Volume 90, Issue 1 p. 3-14
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Identifying Essential Components of School-Linked Mental Health Services for Refugee and Immigrant Children: A Comparative Case Study

Clea A. McNeely DrPH

Corresponding Author

Clea A. McNeely DrPH

Research Professor

College of Nursing, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, 37996

Address correspondence to: Clea A. McNeely, ([email protected]).Search for more papers by this author
Katharine Sprecher PhD

Katharine Sprecher PhD

Director

Center for Transformative Arts and Education, Portland, Oregon

Search for more papers by this author
Denise Bates-Fredi PhD

Denise Bates-Fredi PhD

Associate Professor

Louisiana State University Health Science Center, MPH program, Shreveport, Louisiana, 71103

Search for more papers by this author
Olga Acosta Price PhD

Olga Acosta Price PhD

Associate Professor

Center for Health and Health Care in Schools, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, 20052

Search for more papers by this author
Chenoa D. Allen PhD

Chenoa D. Allen PhD

Associate Professor

University of Missouri School of Health Professions, Columbia, Missouri, 65211

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 November 2019
Citations: 6
We gratefully acknowledge funding from The George Washington University Center for Health and Healthcare in Schools and The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Foreign-born children rarely use traditional school mental health services. Comprehensive programs that combine mental health services with academic, economic, and socioemotional supports reach more foreign-born children and improve wellbeing. However, little practical guidance exists regarding how to best combine these diverse services.

METHODS

To identify essential service components and their organization, we interviewed 92 parents, school staff, mental health providers, and community agency staff from 5 school-linked mental health programs designed specifically to serve immigrant and refugee youth.

RESULTS

Foreign-born parents did not distinguish between academic, behavioral, and emotional help for their children; these western categorizations of functioning were not meaningful to them. Consequently, programs needed to combine 4 components, organized in a pyramid: family engagement, assistance with basic needs, assistance with adaptation to a new culture, and emotional and behavioral supports. Family engagement was the foundation upon which all other services depended. Assistance with economic and cultural stressors directly promoted emotional wellbeing and helped parents trust clinical mental health interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific strategies to implement the 4 essential components include home visits by program staff, a one-stop parent center located in the school to help with basic needs, working with cultural brokers, and informed consent procedures that clearly explain recommended care without requiring immigrant and refugee parents to internalize western conceptualizations of psychopathology. Future evaluations should assess the cost and effectiveness of these strategies. These data are essential to advocate payment for these nonclinical services by traditional funding mechanisms.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts to declare.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.