Restricted access
Research articles
Research articles
A congruent solution to arthropod phylogeny: phylogenomics, microRNAs and morphology support monophyletic Mandibulata
Published:11 August 2010https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0590
Abstract
While a unique origin of the euarthropods is well established, relationships between the four euarthropod classes—chelicerates, myriapods, crustaceans and hexapods—are less clear. Unsolved questions include the position of myriapods, the monophyletic origin of chelicerates, and the validity of the close relationship of euarthropods to tardigrades and onychophorans. Morphology predicts that myriapods, insects and crustaceans form a monophyletic group, the Mandibulata, which has been contradicted by many molecular studies that support an alternative Myriochelata hypothesis (Myriapoda plus Chelicerata). Because of the conflicting insights from published molecular datasets, evidence from nuclear-coding genes needs corroboration from independent data to define the relationships among major nodes in the euarthropod tree. Here, we address this issue by analysing two independent molecular datasets: a phylogenomic dataset of 198 protein-coding genes including new sequences for myriapods, and novel microRNA complements sampled from all major arthropod lineages. Our phylogenomic analyses strongly support Mandibulata, and show that Myriochelata is a tree-reconstruction artefact caused by saturation and long-branch attraction. The analysis of the microRNA dataset corroborates the Mandibulata, showing that the microRNAs miR-965 and miR-282 are present and expressed in all mandibulate species sampled, but not in the chelicerates. Mandibulata is further supported by the phylogenetic analysis of a comprehensive morphological dataset covering living and fossil arthropods, and including recently proposed, putative apomorphies of Myriochelata. Our phylogenomic analyses also provide strong support for the inclusion of pycnogonids in a monophyletic Chelicerata, a paraphyletic Cycloneuralia, and a common origin of Arthropoda (tardigrades, onychophorans and arthropods), suggesting that previous phylogenies grouping tardigrades and nematodes may also have been subject to tree-reconstruction artefacts.
References
- 1
Telford M. J., Bourlat S. J., Economou A. D., Papillon D.& Rota-Strabelli O. . 2008 The evolution of the Ecdysozoa. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 363, 1529–1537.doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2243 (doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2243). Link, ISI, Google Scholar - 2
Edgecombe G. D. . 2010 Arthropod phylogeny: an overview from the perspectives of morphology, molecular data and the fossil record. Arthropod Struct. Dev. 39, 74–87.doi:10.1016/j.asd.2009.10.002 (doi:10.1016/j.asd.2009.10.002). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 3
Budd G. E.& Telford M. J. . 2009 The origin and evolution of arthropods. Nature 417, 812–817.doi:10.1038/nature07890 (doi:10.1038/nature07890). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 4
Nielsen C. . 1995 Animal evolution. Interrelationships of the living phyla, 2nd edn. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar - 5
Telford M. J.& Thomas R. H. . 1995 Demise of the Atelocerata? Nature 376, 123–124.doi:10.1038/376123a0 (doi:10.1038/376123a0). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 6
Boore J. L., Lavrov D. V.& Brown W. M. . 1998 Gene translocation links insects and crustaceans. Nature 392, 667–668.doi:10.1038/33577 (doi:10.1038/33577). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 7
Dohle W. . 2001 Are the insects terrestrial crustaceans? A discussion of some new facts and arguments and the proposal of a proper name ‘Tetraconata’ for the monophyletic unit Crustacea + Hexapoda. Ann. Soc. Entomol. France 37, 85–103. ISI, Google Scholar - 8
Cook C. E., Smith M. L., Telford M. J., Bastianello A.& Akam M. . 2001 Hox genes and the phylogeny of the arthropods. Curr. Biol. 11, 759–763.doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00222-6 (doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00222-6). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 9
Pisani D., Poling L. L., Lyons-Weiler M.& Hedges S. B. . 2004 The colonization of land by animals: molecular phylogeny and divergence times among arthropods. BMC Biol. 2, 1.doi:10.1186/1741-7007-2-1 (doi:10.1186/1741-7007-2-1). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 10
Friedrich M.& Tautz D. . 1995 rDNA phylogeny of the major extant arthropod classes and the evolution of myriapods. Nature 376, 165–167.doi:10.1038/376165a0 (doi:10.1038/376165a0). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 11
Hwang U.-W., Friedrich M., Tautz D., Park C. J.& Kim W. . 2001 Mitochondrial protein phylogeny joins myriapods with chelicerates. Nature 413, 154–157.doi:10.1038/35093090 (doi:10.1038/35093090). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 12
Dunn C. W., 2008 Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 452, 745–749.doi:10.1038/nature06614 (doi:10.1038/nature06614). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 13
Hejnol A., 2009 Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomic methods. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 4261–4270.doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.0896 (doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.0896). Link, ISI, Google Scholar - 14
Lartillot N.& Philippe H. . 2008 Improvement of molecular phylogenetic inference and the phylogeny of Bilateria. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 363, 1463–1472.doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2236 (doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2236). Link, ISI, Google Scholar - 15
Roeding F., Borner J., Kube M., Klages S., Reinhardt R.& Burmester T. . 2009 A 454 sequencing approach for large scale phylogenomic analysis of the common emperor scorpion (Pandinus imperator). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 53, 826–834.doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2009.08.014 (doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2009.08.014). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 16
Regier J. C., Shultz J. W., Zwick A., Hussey A., Ball B., Wetzer R., Martin J. W.& Cunningham C. W. . 2010 Arthropod relationships revealed by phylogenomic analysis of nuclear protein-coding sequences. Nature 463, 1079–1083.doi:10.1038/nature08742 (doi:10.1038/nature08742). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 17
Mayer G.& Whitington P. M. . 2009 Velvet worm development links myriapods with chelicerates. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 3571–3579.doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.0950 (doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.0950). Link, ISI, Google Scholar - 18
Stollewerk A.& Chipman A. D. . 2006 Neurogenesis in myriapods and chelicerates and its importance for understanding arthropod relationships. Integr. Comp. Biol. 46, 195–206.doi:10.1093/icb/icj020 (doi:10.1093/icb/icj020). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 19
Rota-Stabelli O.& Telford M. J. . 2008 A multi criterion approach for the selection of optimal outgroups in phylogeny: recovering some support for Mandibulata over Myriochelata using mitogenomics. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 48, 103–111.doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2008.03.033 (doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2008.03.033). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 20
Brinkmann H.& Phillipe H. . 1999 Archaea sister group of bacteria? Indications from tree reconstruction artifacts in ancient phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 817–825. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 21
Philippe H., Delsuc F., Brinkmann H.& Lartillot N. . 2005 Phylogenomics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36, 541–562.doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.112202.130205 (doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.112202.130205). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 22
Philippe H., Lartillot N.& Brinkmann H. . 2005 Multigene analyses of bilaterian animals corroborate the monophyly of Ecdysozoa, Lophotrochozoa, and Protostomia. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 1246–1253.doi:10.1093/molbev/msi111 (doi:10.1093/molbev/msi111). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 23
Mallatt J.& Giribet G. . 2006 Further use of nearly complete 28S and 18S rRNA genes to classify Ecdysozoa: 37 more arthropods and a kinorhynch. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 40, 772–794.doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2006.04.021 (doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2006.04.021). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 24
Regier J. C., 2008 Resolving arthropod phylogeny: exploring phylogenetic signal within 41 kb of protein-coding nuclear gene sequence. Syst. Biol. 57, 920–938.doi:10.1080/10635150802570791 (doi:10.1080/10635150802570791). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 25
Janssen R., Eriksson B. J., Budd G. E., Akam M.& Prpic N.-M. . 2010 Gene expression patterns in an onychophoran reveal that regionalization predates limb segmentation in pan-arthropods. Evol. Dev. 12, 363–372.doi:10.1111/j.1525-142X.2010.00423.x (doi:10.1111/j.1525-142X.2010.00423.x). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 26
Lartillot N.& Philippe H. . 2004 A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1095–1109.doi:10.1093/molbev/msh112 (doi:10.1093/molbev/msh112). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 27
Webster B. L., Copley R. R., Jenner R. A., Mackenzie-Dodds J. A., Bourlat S. J., Rota-Stabelli O., Littlewood D. T. J.& Telford M. J. . 2006 Mitogenomics and phylogenomics reveal priapulid worms as extant models of the ancestral Ecdysozoan. Evol. Dev. 8, 502–510.doi:10.1111/j.1525-142X.2006.00123.x (doi:10.1111/j.1525-142X.2006.00123.x). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 28
Wheeler B. M., Heimberg A. M., Moy V. N., Sperling E. A., Holstein T. W., Heber S.& Peterson K. J. . 2009 The deep evolution of metazoan microRNAs. Evol. Dev. 11, 50–68.doi:10.1111/j.1525-142x.2008.00302.x (doi:10.1111/j.1525-142x.2008.00302.x). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 29
Sperling E. A.& Peterson K. J. . 2009 MicroRNAs and metazoan phylogeny: big trees from little genes. Animal evolution: genomes, fossils, and trees (eds, Telford M. J.& Littlewood D. T. J. ), pp. 157–170. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Crossref, Google Scholar - 30
Janssen R.& Budd G. E. . 2010 Gene expression suggests conserved aspects of Hox gene regulation in arthropods and provides additional support for monophyletic Myriapoda. EvoDevo. (doi:10.1186/2041-9139-1-4). Google Scholar - 31
Scholtz G.& Edgecombe G. D. . 2006 The evolution of arthropod heads: reconciling morphological, developmental and palaeontological evidence. Dev. Genes Evol. 216, 395–415.doi:10.1007/s00427-006-0085-4 (doi:10.1007/s00427-006-0085-4). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 32
Giribet G., Edgecombe G. D.& Wheeler W. C. . 2001 Arthropod phylogeny based on eight molecular loci and morphology. Nature 413, 157–161.doi:10.1038/35093097 (doi:10.1038/35093097). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 33
Maxmen A., Browne W. E., Martindale M. Q.& Giribet G. . 2005 Neuroanatomy of sea spiders implies an appendicular origin of the protocerebral segment. Nature 437, 1144–1148.doi:10.1038/nature03984 (doi:10.1038/nature03984). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 34
Podsiadlowski L.& Braband A. . 2006 The mitochondrial genome of the sea spider Nymphon gracile (Arthropoda: Pycnogonida). BMC Genom. 7, 284.doi:10.1186/1471-2164-7-284 (doi:10.1186/1471-2164-7-284). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 35
Pisani D., Benton M. J.& Wilkinson M. . 2007 Congruence of morphological and molecular phylogenies. Acta Biotheoretica 55, 269–281.doi:10.1007/s10441-007-9015-8 (doi:10.1007/s10441-007-9015-8). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 36
Rota-Stabelli O., Kayal E., Gleeson D., Daub J., Boore J., Pisani D., Blantor M.& Lavrov D. V. . 2010 Ecdysozoan mitogenomics: evidence for a common origin of the legged invertebrates, the Panarthropoda. Genom. Biol. Evol. 2, 425–440.doi:10.1093/gbe/evq030 (doi:10.1093/gbe/evq030). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 37
Garey J. R. . 2001 Ecdysozoa: the relationship between Cycloneuralia and Panarthropoda. Zool. Anz. 240, 321–330.doi:10.1078/0044-5231-00039 (doi:10.1078/0044-5231-00039). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 38
Richter S.& Wirkner S. . 2004 Kontroversen in der phylogenetische systematik der Euarthropoda. Kontroversen in der phylogenetischen systematik der Metazoa. (eds, Richter S.& Sudhaus W. ), pp. 73–102. Berlin, Germany: Sitzungs-Berichte der Gesellschaft Naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin. Google Scholar - 39
Waloszek D., Maas A., Chen J.& Stein M. . 2007 Evolution of cephalic feeding structures and the phylogeny of Arthropoda. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 254, 273–287.doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2007.03.027 (doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2007.03.027). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 40
Zhang X. G., Siveter D. J., Waloszek D.& Maas A. . 2007 An epipodite-bearing crown-group crustacean from the Lower Cambrian. Nature 449, 595–598.doi:10.1038/nature06138 (doi:10.1038/nature06138). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 41
Telford M. J.& Budd G. E. . 2003 The place of phylogeny and cladistics in Evo-Devo research. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 47, 479–490. PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
