Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Restricted access

Cost of resistance: relationship between reduced fertility and increased resistance in a snail—schistosome host—parasite system

J. P. Webster

J. P. Webster

WellcomeTrust Centre for the Epidemiology of Infectious Disease, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road,Oxford OX1 3PS, UK

[email protected]

Google Scholar

Find this author on PubMed

and
M. E. J. Woolhouse

M. E. J. Woolhouse

WellcomeTrust Centre for the Epidemiology of Infectious Disease, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road,Oxford OX1 3PS, UK

Google Scholar

Find this author on PubMed

Published:https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0650

    Natural host populations often exhibit genetic variability in resistance to parasitism. One possible mechanism for maintaining such diversity is a trade–off between fitness costs associated with resistance and fitness costs associated with parasitism. However, little is known about the nature or magnitude of these costs in animal populations. Using artificial selection experiments in a Biomphalaria glabrata–Schistosoma mansoni host–parasite system, we demonstrated that resistance and susceptibility to infection are heritable. We then investigated whether resistance had any associated costs in terms of snail reproductive success. Susceptible–selected snail lines showed significantly higher fertility (number of offspring produced) than resistant–selected or unselected control snail lines, irrespective of current infection status. There were no consistent differences between snail lines in fecundity, proportion of abnormal egg masses produced, or mean number of eggs per egg mass. Mortality rate was higher among infected than uninfected snails. These results are consistent with snails incurring costs of resistance to schistosome infection in the absence of the parasite.