark samples show an apparent increase in ∆E00 followed by a temporary decrease. This initial increase is concomitant with a decrease in the a* coordinate, suggesting the formation of a greener paint layer on drying ().

Fig. 8. Color shift (∆E00) for arsenic sulfide in gum arabic exposed to TH, LED1, and LED2. Horizontal dashed line denotes a clear discernible color shift.

Fig. 8. Color shift (∆E00) for arsenic sulfide in gum arabic exposed to TH, LED1, and LED2. Horizontal dashed line denotes a clear discernible color shift.

Fig. 9. Color shift (∆a* and ∆b*) for arsenic sulfide in gum arabic exposed to TH, LED1, and LED2.

Fig. 9. Color shift (∆a* and ∆b*) for arsenic sulfide in gum arabic exposed to TH, LED1, and LED2.

The standard deviations at each sampling interval are high, making interpretation tentative. However, all samples exhibit a decrease in a*, indicating the formation of a greener pigment layer as exhibited in the control samples. Up to exposures approximating 4.5 Mlux h all three artificial lighting systems are equivalent and below the limits of visual detection (). Between 9.5 and 73 Mlux h LED1 appears to perform marginally better than the TH and LED2. All three light exposures exhibit a significant decrease in the b* coordinate, equating to a loss of yellow and a shift toward a blue hue (). At very high exposures, above 75 Mlux h this increase in blueness is retarded on exposure to the TH lamps. This is supported by the ∆E00 values and indicates that at high exposures arsenic sulfide in gum arabic is more stable under TH lighting.

When accounting for the high standard deviations, the samples exposed to filtered daylight display equivalent levels of color shift.

3.4. Arsenic sulfide (As2S3) in linseed oil

The standard deviations and repeatability errors are low, indicating a homogenous surface and color shift across all samples. At exposures up to 9.5 Mlux h all three artificial lighting exposures show similar levels of change, ∆E00 ≈ 1.0 (). At higher exposures there is a divergence, with the TH and LED2 samples exhibiting a greater color shift than the LED1 samples.

Fig. 10. Color shift (∆E00) for arsenic sulfide in linseed oil exposed to TH, LED1, and LED2. Horizontal dashed line denotes a clear discernible color shift.

Fig. 10. Color shift (∆E00) for arsenic sulfide in linseed oil exposed to TH, LED1, and LED2. Horizontal dashed line denotes a clear discernible color shift.

The LED2 samples demonstrate a clear, perceptual color shift above 18.5 Mlux h. The change in color is due to a decrease in L* and b* and an increase in a*. This latter change in hue is in opposition to the decrease in a* exhibited by the TH and LED1 samples (). The former lamp induces redder color shift, whereas the TH and LED1 lamps tend toward a greener shift in hue.

Fig. 11. Color shift (∆a* and ∆b*) for arsenic sulfide (orpiment) in gum arabic exposed to TH, LED1, and LED2.

Fig. 11. Color shift (∆a* and ∆b*) for arsenic sulfide (orpiment) in gum arabic exposed to TH, LED1, and LED2.

The discoloration of arsenic sulfide (orpiment) is well documented and known to form the more stable arsenic oxide compound, arsenolite (As2O3), particularly on exposure to wavelengths shorter than 428 nm (Allen et al. Citation2005). Whitmore and Cass (Citation1989) have also suggested that there may be a link between the presence of nitrogen dioxide and accelerated deterioration of both orpiment (As2S3) and realgar (As4S4). The concentrations of nitrogen dioxide were equivalent inside all three light chambers. Therefore, the measured color shift is likely due to the higher spectral power distribution between 380 and 429 nm in the LED2 lamps.

shows the appearance of an FTIR band at 790 cm−1 that confirms the formation of arsenic oxide (As2O3; Paiuk et al. Citation2012; Vermeulen et al. Citation2016), accompanied by a band and As-O vibration at 1030 cm−1. There were no bands associated with arsenic sulfide because its absorbance frequencies are outside of the mid-infrared region.

Fig. 12. Expanded arsenic sulfide spectra for control (black) and TH samples at exposure interval 4 (gray solid) and exposure interval 9 (gray dashed).

Fig. 12. Expanded arsenic sulfide spectra for control (black) and TH samples at exposure interval 4 (gray solid) and exposure interval 9 (gray dashed).

To interrogate the alterations in the infrared spectra following exposure, the color shift data were regressed against the primary FTIR variables using PLS. shows the predicted versus measured validation line for ∆E00, indicating a high degree of correlation between the FTIR and colorimetry analysis (R2 = 0.97). The associated regression coefficient plots for principal axes 1 to 4 are dominated by the band centered at 790 cm−1, associated with the formation of arsenic oxide (As2O3). This is a clear indication that the color shift of the arsenic sulfide oil paint is primarily driven by the degradation of the orpiment pigment (Vermeulen et al. Citation2016) and exacerbated by exposure to LED2.

Fig. 13. Arsenic sulfide PLS predicted versus measured validation line for ∆E00 with four factors. Regression line (black) R2 = 0.97 and target line (black) R2 = 1.00.

Fig. 13. Arsenic sulfide PLS predicted versus measured validation line for ∆E00 with four factors. Regression line (black) R2 = 0.97 and target line (black) R2 = 1.00.

3.5. Cadmium sulfide (CdS) in gum arabic

Accounting for repeatability error and levels of perceptual change, the samples kept in the dark exhibited no significant color shift (). The same is true for the TH, LED1, and LED2 samples. Although there were slight increases in ∆E00, the maximum value across all three samples sets was ∆E00 = 0.9, which is below the limit of discernible change. The samples exposed to UV-filtered daylight followed behavior equivalent to that of the other exposed sample sets.

Fig. 14. Color shift (∆E00) for cadmium yellow in gum arabic exposed to TH, LED1, and LED2. Horizontal dashed line denotes a clear discernible color shift.

Fig. 14. Color shift (∆E00) for cadmium yellow in gum arabic exposed to TH, LED1, and LED2. Horizontal dashed line denotes a clear discernible color shift.

3.6. Cadmium sulfide (CdS) in linseed oil

The TH, LED1, and LED2 samples displayed slight increases in ∆E00 when compared to the control samples, with the maximum value across all three samples sets reaching ∆E00 = 1.4 (). Although this is potentially a detectable change in color, when considering the error of repeatability and the similarities across all of the exposed samples these differences are not significant. The minor changes detected are due to a positive shift in the L* and b* axes and a negative change in the a* coordinate, equating to a lightening of the paint surface and a slightly more green/yellow hue ().

Fig. 15. Color shift (∆E00) for cadmium yellow in linseed oil exposed to TH, LED1, and LED2. Horizontal dashed line denotes a clear discernible color shift.

Fig. 15. Color shift (∆E00) for cadmium yellow in linseed oil exposed to TH, LED1, and LED2. Horizontal dashed line denotes a clear discernible color shift.

Fig. 16. Color shift (∆a* and ∆b*) for cadmium yellow in linseed oil exposed to TH, LED1, and LED2.

Fig. 16. Color shift (∆a* and ∆b*) for cadmium yellow in linseed oil exposed to TH, LED1, and LED2.

Leone et al. (Citation2005) and Mass et al. (Citation2013) demonstrated that CdS was susceptible to chemical alterations in the pigment structure on exposure to light and high RH (85%), which resulted in the formation of brown, white, and colorless compounds. Eastaugh (Citation2008) also suggested that moisture may have a deleterious effect on the pigment if only leanly bound in the paint. However, Leone et al. (Citation2005) found that alterations were dependant on the physical conformation of the pigment and where there was a higher content of amorphous cadmium sulfide the pigment was more prone to deterioration. Although there were some changes to the color of the CdS samples, these were very low considering the degree of exposure of the samples. The reason for apparent stability across all lighting types is potentially twofold, namely, the low relative humidity within each aging chamber and quality of the manufactured pigment, which is likely to have a high degree of crystallinity. The samples exposed to filtered daylight followed the equivalent behavior.

The initial PCA across the entire spectral range displayed no inherent clusters or patterns relating to exposure type or duration, although there was evidence of the exposed samples clustering away from the control samples kept in the dark (data not shown). Following variable selection the overall description of the samples improved, with the explained variance at two components increasing from 87% to 93%. Primary variables influencing clustering were 1740 cm−1, 2850 cm−1, and 2922 cm−1, the first exhibiting an inverse relationship to the latter variables. The band at 1740 cm−1 is assigned to the C =O stretch associated with ester linkages formed during oxidative polymerization of fatty acid materials—that is, linseed oil—whereas the bands at 2850 cm−1 and 2922 cm−1 suggest the loss of hydrocarbon. A reduction in the intensity of the CH2 bands 2850 cm−1 and 2922 cm−1 is in line with oxidative chain cleavage (Meilunas et al. Citation1990). There was no systematic clustering associated with exposure to particular light sources and no evidence of alterations in the chemical structure of cadmium sulfide (Mass et al. Citation2013) or the presence of pigment and oil binder interactions (Pouyet et al. Citation2015). All molecular changes on exposure were ascribed to the oxidation and polymerization reactions associated with the continued drying of linseed oil.

4. Conclusions

The use of LED lighting in heritage institutions is steadily increasing due to their energy efficiency, long lamp life, and the risk of obsolescence of tungsten halogen lighting. Therefore, understanding the stability of pigments and paints exposed to specific spectral distributions is critical for safeguarding works of art. The results presented here on three historically important yellow pigments suggest that both lead chromate sulfate and arsenic sulfide in linseed oil display an increased risk of the formation of oxidative degradation products on exposure to LED lighting.

The FTIR analysis and PLS regression demonstrated the presence of degradation products in lead chromate sulfate, namely, lead oxide. A correlation between exposure and oxidation was particularly evident in the samples exposed to LED1 and was in keeping with the marginally higher ∆E00 values at very high exposures. Lead chromate sulfate in gum arabic displayed a discernable color shift above 2 Mlux h, with the TH samples displaying marginally lower degrees of change, although when accounting for deviations this may not be significant.

Color shifts of arsenic sulfide in linseed oil indicated that, at high exposures, the LED2 lamps induced a definite shift in color compared to samples exposed to TH and LED1. This was due to the transformation of arsenic sulfide into arsenic oxide, accelerated by the higher spectral distribution across the 380–429 nm region. This interpretation was supported by the FTIR analysis that clearly demonstrated the presence of arsenic oxide at higher exposures and indicated a correlation between the exposure type, duration, and color shift. The colorimetry data for arsenic sulfide in gum arabic were inconclusive due to the high deviations across all samples sets caused by large particle size and surface heterogeneity.

The cadmium sulfide samples bound in linseed and gum arabic displayed very low-level, insignificant alterations in color across all sample sets. This was attributed to the high quality of the manufactured pigment and the low relative humidity in each aging chamber. Further work is underway to investigate the stability of low-quality, high amorphous content cadmium sulfide on exposure to LED lighting.

This work forms a proportion of larger research project aimed at interrogating the impact of LED lighting on model pigment and paint compositions and the results from the broader project will be published in due course. Although the work presented here has been limited to three pigments and two binders, the initial results indicate that certain colorants are more vulnerable to degradation when exposed to LED lighting. As such, strategies for the display of works of art will need to carefully balance curatorial needs with those of particular pigment types. Decisions regarding the length of time an object is on display will continue to be critical but will also need to take into account the type of LED used for display.

Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download TIFF Image (79.2 MB)

Supplemental Material

Download TIFF Image (79.2 MB)

Supplemental Material

Download TIFF Image (79.2 MB)

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed on the publisher’s website.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

Emma Richardson was funded by the Heritage Protection Commission (Grant Number 7087) and the Analytical Chemistry Trust Fund (Grant Number TWAF/15/01): “Assessing the Impact of LED Lighting on Pigments and Paper in Collections.”

Notes

1. The term “change” rather than “damage” was adopted to better encompass the potential for changes in color due to continuing “drying” of oil binders.

References

  • Allen P, Johnson B, Riley B. 2005. Photo-oxidation of thermally evaporated As2S3 thin films. J Optoelec Adv Mater. 7:1759–1764.
  • Arkinson R. 2011. Is now the time to invest in LED lighting? [Internet]. Museums Association. http://www.museumsassociation.org/museum-practice/lighting/17012011-lighting-leds.
  • ARUP. 2010. Museums and galleries survival strategies: a guide for reducing operating costs and improving sustainability. London (UK): ARUP.
  • Berger-Schunn A. 1994. Practical colour measurment, a primer for the beginner, a reminder for the expert. New York (NY): John Wiley and Sons.
  • Casadio F, Fiedler I, Gray KA, Warta R. 2008. Deterioration of zinc potassium chromate pigments: elucidating the effects of paint composition and environmental conditions on chromatic alteration. ICOM Committee Conserv. 2:572–580.
  • Commision Internationale de l’Eclairage. 2004. Control of damage to museum objects by optical radiation. Commision Internationale de l’Eclairage. Standards DS. Vienna (Austria): CIE Ed. p. 30.
  • Cuttle C. 1996. Damage to museum objects due to light exposure. Int J Light Res Technol. 28(1):1–9.
  • De Maesschalck R, Candolfi A, Massart DL, Heuerding S. 1999. Decision criteria for soft independent modelling of class analogy applied to near infrared data. Chemom Intell Lab Syst. 47:65–77.
  • de Santoli L. 2015. Guidelines on energy efficiency of cultural heritage. Energy Build. 86:534–540.
  • Del Hoyo-Melendez JM, Mecklenburg MF. 2011. An investigation of the reciprocity principle of light exposures using microfading spectrometry. Spectrosc Lett. 44(1):52–62.
  • Department of Energy & Climate Change. 2012. The energy efficiency strategy: the energy efficiency opportunity in the UK. In: DECC, editor. London (UK): Department of Energy & Climate Change.
  • Department of Trade and Industry. 2007. Meeting the energy challenge: a white paper on energy. In: DTI, editor. London (UK): Department of Trade and Industry.
  • Druzik JR, Michalski SW. 2012. Guidelines for selecting solid-state lighting in museums. Los Angeles: J. Paul Getty Trust and Canadian Conservation Institute.
  • Eastaugh N. 2008. Pigment compendium: a dictionary and optical microscopy of historical pigments. Oxford (UK): Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • English Heritage. 2012. Climate change and the historic environment. London (UK): English Heritage.
  • Erkens L, Hamers H, Hermans R, Claeys E, Bijnens M. 2001. Lead chromates: A review of the state of the art in 2000. Surf Coat Int Part B. 84(3):169–176.
  • Esbensen KH. 2002. Multivariate Data Analysis: in Practice. Esbjerg (Norway): Camo; p. 254–261.
  • Fearn T, Riccioli C, Garrido-Varo A, Guerrero-Ginel JE. 2009. On the geometry of SNV and MSC. Chemom Intell Lab Syst. 96(1):22–26.
  • Feller RL. 1986. Artists’ pigments: a handbook of their history and characteristics. Washington DC: National Gallery of Art.
  • Fitzhugh EW. 1997. Artists’ pigments: a handbook of their history and characteristics.
  • Garside D, Curran K, Korenberg C, MacDonald L, Teunissen K, Robson S. 2017. How is museum lighting selected? An insight into current practice in UK museums. J Inst Conserv. 40(1):3–14.
  • Gautam C, Yadav AK, Singh AK. 2012. A review on infrared spectroscopy of borate glasses with effects of different additives. ISRN Ceram. 2012:17.
  • Habekost M. 2013. Which color differencing equation should be used? Int Circ Graphic Educ Res. (6):20–32.
  • Johnston-Feller R. 2001. Color science in the examination of museum objects: nondestructive procedures. Los Angeles (CA): Getty Conservation Institute.
  • Kirby J, Saunders D, Cupitt J. 1996. Colorants and colour change. In: Early Italian painting techniques and analysis. p. 60–66.
  • Kühn H, Curran M. 1986. Chrome yellow and other chromate pigments. In Feller RL, editor. Artists’ pigments: a handbook of theirhistory and characteristics, Vol. 1 Washington DC: National Gallery of Art; Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. p. 187–218.
  • Lane MD. 2007. Mid-infrared emission spectroscopy of sulfate and sulfate-bearing minerals. Am Mineral. 92:1–18.
  • Leone B, Burnstock A, Jones C, Hallebeek P, Boon J, Keune K. 2005. The deterioration of cadmium sulphide yellow artists’ pigments. Triennial meeting (14th); The Hague, 12–16 September 2005: preprints. James & James. p. 803–813, figs.
  • Lerwill A, Brookes A, Townsend JH, Hackney S, Liang H. 2014. Micro-fading spectrometry: investigating the wavelength specificity of fading. Appl Phys A. 118(2):457–463.
  • Lerwill A, Townsend JH, Thomas J, Hackney S, Caspers C, Liang H. 2015. Photochemical colour change for traditional watercolour pigments in low oxygen levels. Stud Conserv. 60(1):15–32.
  • Lunz M, Talgorn E, Baken J, Wagemans W, Veldman D. 2016. Can LEDs help with art conservation? – impact of different light spectra on paint pigment degradation. Stud Conserv. 62:1–10.
  • Luo MR, Cui G, Rigg B. 2001. The development of the CIE 2000 colour-difference formula: CIEDE2000. Color Res Appl. 26(5):340–350.
  • Luxford N, Thickett D. 2012. Monitoring complex objects in real display environments - How helpful is it? In: Ashley-Smith J, Burmester A, Eibl M, editors. Climate for Collections-Standards and Uncertainties. Munich (Germany): Doerner Institute; p. 257–269.
  • Mass J, Sedlmair J, Patterson CS, Carson D, Buckley B, Hirschmugl C. 2013. SR-FTIR imaging of the altered cadmium sulfide yellow paints in Henri Matisse’s Le Bonheur de vivre (1905–6)–examination of visually distinct degradation regions. Analyst. 138(20):6032–6043.
  • Masschelein-Kleiner L. 1995. Ancient binding media, varnishes and adhesives. Rome (Italy): ICCROM.
  • Meilunas RJ, Bentsen JG, Steinberg A. 1990. Analysis of aged paint binders by FTIR spectroscopy. Stud Conserv. 35(1):33–51.
  • Miller NJ, Druzik JR. 2012. Demonstration assessment of Light-Emitting Diode (LED) retrofit lamps. Energy USDo, editor. Washington DC: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
  • Monico L, Van der Snickt G, Janssens K, De Nolf W, Miliani C, Dik J, Radepont M, Hendriks E, Geldof M, Cotte M. 2011. Degradation process of lead chromate in paintings by Vincent van Gogh studied by means of synchrotron X-ray spectromicroscopy and related methods. 2. Original paint layer samples. Anal Chem. 83(4):1224–1231.
  • Muehlethaler C, Massonnet G, Esseiva P. 2011. The application of chemometrics on Infrared and Raman spectra as a tool for the forensic analysis of paints. Forensic Sci Int. 209(1–3):173–182.
  • Ormsby BA, Townsend JH, Singer BW, Dean JR. 2005. British watercolour cakes from the eighteenth to the early twentieth century. Stud Conserv. 50(1):45–66.
  • Padfield J. 2014. Measuring and Working with Different Light Sources with The National Gallery [Internet]. London (UK): The National Gallery. http://research.ng-london.org.uk/scientific/spd/.
  • Padfield J, Vandyke S, Carr D. 2013. Improving our environment [Internet]. London (UK): The National Gallery. http://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/research/improving-our-environment.
  • Paiuk AP, Stronski AV, Vuichyk NV, Gubanova AA, Krys’kov TA, Oleksenko PF. 2012. Mid-IR impurity absorption in As2S3 chalcogenide glasses doped with transition metals. Semicond Phys Quantum Electron Optoelectron. 15(2):152–156.
  • Pouyet E, Cotte M, Fayard B, Salomé M, Meirer F, Mehta A, Uffelman ES, Hull A, Vanmeert F, Kieffer J, et al. 2015. 2D X-ray and FTIR micro-analysis of the degradation of cadmium yellow pigment in paintings of Henri Matisse. Appl Phys A. 121(3):1–14.
  • Roy A. 1993. Artists’ pigments: a handbook of their history and characteristics. Washington DC: National Gallery of Art.
  • Saunders D, Kirby J. 2008. A comparison of light induced damage under common museum illuminants. In: Wouters J, editor. ICOM Committee for Conservation. 15th Triennial Conference, New Delhi (India): 22-26 September 2008: preprints. Allied Publishers.
  • Savitzky A, Golay MJE. 1964. Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedure. Anal Chem. 36(8):1627–1630.
  • Solais. 2014. LED lighting – separating fact from fiction - 2014 update. www.solais.com:Solais.
  • Thorseth A, Corell DD, Poulsen PB, Hansen SS, Dam-Hansen C. 2012. Museum lighting for golden artifacts, with low correlated color temperature, high color uniformity and high color rendering index, using diffusing color mixing of red, cyan, and white-light-emitting diodes. SPIE OPTO. International Society for Optics and Photonics. p. 82781N-82781N-6.
  • Townsend JH. 1993. The materials of J. M. W. Turner: pigments. Stud Conserv. 38(4):231–254.
  • Townsend JH. 1994. Whistler’s oil painting materials. Burlingt Mag. 136(1099):690–695.
  • Vermeulen M, Nuyts G, Sanyova J, Vila A, Buti D, Suuronen J-P, Janssens K. 2016. Visualization of As(iii) and As(v) distributions in degraded paint micro-samples from Baroque- and Rococo-era paintings. J Anal At Spectrom. 31(9):1913–1921.
  • Whitmore PM, Cass GR. 1989. The fading of artists’ colorants by exposure to atmospheric nitrogen dioxide. Stud Conserv. 34(2):85–97.