Restricted access
Research articles
Research articles
Beyond the Burgess Shale: Cambrian microfossils track the rise and fall of hallucigeniid lobopodians
Published:22 September 2013https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.1613
Abstract
Burgess Shale-type deposits are renowned for their exquisite preservation of soft-bodied organisms, representing a range of animal body plans that evolved during the Cambrian ‘explosion’. However, the rarity of these fossil deposits makes it difficult to reconstruct the broader-scale distributions of their constituent organisms. By contrast, microscopic skeletal elements represent an extensive chronicle of early animal evolution—but are difficult to interpret in the absence of corresponding whole-body fossils. Here, we provide new observations on the dorsal spines of the Cambrian lobopodian (panarthropod) worm Hallucigenia sparsa from the Burgess Shale (Cambrian Series 3, Stage 5). These exhibit a distinctive scaly microstructure and layered (cone-in-cone) construction that together identify a hitherto enigmatic suite of carbonaceous and phosphatic Cambrian microfossils—including material attributed to Mongolitubulus, Rushtonites and Rhombocorniculum—as spines of Hallucigenia-type lobopodians. Hallucigeniids are thus revealed as an important and widespread component of disparate Cambrian communities from late in the Terreneuvian (Cambrian Stage 2) through the ‘middle’ Cambrian (Series 3); their apparent decline in the latest Cambrian may be partly taphonomic. The cone-in-cone construction of hallucigeniid sclerites is shared with the sclerotized cuticular structures (jaws and claws) in modern onychophorans. More generally, our results emphasize the reciprocal importance and complementary roles of Burgess Shale-type fossils and isolated microfossils in documenting early animal evolution.
References
- 1
Ou Q, Shu D& Mayer G . 2012 Cambrian lobopodians and extant onychophorans provide new insights into early cephalization in Panarthropoda. Nat. Commun. 3, 1261. (doi:10.1038/ncomms2272). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 2
Liu J, Shu D, Han J, Zhang Z& Zhang X . 2008 Origin, diversification, and relationships of Cambrian lobopods. Gondwana Res. 14, 277–283. (doi:10.1016/j.gr.2007.10.001). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 3
Gaines RR, Droser ML, Orr PJ, Garson D, Hammarlund E, Qi C& Canfield DE . 2012 Burgess Shale-type biotas were not entirely burrowed away. Geology 40, 283–286. (doi:10.1130/g32555.1). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 4
Butterfield NJ& Harvey THP . 2012 Small carbonaceous fossils (SCFs): a new measure of early Paleozoic paleobiology. Geology 40, 71–74. (doi:10.1130/g32580.1). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 5
Steiner M, Hu SX, Liu J& Keupp H . 2012 A new species of Hallucigenia from the Cambrian Stage 4 Wulongqing Formation of Yunnan (South China) and the structure of sclerites in lobopodians. Bull. Geosci. 87, 107–124. (doi:10.3140/bull.geosci.1280). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 6
Conway Morris S . 1977 A new metazoan from the Cambrian Burgess Shale of British Columbia. Palaeontology 20, 623–640. Google Scholar - 7
Ramsköld L . 1992 The second leg row of Hallucigenia discovered. Lethaia 25, 221–224. (doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.1992.tb01389.x). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 8
Smith MR . 2012 Mouthparts of the Burgess Shale fossils Odontogriphus and Wiwaxia: implications for the ancestral molluscan radula. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 4287–4295. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.1577). Link, ISI, Google Scholar - 9
Pettersson S, Holmer LE& Caron J-B . 2010 First record of a pediculate linguloid from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale. Acta Zool. 91, 150–162. (doi:10.1111/j.1463-6395.2009.00394.x). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 10
Butterfield NJ& Nicholas C . 1996 Burgess Shale-type preservation of both non-mineralizing and ‘shelly’ Cambrian organisms from the Mackenzie Mountains, Northwestern Canada. J. Paleontol. 70, 893–899. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 11
Butterfield NJ . 1990 A reassessment of the enigmatic Burgess Shale fossil Wiwaxia corrugata (Matthew) and its relationship to the polychaete Canadia spinosa Walcott. Paleobiology 16, 287–303. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 12
Harvey THP, Ortega-Hernández J, Lin J-P, Zhao Y& Butterfield NJ . 2012 Burgess Shale-type microfossils from the Middle Cambrian Kaili Formation, Guizhou Province, China. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 57, 423–436. (doi:10.4202/app.2011.0028). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 13
Hou X& Bergström J . 1995 Cambrian lobopodians: ancestors of extant onychophorans? Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 114, 3–19. (doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1995.tb00110.x). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 14
Topper TP, Skovsted CE, Harper DAT& Ahlberg P . 2013 A bradoriid and brachiopod dominated shelly fauna from the Furongian (Cambrian) of Västergötland, Sweden. J. Paleontol. 87, 69–83. (doi:10.1666/12-047R.1). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 15
Li G, Steiner M, Zhu M& Zhao X . 2012 Early Cambrian eodiscoid trilobite Hupeidiscus orientalis from South China: ontogeny and implications for affinities of Mongolitubulus-like sclerites. Bull. Geosci. 87, 159–169. (doi:10.3140/bull.geosci.1224). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 16
Dzik J . 2003 Early Cambrian lobopodian sclerites and associated fossils from Kazakhstan. Palaeontology 46, 93–112. (doi:10.1111/1475-4983.00289). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 17
Skovsted CE& Peel JS . 2001 The problematic fossil Mongolitubulus from the Lower Cambrian of Greenland. Bull. Geol. Soc. Denmark 48, 135–147. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 18
Topper TP, Skovsted CE, Brock GA& Paterson JR . 2007 New bradoriids from the lower Cambrian Mernmerna Formation, South Australia: systematics, biostratigraphy and biogeography. Mem. Assoc. Australas. Palaeontol. 33, 67–100. Google Scholar - 19
Wrona R . 2009 Early Cambrian bradoriide and phosphatocopide arthropods from King George Island, West Antarctica: biogeographic implications. Pol. Polar Res. 30, 347–377. (doi:10.4202/ppres.2009.19). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 20
Wrona R . 2004 Cambrian microfossils from glacial erratics of King George Island, Antarctica. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 49, 13–56. ISI, Google Scholar - 21
Hinz I . 1987 The Lower Cambrian microfauna of Comley and Rushton, Shropshire/England. Palaeontographica Abteilung A 198, 41–100. Google Scholar - 22
Walliser VOH . 1958 Rhombocorniculum comleyense n. gen, n. sp. (Incertae sedis, Unterkambrium, Shropshire). Paläontol. Z. 30, 176–181. Crossref, Google Scholar - 23
Landing E, Nowlan GS& Fletcher TP . 1980 A microfauna associated with Early Cambrian faunas of the Callavia Zone, northern Antigonish Highlands, Nova Scotia. Can. J. Earth Sci. 17, 400–418. (doi:10.1139/e80-038). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 24
Kouchinsky A, Bengtson S, Clausen S& Vendrasco M . 2013 A lower Cambrian fauna of skeletal fossils from the Emyaksin Formation, northern Siberia. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. (doi:10.4202/app.2012.0004). Google Scholar - 25
Missarzhevsky VV . 1977 Conodonts(?) and Cambrian phosphatic problematica from Mongolia and Siberia. Paleozoic invertebrates of Mongolia (ed.& Voronin YI ), pp. 10–19. Nauka, Moscow: Transactions of the Joint Soviet-Mongolian Paleontological Expedition. [In Russian.]. Google Scholar - 26
Meshkova NP . 1985 New tubicolous problematica from the Middle Cambrian of Siberia and Central Asia. Trudy Instituta Geologii i Geofiziki, Sibirskoj Otdelnenii Akadmia Nauk SSSR 632, 127–133. [In Russian.]. Google Scholar - 27
Li G, Zhu M& Steiner M . 2003 Microstructure and functional morphology of the early Cambrian problematical fossil Rhombocorniculum. Prog. Nat. Sci. 13, 831–835. (doi:10.1080/10020070312331344510). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 28
Brasier MD . 1989 Towards a biostratigraphy of the earliest skeletal biotas. The Precambrian–Cambrian boundary (eds, Cowie JW& Brasier MD ), pp. 117–165. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar - 29
Landing E . 1995 Upper Placentian–Branchian series of mainland Nova Scotia (Middle–Upper Lower Cambrian): faunas, paleoenvironments, and stratigraphic revision. J. Paleontol. 69, 475–495. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 30
Zhang XG& Aldridge RJ . 2007 Development and diversification of trunk plates of the lower Cambrian lobopodians. Palaeontology 50, 401–415. (doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2006.00634.x). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 31
Chen JY, Zhou GQ& Ramsköld L . 1995 The Cambrian lobopodian Microdictyon sinicum. Bull. Natl Mus. Nat. Sci. 5, 1–93. Google Scholar - 32
Topper TP, Skovsted CB, Peel JS& Harper DAT . 2013 Moulting in the lobopodian Onychodictyon from the lower Cambrian of Greenland. Lethaia. (doi:10.1111/let.12026). Google Scholar - 33
Martin JW . 1992 Branchiopoda. Crustacea (eds, Harrison FW& Humes AG ), ch. 3, pp. 25–224. New York, NY: Wiley-Liss, Inc. Google Scholar - 34
Olempska E . 2012 Morphology and affinities of Eridostracina: Palaeozoic ostracods with moult retention. Hydrobiologia 688, 139–165. (doi:10.1007/s10750-011-0659-7). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 35
Schwab KW . 1966 Microstructure of some fossil and recent scolecodonts. J. Paleontol. 40, 416–423. (doi:10.2307/1301671). Google Scholar - 36
Robson EA . 1964 The cuticle of Peripatopsis moseleyi. Q. J. Microsc. Sci. 105, 281–299. Google Scholar - 37
Butterfield NJ . 1995 Secular distribution of Burgess-Shale-type preservation. Lethaia 28, 1–13. (doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.1995.tb01587.x). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 38
Porter SM . 2004 Closing the phosphatization window: testing for the influence of taphonomic megabias on the pattern of small shelly fossil decline. Palaios 19, 178–183. (doi:10.1669/0883-1351(2004)019<0178:CTPWTF>2.0.CO;2). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 39
Szaniawski H& Bengtson S . 1993 Origin of euconodont elements. J. Paleontol. 67, 640–654. (doi:10.2307/1305936). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 40
Kouchinsky A, Bengtson S, Runnegar B, Skovsted C, Steiner M& Vendrasco M . 2012 Chronology of early Cambrian biomineralization. Geol. Mag. 149, 221–251. (doi:10.1017/s0016756811000720). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 41
Van Roy P, Orr PJ, Botting JP, Muir LA, Vinther J, Lefebvre B, el Hariri K& Briggs DEG . 2010 Ordovician faunas of Burgess Shale type. Nature 465, 215–218. (doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.01.001). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
