Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Restricted access

Aggregation and distribution of strains in microparasites

C. C. Lord

C. C. Lord

Wellcome Centre for the Epidemiology of Infectious Disease, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford UKOX1 3PS, UK

Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory, University of Florida, 200 9th Street SE,Vero Beach, FL 32962, USA

Google Scholar

Find this author on PubMed

,
B. Barnard

B. Barnard

Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute, Onderstepoort 0110, Republic of South Africa

Google Scholar

Find this author on PubMed

,
K. Day

K. Day

Wellcome Centre for the Epidemiology of Infectious Disease, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford UKOX1 3PS, UK

Google Scholar

Find this author on PubMed

,
J. W. Hargrove

J. W. Hargrove

ODA Insect Pest Management Initiative, Box CY52, Causeway, Harare, Zimbabwe

Google Scholar

Find this author on PubMed

,
J. J. McNamara

J. J. McNamara

MRCTrypanosomiasis Research Group,Department of ClinicalVeterinary Science,University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DU, UK

Google Scholar

Find this author on PubMed

,
R. E. L. Paul

R. E. L. Paul

Wellcome Centre for the Epidemiology of Infectious Disease, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford UKOX1 3PS, UK

Google Scholar

Find this author on PubMed

,
K. Trenholme

K. Trenholme

Walter & ElizaHall Institute ofMedical Research, Parkville,Victoria 3050, Australia

Google Scholar

Find this author on PubMed

and
M. E. J. Woolhouse

M. E. J. Woolhouse

Wellcome Centre for the Epidemiology of Infectious Disease, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford UKOX1 3PS, UK

Centre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine,University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Roslin,Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK

Google Scholar

Find this author on PubMed

    Recent research has shown that many parasite populations are made up of a number of epidemiologically distinct strains or genotypes. The implications of strain structure or genetic diversity for parasite population dynamics are still uncertain, partly because there is no coherent framework for the interpretation of field data. Here, we present an analysis of four published data sets for vector–borne microparasite infections where strains or genotypes have been distinguished: serotypes of African horse sickness (AHS) in zebra; types of Nannomonas trypanosomes in tsetse flies; parasite–induced erythrocyte surface antigen (PIESA) based isolates of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in humans, and the merozoite surface protein 2 gene (MSP–2) alleles of P. falciparum in humans and in anopheline mosquitoes. For each data set we consider the distribution of strains or types among hosts and any pairwise associations between strains or types. Where host age data are available we also compare age–prevalence relationships and estimates of the force–of–infection. Multiple infections of hosts are common and for most data sets infections have an aggregated distribution among hosts with a tendency towards positive associations between certain strains or types. These patterns could result from interactions (facilitation) between strains or types, or they could reflect patterns of contact between hosts and vectors. We use a mathematical model to illustrate the impact of host–vector contact patterns, finding that even if contact is random there may still be significant aggregation in parasite distributions. This effect is enhanced if there is non–random contact or other heterogeneities between hosts, vectors or parasites. In practice, different strains or types also have different forces of infection. We anticipate that aggregated distributions and positive associations between microparasite strains or types will be extremely common.