Managing Soil Carbon
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References and Notes
1
Lal R., Prog. Environ. Sci.1, 307 (1999).
2
Lal R., et al., J. Soil Water Conserv.54, 374 (1999).
3
Smith S. V., et al., Global Biogeochem. Cycles15, 697 (2001).
4
Lal R., Environ. Int.29, 437 (2003).
5
Reicosky D. C., et al., Soil Tillage Res.41, 105 (1997).
6
Dalal R. C., et al., Aust. J. Exp. Agric.37, 903 (1995).
7
de J. C., Sa M., et al., Soil Sci. Soc. Am.65, 1486 (2001).
8
West T. O., Post W. M., Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.66, 1930 (2002).
9
Bauer A., Black A. L., Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.58, 185 (1994).
10
Kanchikerimath M., Singh M., Agric. Ecosys. Environ.86, 155 (2001).
11
Jenkinson D. S., Agron. J.83, 2 (1991).
12
Smith P., Powlson D. S., Science287, 428 (2000).
13
Drinkwater L. E., et al., Nature396, 262 (1998).
14
Uhlen G., Tveitnes S., Nor. J. Agric. Sci.9, 143 (1995).
15
Lal R., Soil Sci.165, (2000).
16
Derpsch R., Benites J. R., Second World Congress on Conservation Agriculture, 11 to 15 August 2003, Ignassu Falls, Parana, Brazil.
17
Hobbs P., Gupta R., Sustainable Agriculture and the International Rice-Wheat System (Dekker, New York, 2004).
18
For example, the Conservation Reserve Program pays farmers up to $50 per acre per year for retiring highly erodible land from cultivation.
19
Supported in part by the Carbon Management and Sequestration Center, OARDC, Ohio State University, the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and the Electric Power Research Institute through Carnegie Mellon University (CMU), and the Green Design Institute at CMU. We thank D. Keith, H. Dowlatubadi, and G. Mullins.
(0)eLetters
eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.
Log In to Submit a ResponseNo eLetters have been published for this article yet.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Science
Volume 304 | Issue 5669
16 April 2004
16 April 2004
Copyright
© 2004 American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Submission history
Published in print: 16 April 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Article Usage
Altmetrics
Citations
Cite as
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.
Cited by
- Anthropogenic, Carbon-Reinforced Soil as a Living Engineered Material, Chemical Reviews, 123, 5, (2420-2435), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00399
- A novel coupled framework for detecting hotspots of methane emission from the vulnerable Indian Sundarban mangrove ecosystem using data-driven models, Science of The Total Environment, 866, (161319), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161319
- The net and combined effects of minimum tillage and straw mulching on carbon accumulation in global croplands, European Journal of Agronomy, 143, (126719), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126719
- Carbon Materials Advancing Microorganisms in Driving Soil Organic Carbon Regulation, Research, 2022, (2022)./doi/10.34133/2022/9857374
- Impact of Water and Land Resources Matching on Agricultural Sustainable Economic Growth: Empirical Analysis with Spatial Spillover Effects from Yellow River Basin, China, Sustainability, 14, 5, (2742), (2022).https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052742
- Effects of Ecological Restoration on the Distribution of Soil Particles and Organic Carbon in Alpine Regions, Separations, 9, 10, (279), (2022).https://doi.org/10.3390/separations9100279
- Persistent soil carbon enhanced in Mollisols by well-managed grasslands but not annual grain or dairy forage cropping systems, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119, 7, (2022).https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2118931119
- Multiple soil map comparison highlights challenges for predicting topsoil organic carbon concentration at national scale, Scientific Reports, 12, 1, (2022).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05476-5
- Rigorous, empirical, and quantitative: a proposed pipeline for soil health assessments, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 170, (108710), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108710
- The United States and China on the paths and policies to carbon neutrality, Journal of Environmental Management, 320, (115785), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115785
- See more
Loading...
View Options
Check Access
Log in to view the full text
AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.
- Become a AAAS Member
- Activate your AAAS ID
- Purchase Access to Other Journals in the Science Family
- Account Help
Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options
Purchase digital access to this article
Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.
Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.