Volume 19, Issue 3 p. 592-605
Original Article

Intolerance of uncertainty, appraisals, coping, and anxiety: The case of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic

Sheena Taha

Corresponding Author

Sheena Taha

Department of Neuroscience, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Correspondence should be addressed to Sheena Taha, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Room 333, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1S 5B6 (e-mail: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this author
Kim Matheson

Kim Matheson

Department of Neuroscience, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Department of Psychology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Tracey Cronin

Tracey Cronin

Department of Psychology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Hymie Anisman

Hymie Anisman

Department of Neuroscience, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 July 2013
Citations: 220

Abstract

Objectives

Although ambiguous and uncertain situations, such as those dealing with the threat of widespread viral illness, may have pronounced psychological ramifications, there have been few studies that examined the factors that contributed to such outcomes. The purpose of the present investigation was to examine emotional reactions to a health threat.

Design

A structural equation model examined the interplay between anxiety and intolerance of uncertainty, as sequentially mediated by appraisals and coping strategies.

Methods

Adult participants over the age of 18 (N = 1,027) completed online self-report measures during the H1N1 pandemic in 2009.

Results

Greater intolerance of uncertainty was related to lower appraisals of self- and other control, which predicted low levels of problem-focused coping and greater reports of H1N1-related anxiety. Additionally, individuals with a high intolerance of uncertainty were more likely to perceive the pandemic as threatening and also were more apt to use emotion-focused coping strategies, and both of these factors predicted elevated levels of anxiety.

Conclusions

Together, these data indicate that threats, such as those related to a potential pandemic, not only have implications for physical health, but also for psychological distress, and that such outcomes vary with a constellation of appraisal and coping factors.

Statement of contribution

What is already known on this subject? It has been established that the public is often confused by the threat that a potential pandemic virus poses and that they are unsure of what information related to the disease they can trust. Government health agencies often walk the line of minimizing the threat to prevent panic, but simultaneously emphasize the importance of action (vaccination) to prevent a worldwide pandemic.

What does this study add?

  • Beyond the physical threat of a pandemic, a significant psychological toll may occur for certain individuals.
  • Anxiety regarding H1N1 is heightened amongst those who cannot tolerate uncertainty.
  • Appraisals of threat, control, and the use of emotion-focused coping mediate the above relationship.