Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Restricted access

Habitat fragmentation may not matter to species diversity

Gal Yaacobi

Gal Yaacobi

Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the NegevBeer-Sheva 84105, Israel

[email protected]

Google Scholar

Find this author on PubMed

,
Yaron Ziv

Yaron Ziv

Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the NegevBeer-Sheva 84105, Israel

Google Scholar

Find this author on PubMed

and
Michael L Rosenzweig

Michael L Rosenzweig

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of ArizonaTucson, AZ 85721, USA

Google Scholar

Find this author on PubMed

    Conservation biologists worry that fragmenting a bloc of natural habitat might reduce its species diversity. However, they also recognize the difficulty and importance of isolating the effect of fragmentation from that of simple loss of area. Using two different methods (species–area curve and Fisher's α index of diversity) to analyse the species diversities of plants, tenebrionid beetles and carabid beetles in a highly fragmented Mediterranean scrub landscape, we decoupled the effect of degree of fragmentation from that of area loss. In this system, fragmentation by itself seems not to have influenced the number of species. Our results, obtained at the scale of hectares, agree with similar results at island and continent scales.

    References

    • Fahrig L . 2003 Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34, 487–515.doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Fisher R.A, Corbet A.S& Williams C.B . 1943 The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample from an animal population. J. Anim. Ecol. 12, 42–58.doi:10.2307/1411. . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Haila Y . 2002 A conceptual genealogy of fragmentation research: from island biogeography to landscape ecology. Ecol. Appl. 12, 321–334. ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Harrison S& Bruna E . 1999 Habitat fragmentation and large-scale conservation: what do we know for sure?. Ecography. 22, 225–232.doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.1999.tb00496.x. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Lomolino M.V . 1994 An evaluation of alternative strategies for building networks of nature-reserves. Biol. Conserv. 69, 243–249.doi:10.1016/0006-3207(94)90423-5. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Lubchenco J, et al. 1991 The sustainable biosphere initiative: an ecological research agenda. Ecology. 72, 371–412.doi:10.2307/2937183. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Rosenzweig M.L Species diversity in space and time. 1995 Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    • Rosenzweig M.L . 2001 The four questions: what does the introduction of exotic species do to diversity?. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3, 361–367. ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Rosenzweig M.L Applying species–area relationships to the conservation of species diversity. Frontiers of biogeography: new directions in the geography of nature , Lomolino M.V& Lawrence R.H . 2004pp. 325–344. Eds. Sunderland, MA:Sinauer Associates. Google Scholar
    • Slobodkin L.B . 2001 The good, the bad and the reified. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3, 1–13. ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Tscharntke T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Kruess A& Theis C . 2002 Contribution of small habitat fragments to conservation of insect communities of grassland–cropland landscapes. Ecol. Appl. 12, 354–363. ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Wilson E.O& Willis E.O Applied biogeography. Ecology and evolution of communities , Cody M.L& Diamond J.M . 1975pp. 522–534. Eds. Cambridge, UK:Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
    • Yaacobi G, Ziv Y& Rosenzweig M.L . 2007 Effects of interactive scale-dependent variables on beetle diversity patterns in a semiarid ecosystem. Landscape Ecol. 22, 687–703.doi:10.1007/s10980-006-9061-7. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar