Advertisement
No access
Reports

Comparative Losses of British Butterflies, Birds, and Plants and the Global Extinction Crisis

Science
19 Mar 2004
Vol 303, Issue 5665
pp. 1879-1881

Abstract

There is growing concern about increased population, regional, and global extinctions of species. A key question is whether extinction rates for one group of organisms are representative of other taxa. We present a comparison at the national scale of population and regional extinctions of birds, butterflies, and vascular plants from Britain in recent decades. Butterflies experienced the greatest net losses, disappearing on average from 13% of their previously occupied 10-kilometer squares. If insects elsewhere in the world are similarly sensitive, the known global extinction rates of vertebrate and plant species have an unrecorded parallel among the invertebrates, strengthening the hypothesis that the natural world is experiencing the sixth major extinction event in its history.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Supplementary Material

File (thomas.som.pdf)

References and Notes

1
S. L. Pimm, G. J. Russell, J. L. Gittleman, T. M. Brooks, Science269, 347 (1995).
2
R. M. May, J. H. Lawton, N. E. Stork, in Extinction Rates, J. H. Lawton, R. M. May, Eds. (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1995), pp. 1–24.
3
J. A. Thomas, M. G. Morris, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci.344, 47 (1994).
4
R. M. May, K. Tregonning, in Conservation in a Changing World, G. M. Mace, A. Balmford, J. R. Ginsberg, Eds. (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1998), pp 287–301.
5
A. P. Dobson, J. P. Rodriguez, W. M. Roberts, D. S. Wilcove, Science275, 550 (1997).
6
M. L. McKinney, Conserv. Biol.13, 1273 (1999).
7
H. M. Regan, R. Lupia, A. N. Drinnan, M. A. Burgman, Am. Nat.157, 1 (2001).
8
G. Ceballos, P. R. Ehrlich, Science296, 904 (2002).
9
A. Balmford, R. E. Green, M. Jenkins, Trends Ecol. Evol.18, 326 (2003).
10
G. W. Luck, G. C. Daily, P. R. Ehrlich, Trends Ecol. Evol.18, 331 (2003).
11
Material and methods: Further details of surveys are given on Science Online, together with tests for possible artifacts or bias in data set comparisons due to differences in sampling effort between surveys and different initial distributions of species in the three groups. Results justify our conclusion that any errors in intertaxon comparisons are one to two orders of magnitude smaller than the pattern of relative changes shown in Fig. 1. The data sets of distributions are held by the following. Plants: NERC's Biological Records Centre (BRC), Monks Wood. Butterflies: BRC and Butterfly Conservation Society. Birds: British Trust for Ornithology.
12
F. H. Perring, S. M. Walters, Eds. Atlas of the British Flora (Thomas Nelson & Sons, London, 1962).
13
C. D. Preston, D. A. Pearman, T. D. Dines, Eds. New Atlas of the British and Irish Flora (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2002).
14
J. T. R. Sharrock, The Atlas of Breeding Birds in Britain and Ireland (T&AD Poyser, Staffordshire, UK, 1976).
15
D. W. Gibbons, J. B. Reid, R. A. Chapman, The New Atlas of Breeding Birds in Britain and Ireland 1988-1991 (T&AD Poyser, London, 1993).
16
J. Heath, E. Pollard, J. A. Thomas, Atlas of Butterflies in Britain and Ireland (Viking, Harmondsworth, UK, 1984).
17
J. A. Asheret al., The Millennium Atlas of Butterflies in Britain and Ireland (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2001).
18
P. R. Ehrlich, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci.344, 99 (1994).
19
M. J. R. Cowley, C. D. Thomas, J. A. Thomas, M. S. Warren, Proc. R. Soc. London B. Biol. Sci.266, 158 (1999).
20
M. S. Warrenet al., Nature414, 65 (2001).
21
K. J. Gastonet al., J. Appl. Ecol.37, 39 (2000).
22
A. Erhardt, J. A. Thomas, in The Conservation of Insects and Their Habitats, N. M. Collins, J. A. Thomas, Eds. (Academic Press, London, 1991), pp. 213–237.
23
D. B. Shirt, Ed. British Red Data Books, vol. 2, Insects (Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough, 1987).
24
K. S. Brown, G. G. Brown, in Tropical Forest Deforestation and Species Extinction, T. C. Whitmore, J. A. Sayer, Eds. (Chapman & Hall, London, 1992), pp. 119–142.
25
L. L. Master, B. A. Stein, L. S. Kutner, G. A. Hammerson, in Precious Heritage: the Status of Biodiversity in the United States, B. A. Stein, L. S. Kutner, J. S. Adams, Eds. (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2000).
26
D. Malakoff, Science277, 486 (1997).
27
J. M. Diamond, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci.325, 469 (1989).
28
O. E. Salaet al., Science287, 1770 (2000).
29
C. D. Thomas, J. J. Lennon, Nature399, 213 (1999).
30
We thank the more than 20,000 recorders who contributed to the six atlas surveys and our fellow organizers of surveys: R. A. Chapman, T. D. Dines, D. W. Gibbons, G. Jeffcoate, S. Jeffcoate, P. T. Harding, J. Heath, D. A. Pearman, F. H. Perring, E. Pollard, J. B. Reid, J. T. R. Sharrock, S. M. Walters, and M. S. Warren. J.A.T. acknowledges the European Commission for RTD research grant MacMan (EVK2-CT-2001-00126).

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 303 | Issue 5665
19 March 2004

Submission history

Received: 23 December 2003
Accepted: 17 February 2004
Published in print: 19 March 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Notes

Supporting Online Material
www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/303/5665/1879/DC1
Materials and Methods
SOM Text
Fig. S1
References

Authors

Affiliations

J. A. Thomas* [email protected]
Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Dorset Laboratory, Winfrith Technology Centre, Dorchester DT2 8ZD, UK.
M. G. Telfer
NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Monks Wood, Abbots Ripton, Huntington, Cambridgeshire PE28 2LS, UK.
D. B. Roy
NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Monks Wood, Abbots Ripton, Huntington, Cambridgeshire PE28 2LS, UK.
C. D. Preston
NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Monks Wood, Abbots Ripton, Huntington, Cambridgeshire PE28 2LS, UK.
J. J. D. Greenwood
British Trust for Ornithology, Thetford, Norfolk IP2 2PU, UK.
J. Asher
Butterfly Conservation, Manor Yard, East Lulworth, Wareham, Dorset BH20 5QP, UK.
R. Fox
Butterfly Conservation, Manor Yard, East Lulworth, Wareham, Dorset BH20 5QP, UK.
R. T. Clarke
Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Dorset Laboratory, Winfrith Technology Centre, Dorchester DT2 8ZD, UK.
J. H. Lawton
NERC, Polaris House, North Star Avenue, Swindon SN21EU, UK and Centre for Population Biology, Imperial College, Silwood Park, Ascot SL5 7PY, UK.

Notes

*
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage

Altmetrics

Citations

Cite as

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by

  1. Population Genomics for Insect Conservation, Annual Review of Animal Biosciences, 11, 1, (115-140), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-122221-075025
    Crossref
  2. Density declines, richness increases, and composition shifts in stream macroinvertebrates, Science Advances, 9, 18, (2023)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.adf4896
    Abstract
  3. Population genomics of Corsican wildcats: Paving the way toward a new subspecies within the Felis silvestris spp. complex? , Molecular Ecology, 32, 8, (1908-1924), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.16856
    Crossref
  4. Modelling the scope to conserve an endemic‐rich mountain butterfly taxon in a changing climate, Insect Conservation and Diversity, (2023).https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12636
    Crossref
  5. The conservation of Afro‐Palaearctic migrants: What we are learning and what we need to know?, Ibis, 165, 3, (717-738), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.13171
    Crossref
  6. The effect of insect food availability on songbird reproductive success and chick body condition: Evidence from a systematic review and meta‐analysis, Ecology Letters, 26, 4, (658-673), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14178
    Crossref
  7. An assessment of diversity patterns of butterfly fauna (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) from subalpine zone of Western Himalaya, Oriental Insects, (1-18), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1080/00305316.2023.2186507
    Crossref
  8. Agricultural spider decline: long-term trends under constant management conditions, Scientific Reports, 13, 1, (2023).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29003-2
    Crossref
  9. Can reintroduction of beavers improve insect biodiversity?, Journal of Environmental Management, 337, (117719), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117719
    Crossref
  10. Effects of subpopulation extinction on effective size (Ne) of metapopulations, Conservation Genetics, (2023).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-023-01510-9
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

Check Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.

More options

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Full Text

FULL TEXT

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media