Advertisement
No access
Research Articles

Distinct Roles of CONSTANS Target Genes in Reproductive Development of Arabidopsis

Science
2 Jun 2000
Vol 288, Issue 5471
pp. 1613-1616

Abstract

In plants, flowering is triggered by endogenous and environmental signals. CONSTANS (CO) promotes flowering of Arabidopsis in response to day length. Four early target genes of CO were identified using a steroid-inducible version of the protein. Two of these genes,SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CO 1 (SOC1) andFLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), are required for CO to promote flowering; the others are involved in proline or ethylene biosynthesis. The SOC1 and FT genes are also regulated by a second flowering-time pathway that acts independently of CO. Thus, early target genes of CO define common components of distinct flowering-time pathways.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Supplementary Material

File (1049483.xhtml)
File (1049483s1_large.jpeg)
File (1049483s1_med.gif)
File (1049483s1_thumb.gif)
File (1049483s2_large.jpeg)
File (1049483s2_med.gif)
File (1049483s2_thumb.gif)
File (1049483s3_large.jpeg)
File (1049483s3_med.gif)
File (1049483s3_thumb.gif)
File (1049483s4_large.jpeg)
File (1049483s4_med.gif)
File (1049483s4_thumb.gif)
File (1049483s5_large.jpeg)
File (1049483s5_med.gif)
File (1049483s5_thumb.gif)
File (1049483s6_large.jpeg)
File (1049483s6_med.gif)
File (1049483s6_thumb.gif)

REFERENCES AND NOTES

1
Koornneef M., Alonso-Blanco C., Peeters A. J. M., Soppe W., Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 49, 345 (1998).
2
Levy Y. Y., Dean C., Plant Cell 10, 1973 (1998).
3
Samach A., Coupland G., Bioessays 22, 38 (2000).
4
Koornneef M., Hanhart C. J., van der Veen J. H., Mol. Gen. Genet. 229, 57 (1991).
5
M. Koornneef, C. Alonso-Blanco, H. Blankestijn–de Vries,
Hanhart C. J., Peeters A. J. M., Genetics 148, 885 (1998) .
6
Redei G. P., Genetics 47, 443 (1962).
7
Putterill J., Robson F., Lee K., Simon R., Coupland G., Cell 80, 847 (1995).
8
H. Onouchi, M. I. Igeno, C. Perilleux, K. Graves, G. Coupland, Plant Cell, in press.
9
Simon R., Igeño M. I., Coupland G., Nature 384, 59 (1996).
10
Sablowski R. W. M., Meyerowitz E. M., Cell 92, 93 (1998).
11
Kobayashi Y. K. H., Goto K., Iwabuchi M., Araki T., Science 286, 1960 (1999).
12
Diatchenko L., et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 6025 (1996).
13
For additional data, see Science Online (www.sciencemag.org/feature/data/1049483.shl).
14
The increase in SOC1 expression at the time of flowering occurs at the apex of the plant (Fig. 3, A and B), and this may explain why no effect of co-2 on SOC1 expression was detected on Northern blots of RNA extracted from whole seedlings before day 14. However, flowering wild-type plants contained the SOC1 mRNA at detectably higher levels than co-2 mutants of the same age. Redundancy between flowering-time pathways may also make the effect of co-2 on SOC1 expression difficult to detect (Fig. 4).
15
Lin X., et al., Nature 402, 761 (1999).
16
Menzel G., Apel K., Melzer S., Plant J. 9, 399 (1996).
17
Smyth D. R., Bowman J. L., Meyerowitz E. M., Plant Cell 2, 755 (1990).
18
Yanofsky M. F., et al., Nature 346, 35 (1990).
19
Strizhov N., et al., Plant J. 12, 557 (1997).
20
Guzman P., Ecker J. R., Plant Cell 2, 513 (1990).
21
In our conditions the ein2-1 late-flowering phenotype showed low penetrance, causing higher than normal standard deviation in a population.
22
G. Bernier, J. M. Kinet, R. Sachs, The Physiology of Flowering (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1981), pp. 135–160.
23
Nanjo T. K. M., et al., Plant J. 18, 185 (1999).
24
Nilsson O., Lee I., Blázquez M. A., Weigel D., Genetics 150, 403 (1998).
25
Macknight R., et al., Cell 89, 737 (1997).
26
J. H. Ahn and D. Weigel, unpublished data.
27
Kardailsky I., et al., Science 286, 1962 (1999).
28
Ruiz-Garcia L., et al., Plant Cell 9, 1921 (1997).
29
Sheldon C. C., et al., Plant Cell 11, 445 (1999).
30
Michaels S. D., Amasino R. M., Plant Cell 11, 949 (1999).
31
Sheldon C. C., Rouse D. T., Finnegan E. J., Peacock W. J., Dennis E. S., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 3753 (2000).
32
Corbesier L., Gadisseur I., Silvestre G., Jacqmard A., Bernier G., Plant J. 9, 947 (1996).
33
Liljegren S. J., Gustafson-Brown C., Pinyopich A., Ditta G. S., Yanofsky M. F., Plant Cell 11, 1007 (1999).
34
We thank P. Suarez-Lopez for advice, S. Melzer for sharing his data on AGL20 before publication, and G. Simpson, Y. Levy, C. Dean, and R. Sablowski for comments on the manuscript. Supported by grants from the European Community and the Human Frontier Science Program (G.C.).

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 288 | Issue 5471
2 June 2000

Submission history

Received: 15 February 2000
Accepted: 4 May 2000
Published in print: 2 June 2000

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Alon Samach*,
John Innes Centre, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.
Hitoshi Onouchi*
John Innes Centre, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.
Scott E. Gold
Department of Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Gary S. Ditta
Department of Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Zsuzsanna Schwarz-Sommer
Max-Planck-Institut für Züchtungsforschung, Köln 50829, Germany.
Martin F. Yanofsky
Department of Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
George Coupland§
John Innes Centre, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.

Notes

*
These authors contributed equally to this article.
Present address: Faculty of Agriculture, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel.
Present address: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602–7274.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage

Altmetrics

Citations

Cite as

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by

  1. The role of corepressor HOS15-mediated epigenetic regulation of flowering, Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, (2023).https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1101912
    Crossref
  2. Overexpression of Wheat TaELF3-1BL Delays Flowering in Arabidopsis, Phyton, 92, 1, (79-90), (2023).https://doi.org/10.32604/phyton.2022.022225
    Crossref
  3. Genome-wide screening and characterization of long noncoding RNAs involved in flowering/bolting of Lactuca sativa, BMC Plant Biology, 23, 1, (2023).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-04031-8
    Crossref
  4. OsFTL12 , a member of FT ‐like family, modulates the heading date and plant architecture by florigen repression complex in rice , Plant Biotechnology Journal, (2023).https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.14020
    Crossref
  5. Systematic identification and characterization of the soybean ( Glycine max ) B-box transcription factor family , Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 37, 1, (104-116), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2022.2155570
    Crossref
  6. Photoperiod controls plant seed size in a CONSTANS-dependent manner, Nature Plants, 9, 2, (343-354), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-023-01350-y
    Crossref
  7. BrSPA1 mutation resulted in earlier bolting of Chinese cabbage under short day conditions, Scientia Horticulturae, 315, (111962), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2023.111962
    Crossref
  8. Identification and characterization of flowering time regulatory gene FLC of Paeonia ostii ‘Fengdan’, Scientia Horticulturae, 310, (111748), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111748
    Crossref
  9. Citrus VASCULAR PLANT ONE-ZINC FINGER1 (VOZ1) interacts with CuFT1 and CuFT3, affecting flowering in transgenic Arabidopsis, Scientia Horticulturae, 310, (111702), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111702
    Crossref
  10. Flowering under enhanced ionising radiation conditions and its regulation through epigenetic mechanisms, Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 196, (246-259), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.01.049
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

Check Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.

More options

Purchase digital access to this article

Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Full Text

FULL TEXT

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media