Reliability of Antitransglutaminase Antibodies As Predictors of Gluten-Free Diet Compliance in Adult Celiac Disease : Official journal of the American College of Gastroenterology | ACG

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION: PDF Only

Reliability of Antitransglutaminase Antibodies As Predictors of Gluten-Free Diet Compliance in Adult Celiac Disease

Vahedi, Kouroche MD1; Mascart, Françoise MD, PhD2; Mary, Jean-Yves PhD3; Laberenne, Jean-Eric MD4; Bouhnik, Yoram MD, PhD1; Morin, Marie-Christine1; Ocmant, Annick PhD2; Velly, Christine4; Colombel, Jean-Frédéric MD, PhD4; Matuchansky, Claude MD1

Author Information
American Journal of Gastroenterology 98(5):p 1079-1087, May 2003. | DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07284.x

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: 

Strict lifelong compliance to a gluten-free diet (GFD) minimizes the long-term risk of mortality, especially from lymphoma, in adult celiac disease (CD). Although serum IgA antitransglutaminase (IgA-tTG-ab), like antiendomysium (IgA-EMA) antibodies, are sensitive and specific screening tests for untreated CD, their reliability as predictors of strict compliance to and dietary transgressions from a GFD is not precisely known. We aimed to address this question in consecutively treated adult celiacs.

METHODS: 

In a cross-sectional study, 95 non-IgA deficient adult (median age: 41 yr) celiacs on a GFD for at least 1 yr (median: 6 yr) were subjected to 1) a dietician-administered inquiry to pinpoint and quantify the number and levels of transgressions (classified as moderate or large, using as a cutoff value the median gluten amount ingested in the overall noncompliant patients of the series) over the previous 2 months, 2) a search for IgA-tTG-ab and -EMA, and 3) perendoscopic duodenal biopsies. The ability of both antibodies to discriminate celiacs with and without detected transgressions was described using receiver operating characteristic curves and quantified as to sensitivity and specificity, according to the level of transgressions.

RESULTS: 

Forty (42%) patients strictly adhered to a GFD, 55 (58%) had committed transgressions, classified as moderate (≤18 g of gluten/2 months; median number 6) in 27 and large (>18 g; median number 69) in 28. IgA-tTG-ab and -EMA specificity (proportion of correct recognition of strictly compliant celiacs) was 0.97 and 0.98, respectively, and sensitivity (proportion of correct recognition of overall, moderate, and large levels of transgressions) was 0.52, 0.31, and 0.77, and 0.62, 0.37, and 0.86, respectively. IgA-tTG-ab and -EMA titers were correlated (p < 0.001) to transgression levels (r = 0.560 and r = 0.631, respectively) and one to another (p < 0.001) in the whole patient population (r = 0.834, n = 84) as in the noncompliant (r = 0.915, n = 48) group. Specificity and sensitivity of IgA-tTG-ab and IgA-EMA for recognition of total villous atrophy in patients under a GFD were 0.90 and 0.91, and 0.60 and 0.73, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: 

In adult CD patients on a GFD, IgA-tTG-ab are poor predictors of dietary transgressions. Their negativity is a falsely secure marker of strict diet compliance.

© The American College of Gastroenterology 2003. All Rights Reserved.

Full Text Access for Subscribers:

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Access through Ovid