Volume 28, Issue 2 p. 303-314
ORIGINAL PAPER

Profiling knowledge brokers in the rehabilitation sector across Canada: A descriptive study

Dina Gaid BSc. (PT), MSc., PhD

Corresponding Author

Dina Gaid BSc. (PT), MSc., PhD

McGill University, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal (CRIR), Montreal, Québec, Canada

Correspondence

Gaid Dina BSc. (PT)., MSc., PhD, McGill University, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal (CRIR), D39, 3654 Sir-William-Osler, Montreal, QC H3G 1Y5 Canada.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Sara Ahmed PT., PhD

Sara Ahmed PT., PhD

McGill University, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal (CRIR), Montreal, Québec, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Aliki Thomas OT (C)., PhD

Aliki Thomas OT (C)., PhD

McGill University, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal (CRIR), Montreal, Québec, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
André Bussières DC., PhD

André Bussières DC., PhD

McGill University, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal (CRIR), Montreal, Québec, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 06 October 2021
Citations: 3

Funding information: McGill University; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation

Abstract

Rationale

Knowledge brokers (KBs) can help promote the uptake of the latest research evidence into clinical practice. Little is known about who they are, the types of roles they perform, and the training they receive. Establishing a portrait of Canadian KBs working in the rehabilitation sector may inform health care organizations and knowledge translation specialists on how best to advance KBs practices. The overall goal was to describe the profile of KBs working to promote the uptake of evidence within rehabilitation settings in Canada. Specifically, this study aimed to describe the sociodemographic and professional characteristics, work activities, and training of KBs.

Methods

A cross-sectional online survey was administered to KBs working in rehabilitation settings across Canada. The survey included 20 questions covering sociodemographic and professional characteristics, work activities, and training opportunities. Response frequency and percentage were calculated for all categorical variables, and the weighted average (WA) for each role was calculated across participants. Descriptive analysis was conducted for all open-ended questions.

Results

Of 475 participants accessing the website, 198 completed the survey questionnaire, including 99 clinicians, 35 researchers, and 26 managers. While over two-thirds of respondents had completed a graduate degree, only 38% reported receiving KBs-related training. The respondents' primary roles corresponded to a linking agent (WA = 1.84), followed by capacity builder (WA = 1.76), information manager (WA = 1.71), facilitator (WA = 1.41), and evaluator (WA = 1.32).

Conclusions

KBs are mostly expert clinicians who tend to perform brokering activities part-time targeting their peers. Participants mostly perform the linking agent, capacity builder, and information roles. Moreover, only a few participants received formal training to perform brokering activities.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data available on request due to privacy/ethical restrictions.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.