Volume 63, Issue 3 p. 462-469
Clinical Investigations

Heterogeneity of Physical Function Responses to Exercise Training in Older Adults

Elizabeth A. Chmelo MS

Corresponding Author

Elizabeth A. Chmelo MS

J. Paul Sticht Center on Aging and Rehabilitation, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Address correspondence to Elizabeth Chmelo, Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Charlotte I. Crotts BS

Charlotte I. Crotts BS

J. Paul Sticht Center on Aging and Rehabilitation, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Jill C. Newman MS

Jill C. Newman MS

Department of Biostatistical Sciences, School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Tina E. Brinkley PhD

Tina E. Brinkley PhD

J. Paul Sticht Center on Aging and Rehabilitation, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Mary F. Lyles MD

Mary F. Lyles MD

J. Paul Sticht Center on Aging and Rehabilitation, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Xiaoyan Leng PhD

Xiaoyan Leng PhD

Department of Biostatistical Sciences, School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Anthony P. Marsh PhD

Anthony P. Marsh PhD

Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Barbara J. Nicklas PhD

Barbara J. Nicklas PhD

J. Paul Sticht Center on Aging and Rehabilitation, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 06 March 2015
Citations: 75

Abstract

Objectives

To describe the interindividual variability in physical function responses to supervised resistance and aerobic exercise training interventions in older adults.

Design

Data analysis of two randomized, controlled exercise trials.

Setting

Community-based research centers.

Participants

Overweight and obese (body mass index (BMI) ≥27.0 kg/m2) sedentary men and women aged 65 to 79 (N = 95).

Intervention

Five months of 4 d/wk of aerobic training (AT, n = 40) or 3 d/wk of resistance training (RT, n = 55).

Measurements

Physical function assessments: global measure of lower extremity function (Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)), 400-m walk, peak aerobic capacity (VO2peak), and knee extensor strength.

Results

On average, both exercise interventions significantly improved physical function. For AT, there was a 7.9% increase in VO2peak; individual absolute increases varied from 0.4 to 4.3 mL/kg per minute, and four participants (13%) showed no change or a decrease in VO2peak. For RT, knee extensor strength improved an average of 8.1%; individual increases varied from 1.2 to 63.7 Nm, and 16 participants (30%) showed no change or a decrease in strength. Usual gait speed, 400-m walk time, chair rise time, and SPPB improved for the majority of AT participants and usual gait speed, chair rise time, and SPPB improved for the majority of RT participants, but there was wide variation in the magnitude of improvement. Only change in 400-m walk time with RT was related to exercise adherence (correlation coefficient = −0.31, P = .004).

Conclusion

Despite sufficient levels of adherence to both exercise interventions, some participants did not improve function, and the magnitude of improvement varied widely. Additional research is needed to identify factors that optimize responsiveness to exercise to maximize its functional benefits in older adults.